Sponsored message
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

The Brief

The most important stories for you to know today
  • LA establishes 'Right to Counsel' for tenants
    Tenants rights groups caution that a new ordinance may not mean immediate access to lawyers for renters facing eviction.

    Topline:

    The Los Angeles City Council voted Tuesday to establish a long-debated “Right to Counsel” ordinance, which aims to provide free attorneys to low-income tenants facing eviction.

    The background: Tenants facing eviction have not had the same right to a free attorney as defendants in criminal court. As a result, very few L.A. renters are accompanied by a lawyer in eviction court, where an estimated 95% of landlords have an attorney. Tenant advocates say this imbalance in legal representation puts renters at a severe disadvantage, increasing their odds of becoming part of an unhoused population that has grown sharply in L.A. over the past decade.

    The details: The ordinance would provide free eviction attorneys to tenants in the city earning less than 80% of the area’s median income. Right now, that means up to $77,700 per year for an individual or $110,950 for a family of four. The program will be funded by Measure ULA, sometimes called the city’s “mansion tax.” Until funding and the number of lawyers increases, the city will prioritize low-income renters living within certain priority ZIP codes for free eviction attorneys.

    What's next? Tenant rights groups cheered the passage of a policy they’ve spent years advocating for, but cautioned that it could take five years or more before the city has enough funding and lawyers to give all eligible renters free legal representation in eviction court.

    Read on … to learn which other cities already have "Right to Counsel" programs.

    The Los Angeles City Council voted Tuesday to establish a long-debated “Right to Counsel” ordinance, which aims to provide free attorneys to low-income tenants facing eviction.

    Tenant rights groups cheered the passage of a policy they’ve spent years advocating for, but cautioned that it could take five years or more before the city has enough funding and lawyers to give all eligible renters free legal representation in eviction court.

    “We’re working to get there,” said Catalina Romo Paxcle with Stay Housed L.A., a coalition of legal service providers funded by the city and county of L.A. “This is a win moving toward justice in the courtroom and having a chance at a fair trial.”

    Tenants facing eviction have not had the same right to a free attorney as defendants in criminal court. As a result, very few L.A. renters are accompanied by a lawyer in eviction court, where an estimated 95% of landlords have an attorney.

    Tenant advocates say this imbalance in legal representation puts renters at a severe disadvantage, increasing their odds of becoming part of an unhoused population that has grown sharply in L.A. over the past decade.

    Where will the funding come from?

    The ordinance was approved by the City Council in a 14-0 vote. Councilmember Curren Price was absent.

    The language of the ordinance clarifies that free eviction attorneys will be provided only to tenants earning less than 80% of the area’s median income. Right now, that means up to $77,700 per year for an individual or $110,950 for a family of four.

    In Tuesday’s meeting, Councilmember Nithya Raman said L.A. was finally able to pass a policy she and other councilmembers introduced more than two years ago due to funding approved by voters through Measure ULA. It’s sometimes called the city’s “mansion tax,” though much of the measure’s revenue comes from the sale of commercial buildings and apartment complexes.

    Listen 0:44
    LA passes ‘Right to Counsel’ law, but many tenants facing eviction won’t get a lawyer yet

    Some questions remain about "Right to Counsel," such as how much funding the city will be able to put toward the new program. Measure ULA raised nearly $300 million dollars in the 2024 fiscal year, and the measure requires 10% of annual revenue go toward the "Right to Counsel" program.

    One previous report from L.A.’s Housing Department concluded that a fully funded "Right to Counsel" program would cost the city about $68 million per year.

    Advocates say more lawyers are needed 

    Barbara Schultz, an attorney with the Legal Aid Foundation of L.A., said if the program launches with around $30 million in funding, the city would be able to connect low-income renters facing eviction within certain priority ZIP codes with about 80 lawyers currently handling eviction defense cases countywide through Stay Housed L.A.

    “This has to be phased in,” Schultz said. “We can't instantly provide all tenants in the city of L.A. with a right to counsel and evictions, because we don't have enough attorneys to do that yet. It's something that we need to build up.”

    Schultz said tenants living outside the current priority ZIP codes would not be disqualified for eviction defense attorneys, but they would be less likely to receive them. Schultz estimates L.A. needs closer to 300 eviction attorneys to serve every qualified renter throughout the county.

