Sponsored message
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

The Brief

The most important stories for you to know today
  • Sharp rise without extension of federal subsidies
    A sign hangs in a window which reads "health insurance Covered California call (844) 367-6555."

    Topline:

    California this week plans to notify Affordable Care Act marketplace enrollees that their costs could rise sharply next year unless Congress extends subsidies to help people buy health insurance.

    Why now: Health care analysts say the nation’s uninsured population will rise significantly if federal lawmakers do not agree to renew covid-era tax credits, which Congress authorized in 2021 to supplement ACA subsidies. The additional credits have lowered premiums, helped millions of Americans afford the cost of ACA insurance, and lowered the nation’s uninsured rate.

    What's next: Open enrollment season for 2026 ACA health plans starts Nov. 1 in most states, including California, and enrollees still have no clue whether their premiums will rise exorbitantly next year. If the enhanced subsidies end, Covered California projects its enrollees receiving enhanced subsidies will see their premium costs rise an average of 97%. But the increases will not be borne equally. Depending on age, income, and location, some people will see smaller jumps while others could see their out-of-pocket costs triple, Altman says.

    California this week plans to notify Affordable Care Act marketplace enrollees that their costs could rise sharply next year unless Congress extends subsidies to help people buy health insurance.

    Health care analysts say the nation’s uninsured population will rise significantly if federal lawmakers do not agree to renew covid-era tax credits, which Congress authorized in 2021 to supplement ACA subsidies.

    They’re popular too. According to a KFF poll, more than three-quarters of adults, including 59% of Republicans, say they want Congress to extend the enhanced tax credits for people with low and moderate incomes. KFF is a health information nonprofit that includes KFF Health News, the publisher of California Healthline.

    The additional credits have lowered premiums, helped millions of Americans afford the cost of ACA insurance, and lowered the nation’s uninsured rate.

    Last week, President Donald Trump suggested a health care deal might be in the works. And Republican U.S. Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia, long aligned with the “Make America Great Again” movement, appeared to endorse an extension of the tax credits, saying in a social media post that she was “absolutely disgusted that health insurance premiums will DOUBLE if the tax credits expire this year.”

    However, Republican leaders want to reopen the government first, while Democrats want a deal in a bill that ends the shutdown.

    If the supplemental subsidies are not extended beyond this year, the amount subsidized consumers pay for their ACA health plans is expected to more than double on average. That would be a painful cost-of-living increase for most of the country’s more than 24 million marketplace enrollees, including almost 90% of the nearly 2 million people in Covered California, the largest state-run health insurance marketplace. Analysts say the loss of enhanced credits would lead millions to drop their coverage nationally, including hundreds of thousands in California.

    The federal government shutdown stems primarily from a disagreement between Democratic lawmakers, who want to extend the tax credits, and Republicans opposed to the cost and, in many cases, to the landmark health care law itself. One estimate puts the price tag at $350 billion over 10 years. The Democrats hope their stance can help them win back the House in next year’s midterm elections, as they did in 2018 following a failed GOP effort to repeal the ACA.

    Open enrollment season for 2026 ACA health plans starts Nov. 1 in most states, including California, and enrollees still have no clue whether their premiums will rise exorbitantly next year.

    “People need to be able to shop for health plans,” says Jessica Altman, executive director of Covered California. “We are at a pivotal moment.”

    In July, Covered California sent notices to enrollees breaking out the enhanced portion of their federal subsidy that is set to expire. The idea was to give them a warning of how much their costs might rise if they chose to keep the same health plan next year.

    In one case, a common scenario for middle-income enrollees, the entire subsidy of $200 a month would go away. Another enrollee stood to lose one-third of a total $600 per month in aid, according to sample notices provided by Covered California.

    The additional tax credits have provided financial assistance to many middle-income health plan shoppers who didn’t qualify for the original subsidies and increased the amount of aid for many others.

    Senate Majority Leader John Thune in late September left the door open to extending the otherwise-expiring tax credits but said “it would have to come with some reforms.”

    Those might include changes that would reduce the number of enrollees eligible for the extra financial aid, based on income, and reduce or eliminate zero-premium plans, which have become widely available with the advent of the additional tax credits.

