David Wagner
covers housing in Southern California, a place where the lack of affordable housing contributes to homelessness.
Published April 1, 2025 3:03 PM
Tenants rights groups caution that a new ordinance may not mean immediate access to lawyers for renters facing eviction.
(
Chava Sanchez
/
LAist
)
Topline:
The Los Angeles City Council voted Tuesday to establish a long-debated “Right to Counsel” ordinance, which aims to provide free attorneys to low-income tenants facing eviction.
The background: Tenants facing eviction have not had the same right to a free attorney as defendants in criminal court. As a result, very few L.A. renters are accompanied by a lawyer in eviction court, where an estimated 95% of landlords have an attorney. Tenant advocates say this imbalance in legal representation puts renters at a severe disadvantage, increasing their odds of becoming part of an unhoused population that has grown sharply in L.A. over the past decade.
The details: The ordinance would provide free eviction attorneys to tenants in the city earning less than 80% of the area’s median income. Right now, that means up to $77,700 per year for an individual or $110,950 for a family of four. The program will be funded by Measure ULA, sometimes called the city’s “mansion tax.” Until funding and the number of lawyers increases, the city will prioritize low-income renters living within certain priority ZIP codes for free eviction attorneys.
What's next? Tenant rights groups cheered the passage of a policy they’ve spent years advocating for, but cautioned that it could take five years or more before the city has enough funding and lawyers to give all eligible renters free legal representation in eviction court.
Read on … to learn which other cities already have "Right to Counsel" programs.
The Los Angeles City Council voted Tuesday to establish a long-debated “Right to Counsel” ordinance, which aims to provide free attorneys to low-income tenants facing eviction.
Tenant rights groups cheered the passage of a policy they’ve spent years advocating for, but cautioned that it could take five years or more before the city has enough funding and lawyers to give all eligible renters free legal representation in eviction court.
“We’re working to get there,” said Catalina Romo Paxcle with Stay Housed L.A., a coalition of legal service providers funded by the city and county of L.A. “This is a win moving toward justice in the courtroom and having a chance at a fair trial.”
Tenants facing eviction have not had the same right to a free attorney as defendants in criminal court. As a result, very few L.A. renters are accompanied by a lawyer in eviction court, where an estimated 95% of landlords have an attorney.
Tenant advocates say this imbalance in legal representation puts renters at a severe disadvantage, increasing their odds of becoming part of an unhoused population that has grown sharply in L.A. over the past decade.
Where will the funding come from?
The ordinance was approved by the City Council in a 14-0 vote. Councilmember Curren Price was absent.
The language of the ordinance clarifies that free eviction attorneys will be provided only to tenants earning less than 80% of the area’s median income. Right now, that means up to $77,700 per year for an individual or $110,950 for a family of four.
In Tuesday’s meeting, Councilmember Nithya Raman said L.A. was finally able to pass a policy she and other councilmembers introduced more than two years ago due to funding approved by voters through Measure ULA. It’s sometimes called the city’s “mansion tax,” though much of the measure’s revenue comes from the sale of commercial buildings and apartment complexes.
Listen
0:44
LA passes ‘Right to Counsel’ law, but many tenants facing eviction won’t get a lawyer yet
Some questions remain about "Right to Counsel," such as how much funding the city will be able to put toward the new program. Measure ULA raised nearly $300 million dollars in the 2024 fiscal year, and the measure requires 10% of annual revenue go toward the "Right to Counsel" program.
One previous report from L.A.’s Housing Department concluded that a fully funded "Right to Counsel" program would cost the city about $68 million per year.
Advocates say more lawyers are needed
Barbara Schultz, an attorney with the Legal Aid Foundation of L.A., said if the program launches with around $30 million in funding, the city would be able to connect low-income renters facing eviction within certain priority ZIP codes with about 80 lawyers currently handling eviction defense cases countywide through Stay Housed L.A.
“This has to be phased in,” Schultz said. “We can't instantly provide all tenants in the city of L.A. with a right to counsel and evictions, because we don't have enough attorneys to do that yet. It's something that we need to build up.”
Schultz said tenants living outside the current priority ZIP codes would not be disqualified for eviction defense attorneys, but they would be less likely to receive them. Schultz estimates L.A. needs closer to 300 eviction attorneys to serve every qualified renter throughout the county.
