Sponsored message
Logged in as
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

The Brief

The most important stories for you to know today
  • Tustin town hall calls out California Republicans
    A woman holds a microphone in her had while speaking at a podium. She is wearing a green shirt and her left arm is outstretched as she points towards something in front of her.
    Medi-Cal, California’s Medicaid program, pays for the in-home care that Cynthia Williams provides for her sister and daughter. Williams spoke at a town hall Feb. 20.

    Topline:

    A standing-room crowd of over 200 people at a recent town hall in Tustin voiced opposition to the House approved Republican budget plan that could shrink Medicaid spending by $880 billion over 10 years.

    What cuts could mean for California: A spending cut of that magnitude would have a huge impact in California, with nearly 15 million people — more than a third of the population — on Medi-Cal (which is California's name for its Medicaid program). More than half California's children are covered by Medi-Cal. And over 60% of Medi-Cal’s $161 billion budget comes from Washington.

    The arguments: Critics of the House budget plan, which would extend the tax cuts enacted in President Donald Trump's first term, say it helps the rich at the expense of society’s most vulnerable — an argument that was vigorously repeated at the Tustin town hall. But supporters of the plan say that extending the tax cuts, key provisions of which are set to expire at the end of this year, would avoid a large tax hike for average Americans and benefit low-income families the most.

    Read on ... for responses from Southern California Republican House members, who did not attend the town hall.

    Cynthia Williams is furious with U.S. House Republicans willing to slash Medicaid, the government-run insurance program for people with low incomes or disabilities.

    The 61-year-old Anaheim resident cares for her adult daughter, who is blind, and for her sister, a military veteran with severe post-traumatic stress disorder and other mental health conditions. Medi-Cal, the state’s version of Medicaid, pays Williams to care for them, and she relies on that income, just as her sister and daughter depend on her.

    “Let’s be real. We shouldn’t have to be here tonight,” Williams told a raucous standing-room crowd of over 200 people at a recent town hall. “We should be home, spending time with our loved ones and our families, but we’re here. And we’re here to fight, because when politicians try to take away our healthcare, we don’t have the option to sit back and let it happen.”

    The House last month approved a Republican budget plan that could shrink Medicaid spending by $880 billion over 10 years, only partially paying for an extension of expiring tax cuts from President Donald Trump’s first term, plus some new ones he has promised, totaling as much as $4.5 trillion.

    A spending cut of that magnitude would have a huge impact in California, with nearly 15 million people — more than a third of the population — on Medi-Cal. Over 60% of Medi-Cal’s $161 billion budget comes from Washington.

    A group of people sitting in chairs appaluding.
    Attendees applaud speakers during a Tustin town hall last month organized to protest potential cuts to Medicaid.
    (
    Jenna Schoenefeld
    /
    KFF Health News
    )

    Williams was among about a dozen providers, patient advocates, disabled people and family members who stood up one after the other to tell their stories. Rep. Young Kim, a Republican whose district includes this relatively affluent Orange County city, declined an invitation for her or a staff member to attend. But her constituents delivered their message loud and clear to her and the other Republicans in Congress: Hands off Medicaid.

    Josephine Rios, a certified nursing assistant at a Kaiser Permanente surgical center in Irvine, said her 7-year-old grandson, Elijah, has received indispensable treatments through Medi-Cal, including a $5,000-a-month medication that controls his seizures, which can be life-threatening. Elijah, who has cerebral palsy, is among the more than 50% of California children covered by Medi-Cal.

    “To cut Medicaid, Medi-Cal, that’s like saying he can’t live. He can’t thrive. He’s going to lie in bed and do nothing,” Rios said. “Who are they to judge who lives and who doesn’t?”

    A woman standing at a podium wearing a dark shirt and a beaded bracelet, holding her left arm to the side as she speaks into a microphone.
    Josephine Rios, speaking at the Feb. 20 town hall in Tustin, worries about her grandson who has cerebral palsy and relies on Medi-Cal.
    (
    Jenna Schoenefeld
    /
    KFF Health News
    )

    Two-thirds of Californians across party lines oppose cuts to Medi-Cal, according to a new survey by the California Health Care Foundation and NORC at the University of Chicago.

    The town hall here was one of three organized by Fight for Our Health, a coalition of health advocacy groups and unions, to target Republican House members whose California districts are considered politically competitive. The other two were in Bakersfield, part of which is represented by Rep. David Valadao, and Corona, home to Rep. Ken Calvert. Multiple other town halls and protests have sprung up across the country in recent weeks.

