Sponsor
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

The Brief

The most important stories for you to know today
  • Delayed council vote means higher rents for many
    A large banner advertising open apartments hangs on the walls of a large multi unit apartment building in Koreatown.

    Topline:

    In a season of gift-giving, many Los Angeles residents are unwrapping a less pleasant surprise — rent increases of up to 6%.

    The backstory: City officials have been considering major changes to the rent control limits that apply to three-quarters of L.A. apartments. In recent months, outside economists and the city’s own housing officials have determined that some aspects of the city’s decades-old rent control formula should be changed to more fairly balance the needs of tenants and landlords. However, because the City Council has failed to vote on the issue ahead of a looming deadline, many tenants are about to receive substantially higher increases based on the old formula.

    The debate: Tenant advocacy groups are now calling on the City Council to put a temporary pause on rent increases until the council has passed an updated rent control formula. Meanwhile, landlords have urged the city to permit higher increases in rent-controlled apartments, saying they’re struggling to keep up with the ballooning costs of building maintenance and insurance.

    Read on… to learn about the recommendations city housing officials have made for changing L.A.’s rent caps, and why they still haven’t taken effect.

    In a season of gift-giving, many Los Angeles residents are unwrapping a less pleasant surprise — rent increases of up to 6%.

    City officials have been considering major changes to the rent control limits that apply to three-quarters of L.A. apartments. In recent months, outside economists and the city’s own housing officials have determined that some aspects of the city’s decades-old rent control formula should be changed to more fairly balance the needs of tenants and landlords.

    However, because the L.A. City Council has failed to vote on the issue ahead of a looming February deadline, many tenants are about to receive substantially higher increases based on the old formula.

    Cindy Sanders, a senior citizen living in a rent-controlled apartment in Studio City, recently found a notice taped to her door saying that her rent would be going up 5% on Feb. 1.

    “I was just like, oh my God, Merry Christmas — here's one more thing we have to look forward to,” Sanders said.

    As a retiree, Sanders noted that her Social Security benefits will be going up 2.5% next year, causing her rent to grow faster than her income for the second year in a row.

    “For a long-term tenant on a fixed income, you're never going to get ahead,” Sanders said.

    Tenant advocates call for pause on rent hikes

    Tenant advocacy groups are now calling on the City Council to put a temporary pause on rent increases until the council has passed an updated rent control formula. So far, the council has not indicated that it has any plans to act on the upcoming rent increases.

    “Tenants should not be penalized for the city's delay in acting,” said Faizah Malik, an attorney with the nonprofit public interest law firm Public Counsel and a member of the Keep L.A. Housed coalition.

    “It's too bad the council did not act” before going on winter recess, Malik added. “We really hope that when they come back, they treat this with some urgency.”

    Why Feb. 1 is such a key date

    The reason so many L.A. tenants are facing an increase on Feb. 1 goes back to the waning days of the city’s COVID-19 emergency period.

    For nearly four years during the pandemic, the city banned all rent increases in rent-controlled housing. That rent freeze lasted much longer than in many other cities, leading to an outcry from landlords who said their expenses during that time were rising sharply.

    The City Council voted to end the COVID-19 rent freeze on Feb. 1, 2024. On that day, the vast majority of tenants in L.A. became eligible for rent increases of up to 4%, plus an additional 2% if their landlord paid for both gas and electricity in their units.

    Because landlords are allowed to increase rents once per year, the next annual rent hike for many L.A. tenants is coming on Feb. 1, 2025. Landlords must give at least 30-day’s notice before an increase takes effect.

    Many tenants are starting to receive those notices now.

    No word from City Council on vote timing 

    Most L.A. residents are renters. About half of them are paying more than 30% of their income on rent, a level considered unaffordable by federal government standards.

    Through a public records request, LAist recently published a city-commissioned report from the Economic Roundtable, an independent nonprofit research group. That report found that some provisions in the city’s rent control ordinance have favored landlords over tenants.

    The report found that among the one-fifth of L.A. renters living below the federal poverty line, about half are spending 90% of their income or more on rent, leaving them perilously close to eviction and homelessness.