With Tuesday’s vote, L.A. now joins other cities, including New York, Philadelphia and San Francisco, that have passed their own versions of a "Right to Counsel" in recent years. Tenants in unincorporated areas of L.A. County became the first in Southern California to receive such support after a vote by the county’s Board of Supervisors last summer.
How tenants can ask for help
Landlord groups have argued that local governments would be better off spending funds on rental assistance to struggling tenants, rather than paying lawyers to defend them in eviction court.
In a letter to the City Council ahead of Tuesday’s vote, Janet Gagnon with the Apartment Association of Greater Los Angeles urged lawmakers to change a provision in the ordinance that would have allowed all tenants to challenge an eviction if their landlord failed to notify them of the Right To Counsel protections, even if that tenant did not meet the program’s qualifications.
“It is astounding that such unwarranted complications are being proposed,” the letter read. Councilmembers amended the ordinance Tuesday to clarify that this protection applied only to tenants eligible for the program.
For now, Schultz said, tenants facing eviction who believe they would qualify for help should reach out at StayHousedLA.org or call (888) 694-0040.
A view of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) building in Washington, D.C., on Monday, March 30, 2020.
(
Graeme Sloan
/
Reuters
)
Topline:
California is home to 36% of the nation’s families with mixed immigration status receiving federal rent assistance. Those 7,190 California households are at risk of losing their housing now that the Trump administration is proposing to exclude mixed-status families from federal housing support.
The context: Undocumented immigrants are not eligible for federally funded programs such as Housing Choice Vouchers (also known as Section 8) or units in public housing projects. But citizens living with an undocumented spouse or parent have been allowed to receive such help. Nationwide, about 20,000 mixed-status families receive federal housing subsidies.
The change: The U.S. Housing and Urban Development Department released a long-awaited proposed rule change Thursday that would exclude mixed-status families from federal housing assistance. Researchers with UC Berkeley’s Terner Center for Housing Innovation note that Los Angeles is home to a disproportionate number of families who could be affected.
Why it matters: “If this rule were to go into effect, these families will just increase the number of folks that are facing housing insecurity or at risk of homelessness,” said Julie Aguilar, a Terner research analyst.
What local governments could do: In an analysis published Thursday, Terner researchers write that state and local governments could ease families through this transition by providing ongoing rental assistance, legal aid or one-time financial aid for moving costs of security deposits.
Gab Chabrán
covers what's happening in food and culture for LAist.
Published February 19, 2026 3:30 PM
Mason and Lily Royal run Max & Helen's day-to-day operations.
(
Catherine Dzilenski
/
Courtesy Max & Helen's
)
Topline:
Phil Rosenthal and Nancy Silverton's Larchmont diner, Max & Helen's, became an instant phenomenon, with eight-hour waits and celebrity sightings. Running it are husband-and-wife team Lily Rosenthal Royal (Phil's daughter and creative director) and Mason Royal (director of operations), who are navigating viral fame while trying to build the neighborhood fixture they originally envisioned.
Why now: Four months after opening, Max & Helen's has settled into a rhythm — weekday afternoons feel like a true neighborhood spot, while weekends still draw destination diners from across L.A.
Why it's important: In a city where diners have become increasingly scarce, Max & Helen's represents both nostalgia and community-building. The couple running it are proving that intentional hospitality — from thoughtful seating that sparks conversations to creating a space where everyone feels welcome — can matter as much as the food itself.
It wasn't supposed to be a big deal. After all, it was just a diner.
Sure, Phil Rosenthal (creator of Everybody Loves Raymond and Netflix's Somebody Feed Phil) and Nancy Silverton (owner of Mozza and Chi Spacca) — two of Los Angeles' most iconic food voices — were teaming up on the project. Still, the concept was modest: fluffy scrambled eggs, turkey club sandwiches and coffee refills.
Named in memory of Rosenthal's late parents, Max and Helen — familiar faces to fans of his Netflix series — their unpretentious love of diner classics became both the menu's foundation and its guiding philosophy.
Yet within weeks of opening in November, Max & Helen's had eight-hour waits, viral hot chocolate and celebrity sightings, including Timothée Chalamet, Kylie Jenner and Selena Gomez. It came as a shock to the newly married couple running it all, Lily Rosenthal Royal, Phil's daughter and the diner's creative director, and her husband, Mason Royal, the director of operations, who oversees the kitchen. (They started working together a week after their wedding).
"We thought we were gonna be hot for Larchmont," Rosenthal Royal says.