    If the enhanced subsidies end, Covered California projects its enrollees receiving enhanced subsidies will see their premium costs rise an average of 97%. But the increases will not be borne equally. Depending on age, income, and location, some people will see smaller jumps while others could see their out-of-pocket costs triple, Altman says.

    Rural residents, especially in the northern and eastern counties, and along the Monterey Coast, will see disproportionately large cost increases, according to projections from Covered California. Enrollees with incomes over $62,600 will lose financial aid altogether, leaving some who are ages 55-64 with premium bills as high as 30% of their income.

    Without the enhanced subsidies, “we’re going to see more people experiencing medical debt, more people being either uninsured or underinsured,” says Cary Sanders, senior policy director at the nonprofit California Pan-Ethnic Health Network. “And that is the quickest way for families to lose their economic security.”

    Covered California estimates about 400,000 people would leave the exchange and likely go without insurance. And that, health care professionals and advocates warn, will only heap stress — in the form of more crowded emergency rooms and community clinics — on an already stressed health care system.

    But the proportional impact in California will be smaller than in some Republican-led states such as Florida, Texas, and Georgia. Since those states did not embrace the ACA’s Medicaid expansion, millions of residents thronged to Obamacare marketplace plans, particularly after the enhanced tax credits made coverage eminently more affordable.

    From 2020 to 2025, ACA marketplace enrollment grew nearly 2.5 times in Florida to 4.7 million — more than double California’s marketplace enrollment. In Texas, it more than tripled to just under 4 million. Georgia’s tripled, too, to 1.5 million.

    California has about $190 million for 2026 in state funds to help offset the loss of the enhanced premium subsidies. But that money is currently used to help offset enrollee deductibles, coinsurance payments, and other out-of-pocket expenses. And it’s a drop in the bucket compared with the $2.5 billion annually in financial aid Covered California enrollees currently receive from the expiring tax credits.

    “A lot of people are going to be shocked at what they’re facing,” says Rachel Linn Gish, a spokesperson for the nonprofit advocacy group Health Access California. “They’re going to have to make super hard choices of, ‘Do I cut back on my groceries, or my rent, or do I go uninsured?’”

    Very soon, Covered California and other ACA marketplaces will have to send out formal open enrollment letters, notifying enrollees precisely what to expect for 2026 coverage.

    Covered California typically sends those letters out Oct. 1 but has delayed them to around Oct. 15 in the hope that Washington will provide clarity. For now, Covered California has two versions of the letter on ice, one with tax credit extensions and one without.

    Altman says she is hoping for congressional action before sending the one with whopping premium increases. But she may have no choice.

    “That’s the default here, as in the thing that will happen if nothing changes,” Altman says. “It is also the worst-case scenario, unfortunately.”

    She fears that if Covered California informs enrollees that their rates will likely rise sharply, it will scare many away, even if Congress later agrees to extend the credits.

    KFF Health News is a national newsroom that produces in-depth journalism about health issues and is one of the core operating programs at KFF—an independent source of health policy research, polling, and journalism. Learn more about KFF.

  • Fighting food insecurity with free fresh produce
    A close up of an open cardboard box full of bright orange tangerines. A man with a medium skin tone is holding up one of the tangerines in his hand. He's wearing a bright orange appron that says Food Forward.
    Volunteer Josh Debuque holds up fresh tangerines that were donated by a local farmer.

    Topline:

    A North Hollywood nonprofit is helping feed Angelenos by making sure farmers market produce doesn’t go to waste.

    Who’s behind it? Food Forward has been a leader in the fight against food insecurity in Southern California for years. Their programs save excess food from multiple sources — everything from wholesale sellers to local farmers markets.

    Why it matters: Food insecurity affects 1 in 4 L.A. County households. By rescuing these fruits and vegetables, they’re helping it get into the hands of residents in need.

    How does it work? The programs are largely powered by volunteers. A group heads to one of the participating farmers markets with boxes that farmers then fill with what didn’t sell.

    Read on ... to see where some of the recovered food goes.

    Growing up, Eleu Navarro says he and his family dealt with food insecurity a lot. They came to the U.S. from Mexico in the early ‘70s.

    “As a child and my other siblings, it was our job to either recycle cans or dumpster dive,” he told LAist.

    Navarro says the experience made him realize that he wants to do his part to help others. Now, as the program director for Growing Hope Gardens, he’s helping fight food insecurity.

