Sponsored message
Logged in as
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

The Brief

The most important stories for you to know today
  • FDA is banning one specific kind in edibles

    Topline:

    Federal regulators are taking aim at a popular category of psychoactive edibles that contain an iconic red-capped mushroom in the wake of a rash of illnesses and even a few suspected deaths.

    Why it matters: This week, the Food and Drug Administration warned food manufacturers that Amanita muscaria and the compounds in that mushroom are not authorized for use in food, citing a review of the scientific evidence that found these ingredients do not meet "safety standards."

    The backstory: There's considerable folklore surrounding the white-spotted fungus, also known as "fly agaric," which still permeates popular culture, even appearing in the Mario video game franchise and as emojis.

    Unlike psilocybin, the active ingredient in magic mushrooms, Amanita muscaria isn't listed as a controlled substance.

    Federal regulators are taking aim at a popular category of psychoactive edibles that contain an iconic red-capped mushroom in the wake of a rash of illnesses and even a few suspected deaths.

    This week, the Food and Drug Administration warned food manufacturers that Amanita muscaria and the compounds in that mushroom are not authorized for use in food, citing a review of the scientific evidence that found these ingredients do not meet "safety standards."

    There's considerable folklore surrounding the white-spotted fungus, also known as "fly agaric," which still permeates popular culture, even appearing in the Mario video game franchise and as emojis.

    Unlike psilocybin, the active ingredient in magic mushrooms, Amanita muscaria isn't listed as a controlled substance.

    It's advertised as an ingredient in some edibles, which are touted as having cognitive-enhancing "nootropic" or "microdosing" blends. Many are sold in trippy-looking packaging at convenience stores, smoke and vape shops, and online.

    In its warning letter to food manufacturers, the FDA notes these are sometimes marketed as "psychedelic edibles" or "legal psychedelics," and that "adverse event reports" prompted the agency to assess the mushroom's safety profile.

    "I feel it's the right call," says Eric Leas, an epidemiologist at the University of California, San Diego who has documented public health concerns around the mushroom. "It could potentially have very large implications for this market."

    Christian Rasmussen, who runs an online retailer of Amanita muscaria, said his lawyers are still figuring out the implications, but called it a "huge obstacle" for his business, the industry and individuals who've been using the mushroom.

    "A lot of this seems to be brought on by the actual adulterated products that have hit the market in recent years, containing various synthetic drugs and being marketed as Amanita," Rasmussen, who runs MN Nice Botanicals, said in an email.

    NPR contacted several other major companies that sell these mushroom edibles and did not receive a response.

    Hospitalizations led to edible recall

    These products drew considerable attention earlier this year as poison centers across the country received reports of people being hospitalized after consuming chocolates and gummies marketed under the brand name Diamond Shruumz, which were made by a California-based company known as Prophet Premium Blends. The company recalled the products.

    Subsequent testing revealed some of those edibles contained "muscimol," one of the active ingredients in Amanita muscaria. However, there was also a mixture of other substances, including a synthetic version of psilocybin, the prescription anticonvulsant drug pregabalin and the supplement kava. Others who've tested mushroom edible products have also documented a variety of undisclosed substances, as NPR reported earlier this year.

    The FDA investigation concluded that muscimol "couldn't explain all the symptoms reported by ill people who consumed the Diamond Shruumz-brand products."

    The agency is now prohibiting the use of three compounds in the mushroom — muscimol, ibotenic acid and muscarine — given safety concerns identified in its review of the evidence. Exactly how the FDA will decide to enforce its decision remains to be seen.

    The market for these psychoactive edibles has grown substantially in just the last few years.

    "There are hundreds of brands sold online," says UCSD's Leas, "This threatens the legal status of manufacturers so it could put a stop to that trend."

    And Dr. Mason Marks, a law professor and senior fellow with the Project on Psychedelics Law and Regulation at Harvard Law School's Petrie-Flom Center, says inaccurately labeling food products is "quite concerning" and against federal regulations, regardless of whether or not they contain Amanita muscaria. 

