Your year-end gift MATCHED!

Your tax-deductible gift to power our newsroom is matched dollar for dollar right now. Help raise $1 million in essential funding for LAist by December 31.
$539,313 of $1,000,000 goal
A row of graphics payment types: Visa, MasterCard, Apple Pay and PayPal, and  below a lock with Secure Payment text to the right
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

The Brief

The most important stories for you to know today
  • Payment issues led to delay
    A woman with short hair (right) wearing a blue jacket with the L.A. city seal on it reaches out and holds the arm of a man (left) who's closing his eyes and wearing a mask, in front of tents in the background.
    L.A. Mayor Karen Bass (right) speaks with a man at an encampment in front of the Sunset Sound recording studio in Hollywood on the morning of Friday, May 31, 2024. People at the encampment were offered rooms at motels with food and case management services in advance of the city removing the encampment Friday.

    Topline:

    L.A. officials moved forward with an encampment clearing in Hollywood on Friday, after payment problems to homeless service providers caused a week-and-a-half delay. Over 25 people accepted motel rooms from the encampment as part of Mayor Karen Bass’ Inside Safe program, according to the city.

    ‘Excited’: Unhoused people said they were feeling hopeful and looking forward to moving indoors. “I'm pretty excited about this. This is looking pretty promising,” said Sean Caffey, a sculptor and cancer survivor who’s been living on the streets with his dog.

    Mayor attended: Bass was there for over an hour, going tent to tent to talk with unhoused people, as well as outreach workers and reporters, and waved goodbye to the first bus of unhoused people who left for the motels. “No human being should live like this,” the mayor said of the city’s encampments.

    A delay: The Hollywood encampment clearing was delayed by a week and a half over late payments by the city and county’s joint homeless services agency — a problem that exploded into public view recently.

    L.A. officials moved forward with an encampment clearing in Hollywood on Friday, after payment problems to homeless service providers caused a week-and-a-half delay. Over 25 people accepted motel rooms from the encampment as part of Mayor Karen Bass’ Inside Safe program, according to a spokesperson for the mayor.

    An LAist reporter was there for the first hour of the operation in front of the Sunset Sound recording studio early Friday, and spoke with unhoused people, Mayor Karen Bass and other city officials.

    A group of people stand in front of tents on the sidewalk, in front of a building that says "Sunset Sound."
    L.A. Mayor Karen Bass (second from left) at the encampment operation in front of Sunset Sound in Hollywood on Friday, May 31, 2024.
    (
    Nick Gerda / LAist
    )

    Unhoused people said they were feeling hopeful and looking forward to moving indoors.

    “I'm pretty excited about this. This is looking pretty promising,” said Sean Caffey, a sculptor and cancer survivor who’s been living on the streets with his dog. He was missing almost all of his teeth, and said they were knocked out when he was beaten up by people who stole his sculpting tools.

    “It's harder than you think to get housing,” he said. “I've been trying to get a house for like a minute, like at least a year.” Bass told him the city would make sure he gets dental care.

    “I'm excited to shower and to have a bed and clean clothes,” said another man, who gave his first name as Adam and didn’t provide a last name.

    Bass was there for over an hour, going tent to tent to talk with unhoused people, as well as outreach workers and reporters, and waved goodbye to the first bus of unhoused people who left for the motels.

    A woman waves to a departing bus that has "LADOT" written on the side.
    L.A. Mayor Karen Bass waves to the first bus of unhoused people leaving an encampment in front of Sunset Sound in Hollywood and heading to city-provided motel rooms on May 31, 2024.
    (
    Nick Gerda / LAist
    )

    “No human being should live like this,” the mayor said of the city’s encampments.

    “Even though it takes a while [to move people indoors], and even though it's expensive, it is far more expensive in terms of human lives compromised, and in terms of the businesses, the safety, everything else, to leave people on the street,” she added.

    Bass announced to the Hollywood Chamber of Commerce earlier this week that a series of large encampments in the area would be going away over the next month.

    A worker in a bright orange vest carries an object from between tents on a sidewalk, as another worker in a bright yellow vest looks on.
    A worker removes items from an encampment in front of Sunset Sound in Hollywood on Friday, May 31, 2024, after unhoused people began to be bused to motel rooms.
    (
    Nick Gerda / LAist
    )

    How many people have come inside under the mayor’s program? 

    Bass acknowledged challenges around service providers being stretched to their limits, which the nonprofits say stems from being shortchanged and paid late by the city and county’s homelessness agency, the Los Angeles Homeless Services Authority.