    With Tuesday’s vote, L.A. now joins other cities, including New York, Philadelphia and San Francisco, that have passed their own versions of a "Right to Counsel" in recent years. Tenants in unincorporated areas of L.A. County became the first in Southern California to receive such support after a vote by the county’s Board of Supervisors last summer.

    How tenants can ask for help

     
    Landlord groups have argued that local governments would be better off spending funds on rental assistance to struggling tenants, rather than paying lawyers to defend them in eviction court.

    In a letter to the City Council ahead of Tuesday’s vote, Janet Gagnon with the Apartment Association of Greater Los Angeles urged lawmakers to change a provision in the ordinance that would have allowed all tenants to challenge an eviction if their landlord failed to notify them of the Right To Counsel protections, even if that tenant did not meet the program’s qualifications.

    “It is astounding that such unwarranted complications are being proposed,” the letter read. Councilmembers amended the ordinance Tuesday to clarify that this protection applied only to tenants eligible for the program.

    For now, Schultz said, tenants facing eviction who believe they would qualify for help should reach out at StayHousedLA.org or call (888) 694-0040.

  • Officials issue warning for returning visitors
    Snow capped mountains are visible above a bank of clouds.
    The hiking trails surrounding Mt. Baldy reopened to visitors Wednesday after being closed due to winter storms and three deaths.

    Topline:

    The hiking trails surrounding Mt. Baldy reopened to visitors on Wednesday after being closed last week due to unsafe winter storm conditions and three deaths.

    Why were the trails closed? Officials closed all hiking trails in and around Mt. Baldy on Dec. 29 after three people were found dead. At the time, officials said the closures were "being implemented to prevent further loss of life ... due to extreme environmental hazards and the current risk to hikers.”

    Read on … for what you should know before hitting the trails.

    The hiking trails surrounding Mt. Baldy reopened to visitors on Wednesday after being closed last week due to unsafe winter storm conditions and three deaths.

    The trails were closed on Dec. 29 during a series of powerful winter storms and after three hikers were found dead. Officials said the closures were “to prevent further loss of life ... due to extreme environmental hazards and the current risk to hikers.”

    Keila Vizcarra, public affairs specialist at the Angeles National Forest, said that at this time, there is no cause to extend the closure.

    What we know about the hikers

    A search-and-rescue crew last Monday found the body of missing hiker Marcus Alexander Muench Casanova, 19, of Seal Beach.

    In their search for Casanova, they also discovered two more bodies identified as Juan Sarat Lopez, 37, and Bayron Pedro Ramos Garcia, 36, both Guatemalan nationals living in Los Angeles. Authorities believe the men fell from the Devil’s Backbone Trail.

    What you need to know before visiting

    Visitors should beware that even though the closures have been lifted, there's still a high safety risk in the area because of winter conditions.

    The trails are not recommended for people with no mountain or winter weather hiking experience, or if you don’t have the right equipment for safe climbing.

    Trail conditions can change very quickly, Vizcarra added. Before heading to the trails, visitors are encouraged to check for updates online and call the San Gabriel Mountains National Monument office at (626) 335-1251.

  • Sponsored message
  • New website lets Californians opt out of sharing
    An illustration shows a man in glasses at an open laptop.

    Topline:

    The California Privacy Protection Agency kicked off 2026 by launching a tool that state residents can use to make data brokers delete and stop selling their personal information.

    The context: The system, known as the Delete Request and Opt-out Platform, or DROP, has been in the works for years, mandated by a 2023 law known as the Delete Act. Under it and previous laws, data brokers must register with the state and enable consumers to tell brokers to stop tracking them and selling their information. Until now, those instructions had to be delivered to each data broker individually — not an easy feat, given that more than 500 brokers were registered in the state as of the end of last year.

    What's new? The new system delivers privacy instructions to every registered broker at once. Launched on Jan. 1, it is open to all California residents. By law, the hundreds of data brokers registered with the state must begin processing those requests in August.

    Read on ... for instructions on how to take advantage of it.

    The California Privacy Protection Agency kicked off 2026 by launching a tool that state residents can use to make data brokers delete and stop selling their personal information.

    About this article

    This story was originally published by LAist partner CalMatters. Sign up for their newsletters. This article was republished under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives license.