    "The problem with these products is we just don't know what's in them," says Marks. "It's a little bit difficult to predict what comes next."

    It's unclear how the FDA will enforce mushroom prohibition

    The FDA has a variety of options at its disposal — it can work with companies to initiate a recall, as it already did with Diamond Shruumz, seize products on store shelves, get a court order or an injunction to prevent sales.

    In theory, the agency could even push the Drug Enforcement Administration to designate the mushroom or its active ingredients a controlled substance, although that would depend on how the incoming Trump administration wants to handle the matter, says Marks.

    "The FDA issues a lot of these warning letters," he says. "There's a possibility that nothing will happen."

    The situation has parallels to what's happening with certain hemp-derived products like Delta-9 THC and CBD, or cannabidiol.

    Those populate stores even though they're "not considered legal ingredients by the FDA," says Shawn Hauser, a partner at the Colorado-based law firm Vicente, which focuses on psychedelics, cannabis and novel natural ingredients like mushrooms.

    "There have been warning letters around that, but they generally haven't been enforced unless there's unlawful drug claims, marketing to children or other public safety issues," she says.

    A spokesperson for the National Association of Convenience Stores said they were alerting their members so that they "can take appropriate action" in response to the warning letter.

    Marks says the FDA ruling doesn't prohibit people from growing or picking this kind of mushroom, which has a relatively small following compared to other psychedelics.

    Amanita muscaria targets GABA receptors (unlike psilocybin that primarily acts on serotonin receptors) and can lead to a dissociative state that some describe as quite unpleasant and even disturbing in high doses.

    "There are people that are interested in having heavy psychedelic experiences, and this really isn't the mushroom to go to for that," says Kevin Feeney, a lawyer and a cultural anthropologist at Central Washington University who has edited a compendium on Amanita muscaria.

    People often seek it out for microdosing out of the belief that it helps anxiety, sleep and even more serious problems like addiction to benzodiazepines and alcohol, though there's little evidence from clinical research on its possible therapeutic properties in humans.

    "[FDA] is clearly addressing this mushroom," Feeney says. "But to what degree are they addressing the other additives that are in these products?"

    Feeney is also an adviser to Psyched Wellness, a company that sells Amanita muscaria products and is affected by the FDA decision. He says his comments do not reflect the company's views.

    While the mushroom is poisonous, there are not many documented reports of overdose and death.

    In its scientific review, FDA staff noted there were no "toxicity studies sufficient to establish the safe use" of the mushroom or its extracts, and that the available information "underscores their potential for serious harm and adverse effects on the central nervous system," including hallucinations, drowsiness, delirium and seizure.

    Online retailer Rasmussen and others in the industry have said the mushroom can be prepared in ways that reduce undesirable effects. The FDA said there are no internationally recognized food standards to support safe processing and consumption.

    Hauser, the Colorado-based lawyer, sees this as a cautionary tale of the "hands-off" approach that the FDA has taken with some natural substances that have a history of being used for medicinal, beneficial or spiritual purposes.

    "This is one of the places where consumer demand is moving faster than the law, and businesses are going to try and meet that demand," she says. "When these products are unregulated and when there isn't consumer education, that's where you have real public safety issues.
    Copyright 2024 NPR

  • The issue has sparked criticism from her opponent
    A woman with medium-dark skin tone with long dark wavy hear wearing a black blazer speaks into a microphone holding a piece of paper while standing behind a wooden dais with a wooden nameplate that reads "Raman."
    Los Angeles City Councilmember Nithya Raman has missed nearly 3,000 votes since being elected in 2020.

    Topline

    Los Angeles City Councilmember Nithya Raman has missed nearly 3,000 votes since she was first elected in 2020, according to an analysis by LAist, a number that has been criticized by her opponent in the upcoming mayoral race.

    The details: A closer look at data from the L.A. city clerk reveals Raman ranks in the middle of the pack of the 15-member council when it comes to votes missed. She was eighth among her colleagues when it came to votes missed so far this year. Last year she ranked third. In 2024, she ranked sixth.