    The coalition has reprised a campaign — part of a broader national movement — that fought against the GOP’s unsuccessful 2017 effort to repeal the Affordable Care Act.

    The Republicans’ loss of House control in the 2018 midterm elections has been widely attributed to their stance on healthcare. Valadao was among the GOP members who lost their seats in 2018, though he took his back two years later.

    Still, he voted for the House budget proposal last week, despite the fact that about two-thirds of the population in his district is on Medi-Cal — the highest in the state — and even though he is one of eight GOP House members who sent a letter to House Speaker Mike Johnson warning about the “serious consequences” of deep cuts to Medicaid. Valadao’s office did not respond to requests for comment.

    Calvert, who’s been in the House for 32 years and eked out reelection last November, also voted for the budget, as did Kim. All nine GOP members of California’s congressional delegation supported it, as did all House Republicans except one.

    A person stands outside a glass building holding a sign that reads "Medicaid saves, Trump kills"
    A woman protests Medicaid cuts outside the Tustin town hall.
    (
    Jenna Schoenefeld
    /
    KFF Health News
    )

    Critics of the budget plan say it helps the rich at the expense of society’s most vulnerable — an argument that was vigorously repeated at the Tustin town hall. But supporters of the plan say that extending the tax cuts, key provisions of which are set to expire at the end of this year, would avoid a large tax hike for average Americans and benefit low-income families the most.

    “American families are facing a massive tax increase unless Congress acts by the end of the year,” Calvert said in a statement to KFF Health News before the vote. He vowed the GOP would not touch Social Security or Medicare. He did not offer similar assurances on Medicaid, but said, “We are not interested in cutting the social and healthcare safety net for children, disabled and low-income Americans. We are focused on eliminating waste, fraud and abuse.”

    The House budget proposal does not specify spending cut details, though it instructs the Energy and Commerce Committee, which oversees Medicaid and Medicare spending, to cut $880 billion — a large chunk of the up to $2 trillion in total cuts. The GOP’s razor-thin majority means Johnson will have a narrow path to get a more detailed budget passed. Republican support, whether from fiscal hawks who want deeper spending cuts or House members worried about slashing Medicaid, could ebb and flow as the details are hashed out.

    Moreover, the House must reach a compromise with the Senate, which has passed a much narrower budget resolution that leaves the big tax cuts out for now.

    Like Kim, Valadao and Calvert declined invitations to attend or send staffers to the town hall meetings in their regions. At the Tustin meeting, multiple speakers chided Kim for her absence. At one point, the large screen behind the podium flashed a picture of an empty chair with the words, in large block letters, “Congresswoman Kim, we saved you a seat.”

    Kim spokesperson Callie Strock said in an email that Kim and her local staff had preexisting commitments that night. She added that Kim is “committed to protecting and strengthening our healthcare system.”

    But those in attendance were clearly worried.

    “It’s a moral obligation for all of us to look at the most disadvantaged people in our country and take good care of them,” said Beth Martinko, whose 33-year-old son, Josh, has autism and relies on Medi-Cal for his care. “This has no place in politics.”

    KFF Health News is a national newsroom that produces in-depth journalism about health issues and is one of the core operating programs at KFF—an independent source of health policy research, polling, and journalism. Learn more about KFF.

  • Bass and Raman lay out environmental platforms
    Two women in suit jackets hold mics and gesture as the address an audience.
    L.A. Mayor Karen Bass and Councilmember Nithya Raman separately explain their environmental positions at a mayoral forum held Thursday at L.A. Trade Tech in downtown Los Angeles.

    Topline:

    The two candidates for L.A. mayor defended their environmental records and painted two different pictures of the city on Thursday during a forum on climate and environment issues.

    The details: Incumbent Mayor Karen Bass and City Councilmember Nithya Raman each answered questions separately about how they would approach many environmental challenges facing the city, including emergency preparedness, water resiliency and transportation policy.

    The takeaways: Bass said L.A. has made solid progress on transitioning to clean energy and other environmental challenges, while Raman argued the city has fallen behind. Bass defended her role in the city’s response to the Palisades and Boyle Heights warehouse fires, while Raman criticized it for lacking effective guidance and communication for victims.

    Read on…for more takeaways from the forum.