    The system, known as the Delete Request and Opt-out Platform, or DROP, has been in the works for years, mandated by a 2023 law known as the Delete Act. Under it and previous laws, data brokers must register with the state and enable consumers to tell brokers to stop tracking them and selling their information.

    Until now, those instructions had to be delivered to each data broker individually — not an easy feat, given that more than 500 brokers were registered in the state as of the end of last year. Making things even more difficult, some brokers obscured their opt-out forms from search results, as the Markup and CalMatters revealed in August.

    The new system delivers privacy instructions to every registered broker at once. Launched on Jan. 1, it is open to all California residents. By law, the hundreds of data brokers registered with the state must begin processing those requests in August.

    Here’s how to take advantage of it.

    Finding your advertising IDs

    DROP asks you to provide some basic information — your name, email address, phone number, and ZIP code — so data brokers can find you in their systems. You can submit the form with just this information, but if you’d like a more thorough deletion, you can also provide your mobile advertising IDs from your phones, smart TVs, and vehicles. Including these IDs can help brokers match more of your data, but you have to take the time to collect them.

    Click here to jump ahead if you want to provide basic information only, or continue reading for instructions on providing mobile advertising IDs for:

    • Android phones and tablets
    • Apple iPhones and iPads
    • Vehicle ID numbers and smart TVs
    • Personal computers

    Android phones and tablets

    The steps below may vary slightly depending on your device and operating system version, but the general process is the same:

    Open Settings.

    • At the top of the Settings screen, select the menu option with your name, followed by “Google services and preferences.”
    • Select the All services tab.
    • Scroll to the Privacy & Security section, and select Ads. Scroll to the bottom of that screen to get your advertising ID, which will look like a string of random numbers and letters separated by four hyphens. Save that ID for the DROP form.
    • On the same screen, you can find options to reset or delete your advertising ID. The CCPA suggests resetting your ID “because it breaks the persistent tracking link that advertisers, data brokers, and apps use to build long-term behavioral profiles of your device.” Alternatively, deleting the ID should prevent ID-based data tracking from happening at all.

    Apple iPhones and iPads

    Apple doesn’t provide a way for iOS users to see their mobile advertising ID, which it calls the Identifier for Advertisers, or IDFA. But it does provide a way for users to prevent trackers from accessing these IDs.

    To turn off tracking, first, adjust your Screen Time settings:

    • Open Settings. 
    • Scroll down and select Screen Time. 
    • Scroll down and select Content & Privacy Restrictions. 
    • Scroll down and select Allow Apps to Request to Track.
    • Select Don’t Allow Changes. 

    Then, adjust your Tracking settings:

    • Open Settings. 
    • Scroll down and select Privacy & Security. 
    • Select Tracking.
    • Toggle OFF the option to Allow Apps to Request to Track.

    Apple has its own ads system that doesn’t use an IDFA. To disable that:

    • Open Settings. 
    • Scroll down and select Privacy & Security. 
    • Scroll down and select Apple Advertising.
    • Toggle OFF the Personalized Ads option.

    A quick note for our technically savvy readers: If you’ve already turned tracking off, you might be tempted to turn it back on to look up your advertising ID using a third-party app, but it’s unnecessary. Re-enabling tracking will reset the ID, limiting its usefulness to data brokers — they can’t continue tracking data or delivering personalized ads using a device ID that no longer exists.

    Vehicle ID numbers and smart TVs

    Vehicles can track their owners in surprisingly invasive ways, and you can provide a vehicle’s identification number, or VIN, in case data brokers have that information. Where your VIN is will depend on the vehicle, but common places include on the dash on the driver’s side, or on a sticker in the jamb of the front passenger door. Your vehicle registration documents should also have your VIN listed.

    Smart TVs also use advertising IDs. Here’s a guide that provides some settings for common brands. If the guide doesn’t cover your smart TV, try checking under its privacy or advertising settings. But be aware that this is different from numbers like the model code and serial number.

    Personal computers

    Laptop and desktop computers use unique identifiers to share data, but these are harder to find than mobile advertising IDs. Instead, you can turn off tracking, which will delete those IDs. (Turning tracking on again will generally reset the IDs.)