    LAist reached out to the office of the council’s housing committee chair, Nithya Raman, and asked why the lower rent increases had not yet been scheduled for a vote. We also asked if she was in favor of putting a temporary hold on rent increases.

    We did not receive a response. A spokesperson said Raman was out of town.

    Current rules and proposed changes

    L.A.’s rent control limits generally apply to tenants living in apartments built before October 1978. Annual rent caps are determined by regional inflation data.

    Under the current limits, landlords will be allowed to raise rents by 4% on Feb. 1 — plus an additional 1% for each utility (gas and electricity) they cover in a tenant’s unit.

    Other areas with rent control in Southern California typically have lower caps on rent hikes. For example, the L.A. County Board of Supervisors recently voted to cap rent increases below 3% next year for rent-controlled tenants in unincorporated parts of the county.

    The authors of the Economic Roundtable report recommended using a different measure of inflation to calculate allowable increases. The city’s Housing Department calculated that increases next year would be capped at 2% based on the report’s recommended formula.

    The Economic Roundtable report also noted that other cities in California with rent control do not allow landlords to add an extra 2% increase each year if they pay for utilities.

    L.A.’s Housing Department issued a report last month recommending the City Council vote to get rid of the utilities bump. The report concluded, “In the case of long-term tenancies, the additional rent increase exceeds the total cost of the utility service.”

    Tenants brace for another 6% rent hike

    Despite recommendations from city housing officials to end the utilities bump, many tenants are scheduled to receive the extra 2% increase on Feb. 1.

    One of them is Maribel Velasquez Herrera, a fast food worker whose landlord raised the rent in her Pico-Union apartment by 6% early this year. She recently received notice of another 6% increase this upcoming February.

    “I know that rent is going up too much,” Velasquez Herrera said, speaking in Spanish. “What landlords are doing now is getting people out and then renting for $1,400 to $1,600. To not live on the street, you have to pay.”

    Once Velasquez Herrera’s 6% rent increase takes effect in February, her monthly rent will have risen by about $135 in the last two years. She said lower rent increases would allow her to more easily afford food, clothing and have enough left over to go to the dentist or optometrist.

    Landlords want city to allow higher increases

    Meanwhile, landlords have urged the city to permit higher increases in rent-controlled apartments, saying they’re struggling to keep up with the ballooning costs of building maintenance and insurance. They unsuccessfully lobbied the City Council to allow increases of up to 9% after L.A.’s COVID-19 rent freeze ended.

    With city officials now recommending stricter caps, landlords are again arguing L.A. rent control has failed to account for the rising expenses that come with owning rental housing.

    “The cost of labor and materials have skyrocketed,” wrote Marc Chopp in a comment to the council. “In addition, legal costs to evict non-paying and nuisance tenants has become extremely expensive due to all the legal motions and jury trials that have become standard in these legal proceedings.”

    But for tenants like Michael Powelson, rent increases are arriving at the same time incomes are falling. Powelson works as a history lecturer in the California State University system. He said his pay is set to drop because he’s scheduled to teach fewer classes next semester.

    “Even with rent control, I can barely pay my bills,” said Powelson, who recently got notice that the rent for his Van Nuys apartment would be going up 4% in February. “If you have housing shooting through the roof and salaries going down, I mean, it's not rocket science.”

  • FDA chief hints at overhaul

    Topline:

    The Food and Drug Administration intends to get tougher on vaccine approvals, as top officials raised concerns about the risk of COVID vaccines for children.

    Why now: Speaking on Fox News Saturday morning, FDA Commissioner Marty Makary said the agency would no longer "rubber-stamp new products that don't work," claiming it made a "mockery of science."

    Background: Makary's comments came the day after FDA's top vaccine regulator, Dr. Vinay Prasad, told his team the agency would change its annual flu vaccine framework, update vaccine labels to be "honest," and make other changes to how it reviews vaccines, according to contents of an internal email reviewed by NPR and reported on first by a PBS News Hour correspondent and later by The Washington Post.

    The Food and Drug Administration intends to get tougher on vaccine approvals, as top officials raised concerns about the risk of COVID vaccines for children.