    Every week, he and hundreds of other organizations partner with the North Hollywood nonprofit Food Forward to pick up fresh produce that feeds the community.

    Gleaning at the markets

    A portrait of Eleu, who's a man with a medium skin tone and gray hair. He's smiling at the camera while loading a box of Food Forward produce into a truck.
    Eleu Navarro is a program director for Growing Hope Gardens, a nonprofit that maintains food gardens and teaches people how to grow food.
    (
    Cato Hernández
    /
    LAist
    )

    At the Santa Monica Farmers Market, Navarro picked up hundreds of pounds of free food. This kind of gathering is called gleaning, which is when excess food in public areas gets harvested.

    That produce helped Growing Hope Gardens, a nonprofit that runs food gardens in Los Angeles County, feed more than 50 families in Santa Monica and residents at a workshop in Boyle Heights.

    “ We make sure that whatever we glean from here doesn’t go to waste,” he said.

    This is Food Forward’s farmers market recovery program, one of multiple ways they rescue good produce and get it into the hands of needy residents. On this day, dozens of boxes were stuffed with romanesco broccoli, fennel, white cauliflower, rainbow chard, artichokes, kale and more.

    The nonprofit’s system is simple. Volunteers show up to markets in L.A. and Ventura counties with boxes and distribute them to farmers who’ve joined the program. Then, as the market nears closing time, they put in whatever produce they’d like that didn’t sell.

    Samatha Teslik, Food Forward’s community programs director, said the boxes get collected, weighed, sorted and picked up within the hour. Weighing is how they track how much gets donated, which ends up as a tax write-off for farmers later on.

     On a good day, the Santa Monica Farmers Market alone yields upward of 5,000 pounds. On a slow day, they still get at least 1,000 pounds of fresh produce.

    “ There is a little bit of physicalness to it for sure,” she said. “But we work really hard to provide a fun and engaging experience for our volunteers so that they leave feeling really good and want to come back.”

    Helping Angelenos

    Food insecurity affects about 1 in 4 L.A. County households, according to Food Base L.A. Largely low-income residents struggle with this, since it’s often tied to economic issues, but recently, more higher-income residents are also experiencing food insecurity.

    Most of Food Forward’s fruits and vegetables goes to L.A. County, according to founder Rick Nahmias. He said they make it clear that the goods need to get passed along to someone who’s self-identified as being food insecure. They don’t check tax returns or citizenship.

    “That produce can end up in soups at a soup kitchen,” he said. “It can end up in grocery bags being given out in MacArthur Park. They can go into boxes being given to veterans.”

    Residents can sign up to be part of the glean team at farmers markets or become a backyard harvester. These volunteers pick fruits from registered trees on private property, as well as public and commercial orchards. The minimum age for farmers market recovery is 12, while kids as young as 5 can join the backyard harvest program.

    “Whether food waste is a big issue for you, food insecurity or just wanting to do something good in this world where sometimes we’re not feeling super great,” Teslik said, “[it’s] an hour-and-a-half to two hours where you can really make a tremendous impact.”

  • Two new studies find an alarming connection
    A lone sunbather in Santa Monica, Calif., watches a large plume of smoke from a wildfire rise over the Pacific Palisades.
    A lone sunbather watches a large plume of smoke rise from the Pacific Palisades on Jan. 7, 2025

    Topline:

    Two new studies have identified an alarming connection between exposure to wildfire smoke during pregnancy and autism in young children.

    Why it matters: Autism spectrum disorder affects one in 31 8-year-olds in the United States. The extent to which the neurological condition, which researchers widely agree is largely determined by genetics, may also be influenced by environmental factors remains an active area of research.

    Why now: In recent years, researchers have also begun to suspect that conflagrations like the one that leveled swaths of Los Angeles County last year impact neurological health, but the effects of smoke on brain development are comparatively poorly understood.

    What the studies show: One found that those born to mothers exposed to 10 or more days of smoke in their third trimester had a 23% greater risk of being diagnosed with autism by age 5. The other study found that among women who experienced intense smoke episodes — particularly those in the top 10th percentile of exposure — the link between the condition and the smoke exposure was substantially stronger.

    What's next: The two studies do not indicate that wildfire smoke specifically causes autism. Credible experts who study the disorder, including the authors of these studies, agree that a diagnosis is very likely the result of several factors working in tandem and hope to see further study in the future.