    “We've been working so fast, we've done so many of these [Inside Safe operations], that we've really pushed to the limit the community based organizations,” Bass told reporters Friday.

    L.A.’s homeless population has surged in recent years, with the latest count showing 32,680 people living outdoors. The latest report posted by the city, with data through March 15, shows the Inside Safe program has brought 2,482 people indoors since the mayor started it in December 2022. Among them, the report says 78% are still sheltered or housed.

    As part of the current fiscal year budget, approved a year ago, the city council required two data reports about Inside Safe each month. The latest report on the city’s website is two months old.

    Judge David O. Carter has scheduled a hearing for next Thursday to press for more frequent public updates about Inside Safe spending. Carter is overseeing L.A.’s biggest homelessness case, in which downtown business and property owners are pushing for faster city action to shelter people and clear encampments.

    A delay over payment problems

    The Hollywood encampment clearing was delayed by a week and a half over late payments by the city and county’s joint homeless services agency — a problem that exploded into public view recently.

    At the county Board of Supervisors’ meeting last week, multiple homeless services providers said they have to take out loans, and are at risk of not being able to pay their staff, due to delayed payments from the agency for contracted services. They warned officials last week that they’re at the “breaking point” over the problem and faced possible cuts to staff and services. The supervisors and Mayor Bass vowed to work quickly to fix the issue.

    The Sunset Sound operation was scheduled for last Tuesday, but the nonprofit that would serve people at motels indicated it would be unable to serve people at the motels because of the payment delays by the Los Angeles Homeless Services Authority.

    That issue has since been worked out, according to PATH and city officials.

    LAist asked the mayor about the payment problems delaying Friday’s operation.

    “This system is broken in a lot of different ways, and it has been for years. What I believed when I came in office, and I believe today, this is an emergency. We have to get people off the streets immediately, while at the same time we're fixing the system,” she responded.

    “But we did come to a little bit of a crisis point, because again we had stretched the system so far. So we had to take a step back for a minute, fix the financing, make sure that the community based organizations got their payments.”

    What services will people receive?

    The people who accepted motel rooms Friday were bused to two motels served by PATH under a city-funded contract.

    HOMELESSNESS FAQ

    How did we get here? Who’s in charge of what? And where can people get help?

    There, people will get three meals a day, on-site security and have access to case managers on site every day from 7 a.m. to 11:30 p.m., said Sasha Morozov, who oversees that work as PATH’s regional director.

    The case managers, she told LAist, build relationships and help people with what they need, like getting an ID and other documents together to qualify for permanent housing, or access to a vaccine for their pet.

    “Our goal at PATH is to end homelessness,” she said. “That's our mission.”

  • We bring the our favorite stories of 2025
    A drawing with the words "LA is love" painted on the side of a display on the street.
    LA is love. 'Nuff said.

    Topline:

    All year, the Explore L.A. team has brought you stories of discovery and connection.

    Why now: As we head into 2026, we bring you our favorite stories of the year.

    The context: We went inside a Los Angeles institution that has been left untouched for more than a decade. We learned to make peace with our city's backyard urban critters. We marveled at street art painted decades ago, pulsing with contemporary relevance. We watched as old houses moved across the city to become new homes for fire survivors.

    Read on... for more of our handpicked highlights from 2025!

    We made it. Happy (almost) 2026.

    All year, the Explore L.A. team has brought you stories of discovery and connection.

    As we leave 2025 behind, we've handpicked our favorites of the year.

    We did a lot.

    We went inside a Los Angeles institution that has been left untouched for more than a decade. We learned to make peace with our city's backyard urban critters. We marveled at street art painted decades ago, pulsing with contemporary relevance. We watched as old houses moved across the city to become new homes for fire survivors. We had a leisurely day — one of us at least — hanging out at a lilac garden to hear stories of love and devotion. We witnessed the closing of a family business in Chinatown — and how that loss ricocheted across the neighborhood. We became obsessed with a cola from Japan bearing our city's namesake and tried to find the connection.

    And there are so many more stories that took us to different parts of the region this year — stories that brought us closer to this place, stories that we have brought back to you.

    We hope you like them as much as we liked writing and producing them. Catch you again next year.