    The vast majority of those votes were unanimous or near unanimous among the other council members, meaning her vote on those matters would not have changed the outcomes.

    Criticism: The campaign of her mayoral opponent incumbent Karen Bass has stressed that the missed votes matter. "This isn't just missing a few votes, it's about six years of Nithya Raman not showing up — for constituents wanting encampments outside of schools cleaned up or voting to make it cheaper to film here,” said Alex Stack, Bass’ campaign spokesperson.

    Conflicting meetings: Raman’s campaign said she was officially excused from many of the meetings because she was appointed to represent L.A. on the board of the Air Quality Management District, which is charged with reducing local air pollution and improving public health. Bass appointed her to the board.

    Los Angeles City Councilmember Nithya Raman has missed nearly 3,000 votes since she was first elected in 2020, according to an analysis by LAist — a number that has been criticized by her opponent in the upcoming mayoral race.

    A closer look at data from the L.A. city clerk reveals Raman ranks in the middle of the pack of the 15-member council when it comes to votes missed. She was eighth among her colleagues when it came to votes missed so far this year.

    Last year she ranked third. In 2024, she ranked sixth.

    The vast majority of those votes were unanimous or near-unanimous among the other council members, meaning her vote on those matters would not have changed the outcomes.

    Still, the campaign of her mayoral opponent — incumbent Karen Bass — has stressed that the missed votes matter.

    "This isn't just missing a few votes, it's about six years of Nithya Raman not showing up — for constituents wanting encampments outside of schools cleaned up or voting to make it cheaper to film here,” said Alex Stack, Bass’ campaign spokesperson.

    “If you don't show up for your job, you shouldn't get a promotion," he said.

    Bass brought up Raman’s City Council meeting absences during a debate earlier this month, and the campaign has since set up a website, titled NoShowNithya, devoted to highlighting those absences.

    Raman’s campaign said she was officially excused from many of the meetings because she was appointed to represent L.A. on the Air Quality Management District board, which is charged with reducing local air pollution and improving public health.

    Those meetings happened at the same time as some council meetings. The board meets on the last Friday of every month. The City Council meets three times a week — on Tuesdays, Wednesdays and Fridays.

    “The data shows that Nithya’s attendance is in line with other council members,” said campaign spokesperson Liz Garcia. “These desperate attacks from Mayor Bass will not distract Nithya from campaigning to make LA a city that works and is affordable for everyone."

    The numbers

    City Councilmember Adrin Nazarian has missed the most votes so far this year — 393 — compared to Raman, who was ranked eighth at 233. Last year, Councilmember Monica Rodriguez ranked first with 631 and Raman ranked third with 556.

    In 2024, Rodriguez ranked first with 741. Raman ranked sixth with 575.

    Bass isn’t the only one who believes this is an issue.

    “Attendance at meetings isn't ceremonial,” said Pomona College Associate Professor of Politics Sara Sadhwani. “It’s where amendments and laws get shaped, it's where budgets get fought over and it's where constituents' priorities either make it into policy or they don’t. So missing that work means missing those leverage points.”

    “Generally, the expectation is that you show up for work,” she added.

    In January, Bass removed Raman from the Air Quality Management District AQMD board, a role she’d been serving in since 2022 when she was appointed by then-Mayor Eric Garcetti.

    Nazarian was appointed to the air quality board to replace Raman.

    As for Raman’s absences, her campaign sought to turn the tables on Bass. It pointed to the incumbent’s absences from commission meetings of the Los Angeles Homeless Services Authority.

    Since joining, the mayor has skipped more than half of the meetings held by the L.A. Homeless Services Authority Commission, according to an LAist review of attendance records, despite the mayor’s insistence that homelessness is her No. 1 issue.

    The Raman campaign also pointed to Bass’ absence during the early hours of the Palisades Fire when she was on a diplomatic trip to Ghana.

    "This is ironic coming from a mayor who was missing during our city’s most devastating emergencies [and] failed to show up for more than half of LAHSA homelessness meetings,” Garcia said.

    Bass’ office told LAist that, regardless of her attendance record, she has kept up to date on what LAHSA has been doing. The regional agency is responsible for managing the region’s homelessness response.