Instead, Max & Helen's became a destination — the kind of place people plan their weekends around, wait four hours for and drive across L.A. to experience.
Lily & Mason
Rosenthal and Silverton were never going to run Max & Helen's themselves — the plan was always to build it and hand it over. Royal, who has 12 years of restaurant experience, caught Silverton's attention during tastings.
"Nancy was like,'I feel like Mason would be good as the guy running the show,'" Rosenthal Royal said.
The couple had been developing their own pop-up when the opportunity at the diner arose, and suddenly they were running the family business.
For Royal, working with Silverton has been a dream. For Rosenthal Royal, the project is deeply personal — a love letter to her grandparents and the diners her father grew up on.
"We opened it almost selfishly because we live in Larchmont," she said. "We wanted a diner for ourselves, for our friends, for our community."
Wood-paneled walls and vintage family photographs create a nostalgic atmosphere at Max & Helen's diner.
(
Catherine Dzilenski
/
Courtesy Max & Helen's
)
Rosenthal is clear about their importance.
“Diners are democratic with a small D,” he told me last year when the project was still in development. Places where everyone is welcome, where community can flourish — something he felt was increasingly rare.
Worth the wait
The frenzy has now cooled slightly — while weekends still draw four-hour waits, midweek is much calmer.
When I visited with my family on a recent weekday morning, the wait was about 45 minutes. We were seated in the corner banquette area, accompanied by crocheted cushions bearing the name "Max & Helen's." Along with the wood-paneled walls and the black-and-white family photographs, it felt more like a cozy roadside diner you'd stumble upon on a drive up the coast than something nestled among the lifestyle boutiques and specialty stores that crowd Larchmont Boulevard.
Breakfast wins
The menu was simple, which made ordering easy, with breakfast and lunch options.
I tried Nancy's omelet ($18) with herbs and farmer’s cheese, which was thin and crepe-like, folded perfectly at the edges, and impossibly fluffy, offering bursts of freshness from the herbs.
I was particularly curious to try the waffle, which has been both widely lauded (for its taste) and lambasted (for the $17 price point).
It was transcendent, with golden, crisp ridges and deep pockets built to cradle syrup. Rosenthal Royal told me they use a three-day-fermented sourdough batter, a labor-intensive process that gives the waffle its distinctive texture and flavor.
The $17 waffle with whipped maple butter uses a three-day fermented sourdough batter
(
Catherine Dzilenski
/
Courtesy Max & Helen's
)
What truly set it apart, for me at least, was the whipped maple butter: airy and lush, melting into every nook, both indulgent and unexpectedly light.
As for the price — it's a generous portion, and a comparable waffle at Mel's Drive-In in Santa Monica costs $13.50. Apparently, those extra few dollars equal rage bait these days.
I was less impressed with the turkey club ($19), well-cooked bacon, fresh vegetables and a spicy mayo. Nice nods to California diner cuisine. But the bread was a bit thin, without the heft needed to support the rest of the sandwich's company.
Max & Helen's turkey club sandwich served with a side of tallow French fries and Lily's hot chocolate topped with a brûléed marshmallow
(
Gab Chabrán
/
LAist
)
Still, the tallow fries ($8) were exceptionally crispy, and the hot chocolate, $9.50, — another viral sensation — was stellar, thick and rich with a brûléed marshmallow on top.
I even took the liberty of dipping a few fries into the chocolate, which turned out to be a genius move.
Looking ahead
Royal hasn't taken a day off since opening — a fact his wife is quick to call out with a laugh. Their partnership works because their roles complement each other: His operational rigor meets her's warmth and joy.
"Mason runs a tight ship," Rosenthal Royal said. "But we want this to be warm and fun and lighthearted."
It's that balance — systems and soul — that they hope will define Max & Helen's beyond the viral moments.
The pair hope Max & Helen's becomes an institution like Apple Pan or Musso & Frank — a place where, as Rosenthal Royal put it, "Max and Helen would feel at home, where everyone feels loved and seen and warm."
The counter at Max & Helen's evokes classic American diners.
(
Catherine Dzilenski
/
Courtesy Max & Helen's
)
A man recently came in with a gift, telling Rosenthal Royal he'd met someone at the counter she'd seated him next to. They're now dating.
"If we could have that happen over and over again," she said, "I'd be so happy."