    Speaking on Fox News Saturday morning, FDA Commissioner Marty Makary said the agency would no longer "rubber-stamp new products that don't work," claiming it made a "mockery of science."

    Makary's comments came the day after FDA's top vaccine regulator, Dr. Vinay Prasad, told his team the agency would change its annual flu vaccine framework, update vaccine labels to be "honest," and make other changes to how it reviews vaccines, according to contents of an internal email reviewed by NPR and reported on first by a PBS News Hour correspondent and later by The Washington Post.

    Prasad wrote that the FDA would also no longer authorize vaccines for pregnant women without stricter requirements. And for pneumonia vaccines, manufacturers will have to prove they reduce disease rather than show they generate antibodies. He also raised questions about giving multiple vaccines at the same time, which is standard practice.

    The changes could make it much more difficult and expensive for vaccines to get approved, further limiting the availability of vaccines, which are considered among the safest and most effective tools for protecting people against infectious diseases.

    While all vaccines carry some risks, most public health experts argue the current process for vetting vaccines before marketing has long assured that the benefits of vaccines outweigh their risks. Studies required after vaccines are approved and surveillance systems, including the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), also flag potential safety issues once vaccines are in use.

    FDA says an analysis links COVID shots to some deaths

    Makary said on Fox News that 10 children had died from the COVID shot during the Biden administration, but did not offer specifics about how the FDA came to that conclusion. Millions of children have received the vaccine. 

    Officials with the Department of Health and Human Services and Food and Drug Administration didn't immediately respond to requests for comment on the COVID analysis and changes to vaccine review standards.

    According to the FDA email from Prasad, he told the agency's biostatistics and pharmacovigilance team to analyze 96 reported deaths from 2021 to 2024, and they determined 10 children died "after and because of" the COVID vaccine. But Prasad said the true number was likely higher.

    Dr. Paul Offit, who directs the Vaccine Education Center at the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, said in a text message that Prasad has not shared the evidence that these vaccines killed 10 children.

    "Because he doesn't provide any evidence, he is asking us to trust him on an important issue," Office said. "All this will do is scare people unnecessarily. At the very least, he should provide all the evidence he has so that experts in the field can review it and decide whether he has enough data to prove his point."

    Dr. Jesse Goodman, a professor at Georgetown University who held Prasad's job at FDA from 2003 until 2009, said in an email that the FDA's Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, which oversees vaccine approval, has been "recognized globally as a gold standard regulator." Goodman defended "immunologic endpoints like antibody levels" for the accelerated approval of pneumonia and influenza vaccines. He said science supports their use and they are confirmed with studies after approval: "These approaches have helped provide children and adults with timely access to safe and effective vaccines, saving many lives."

    Michael Osterholm, an epidemiologist at the University of Minnesota, reviewed the email from Prasad and challenged his statement that "COVID-19 was never highly lethal for children." Osterholm also questioned the FDA's latest analysis of adverse event reports attributing the 10 deaths to COVID vaccines.

    "Prasad's email is filled with factual mistakes and misrepresents both the severity of COVID in children (1597 deaths in 2020-2022) and how the US responded to the first signals of possible vaccine-associated pediatric deaths in May 2021," Osterholm wrote in an email to NPR.

    "While Prasad's email notes 10 such deaths, these cases have never been presented for review by the medical and public health communities or published in the medical literature," Osterholm continued. "Given the record of this Administration to misrepresent scientific data regarding vaccines, until these cases have been reviewed by an expert third party, like the National Academy of Science[s], we can not accept the fact they are vaccine-associated deaths."

    Surveillance system collects vaccines reports

    The FDA makes public data from the VAERS surveillance system co-sponsored by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. But the FDA cautions, "it is important to note that for any reported event, no cause and effect relationship has been established." In his email, Prasad wrote that "with case reports, causality is typically assessed on a subjective scale. In this scale ranging from certain to unlikely — certain, possible/likely, and probable are broadly considered as related to the product."

    Makary said on Fox News that when the COVID shot was first rolled out, it was "amazing" for people at high risk of coming down with severe disease, but things have changed.