    Read on ... for details of the studies.

    Two new studies have identified an alarming connection between exposure to wildfire smoke during pregnancy and autism in young children.

    The unprecedented findings suggest the neurological consequences of breathing smoke are more profound than previously thought.

    About this article

    This story was originally published by Grist. Grist, an LAist partner newsroom, is a nonprofit, independent media organization dedicated to telling stories of climate solutions and a just future. Learn more at Grist.org, and sign up for Grist's weekly newsletter here.

    The research builds on a robust body of evidence that shows wildfire smoke is supremely unhealthy — about 10 times worse than inhaling car exhaust and other pollution emitted by burning fossil fuels. The ultra-fine particles that trees and vegetation release during combustion penetrate deep into the lungs and bloodstream, exacerbating preexisting conditions like asthma and, recent studies suggest, damaging internal organs.

    In recent years, researchers have also begun to suspect that conflagrations — like the ones that leveled swaths of Los Angeles County last year — affect neurological health, but the effects of smoke on brain development are comparatively poorly understood. Two new studies shed light on the complicated web of genetic and environmental factors that contribute to autism spectrum disorder, building on previous research that found connections between the developmental disability and exposure to air pollution in genera

    The first study, published in the peer-reviewed journal Environmental Science and Technology, analyzed data on more than 200,000 children born in southern California between 2006 and 2014. It found that those born to mothers exposed to 10 or more days of smoke in their third trimester had a 23% greater risk of being diagnosed with autism by age 5. Pregnant women who endured between six and 10 days saw a 12% higher risk of such a diagnosis in their kids.

    Notably, the study found that average wildfire smoke concentration across the entire pregnancy or individual trimesters had no material effect on autism diagnoses. What did make a difference was the number of days a person in their third trimester inhaled the pollutant. Even one day of exposure had an effect.

    “The more you get exposed the worse it is,” said David Luglio, a postdoctoral fellow at Tulane University and the lead author of the study. “But we can’t necessarily answer why that is the case.”

    Luglio said he hopes future research will help untangle why prolonged inhalation made such a big difference. Future studies may also help refine these results by incorporating information on how much time the subjects spent outside during fires and whether they wore masks that help filter particulate matter.

    The second study, published in the peer-reviewed journal Environment International, examined a much bigger sample — some 8.5 million births in California between 2001 and 2019. It, too, found a link between wildfire smoke exposure and autism diagnoses, though its different methodology yielded more nuanced results. When researchers looked at average smoke exposure across all births, the association was relatively weak. But among women who experienced intense smoke episodes — particularly those in the top 10th percentile of exposure — the link was substantially stronger. And it was strongest in people who live in where population centers meet undeveloped land and are not exposed to very high levels of general air pollution normally.

    In women in the highest percentile of wildfire smoke exposure who otherwise lived in areas with relatively little background air pollution — such as car exhaust and urban smog — the odds of having a child diagnosed with autism were 50% higher than among those with lower wildfire smoke exposure. The researchers adjusted their analyses for non-wildfire related sources of air pollution.

    “It’s a really huge study,” Rebecca Schmidt, a professor of public health at UC Davis and the paper’s lead author, said, referring to the many millions of records her team analyzed. The earlier study was also quite large, she said, a sign that both findings are well-founded. “There’s more evidence when there’s replication of similar findings,” she said.

    Autism spectrum disorder affects one in 31 8-year-olds in the United States. The extent to which the neurological condition, which researchers widely agree is largely determined by genetics, may also be influenced by environmental factors remains an active area of research. In recent years, as wildfires have burned with more severity and frequency in some parts of the world, researchers have been considering their affect on the disorder.

    At the same time, public interest in autism and its causes has mounted since the late 1990s, when the esteemed British medical journal The Lancet published what was later found to be a fraudulent paper that claimed to find a connection between the MMR vaccine and autism. Robert F Kennedy Jr, the U.S. Secretary of Health and Human Services and one of the world’s most prominent vaccine skeptics, has long championed that theory. Under his leadership, the agency has radically remade the childhood immunization schedule, stacked an expert vaccine safety panel with his skeptics, and wound down mRNA vaccine development, among other moves that public health experts say undermine confidence in vaccines and threaten disease elimination status.

    There is no credible evidence that vaccines cause autism.