    Earlier this month, following LAist’s reporting, Bass announced she was stepping down from the LAHSA Commission.

    “It cuts both ways, and it's a reminder that both of these candidates are political insiders and have a track record with the city,” Sadhwani said.

    Too many meetings?

    The issue of missed meetings points to another question: Does the City Council meet too often? The city charter mandates that the panel meet three times a week. Its counterpart on the county level — the Board of Supervisors — meets once a week even though its budget is far larger.

    In addition to deciding who will be L.A.’s mayor, voters in November will decide whether the number of mandated weekly City Council meetings should be modified. The council has placed a proposed change to the city charter that would require only one meeting per week.

  • Sponsored message
  • See who won at the 2026 primetime awards

    Topline:

    The winners of the 2026 Emmy Awards were announced Monday night for shows that aired between June 2025 and May 2026.

    The context: Last year's winner for best drama, The Pitt, was up against Pluribus, A Knight of the Seven Kingdoms, The Diplomat, and more. On the comedy side, two Apple TV newcomers — Widow's Bay and Margo's Got Money Troubles — were up against a slate of returning nominees including Hacks, nominated for its fifth and final season, and The Bear, nominated for its fourth season.
    Read on... for an updated list of winners as they're announced.

    Updated September 14, 2026 at 21:26 PM ET

    Law & Order: SVU star Mariska Hargitay is hosting the Emmy Awards on Monday night. The ceremony is on NBC and Peacock starting at 8 p.m. PT, 5 p.m. ET.

    Last year's winner for best drama, The Pitt, is up against Pluribus, A Knight of the Seven Kingdoms, The Diplomat, and more. On the comedy side, two Apple TV newcomers — Widow's Bay and Margo's Got Money Troubles — are up against a slate of returning nominees including Hacks, nominated for its fifth and final season, and The Bear, nominated for its fourth season. (Eligible shows aired between June 2025 and May 2026.)

    Noah Kahan is set to perform "Bridge Over Troubled Water" for the In Memoriam segment.

    We'll be updating this page with winners in bold as they come in.

    Outstanding writing for a comedy series

    WINNER: Katie Dippold, Widow's Bay
    Quinta Brunson, Abbott Elementary
    Tim Robinson, Zach Kanin, The Chair Company
    Michael Patrick King, Lisa Kudrow, The Comeback
    Lucia Aniello, Paul W. Downs, Jen Statsky, Hacks
    Anthony King, Jury Duty Presents: Company Retreat

    Outstanding lead actor in a comedy series

    WINNER: Matthew Rhys, Widow's Bay
    Yahya Abdul-Mateen II, Wonder Man
    Steve Carell, Rooster
    Jason Segel, Shrinking
    Martin Short, Only Murders in the Building

    Outstanding lead actress in a limited or anthology series or movie

    WINNER: Sally Field, Remarkably Bright Creatures
    Claire Danes, The Beast In Me
    Carey Mulligan, Beef
    Sarah Pidgeon, Love Story
    Sarah Snook, All Her Fault

    Outstanding supporting actor in a drama series

    WINNER: Tom Pelphrey, Task
    Patrick Ball, The Pitt
    Billy Crudup, The Morning Show
    Shawn Hatosy, The Pitt
    Gerran Howell, The Pitt
    Jack Lowden, Slow Horses
    Carlos Manuel-Vesga, Pluribus

    Outstanding lead actor in a drama series

    WINNER: Noah Wyle, The Pitt
    Sterling K. Brown, Paradise
    Gary Oldman, Slow Horses
    Mark Ruffalo, Task
    Rufus Sewell, The Diplomat

    Outstanding reality competition program

    WINNER: The Traitors
    Dancing With the Stars
    RuPaul's Drag Race
    Survivor
    Top Chef

    Outstanding supporting actor in a comedy series

    WINNER: Stephen Root, Widow's Bay
    Colman Domingo, The Four Seasons
    Paul W. Downs, Hacks
    Nick Offerman, Margo's Got Money Troubles
    Michael Urie, Shrinking
    Tyler James Williams, Abbott Elementary