    • On computers running Windows, you can turn off your advertising ID by going to Settings. Depending on your OS version, select Privacy or Privacy & security. Then select General, and adjust your settings there.
    • On Mac computers, navigate to System Settings > Privacy & Security > Apple Advertising. Then, toggle off Personalized Ads.

    The California Privacy Protection Agency also provides some of its own guidance on finding advertising IDs.

    Verify your identity

    Go to the DROP website. You’ll be asked to accept the terms of use and be directed to a page that asks you to prove you’re a California resident. There are two ways to do so, and you can’t change methods once you’ve selected one of them.

    1. The system allows you to verify your identity using personal information through a system called the California Identity Gateway. 

      If you select this option, you’ll be asked to provide some basic personal information, like a phone number, email address, California address, or your Social Security number. The gateway will use this information to attempt to verify your residency directly with the state. This option should be quick if you have an email address and phone number.

    2. Alternatively, you can verify your identity to DROP using login.gov, a system that some federal and state agencies in the United States have adopted to allow residents to interact with government services. 

      To sign up for a login.gov account, you’ll be asked to provide an email address, create a password, and provide photos of government-issued identification. After signing up and verifying your identity, you should be able to move on to the next step. This option might take a little more effort than the first option, since ID is required, but might be faster if you’ve already signed up for an account for other purposes.

    Fill out and submit the DROP form

    After verifying your identity, you’ll get to a form where you can submit multiple versions of your name, up to three ZIP codes, up to three email addresses, up to three phone numbers, advertising IDs from your mobile devices and smart TVs, and VINs for your vehicles. You’ll be asked to verify your email addresses and phone numbers with single-use codes before submitting. (The agency notes there may be delays with some verification codes due to high volume.)

  • A recently published paper suggests not
    A photo of a black dog with white paws and a white patch on his chest. He is laying down on a patch of grass near a concrete path, in a sploot position. His collar tag reads "leaf"
    AirTalk producer Lucy Copp's pampered pup, Leaf, seen enjoying being an only child.

    Topline:

    Conventional wisdom (and Pope Francis) have suggested that as people increasingly forgo having children, pets are becoming surrogate kids. But a recent working paper out of Taiwan challenges this notion, suggesting rather that having pets can help prepare and even encourage people to have children.

    The local angle: Here in L.A. (and at LAist), treating pets like your own kids is par for the course. We recently heard from AirTalk with Larry Mantle listeners about their own relationships with pets and children, revealing multiple and nuanced perspectives on whether they feel pets are replacing children.

    Megan in Sierra Madre and her husband experienced infertility and couldn’t have kids. She reads to her pets, and even has wrapped a Christmas present for her dog this year. “I feel like our dog makes us a little family,” she said.

    Listen to the full segment to hear AirTalk host Larry Mantle's thoughts on how his own take on if pups prepare you for preteens.

    Listen 17:47
    Are pets replacing kids? New research says maybe not

    Topline:

    Conventional wisdom (and Pope Francis) have suggested that as people increasingly forgo having children, pets are becoming surrogate kids. But a recent working paper out of Taiwan challenges this notion, suggesting rather that having pets can help prepare and even encourage people to have children.

    The local angle: Here in L.A. (and at LAist), treating pets like your own kids is par for the course. We recently heard from AirTalk with Larry Mantle listeners about their own relationships with pets and children, revealing multiple and nuanced perspectives on whether they feel pets are replacing children.

    Megan in Sierra Madre and her husband experienced infertility and couldn’t have kids. She reads to her pets, and even has wrapped a Christmas present for her dog this year. “I feel like our dog makes us a little family,” she said.

    Marty in Fullerton is an estate planning attorney. He shared that planning for pets after their owners’ death comes up in his practice. “It’s a much more elaborate plan for the pet for somebody who doesn’t have children,” he said.

    Lisa in Agoura Hills has both children and a dog wrote in, “Though the cost of having a pet is comparable, the experience is very different. I can't imagine life without my dog Marlo but he can't express or emote like my girls. He's actually much easier to manage!”

    Samson in Echo Park said that pets are good practice for child rearing, saying, “If you can keep a pet happy, healthy and alive, you’re okay to have a kid.”

    Listen to the full segment to hear AirTalk host Larry Mantle's thoughts on how his own take on if pups prepare you for preteens.

    Listen 17:47
    Are pets replacing kids? New research says maybe not

  • Democratic leaders respond to fatality

    Topline:

    Democratic leaders criticized the shooting and the Trump administration's response to it.