    Even the two studies on autism and wildfire smoke do not indicate that wildfire smoke specifically causes autism. Credible experts who study the disorder, including the authors of these studies, agree that a diagnosis is very likely the result of several factors working in tandem.

    “All we can point out is this association in the third trimester,” Guglio said. “It takes other people down the line to investigate those pathways more directly.”

  • Several properties sell for thousands above asking
    The front of a light tan two-story home with a dirt front yard and trimmed bushes lining the front walkway.
    A listing photo for 888 S. Pasadena Ave.

    Topline:

    More than a dozen houses that were slated to be demolished as part of a failed effort to extend the 710 Freeway have sold, and several of them have gone for thousands of dollars above asking price.

    Why it matters: All net proceeds from the sales will go toward developing affordable housing in the city, according to Pasadena Housing Director Jim Wong.

    The backstory: The historic homes, which sat vacant for decades, were put on the market as-is by the city of Pasadena last fall. According to the listings, a few of the homes were uninhabitable.

    Why now: The 13 houses sold for between $750,000 to more than $3.4 million, with the average purchase price around $1.5 million.

    What's next: “We are very pleased with the outcome,” Wong told LAist. “These critically needed dollars will enable the city to address the affordable housing shortage in Pasadena.”

    Go deeper: Pasadena selling more than a dozen former Caltrans homes along failed 710 Freeway corridor

    More than a dozen houses that were slated to be demolished as part of a failed effort to extend the 710 Freeway have sold, and several of them have gone for thousands of dollars above asking price.

    All net proceeds from the sales will go toward developing affordable housing in the city, according to Pasadena Housing Director Jim Wong.

    The historic homes, which sat vacant for decades, were put on the market as-is by the city of Pasadena last fall. According to the listings, a few of the homes were uninhabitable.

    But that didn’t dissuade buyers.

    The 13 houses sold for between $750,000 to more than $3.4 million, with the average purchase price around $1.5 million.

    “We are very pleased with the outcome,” Wong told LAist. “These critically needed dollars will enable the city to address the affordable housing shortage in Pasadena.”

    How we got here

    The properties were set to be demolished decades ago to extend the 710 Freeway through Pasadena, South Pasadena and El Sereno.

    Caltrans ended up purchasing hundreds of homes to make way for the extension, but construction was never completed.

    Three black-and-white aerial photos of the same area several years apart. The one on the far left says 1965, the middle is 1970 and the far right is 1974.
    The section of the 710 Freeway was built in the early 1970s and displaced thousands of residents when their homes were destroyed, according to Pasadena.
    (
    City of Pasadena
    /
    City Manager's Office
    )

    The project faced legal challenges and widespread opposition from residents who objected to how the freeway would impact their communities, particularly by displacing thousands of residents and destroying homes and businesses.

    Several of the homes were put up for sale last year, including some properties earmarked for affordable housing in the L.A. neighborhood of El Sereno. Caltrans invited private and public groups to submit their interest in the El Sereno homes, which were slated to be auctioned off last summer.

    When the city of South Pasadena put five of the homes on the market last fall, the properties attracted thousands of potential buyers. Most sold for thousands above asking — even with boarded up windows, damaged floors and peeling paint — with the costliest going for nearly half a million dollars more.

    But unlike the South Pasadena properties, people didn’t get to scope out the Pasadena homes in person. There were no public open houses or broker tours allowed — virtual viewings only.

    How much the Pasadena homes sold for

    Most of the properties were sold as offered, including a four-bedroom, two-bath duplex on Pasadena Avenue. The house, which is more than a century old, was purchased for $750,000, according to city officials.

    One property was purchased for nearly double the asking price.

    A six-bedroom, four-bath house on State Street sold for more than $3.4 million, according to city officials. The house, built in 1912, was on the market for $1.75 million.

    Five of the houses ended up selling for thousands over offer, including two on State Street that were represented by Bill Podley, a broker associate with the real estate company Compass.

    Podley told LAist last October that most of the homes were in poor condition after sitting empty for so long. Some had paint peeling from the walls and holes in the floors, for example.

    “These properties are not for the faint of heart,” he said. “Because you're really buying something you're not too totally certain as to its condition.”