    When Yue Wa Market closes this week, Chinatown will lose a neighborhood anchor

    A street view of a small grocery storefront with a sign that reads "Yue Wa Market" shaded by a green awnings with boxes of produce displayed on wooden crates outside. Several shoppers browse the stands and talk with the vendor.
    Yue Wa Market blends into the storefronts of Broadway in L.A.'s Chinatown.
    (
    Josie Huang
    /
    LAist
    )

    "I got to spend the final days of Yue Wa Market with the family who runs it — watching them say goodbye to their customers and closing a chapter in a Chinatown that was transforming around them. It’s a story that stuck out for me this year because it showed, in a surprisingly intimate space, how every person leaves an imprint on their neighborhood."

    – Josie Huang, Weekend Edition host and reporter

    After two decades, one man's obsession with the lilac is coming to an end in Idyllwild

    A small bundle of lilacs at the Idyllwild Lilac Garden.
    A small bundle of lilacs at the Idyllwild Lilac Garden.
    (
    Nathanial Torres
    /
    LAist
    )

    "My favorite story this year focused on flowers in bloom and the end of an era for the man who tended to them for over two decades. I particularly loved this story because it was one of the first where I was able to spend the entire day out in the field on my own. It was a nice little road trip where I crossed three county lines, drove into a mountain town, and shared an afternoon with lilac legend Gary Parton. It was an honor to catch the man at the end of his second career and an honor to tell his story."

    – Dañiel Martinez, Explore L.A. producer

    Go inside LA’s old General Hospital before it turns from a spooky Art Deco time capsule into new housing

    Dozens of concrete steps lead up to the Art Deco General Hospital building.
    The stairs to the old General Hospital.
    (
    Katherine Garrova / LAist
    )

    "For me, exploring L.A. means bringing readers and listeners into places they wouldn't normally have access to. It was an honor to get to go into a beloved building that thousands of Angelenos have a connection to, and learn about its future providing housing and mental health care. Oh, and decaying old art deco buildings are just cool and feel like a movie set."

    – Robert Garrova, Explore L.A. reporter

    These LA homes were about to be torn down. Now they’re getting new life in fire-ravaged Altadena

    A wide look at the top of the house where the second story has been removed. The wood flooring is partially removed and an indoor staircase leads to the outside, where the second floor would be.
    The top of the Saint George Street house.
    (
    Cato Hernández
    /
    LAist
    )

    "Most of my reporting tends to stick in our region's convoluted, quirky history — but I love this story the most because it's about making something old new again. A group of fire-affected residents are reviving the mostly-forgotten process of house moving to get back on their feet. This showed me nothing is ever truly antiquated if you have enough drive. (As a bonus: check out what moving a home across L.A. County actually looks like.)"

    – Cato Hernández , L.A. Explained reporter

    When it comes to figs, it’s woman vs. squirrel

    A close up image of the face and body of a squirrel.
    A squirrel daring you to make a move.
    (
    Boys in Bristol Photography
    /
    via Unsplash
    )

    “Here's my thoughts about squirrels: It seemed to hit a nerve — I got readers telling me their methods of deterring squirrels, and others offering their fig preserve recipes. One person said they were only left with one fig on their fig plant, which they cut up into four to share with their family.”

    – Suzanne Levy, Explore L.A. editor

    The story behind the Pico-Robertson mural depicting working-class Jewish history, painted by a Filipino artist

    A section of mural which shows a man with dark hair, his fist up in protest, next to other figures.
    An image of Cesar Chavez, at the top of the photo.
    (
    Adolfo Guzman-Lopez
    /
    LAist
    )

    "There’s a mural in L.A.’s Pico-Robertson neighborhood that stands apart from other Jewish themed public art in L.A. in that it does not focus on the religious or national part of Jewish identity.

    It’s called 'A shenere un besere velt - A Better and More Beautiful World,' in yiddish. It covers a roughly 60 foot long and 15 feet tall wall on a building occupied by the Worker’s Circle in Pico-Robertson, a mutual aid group founded by Yiddish speaking Jewish immigrants that opened an office in L.A. in 1908, not long after it started in New York.

    I love this story because people I interviewed said the mural's message of identity based on working class solidarity with people of other races and ethnicities is just as relevant now as when it was unveiled in 1998."

    – Adolfo Guzman-Lopez, Explore L.A. correspondent

    We went looking for a Japanese cola named 'Los Angeles' — and found a story about home

    A hand holding a red can of "Los Angeles cola" from Japan
    Los Angeles Cola.
    (
    Fiona Ng
    /
    LAist
    )

    “I love this story because I had no idea where it was going to take me. I wanted to write about this soft drink named ‘Los Angeles' and the circuitous journey ended with me speaking with someone who grew up as part of a Korean minority group called Zainichi Koreans in Japan. The coolest thing of all? Hwaji Shin's story has so much heart."