    With a little more than two months to go until the general election, the two mayoral candidates running to lead the city of Los Angeles fielded questions about the environment at a Thursday night forum hosted by LAist.

    Incumbent Karen Bass and her challenger, L.A. City Councilmember Nithya Raman, each answered questions separately about how they would approach many environmental challenges facing the city, including emergency preparedness, water resiliency and transportation policy.

    These and other environmental and climate issues are top of mind for many Angelenos during a summer marked by extreme heat, humidity and the Lineage warehouse fire in Boyle Heights that affected surrounding neighborhoods for months. Communities are also still rebuilding from last year’s destructive Eaton and Palisades fires.

    The forum, held at Los Angeles Trade Technical-College, was organized by the L.A. League of Conservation Voters, SCOPE-LA, Sierra Club, Clean and Healthy California, Neighborhood Council Sustainability Alliance and Communities for a Better Environment, and was moderated by LAist climate and environment Reporter Erin Stone.

    Here are three takeaways from the event:

    Differing visions of LA

    Bass, who was elected mayor in 2022, painted a picture of an L.A. that’s made significant progress on environmental issues during that time, while Raman said the city has stalled under Bass’ leadership.

    Bass referenced her work transitioning the city off of coal-generated energy and expanding the city’s electric bus fleets and clean-energy jobs. She said she wants to build on that momentum, particularly with a focus on helping communities impacted by environmental and industrial pollution.

    She pointed to many communities of color that bear the brunt of industrial pollution, including in South L.A. neighborhoods dotted with oil wells and residents who live in close proximity to the Lineage warehouse in Boyle Heights.

    “Where we need to go now in the future is focusing on environmental justice, focusing on the communities that are disproportionately impacted by greenhouse gases and by the environment,” she said.

    Raman also talked about a need to focus on environmental justice, but she said environmental programs are underfunded and understaffed, and that she would invest more in them if she becomes mayor.

    She said Bass’ administration has not prioritized environmental climate issues enough, and that there should be a more aggressive policy around them.

    “Too much of that work remains unfinished,” she said. “Our transition to clean energy has slowed. Efforts to build a resilient water supply, close neighborhood drilling sites, make our streets safer, all of these have slowed over the last four years.”

    Raman specifically called out Bass for her proposal to cut funding for the Climate Emergency Mobilization Office as the city faced a billion-dollar budget shortfall last year.

    Bass defended the proposal, arguing the program had not developed a climate action plan as directed and needed to be revamped.

    The office has shrunk under Bass’ leadership, and she removed the city’s chief heat officer and quietly appointed a new one earlier this year.

    Emergency response failures

    Both Bass and Raman said L.A. has room for improvement when it comes to preparing for fires, earthquakes and other disasters.

    Raman criticized the city’s response to last year’s Palisades Fire, saying there was no clear leadership to guide the community through the recovery effort. She pointed to Bass' appointment of Steve Soboroff to head the recovery. He left the post after his three-month term and was not replaced.

     ”What we saw in the Palisades, I think, was an example of what shouldn't happen,” Raman said. “ A lot of residents in the Palisades have been feeling like they don't know who to reach out to, who is the person that they need to connect with in order to make sure that recovery really happens.”

    But she defended her administration’s response, and said confusion over city and state land made it more difficult.

     ”Part of the brush was the city, part of the brush was the state. There was a reluctance to go into state territory because our folks were told they couldn't do that,” Bass said. “As far as I'm concerned, that's not gonna happen again.”

    Bass said the biggest impediments to the recovery process — and to people moving back into their homes — are insurance companies and banks. She called for legislative reforms to the insurance process.

    Raman also criticized the response to the Lineage warehouse fire in Boyle Heights this summer, calling out Bass directly for sharing misleading information about air quality.

    Bass said she relied on inaccurate information from public health and air quality management officials.

    Both candidates said there’s a need for stronger enforcement and higher fines that could be levied against corporations like Lineage, the warehouse owner, and better planning for emergencies around industrial buildings.

    Shared goals

    Although the candidates leaned into their differences, the reality is that they align on many climate and environmental policies.

    Unhoused Angelenos are especially at risk from extreme heat, and Bass said the city needs to provide more places for them to cool off.

    “My plan, priority one, is to get people off the streets,” Bass said, adding that during heat emergencies that needs to include providing emergency shelters and other ways to cool off.

    Raman talked about similar solutions.