Beyond the diner, Rosenthal Royal is also releasing a children's book this spring, co-written with her father — a fitting parallel to their collaborative work at Max & Helen's. Three months in, they've built something bigger than they imagined. Whether it stands the test of time depends on whether the hype fades into something more enduring: a neighborhood fixture that just happens to make a really good waffle.
Keep up with LAist.
If you're enjoying this article, you'll love our daily newsletter, The LA Report. Each weekday, catch up on the 5 most pressing stories to start your morning in 3 minutes or less.
Gillian Morán Pérez
is an associate producer for LAist’s early All Things Considered show.
Published February 19, 2026 2:39 PM
The former Martin B. Retting gun store stands less than 1,000 feet from La Ballona Elementary.
(
Gillian Moran Perez
/
LAist
)
Topline:
The Culver City Council recently voted to turn the former Martin B. Retting gun store on Washington Boulevard into affordable housing. It’s the end result of community organizing that started a couple of years ago to prevent another gun store from moving in next to an elementary school.
Listen
0:41
Culver City to turn former gun store into affordable housing for the community
The backstory: In 2023, the Culver City Council voted to buy the store after a group of parents stepped in. The space is less than 1,000 feet from La Ballona Elementary School. It’s also close to a mosque, a senior living facility and Teffelson Park.
After the council bought the property, the city asked for the public to submit ideas on what to do with it. Popular options included turning the space into affordable housing and an art studio/school. The council then directed staff to put out a request for project proposals that would include housing and a community space.
Why now: The council voted Jan. 26 in favor of the West Hollywood Community Housing Corporation’s proposal, which is a 67-unit affordable housing complex with a preference for local teachers and a ground-level art center.
Reaction from the community: Megan Oddsen and Melody Hansen are members of Culver 878, who originally championed the idea for the city to buy the gun store. In a statement, the group said: “We're really just as happy today seeing what the council has voted to do with the property as we were on the day they voted to purchase it. It's no longer a gun store and we remain most thankful for that.”
Oddsen added: “ I'm just really grateful that we have a city council that is moved by activism and can come together on a lot of the most important issues right now.”
Culver City Councilmember Bubba Fish points to Attorney General Pam Bondi’s recent remarks at a congressional hearing calling out the crime rates in the city and says that in a way, those remarks ignited a celebration of the city among community members.
“ What people feel here, which is a real sense of community and a sense of safety, and it is in no small part because of the planning decisions that we make,” Fish said. “ This council has prioritized affordable housing above a lot of other things that we could be spending our money on. And that's because we recognize these are the things that truly make us safe.”
What’s next: 2029 is the target for project completion.
Erin Stone
is a reporter who covers climate and environmental issues in Southern California.
Published February 19, 2026 2:32 PM
Southern California Edison transmission towers overlook Eaton Canyon last year.
(
VCG
/
Getty Images
)
Topline:
Southern California Edison announced this week that it’s updating its payout program for Eaton Fire survivors. Those who accept payments must waive their rights to sue the company over the fire.
The details: The company says it will increase legal fee compensation for those who use an attorney to submit their claim to 20% of net damages, up from 10%. Renters will also receive either three months of their pre-fire rent or the “monthly fair rental value” — as calculated by Edison’s protocol (see page 18) — whichever is higher. Originally the offer included only three months of pre-fire rent for tenants. You can find updated sample offers here.
Applied retroactively: A spokesperson for Edison said these changes will be applied retroactively. That means anyone who has a claim under review, an offer extended, or who has already accepted and received their payout should be contacted by an Edison rep this week about accounting for these changes.
Survivors react: Andrew Wessels, a member of the Eaton Fire Survivors Network from West Altadena, called the changes “cosmetic” and said they don’t go far enough in providing desperately needed financial support for survivors. Wessels said Edison’s calculation for the monthly fair rental value “drastically undervalues actual rents.” The company's calculation for a home with a pre-fire value of $1.2 million, for example, sets a fair monthly rental value of $3,333 per month.
Wessels pointed to his group’s extensive blueprint for how Edison could better support fire survivors — which is endorsed by more than 200 local nonprofits and provides recommendations for addressing the escalating housing needs of survivors as their temporary housing insurance runs out this year. “We're at a loss as to why Edison continues to tell the community what it needs rather than listening to what we have to say,” Wessels said.
Where claims stand now: The company says that as of Feb. 18, 2,405 claims have been submitted, 593 offers totaling more than $183 million have been extended, and 86 claims have been paid out or are in process, totaling $18 million.