    – Fiona Ng, deputy managing editor, Explore L.A. and Weekend

  • Sponsored message
  • Things to consider when looking at cheaper options
    A stethescope and two $100 bills are placed around a form that reads "Health Insurance."

    Topline:

    The deadline for choosing a health plan is quickly approaching. The official end of open enrollment in California is set for Jan. 15 for coverage starting Feb. 1. Here are five considerations in the decision-making process.

    Short-term plans: They are often less expensive than ACA plans. But they cover less. Some ACA shoppers might find themselves considering short-term insurance plans sold outside the government-run marketplaces — or steered toward the plans by insurance brokers. Be wary. They can look a lot like traditional coverage, with deductibles, copayments, and participating networks of hospitals and doctors. Still, they are not ACA-compliant plans and are not available on the official ACA marketplaces.

    Plan options with high deductibles: For those wanting to stay with ACA plans, the lowest premiums are generally in the categories labeled “catastrophic” or “bronze.” They have lower premiums but high annual deductibles — the amount a customer must spend before most coverage kicks in. Deductibles for bronze plans average nearly $7,500 nationally, according to KFF. Another option, new for 2026, is expanded eligibility for catastrophic plans, which used to be limited to people younger than age 30. As the name suggests, they’re intended for people who want health insurance just in case they suffer a catastrophic health condition, such as cancer or injuries from a car accident. The plans can have deductibles as high as $10,600 for an individual or $21,200 for a family

    Read on . . . for more things to consider when purchasing health insurance.

    For the millions of Americans who buy Affordable Care Act insurance, there’s still time left to enroll for 2026. But premium increases and the expiration of enhanced tax subsidies have led to larger-than-expected costs.

    Concerned shoppers, wondering if there’s anything they can do, are consulting insurance brokers or talking to representatives at ACA marketplace call centers.

    “We’re hearing from people with complex medical conditions who don’t think they can survive if they don’t have access to medical care,” said Audrey Morse Gasteier, executive director of the Massachusetts Health Connector, that state’s insurance marketplace.

    And some are considering going outside the ACA to find more affordable options. But that requires caution.

    Congress looks increasingly unlikely to extend the enhanced subsidies before the year’s end. Late Wednesday, the House passed a package of measures favored by conservatives that does not address the subsidies and is largely viewed as dead on arrival in the Senate. Earlier Wednesday, however, four GOP moderates joined with Democrats to sign a discharge petition to force a vote — likely in January — on a three-year extension. The Senate and President Donald Trump would also have to approve the measure, but if extended the subsidies could be applied retroactively.

    Meanwhile, the deadline for choosing a health plan is quickly approaching. The official end of open enrollment is set for Jan. 15 for coverage starting Feb. 1. In most states, it’s already too late to enroll for coverage starting Jan. 1.

    Here are five considerations in the decision-making process:

    1. Short-Term Plans: ‘You Have To Be Healthy’

    Some ACA shoppers might find themselves considering short-term insurance plans sold outside the government-run marketplaces — or steered toward the plans by insurance brokers. Be wary.

    Short-term plans are just that: insurance originally designed as temporary coverage for situations like changing jobs or attending school. They can look a lot like traditional coverage, with deductibles, copayments, and participating networks of hospitals and doctors. Still, they are not ACA-compliant plans and are not available on the official ACA marketplaces.

    They are often less expensive than ACA plans. But they cover less. For example, unlike ACA plans, they can impose annual and lifetime caps on benefits. The vast majority do not cover maternity care. Some might not cover prescription drugs.

    Short-term plans require applicants to complete a medical questionnaire, and insurers can exclude coverage or cancel a policy retroactively for those with preexisting medical conditions. Also, depending on the terms of the particular plan, a person who develops a medical condition during the coverage period might not be accepted for renewal.

    In addition, short-term plans are not required to cover care on the ACA’s checklist of essential benefits, such as preventive care, hospitalization, or emergency services.

    The shortcomings of the plans, which critics say are sometimes marketed in misleading ways, have led Democrats to label them “junk insurance.” The Trump administration argues they’re suitable for some people and has sought to make them more widely available.

    “We recommend it when it makes sense,” said Joshua Brooker, a Pennsylvania insurance broker. “But if you’re going to enroll in short-term coverage, you need to know which boxes are unchecked.”

    “They’re not for everyone. You have to be healthy,” said Ronnell Nolan, the president and CEO of Health Agents of America, a trade group.