    “ Responding to people who are experiencing homelessness to ensure that they're actually able to get indoors and off the streets, so that they're not dying from exposure to heat, because that is a very, very high risk that people who are experiencing homelessness face,” she said.

    They had other shared goals.

    Both said incentives and rebates that keep down the cost of utility bills need to be more accessible, especially in low-income communities.

    Both called for more severe penalties for owners of industrial sites like the Boyle Heights warehouse.

    And they both said they want to grow the city’s electric vehicle fleet, and decrease car use by building more public transit ridership and expanding biking infrastructure.

  • Sponsored message
  • Harmful algal bloom confirmed in Riverside County
    A boat on a lake with green algae.
    A boat motors through green water during a harmful algal bloom in at Lake Elsinore, in 2022. Now another Riverside County lake, Lake Hemet, is reporting issues.

    Topline:

    Visitors and residents are being warned to avoid swimming in another Lake Hemet heading into the long Labor Day weekend.

    The details: State water officials confirmed a harmful algal bloom there is showing up as green, cloudy discolored water, scum and algae.

    What's next: You can check California’s map to see if any harmful algal blooms have been reported in the area.

    Topline:

    Visitors and residents are being warned to avoid swimming in another Southern California lake heading into the long Labor Day weekend.

    The details: State water officials confirmed a harmful algal bloom in Lake Hemet that’s showing up as green, cloudy discolored water, scum and algae.

    Why it matters: The bloom can produce toxins that could cause you and your furry friends to get sick. People and pets are being urged to stay out of the water and away from any scum or algae along the shore. Dogs and children are especially vulnerable because they’re more likely to swallow water while playing and swimming, according to the State Water Resources Control Board. You can learn more about healthy water habits here.

    Why now: The warning for the Riverside County lake comes about a week after a similar alert was issued for Big Bear Lake. Lake Hemet is under an advisory until further notice, state officials said.

    The backstory: Harmful algal blooms are most common in California between the warmer months of late May through October, although they can pop up year round, according to the board.

    What's next: You can check California’s map to see if any harmful algal blooms have been reported in the area.

    Go deeper: What's the green sheen on Big Bear Lake? What you need to know about harmful algal blooms

  • High quality affordable sushi and sake
    A man holds up a tuna head, as he goes through the process of cutting the fish, with an audience in attendance.
    Photo from Yama Sushi Marketplace's Koreatown grand opening

    Top line:

    Started by a local fish broker, Yama Sushi Marketplace has become a one-stop shop for Japanese culture. Current owner Scott Kohno talks about how they've grown the operation from San Gabriel to additional locations in Koreatown and West L.A.

    Expanding to craft sake: Co-owner Wendy Kohno, who is a professional sake sommelier, has helped add a selection of over 200 sake options.

    Upcoming event: Yama Sushi Marketplace is co-hosting American Craft Sake Fest, happening in West L.A., on Saturday, Sept.10.

    Read more... to learn how the business keeps the food quality high while keeping prices lower than you might think.

    Yama Sushi Marketplace is a local chain that helps set the standard for quality sushi and Japanese cuisine in Los Angeles — all while trying to keep prices more affordable than you might expect.

    About the owners

    Kenzo Yamada opened the business in 1984 after working as a local fish broker. He eventually sold the business in 2021 to Scott Kohno and his family. Kohno sat down with Austin Cross, who hosts AirTalk every Friday, to explain how they've continued to deliver quality sushi and expand the business.

    Making Japanese culture accessible and affordable

    A man holds up a tuna head, as he goes through the process of cutting the fish, with an audience in attendance.
    Yama Sushi Marketplace's Koreatown grand opening.
    (
    Courtesy Alysia Rodriguez
    )

    Yama Sushi Marketplace looks to provide the best of both worlds — high-quality sushi lower costs — in serving customers.

    How do they do it? They've benefited from Yamada's connections, sourcing quality fish through trusted suppliers like Bluefiná. It also helps that it's not a restaurant, minimizing the overhead costs that come with staffing.

    Restaurant details

    • The Kohno family has expanded to West L.A. and Koreatown. A fourth location is set to open in Sherman Oaks, although its official opening date hasn’t been announced.
    • Co-owner Wendy Kohno has a background as a kikisake-shi — sake sommelier — and has helped build out the market’s selection of more than 200 sakes, most of which you can find at their San Gabriel and West L.A. locations.
    • They also have classes on sushi, sake and miso.