    "Back in 2020, we saw a reduction in the severity of illness and lives saved, but now recommending that a 6-year-old girl get another 70 million COVID shots — one each year for the rest of her life — is not based on science. And so we're not going to just rubber stamp approvals without seeing some scientific evidence."

    The claim is the latest move by Trump administration health officials questioning the safety and effectiveness of vaccines and how the government has regulated them. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has long questioned vaccines.

    The FDA restricted eligibility for the updated COVID vaccines in August after announcing the agency planned to require more evidence about the shots' safety and effectiveness going forward.

    CDC committee will meet to review vaccine policies

    The FDA email on vaccine policy comes just before the CDC convenes a crucial two-day meeting of that agency's influential Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices on Dec. 4-5. The committee is in the process of conducting a major review of how children are inoculated against dangerous infectious diseases such as measles, mumps, rubella, polio and hepatitis B.

    Many public health experts are concerned the committee will upend the childhood vaccination schedule. It could move to delay the timing of some inoculations, space out vaccinations and call for the reformulation of some vaccines. Taken together, the moves could result in fewer children getting protected and the resurgence of once-vanquished diseases.

    Asked about Makary and Prasad's claims that the COVID vaccine caused deaths among 10 children, Moderna, whose COVID vaccine is approved for children as young as 6 months old, pointed to a statement it made in September. The company says that multiple published, peer-reviewed studies from a variety of sources show its shot is safe and that it is "not aware of any deaths in the last year or pertinent new information from prior years."

    Moderna says it monitors its vaccine's safety along with regulators in more than 90 countries. "With more than one billion doses distributed globally, these systems — including in national health systems across Europe, the United Kingdom, Canada, Australia and the U.S. — have not reported any new or undisclosed safety concerns in children or in pregnant women."

    Pfizer did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
    Copyright 2025 NPR

  • Sponsor
  • Impact on community after immigration crackdown
    Afghan evacuees sit on a bus at the U.S. air base in Ramstein, Germany, on Aug. 26. Ramstein Air Base, the largest U.S. Air Force base in Europe, has hosted thousands of Afghans.
    Afghan evacuees at the U.S. air base in Ramstein, Germany in 2021.

    Topline:

    The Trump administration’s sudden freeze on all visa and asylum decisions for Afghan immigrants has left many of them in Orange County — one of the country's largest hubs for Afghans — in limbo. Local groups are preparing to support the immigrants even as they await clarification from federal authorities.

    Why it matters: California is home to the nation’s largest concentration of Afghan immigrants, many of them now grappling with the Trump administration’s abrupt visa and asylum freeze.

    Read on ... to learn more about the Afghan population in Orange County and guidance from one O.C. immigration official on what could come next.

    California is home to the nation’s largest concentration of Afghan immigrants, many of them now grappling with the Trump administration’s abrupt visa and asylum freeze.

    Friday’s announcement by the White House followed the fatal shooting of a National Guard member in Washington, D.C. a couple days earlier by a suspect who had immigrated from Afghanistan.

    In Orange County, where many Afghans have settled as their immigration applications pend, local officials are gearing up to help them navigate the change, even as guidance is scant from U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services.

    Jose Serrano, director of Orange County's Office of Refugee and Immigrant Services, said the goal is to provide the “most up-to-date information so they can continue on towards their pathway towards citizenship here in the United States.”

    “The Afghan population in Southern California, specifically in Orange County, is one that is really important to the DNA of who we are,” Serrano said. “Let's continue to stay together and strong and reimagine a place for belonging for everyone.”

    As they await more information, Serrano advised visa and asylum seekers to:

    • stay on top of updates from USCIS and the Department of Homeland Security
    • contact their local office of immigrant and refugee affairs
    • connect with organizations that work closely with immigrant and refugee populations, such as resettlement agencies and legal aid groups

    The pull of OC

    Nearly 200,000 Afghans are in the U.S., with 39% of them residing in California, according to the Migration Policy Institute.

    Hundreds of Afghan households have settled in Orange County, Serrano said, making it one of the state’s hubs for Afghan immigrants alongside San Diego and Sacramento.