    And they’re available in only 36 states, according to KFF, a health information nonprofit that includes KFF Health News. Some states, such as California, prohibit them. Others set tight restrictions.

    2. Beware of Coverage That’s Not Comprehensive

    There are other types of health coverage offered by sales brokers or other organizations.

    One kind, called an indemnity plan, is meant to supplement a traditional health insurance plan by paying toward deductibles or copayments.

    Those plans do not have to follow ACA coverage rules, either. Generally, they pay a fixed dollar amount — say a few hundred dollars a day — toward a hospital stay or a smaller amount for a doctor’s office visit. Typically those payments fall short of the full costs and the policyholder pays the rest. They generally also require consumers to fill out medical forms stating any preexisting conditions.

    Another type, a faith-based sharing plan, pools money from members to cover their medical bills. The plans are not required to keep any specific amount of financial reserves and members are not guaranteed that the plans will pay their health expenses, according to the Commonwealth Fund, a foundation that supports health care research and improvements to the health system.

    Sharing plans expanded beyond faith communities after the ACA was adopted. Like short-term plans, they cost less than ACA plans but also don’t have to follow ACA rules.

    They are not considered insurance, and some have been accused of fraud by state regulators.

    “Yes, it is cheaper, and yes, it does work for some people,” Nolan said. “But you need to understand what that plan does. It would be my last resort.”

    3. Consider a ‘Bronze’ or ‘Catastrophic’ Plan, But Be Aware of Deductibles

    For those wanting to stay with ACA plans, the lowest premiums are generally in the categories labeled “catastrophic” or “bronze.”

    Jessica Altman, executive director of California’s ACA exchange, said her state has noticed an uptick in enrollments in bronze-level plans. They have lower premiums but high annual deductibles — the amount a customer must spend before most coverage kicks in. Deductibles for bronze plans average nearly $7,500 nationally, according to KFF.

    Another option, new for 2026, is expanded eligibility for catastrophic plans, which used to be limited to people younger than age 30. As the name suggests, they’re intended for people who want health insurance just in case they suffer a catastrophic health condition, such as cancer or injuries from a car accident, and the plans can have deductibles as high as the ACA’s annual limit on out-of-pocket spending — $10,600 for an individual or $21,200 for a family.

    But now people losing subsidies because of the expiration of the enhanced tax credits can also qualify for the plans. However, they may not be available in every region.

    Lauren Jenkins, a broker in Oklahoma, said some of her clients earning less than $25,000 this year had qualified for very low-cost or free plans with the enhanced subsidies. Next year, though, their costs may rise to $100 or more per month for a “silver”-level plan, a step up from bronze.

    So she is showing them bronze plans to bring down the monthly cost. “But they might have a $6,000, $7,000, or $10,000 deductible they now have to pay,” Jenkins said. “For people only making $25,000 a year, that would be detrimental.”

    Both bronze and catastrophic plans are eligible to be linked with health savings accounts, which can be used to save money tax-free for medical expenses. They are more popular with higher-income households.

    4. Another Plan May Have Lower Premiums

    It can pay to shop around. Some people may be able to find a lower premium by shifting to a different plan, even one offered by the same insurer. There are also different levels of coverage, from bronze to “platinum,” where premiums also vary. Brooker said that in some locations “gold”-level plans are less expensive than silver, even though that seems counterintuitive.

    Also, some people who run their own businesses but have only one employee might qualify for a group plan rather than an individual policy. Sometimes those can be less expensive.

    Not every state allows this, Nolan said. But, for example, Nolan said, she has a client whose only employee is his wife, so she’s going to see whether they can get a group plan at lower rates.

    “That might work out for them,” she said.

    ACA rates for small group plans (fewer than 50 employees) vary regionally and are not always less expensive than individual coverage, Brooker said.

    “It’s pretty all over the board as to where the rates are better,” he said.

    5. Other Rules of the Road

    Insurance experts encourage people not to wait until the last minute to at least take preliminary steps. Shoppers can go onto the official federal or state marketplace website and fill out or update an application with required income and other information necessary to determine what the 2026 plan year holds for them.

    For instance, even without congressional intervention, subsidies will not go away entirely. They will be smaller, though, and there is an upper income limit — a cutoff for households earning more than four times the poverty level, which comes to $62,600 for an individual and $84,600 for a couple for 2026.