    What we tried

    • California Roll (their most popular menu item)
    • Bara Chirashi
    • Yama Deluxe Platter
    • Narumi Sake (Yama's own craft sake)

    Yama Sushi Marketplace is co-hosting American Craft Sake Fest on Saturday, Sept. 10. Click here for more details.

    How to visit

    • Address:
      • San Gabriel location — 911 W Las Tunas Dr., San Gabriel, CA 91776
      • West LA location — 11709 National Blvd, Los Angeles, CA 90064
      • Koreatown location — 3178 W. Olympic Blvd, Los Angeles, CA 90006
    • Hours: All three businesses are open every day from 11 a.m. to 8 p.m.
    • Cost: A six-piece California roll costs $7.39; sushi platters range from $49 to $114.95.

    What should we try next?

    Have a question or comment about a segment? Want to pitch us a story?

    Fill out the form below, and please include an email address so we're able to follow up if necessary! We're not able to respond to every inquiry, but all submissions are read and reviewed by our production team.

  • Last minute fix gives hundreds a path forward
    A man with light skin tone and a beard, wearing a charcoal flat hat cap, flannel shirt, speaks while sitting at a table. There are people next to him and in the foreground also sitting out of focus.
    Paul Duncan, Long Beach's homeless services bureau manager, speaking at the city's Homeless Services Advisory Committee on Wednesday, April 1.

    Topline:

    After months of fear about dwindling federal funding for a pandemic-era housing assistance program, Long Beach housing officials say they have secured enough money to keep nearly 500 households from potentially falling back into homelessness.

    Why now: The last-minute announcement saves the city from what would have been the worst-case scenario: having to kick hundreds of formerly homeless people off of federal housing assistance. The situation illustrates just how dependent Long Beach’s homelessness and health services are on state and federal funding, which has stagnated or been cut in recent years.

    Why it matters: Long Beach officials thought they would run out of money to pay rental subsidies for the 480 households currently on Emergency Housing Vouchers as early as this month, but they now say they have the time — and money — to transition all of those households to other rental assistance programs by November.

    Read on... for more on the vouchers.

    This story first appeared on Long Beach Post.

    After months of fear about dwindling federal funding for a pandemic-era housing assistance program, Long Beach housing officials say they have secured enough money to keep nearly 500 households from potentially falling back into homelessness.

    The last-minute announcement saves the city from what would have been the worst-case scenario: having to kick hundreds of formerly homeless people off of federal housing assistance. The situation illustrates just how dependent Long Beach’s homelessness and health services are on state and federal funding, which has stagnated or been cut in recent years.

    Long Beach officials thought they would run out of money to pay rental subsidies for the 480 households currently on Emergency Housing Vouchers as early as this month, but they now say they have the time — and money — to transition all of those households to other rental assistance programs by November.

    An estimated $480,000 increase in federal funding for Long Beach, cost-saving measures and help from a neighboring housing authority made that possible, according to a city memo.

    The Emergency Housing Voucher program was a one-of-a-kind opportunity for people defined as “chronically homeless” or at risk of losing their housing to have a slew of services paid for to get them housing. That included security deposits, moving costs and paying past utility debt.

    Long Beach quickly used all 582 vouchers allocated to it.

    The swift spending gave people like Clark Inglish, a new mother living on the Los Angeles River, a streamlined and effective way to get back on their feet, according to local health officials. The program “really changed my life,” said Inglish, who was able to start working as a counselor and put her son in preschool after getting a roof over her head.

    The vouchers were supposed to be good through 2030, but when rent rates increased more quickly than anticipated, the program ran out of money years ahead of schedule, and in April last year, the Department of Housing and Urban Development notified housing officials that Congress did not allocate new funding for it.

    Instead, a last-second increase in federal dollars to a different housing program will allow the Long Beach Housing Authority to transfer 400 households from EHVs to Housing Choice Vouchers – also known as Section 8.

    HUD will also give Long Beach’s housing authority an additional $1,000 for each EHV voucher that they convert to Section 8.

    The 80 remaining households on EHVs will receive assistance from the Housing Authority of the city of Los Angeles.

    Over the next few months, housing officials will assist each household with completing the paperwork necessary to make the transition.

    If you’re on an Emergency Housing Voucher and have a question, you can email the city at HA-EHV@longbeach.gov.