    The interior of the second story of a home, with stairs leading down on the left. Three rooms can be seen on the right, with their doors removed. The walls are peeling paint and have holes scattered throughout.
    The interior of 1112 S. Pasadena Ave., a six-bed, three-bath home.
    (
    EGP Imaging
    /
    Courtesy Sotheby's International Realty
    )

    What’s ahead for affordable housing

    Pasadena also purchased four smaller, non-historic homes from Caltrans that were not on the market. Those properties may be renovated for affordable homeownership housing.

    The city is required to fund three affordable units with the net sales proceeds from every property it purchased from Caltrans. Wong confirmed the 13 homes that were sold, in addition to the four non-historic ones set aside, will generate at least 51 units of affordable housing.

    Pasadena officials have to use the proceeds for affordable housing by the end of this year. The city can extend the deadline if needed, subject to state approval, according to Wong.

    There are other homes that have been or will be sold to their tenants, according to the city. Some will also be sold to nonprofits.

  • Get hands-on with heirloom fruit in Fresno
    A ripe peach with deep red and orange coloring hangs from a branch, with rows of peach trees visible in the background under a blue sky
    An Elberta peach ripens on a tree at the Masumoto Family Farm in Fresno County.

    Topline:

    The Masumoto Family Farm in Fresno County is accepting applications for its annual Adopt-a-Tree program, which lets teams of up to 12 people harvest certified-organic heirloom peaches and nectarines over two weekends in the summer.

    Why it matters: For 23 years, the program has offered urban and suburban families a rare hands-on connection to where their food comes from — and a shot at tree-ripened fruit you'll never find at a store or farmers market. Some teams have been coming back all 23 years.

    New this year: The Masumotos recently added Baby Crawford peaches to the program — a grafted heirloom variety that helps buffer against climate-driven shifts in their Elberta peach and Le Grand nectarine ripening cycles.

    Thinking about it? New applicants must attend a virtual info session on Feb. 24 before applying, and spots are limited — the farm turns people away each year to keep the experience small.

    Read on … to learn how much fruit you’ll get for $950.

    There's a difference between a good peach and a perfect one. The good ones make it to your local farmers markets. The perfect ones are too ripe to survive the trip; for those, you have to be standing under the tree. That's the idea behind the Masumoto Family Farm's Adopt-a-Tree program, now accepting applications through March 15.

    Now in its 23rd year, the program allows teams of up to 12 people to harvest certified-organic fruit directly from the farm over two summer weekends.

    Most participants are friends, neighbors, coworkers and families from urban and suburban areas, many returning year after year.

    "So many folks are very disconnected from their sources of food," said Nikiko Masumoto, a fourth-generation Japanese American farmer and author. "We are trying to provide different portals of entry for folks to ask questions and wonder and be curious, and then get to experience themselves a slice of farm life."

    This year brings a restructured format with two tiers: Junior ($950 for roughly 250 to 300 pounds of fruit) and Senior ($1,750 for roughly 500 to 600 pounds). How many individual peaches is that? It's hard to say — Masumoto said some Elbertas last year clocked in at over a pound each, while others were closer to a quarter pound.

    The Masumotos recently added Baby Crawford peaches to the program — a grafted heirloom variety that helps buffer against climate-driven shifts in their Elberta peach and Le Grand nectarine ripening cycles.

    If you’re new to the program

    Fair warning — the Masumotos are upfront that this is a sweat-equity commitment, not a leisurely farm visit. Expect potentially 100-degree heat and a full morning of picking.

    Teams also need to hold three weekends open — the last in July and the first two in August — because the farm won't know the exact harvest dates until mid-July.

    A close-up of David "Mas" Masumoto's weathered, soil-dusted hands cradling a large ripe peach streaked with red and gold.
    David "Mas" Masumoto holds a freshly picked peach at the Masumoto Family Farm.
    (
    Nikiko Masumoto
    /
    Courtesy Masumoto Family Farm
    )

    "We are not centering this around human ease," Masumoto said. "It's about the fruit and what the trees are telling us."

    New applicants must attend a virtual info session before applying. The remaining session is on Feb. 24. The farm must turn away applicants each year — they intentionally keep the program small to preserve the community feel.

    For those who want Masumoto fruit without the full commitment, the farm also runs a low-key drive-through where you can order a flat of peaches online and pick them up at the farm.

    For more information, visit masumoto.com/adopt-a-tree. Applications are due March 15. Questions can be directed to nikmasu@gmail.com.