    When shopping, consumers should make sure they land on an official ACA website, because there are look-alikes that may not offer ACA-compliant plans. Healthcare.gov is the official federal site. From there, people can find websites serving the 20 states, along with the District of Columbia, that run their own ACA exchanges.

    The government sites can also direct consumers to licensed brokers and other counselors who can help with an application.

    And a reminder: Consumers also need to pay their first month’s premium for coverage to take effect.

    KFF Health News is a national newsroom that produces in-depth journalism about health issues and is one of the core operating programs at KFF—an independent source of health policy research, polling, and journalism. Learn more about KFF.

  • Legal battle looming over RV disposal
    An empty street lined with recreational vehicles parked on the curb. One tiny sedan is sandwiched between two of the larger RVs.
    Recreational vehicles line the streets in South Los Angeles.

    Topline:

    A coalition that advocates for renters and unhoused residents is demanding that the city of Los Angeles halt its planned rollout of a new state law that gives local officials authority to dismantle more recreational vehicles that the city deems a problem.

    The state bill: Assembly Bill 630 gave L.A. County authority to dispose of abandoned or inoperable RVs that have an estimated value of $4,000 or less, an increase over the previous $500 threshold. Supporters of the new law argue that abandoned RVs often pose public safety, health and environmental hazards. It goes into effect in the new year.

    The problem: Attorneys representing the American Civil Liberties Union of Southern California, the Legal Aid Foundation of Los Angeles and the Western Center on Law and Poverty argue that the new law only authorizes the county to launch the program, not the city of Los Angeles.

    “The City's planned implementation of AB 630 is illegal,” attorneys wrote in a demand letter sent to L.A. City Attorney Hydee Feldstein Soto last week.

    Next steps: The lawyers who sent the letter represent the CD11 Coalition for Human Rights. The letter gives L.A. city officials a deadline on Dec. 29 at 5 p.m. to confirm in writing that the city will not implement the new law, or at least that it will wait until the issue can be resolved in court. No lawsuit has been filed yet.

    LAist has reached out to the L.A. city attorney, Mayor Karen Bass and others for comment. None have responded so far.

    A coalition that advocates for renters and unhoused residents is demanding the city of Los Angeles halt its planned rollout of a new state law that gives local officials authority to dismantle more recreational vehicles the city deems a problem.

    Assembly Bill 630 gave L.A. County authority to dispose of abandoned or inoperable RVs that have an estimated value of $4,000 or less, an increase over the previous $500 threshold.

    Supporters of the new law argue that abandoned RVs often pose public safety, health and environmental hazards.

    The law goes into effect in the new year. It was signed by Gov. Gavin Newsom in October. That same month, L.A. City Councilmembers approved a motion instructing various city departments to “immediately implement” the new RV enforcement program.

    The problem, according to attorneys representing the American Civil Liberties Union of Southern California, the Legal Aid Foundation of Los Angeles and the Western Center on Law and Poverty, is that the new law only authorizes L.A. County to launch the program, not the city of Los Angeles.

    “The City's planned implementation of AB 630 is illegal,” attorneys wrote in a demand letter sent to L.A. City Attorney Hydee Feldstein Soto last week.

    The lawyers who sent the letter represent the CD11 Coalition for Human Rights, an organization that includes individuals living in RVs in Los Angeles and advocates for renters and unhoused residents in the city’s Westside.

    The letter gives L.A. city officials a deadline on Dec. 29 at 5 p.m. to confirm in writing that the city will not implement the new law, or at least that it will wait until the issue can be resolved in court.

    No lawsuit has been filed yet.

    L.A. City Attorney Hydee Feldstein-Soto did not immediately respond to LAist’s requests for comment on the demand letter.

    Mayor Karen Bass proposed AB 630 in partnership with Assemblymember Mark González, who sponsored the California assembly bill.

    Representatives from Bass' office told LAist Friday that the mayor is working with the state to "secure the authority necessary for the City to fully implement this landmark legislation."

    They also said raising the threshold to $4,000 allows "local jurisdictions to dismantle more of these dangerous, inoperable RVs and get them off the street for good."

    City vs. county authority

    Councilmember Traci Park, who represents westside communities including Venice and Culver City, sponsored the City Council motion to “immediately implement” the new RV law.

    It instructed the city administrative officer to work with the city’s Department of Transportation, city attorney and Police Department to start enforcing AB 630 on L.A.'s streets.

    Park told LAist that the city needs to be able remove unsafe vehicles from public roads.