    Leaders respond: Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer said that he saw the video of the fatal shooting: "You felt like your stomach was being punched. Looking at the video, there seemed no justification for what these agents did. There needs to be a full investigation at the federal level, though I have little faith in the FBI in doing a fair investigation."

    MN attorney general: Speaking to NPR on Thursday, Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison described the ICE agents' actions as an "escalation" and said Good was trying to get away from the situation without being aggressive.

    Read on... for more how Democratic leaders responded to the fatal ICE shooting.

    Democratic leaders criticized the shooting and the Trump administration's response to it.

    "The killing of Renee Nicole Good was an abomination – a disgrace," said House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries at a Thursday press conference.

    "And blood is clearly on the hands of those individuals within the administration who've been pushing an extreme policy that has nothing to do with immigration enforcement connected to removing violent felons from this country."

    Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer said that he saw the video of the fatal shooting: "You felt like your stomach was being punched. Looking at the video, there seemed no justification for what these agents did. There needs to be a full investigation at the federal level, though I have little faith in the FBI in doing a fair investigation."

    Speaking to NPR on Thursday, Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison described the ICE agents' actions as an "escalation" and said Good was trying to get away from the situation without being aggressive.

    "I think the use of force I saw raises such serious questions that there needs to be an intense investigation and perhaps this officer should face charges," Ellison said. "But that needs to be determined through an investigation."

    Ellison said his concern was that Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem had already attempted to spin the shooting as a clear-cut act of self-defense on the agent's behalf and was trying to downplay the need for a thorough investigation.

    "You would think that the Homeland Security secretary would be the first to say, 'let's suspend judgment and look into it.' That's not what we saw," he said.

    Ellison said Good was "anything but" a domestic terrorist, as Noem had described her.

    Good, Ellison said, "was a compassionate neighbor trying to be a legal observer on behalf of her immigrant neighbors."

    Details of the shooting are disputed, despite video footage

    Federal and local officials dispute the circumstances that led an Immigration and Customs Enforcement officer to fatally shoot a 37-year-old woman in Minneapolis on Wednesday.

    President Trump and other members of his administration characterized the ICE agent's actions as an act of self-defense. State and local leaders, however, cast doubt on that account and called for a full and fair investigation.

    The shooting occurred on a residential street in south Minneapolis — less than a mile from where George Floyd was killed by police in 2020. ICE agents were conducting targeted immigration enforcement operations at the time, according to Department of Homeland Security spokeswoman Tricia McLaughlin.

    (Warning: The video at the following link includes violent actions and profanity.)

    NPR and MPR have reviewed multiple videos of the shooting taken from different vantage points and posted to social media. The footage shows multiple officers near an SUV stopped in the middle of the road. One officer demands the driver exit the vehicle and grabs the car handle. The SUV reverses, then begins to drive forward, which is when a different officer near the front of the car pulls his weapon and fires into the vehicle. Three gunshots are heard, as the firing officer backs away from the SUV. Moments later, the vehicle crashes.

    A Honda suv with a bullet hold in the windshield is crashed in front of a light pole. It is taped off from access with yellow tape. There are federal agents standing out of focus in the background.
    A bullet hole is visible in the windshield of a crashed vehicle on Portland Avenue in Minneapolis after an ICE officer shot and killed an observer on Wednesday.
    (
    Ben Hovland/MPR
    )

    The Minneapolis City Council identified the woman as Renee Nicole Good.

    "Renee was a resident of our city who was out caring for her neighbors this morning and her life was taken today at the hands of the federal government," the city council said in a statement. NPR member station MPR News has reached out to a family member of the woman.

    On Wednesday night, large crowds of people filled the street at a vigil in south Minneapolis to mourn Good's death. Many held up posters criticizing ICE's presence in the city, while others carried signs that read "remember."

    Nekima Levy Armstrong, a civil rights lawyer, was one of many speakers who paid tribute to Good at the vigil, MPR News reported.

    "She did not deserve to be gunned down in cold blood for standing up for her neighbor," Armstrong said.

    At a press conference on Wednesday evening, Noem defended the use of force by an ICE agent, while calling the motorist's actions "an act of domestic terrorism."