    Serrano said a big draw for immigrants to Orange County is Little Arabia in Anaheim, a regional destination for Middle Eastern food, culture and community life.

    Serrano, who spent more than a decade working with immigrants at World Relief Southern California and the state's refugee programs bureau, said entering Afghan homes means being offered large meals. One family had prepared a whole feast for a Time Warner cable worker, he recalled.

    “They didn't understand why that person couldn’t stay to dine with them,” he said. “That’s the type of people that are here in Orange County, folks who are so committed to being a part of civic engagement, to connecting alongside other communities.”

    Visa applications in limbo

    Serrano said many of the Afghans who resettled in the county are Special Immigrant Visa holders, a program created for Afghan nationals who helped the U.S. government during the war in their home country.

    That program has now been frozen by the State Department.

    Serrano said immigrants who entered the U.S. as refugees and have since become green card holders could see their cases reopened.

    Joseph Edlow, who leads USCIS, said the new immigration measures will last until “we can ensure that every alien is vetted and screened to the maximum degree possible.”

    For Serrano, the current screening process is rigorous and involves multiple organizations aside from USCIS, such as the U.S. Department of Justice, the F.B.I. and counterterrorist organizations.

    Applicants undergo health screenings and multiple fingerprinting appointments, he said.

    “They're constantly doing an assessment to verify that you are a good-standing citizen,” Serrano said. “One of the things that I think we should be very proud of within the United States is that there is an in-depth screening process for anyone who is seeking a protection.”

  • Four dead and 10 wounded in banquet hall shooting

    Topline:

    Four people were killed and 10 wounded in a shooting during a family gathering at a banquet hall in Stockton, sheriff's officials said Saturday.

    Details: The victims included both children and adults, said Heather Brent, a spokesperson for the San Joaquin County sheriff's office.

    What's next: Early indications "suggest this may have been a targeted incident," Brent said during a news conference at the scene. Local officials said the suspected shooter has not been caught and pleaded with the public for help. Detectives were still working to identify a possible motive.

    STOCKTON, Calif. — Four people were killed and 10 wounded in a shooting during a family gathering at a banquet hall in Stockton, sheriff's officials said Saturday.

    The victims included both children and adults, said Heather Brent, a spokesperson for the San Joaquin County sheriff's office. Early indications "suggest this may have been a targeted incident," Brent said during a news conference at the scene.

    Local officials said the suspected shooter has not been caught and pleaded with the public for help. Detectives were still working to identify a possible motive.

    "If you have any information as to this individual, reach out immediately. If you are this individual, turn yourself in immediately," San Joaquin County District Attorney Ron Freitas said during a news conference.

    The shooting occurred just before 6 p.m. inside the banquet hall, which shares a parking lot with other businesses. Stockton is a city of 320,000 about 40 miles (64 kilometers) south of Sacramento.

    "Families should be together instead of at the hospital, standing next to their loved one, praying that they survive," Mayor Christina Fugazzi said.

    Authorities did not immediately provide additional information about the conditions of the victims. Officials said earlier that several were taken to hospitals.

    Copyright 2025 NPR

  • The Stahl House is for sale, first time ever
    A mid-century modernist home with giant glass walls overlooking the city of Los Angeles. Two women dressed in white party dresses are sitting in the living room, chatting.
    The iconic photograph of the Stahl House taken by photographer Julius Shuman.

    Topline:

    The Stahl House, otherwise known as Case Study House #22, is on the market for the first time in its 65-year history.

    Why it matters: The midcentury modern home in the Hollywood Hills has come to embody the postwar Los Angeles good life. It is also one of the most recognizable examples of West Coast modernism.

    Why now: The house has been with the same family since its completion. But after caring for it for more than 6 decades, the Stahl children are looking for the house's next steward.

    Read on... For the fascinating history of the Stahl House. Find out why its original moniker is Case Study House #22, and see the photographs that have made the hilltop home a revered landmark.

    A quintessential piece of Los Angeles history — a jaw-dropping midcentury modern house of glass, steel and seemingly all skies soaring high above the Hollywood Hills — is up for sale.