    “These vehicles create unacceptable health, environmental, and safety risks, putting entire neighborhoods, critical infrastructure, and sensitive environmental areas at risk,” Park said in a statement. “Residents want solutions, not ideological wars, delay tactics, and frivolous lawsuits.”

    The City Council approved an amended motion this month, instructing city staff to move forward with implementing the new law as they prepared informational reports for various City Council committees.

    The attorneys challenging L.A.’s actions say the City Council moved too quickly, without realizing the legal limitations of the new statute.

    “The City Council passed this motion without really fully understanding the consequences of it or even what it said it all,” said Shayla Myers, an attorney with Legal Aid Foundation of Los Angeles told LAist.

    “As a result of that, it’s a policy that could really harm Angelenos, but also could result in costly litigation,” she continued.

    The legal challenge centers on the language stating that the “Counties of Alameda and Los Angeles may implement a program” to dispose of recreational vehicles. The statute makes no mention of cities having this authority.

    Lawyers for the coalition warn that if the city proceeds with implementation, it would be acting beyond its legal authority under state law.

    Thousands of RV dwellers 

    There are nearly 6,500 people living in more than 4,000 RVs parked across the city of L.A., according to last year’s homeless count estimates.

    L.A’s city administrative officer is involved in coordinating and managing the removal of RVs from city streets, along with LAPD and the city’s Transportation Department.

    It oversaw more than 370 RV clearing operations between May 2022 and June 2024, according to a CAO report. As part of those operations, the city issued more than 1,000 citations, towed more than 600 vehicles and moved nearly 200 people into housing, the report said.

    City Administrative Officer Matt Szabo did not respond to LAist’s request for comment on AB 630.

    Three L.A. City Council members voted against the city’s AB 630 implementation plan: Hugo Soto-Martinez, Isabel Jurado and Eunises Hernandez.

    Hernandez’ communications director Naomi Villagomez Roochnik told LAist the councilmember remains opposed to the city-led effort.

    “Moving forward without clear legal authority exposes the City to unnecessary litigation and cost during an already severe budget crisis,” she said. “It is imperative we get that clear legal analysis before the city moves forward in any way.”

    The state law goes into effect Jan. 1.

  • Some of Trump's order will take time to implement

    Topline:

    President Donald Trump's long-anticipated executive order to loosen U.S. restrictions on marijuana promises to bring immediate relief for cannabis businesses — but only in some respects. And although rescheduling it as a lower-risk drug is touted as opening a new era for cannabis research, experts say it's not as simple as flipping a light switch.

    The context: Many details will shape how the administration enacts Trump's order, affecting the timeline and scope for easing marijuana restrictions. But when it does happen, rescheduling won't automatically revoke federal laws targeting marijuana, and interstate marijuana commerce would remain illegal. It's not yet known how other policies might change.

    Read on... for a rundown of other key questions raised by the rescheduling order.

    President Donald Trump's long-anticipated executive order to loosen U.S. restrictions on marijuana promises to bring immediate relief for cannabis businesses — but only in some respects. And although rescheduling it as a lower-risk drug is touted as opening a new era for cannabis research, experts say it's not as simple as flipping a light switch.

    "It's hard to see the big headlines of, 'Marijuana rescheduled to [Schedule] III; marijuana research will open,'" says Gillian Schauer, executive director of the nonpartisan Cannabis Regulators Association, which includes agencies from 46 states. "You know, those things are not true as of now."

    That's because on its own, Trump's Dec. 18 order isn't enough to rewrite federal drug policy that has stood for more than 50 years.

    "The Controlled Substances Act [of 1970] does not grant any president the authority to unilaterally reschedule a drug," Schauer says. Such changes are historically made through either a rulemaking process, or an act of Congress.

    Many details will shape how the administration enacts Trump's order, affecting the timeline and scope for easing marijuana restrictions. But when it does happen, rescheduling won't automatically revoke federal laws targeting marijuana, and interstate marijuana commerce would remain illegal, Schauer says.

    It's not yet known how other policies might change.

    "We don't know what will happen to federal drug testing requirements," Schauer says, until agencies issue guidance.

    Here's a rundown of other key questions raised by the rescheduling order:

    The time frame depends on which path the DOJ takes

    Trump's order directs Attorney General Pam Bondi to "take all necessary steps to complete the rulemaking process related to rescheduling marijuana to Schedule III" of the Controlled Substances Act "in the most expeditious manner in accordance with Federal law … "

    The directive evokes the process that started under former President Joe Biden. Under his administration, both the Department of Health and Human Services and the Justice Department advanced a proposal to reclassify pot from Schedule I, meaning it has no medical use and a high potential for abuse, to the lower-risk Schedule III, which includes ketamine, Tylenol with codeine, and anabolic steroids.