    According to Noem, ICE officials that morning were helping push one of their vehicles out of the snow when protesters appeared. Noem said the woman who was fatally shot blocked federal officers with her vehicle and refused to exit her car when officers ordered her to do so.

    She added that the ICE officer who fired his gun had been struck by the car and was taken to a hospital, where he was later released.

    "It's clearly established law that a vehicle driven by a person and used to harm someone is a deadly weapon," she said. "Deadly force is perfectly lawful when a threat is faced by a weapon, so I do believe that this officer used his training in this situation."

    A FBI agent takes a close up photo of a windshield of a crashed car with a bloody deployed airbag. Another FBI agent watches as he stands behind yellow caution tape.
    Members of law enforcement photograph a vehicle suspected to be involved in a shooting by an ICE agent during federal law enforcement operations on Wednesday in Minneapolis.
    (
    Stephen Maturen
    /
    Getty Images
    )

    Noem said she also spoke with Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz and acknowledged that they hold "very different viewpoints" on the shooting.

    The incident has worsened tensions between the Trump administration and Minneapolis, which has been the target of a large-scale immigration crackdown. Local officials said they expect protests to follow and urged residents to remain peaceful.

    At a press conference on Wednesday afternoon, Walz said he was prepared to mobilize the state National Guard if necessary.

    "They want a show. We can't give it to them," he said. "We can't give them what they want."

    Federal and local officials clash over the shooting

    In a statement, DHS spokesperson McLaughlin asserted that the motorist "weaponized her vehicle, attempting to run over our law enforcement officers in an attempt to kill them." She added that the ICE officer who pulled the trigger was "fearing for his life, the lives of his fellow law enforcement and the safety of the public."

    Upon reviewing a video of the incident, President Trump said he also believes the shooting was an act of self-defense.

    "The woman driving the car was very disorderly, obstructing and resisting, who then violently, willfully, and viciously ran over the ICE Officer," Trump wrote on Truth Social.

    Police officers stand in a street with homes topped with snow. Some officers wear face masks.
    Minneapolis police chief Brian O'Hara speaks with officers at the scene where a federal agent shot and killed an observer in Minneapolis on Wednesday, Jan. 7, 2026.
    (
    Ben Hovland
    /
    MPR
    )
    People protest and point standing behind a yellow caution tape. There are law enforcement officers standing in front.
    People protest as law enforcement officers attend to the scene of the shooting involving federal law enforcement agents on Wednesday in Minneapolis.
    (
    Tom Baker
    /
    AP
    )

    But local leaders have raised concerns about the Trump administration's account of the shooting.

    At a fiery press conference, Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey accused ICE of "trying to spin this as an action of self-defense. Having seen the video myself, I want to tell everybody that is bull****. "

    "This was an agent recklessly using power that resulted in somebody dying, getting killed," he added.

    The mayor called on ICE agents to leave the city, asserting that federal immigration authorities were ripping families apart and sowing chaos on Minneapolis streets.

    Gov. Walz wrote on X that he has seen video of the shooting and told the public: "Don't believe this propaganda machine."

    "The state will ensure there is a full, fair, and expeditious investigation to ensure accountability and justice," he added.

    Minneapolis police chief says he's 'very concerned' about use of deadly force

    At a press conference, Minneapolis Police Chief Brian O'Hara said local police arrived at the scene to find a woman with a gunshot wound to the head. They performed life-saving measures at the scene, including CPR. The woman was transported to Hennepin County Medical Center, where she was pronounced dead, he added.

    Preliminary information, according to O'Hara, indicated that the woman was in her vehicle and blocking the road on Portland Avenue between 33rd and 34th St.

    "At some point, a federal law enforcement approached her on foot, and the vehicle began to drive off. At least two shots were fired," he said, adding that the car then crashed on the side of the roadway.

    O'Hara said he was "very concerned" with the tactics used by federal immigration agents. He noted that the use of deadly force is justified at times, but that most law enforcement agencies in the U.S. are trained to minimize the risks and the need for deadly force.

    "In any professional law enforcement agency in the country, I think they would tell you it's obviously very concerning whenever there's a shooting into a vehicle of someone who's not armed," he said.

    The shooting is being investigated by the FBI and the Minnesota Bureau of Criminal Apprehension. They will investigate the use of deadly force.
    Copyright 2026 NPR