    Asking price: $25 million.

    The Stahl House, otherwise known as Case Study House #22, has stayed with the same family since it was built in 1960.

    "After 65 years, our family has made the heartfelt and very difficult decision to place the Stahl House on the market," wrote the Stahl children, Bruce Stahl and Shari Stahl Gronwald.

    The 2,200-square-foot home at 1635 Woods Drive has been preserved meticulously, funded in part by proceeds from open-house tours of the space.

    "This home has been the center of our lives for decades, but as we’ve gotten older, it has become increasingly challenging to care for it with the attention and energy it so richly deserves," the Stahl children continued.

    And they are not just looking for a buyer — but a steward.

    "It is a passing of responsibility," the listing for the house reads. "A search for the next custodian who will honor the house's history, respect its architectural purity, and ensure its preservation for generations to come."

    Post-war housing shortage

    A black and white photo of a mid-century modern home taken from the outside looking into the living room.
    The Stahl House, or Case Study House #22, was designed and built by Pierre Koenig in the Hollywood Hills.
    (
    Julius Shulman
    /
    © J. Paul Getty Trust. Getty Research Institute, Los Angeles (2004.R.10)
    )

    The futuristic house, with its stunning panorama and a swimming pool perched at the edge of nothingness, has become one of the most recognizable and prized expressions of midcentury modern architecture in L.A. How it came to be built was fueled by a similar spirit of experimentation and audacity.

    In 1945, the cutting-edge Arts & Architecture magazine launched the "Case Study House" program to commission the era's biggest and most boundary-pushing architects — Richard Neutra, Charles Eames and the like — to design and build affordable, scalable homes for an exploding middle class after World War II.

    "Each house must be capable of duplication and in no sense be an 'individual' performance," editor John Entenza wrote in the announcement-slash-manifesto.

    By its terminus in 1966, the program gave rise to 36 designs, of which 25 prototypes were built — mostly in and around the city — forging L.A. into an epicenter of West Coast modernism.

    Case Study Home #22

    One of them was Case Study Home #22 by Pierre Koenig, who, as an architecture student at USC in the early 1950s, was already making a name for himself, particularly for his use of steel.

    His student work caught the attention of Entenza, who later invited him to join the Case Study House program.

    The Stahl family home

    The Hollywood Hills home would be Koenig's second Case Study house — and his most well-known.

    The story began with Hughes Aircraft purchasing agent and former football player Buck Stahl and his wife, Carlotta, who bought a small hillside lot overlooking the city for $13,500.

    The couple spent weekends putting up a wall around the property using broken concrete sourced from construction sites. Buck, the Stahl family said, had built a model of his dream house to take to architects — many of whom turned the job down because the lot was seen as undevelopable.

    A black and white photo of a vintage car from the 1950s or 1960s parked next to a rectangular structure.
    The Stahl House, part of the Case Study House program, was completed in 1960.
    (
    Julius Shulman
    /
    © J. Paul Getty Trust. Getty Research Institute, Los Angeles (2004.R.10)
    )

    Enter Koenig, who signed on for the challenge in 1957. A month before construction began in 1959, the project was christened Case Study House #22. The Stahl House was completed a year later, according to the Los Angeles Times, at a cost of nearly $38,000.

    The birth of cool

    With its sleek lines and inviting airiness, Case Study House #22 has come to embody the good life in postwar Los Angeles, an idea reinforced by its countless appearances in movies, TV shows and magazine spreads over the decades.

    But the photographs that started it all — elevating the home into the stuff of mythology — were taken by Julius Shulman. He was tapped to document the entire Arts & Architecture program after charting an unlikely career photographing modernist architecture in L.A., starting with those designed by Neutra.

    Shulman shot the Stahl House in May 1960, shortly after its completion. In the most iconic shot of the series, two young women in white party dresses are sitting in the glass living room, conversing leisurely as the house dissolves into the shimmering sprawl below.

    "It was not an architectural quote-unquote 'photograph,'" said Shulman about the image in an interview for the Archives of American Art. "It is a picture of a mood.”