    The Trump administration could resume the process that was already underway under Biden. But the new executive order's mention of the Controlled Substances Act's Section 811 hints at a potential shortcut.

    "That allows the attorney general to move a drug to whatever schedule they deem is best, without going through the usual steps that are needed to reschedule a drug," Schauer says.

    The streamlined process was meant to ensure the U.S. can do things such as complying with international drug treaty obligations. But a historic precedent also links it to cannabis: In 2018, it was used to schedule the CBD epilepsy drug Epidiolex, months after it became the first U.S.-authorized purified medicine derived from marijuana. The drug was placed in Schedule V, the least restrictive schedule.

    An older white man in a suit holds up a signed document as a crowd around him claps.
    President Donald Trump displays an executive order reclassifying marijuana as a less dangerous drug in the Oval Office on Dec. 18.
    (
    Evan Vucci
    /
    AP
    )

    Will the DOJ call for public comment?

    The Trump administration's approach to administrative hearings and public comment periods would also help determine the pace of rescheduling.

    "I would anticipate, if they use that [expedited] option, that we would not see a comment period," shortening the process, Schauer explains.

    But rescheduling could take longer if the Justice Department follows the traditional, and lengthy, notice-and-comment process.

    Again, Bondi has options that could speed things up. She could choose to issue a final rule after a public comment period, for instance, or do so without a comment period.

    "Some of the calculation for that may be on the legal end," Schauer says. Noting that some anti-marijuana groups are vowing to file legal challenges to block rescheduling, she adds that the DOJ will likely have to balance Trump's call for expedience with the need to defend its actions in court.

    If the rule is published for comment, interest would likely be intense: In 2024, the DEA's earlier proposed rescheduling rule for marijuana attracted more than 43,000 comments.

    Cannabis firms would get tax relief, but credit cards remain forbidden

    Sam Brill, CEO of Ascend Wellness Holdings, a multistate dispensary company, says rescheduling could bring a cascade of positive changes to his industry. But one benefit could come immediately, he says.

    "The biggest thing that happens overnight is the 280E, the restrictive punitive tax code that is set on us," would no longer apply to marijuana businesses, he says.

    Like other businesses, Brill's company is obligated to pay taxes on income. But because their core product is a Schedule I drug, the IRS says that under Internal Revenue Code Section 280E, they're blocked from claiming common tax deductions, exposing them to a higher effective tax rate.

    Section 280E "does not allow us to basically deduct normal expenses that everyone else can deduct," Brill says. "I can't deduct the rent for my stores, the cost of my employees in those stores, my interest expense."

    Brill says that some cannabis companies, including his, say 280E should not apply to them — but the IRS disagrees. As a result, Brill says, his company sets aside a large reserve fund in case the IRS comes after them.

    "For 2024 alone, the value of this reserve" was about $38 million, Brill says, "which includes interest and penalties."

    Brill hopes marijuana's changing status might also eventually lead to other restrictions falling, especially the inability of cannabis operations to accept credit cards. Most financial institutions refuse to provide basic banking services to state-authorized marijuana businesses, due to potential liability.

    "The lack of the use of a credit card is really one of the biggest challenges for customers," he says. Citing the importance of payday, Brill says: "For us, Friday by far is the biggest day every single week because this is a cash business."

    Medical research 

    Scientists welcomed news in 2023 that the Biden administration was moving toward reclassifying marijuana, and Trump says his move will boost medical research. But both then and now, there are caveats.

    One benefit of the new rules is that they wouldn't require marijuana researchers to go through the onerous process of obtaining a Schedule I license, and they would also ease rigorous laboratory regulations.

    "You have very stringent requirements, for example, for storage and security and reporting all of these things," neuroscientist Staci Gruber, of McLean Hospital in Massachusetts and Harvard Medical School, told NPR last year.

    But another obstacle promises to be more stubborn: finding marijuana to study. The U.S. requires researchers to obtain marijuana from a handful of sources, which is itself an improvement over decades in which they were compelled to use one facility based at the University of Mississippi.

    And, as Schauer notes, federal rules about sourcing marijuana have been decided separately from the controlled substances schedule.

    "This does a little to make research easier," Schauer says of the current rescheduling effort. "But there's a lot that will still be challenging in researching cannabis unless we see a lot of agency policies change and adjust."
    Copyright 2025 NPR