    Outstanding lead actress in a drama series

    WINNER: Rhea Seehorn, Pluribus
    Carrie Coon, The Gilded Age
    Chase Infiniti, The Testaments
    Keri Russell, The Diplomat
    Zendaya, Euphoria

    Outstanding supporting actress in a drama series

    WINNER: Allison Janney, The Diplomat
    Taylor Dearden, The Pitt
    Fiona Dourif, The Pitt
    Katherine LaNasa, The Pitt
    Sepideh Moafi, The Pitt
    Julianne Nicholson, Paradise
    Karolina Wydra, Pluribus

    Outstanding lead actor in a limited or anthology series or movie

    WINNER: Matthew Rhys, The Beast In Me
    Riz Ahmed, Bait
    Jason Bateman, Black Rabbit
    Charlie Hunnam, Monster: The Ed Gein Story
    Oscar Isaac, Beef

    Outstanding supporting actress in a limited or anthology series or movie

    WINNER: Linda Cardellini, DTF St. Louis
    Dakota Fanning, All Her Fault
    Laurie Metcalf, Monster: The Ed Gein Story
    Joy Sunday, DTF St. Louis
    Youn Yuh-jung, Beef
    Constance Zimmer, Love Story: John F. Kennedy Jr. & Carolyn Bessette

    Outstanding supporting actor in a limited or anthology series or movie

    WINNER: David Harbour, DTF St. Louis
    Jason Bateman, DTF St. Louis
    Richard Gadd, Half Man
    Richard Jenkins, DTF St. Louis
    Charles Melton, Beef
    Nick Offerman, Death by Lightning

    Outstanding lead actress in a comedy series

    WINNER: Jean Smart, Hacks
    Quinta Brunson, Abbott Elementary
    Ayo Edebiri, The Bear
    Elle Fanning, Margo's Got Money Troubles
    Lisa Kudrow, The Comeback

    Outstanding supporting actress in a comedy series

    WINNER: Kate O'Flynn, Widow's Bay
    Dale Dickey, Widow's Bay
    Hannah Einbinder, Hacks
    Janelle James, Abbott Elementary
    Michelle Pfeiffer, Margo's Got Money Troubles
    Megan Stalter, Hacks
    Jessica Williams, Shrinking

    Outstanding comedy series
    Abbott Elementary
    The Bear
    Nobody Wants This
    Hacks
    Margo's Got Money Troubles
    Only Murders in the Building
    Shrinking
    Widow's Bay

    Outstanding directing for a comedy series
    Randall Einhorn, Abbott Elementary
    Christopher Storer, The Bear
    Andrew DeYoung, The Chair Company
    Lucia Aniello, Hacks
    Mary Lou Belli, The Ms. Pat Show
    Hiro Murai, Widow's Bay

    Outstanding drama series
    The Diplomat
    The Gilded Age
    A Knight of the Seven Kingdoms
    Paradise
    The Pitt
    Pluribus
    Slow Horses
    Your Friends and Neighbors

    Outstanding directing for a drama series
    Salli Richardson-Whitfield, The Gilded Age
    Hanelle M. Culpepper, Paradise
    Noah Wyle, The Pitt
    Vince Gilligan, Pluribus
    Saul Metzstein, Slow Horses
    Salli Richardson-Whitfield, Task

    Outstanding writing for a drama series
    Peter Ackerman, Debora Cahn, The Diplomat
    Kirsten Pierre-Geyfman, R. Scott Gemmill, The Pitt
    Valerie Chu, The Pitt
    Vince Gilligan, Pluribus
    Will Smith, Slow Horses
    Brad Ingelsby, Task

    Outstanding limited or anthology series
    All Her Fault
    The Beast In Me
    Beef
    DTF St. Louis
    Love Story

    Outstanding variety series
    The Daily Show
    Jimmy Kimmel Live!
    Last Week Tonight With John Oliver
    The Late Show With Stephen Colbert
    Saturday Night Live

    Copyright 2026 NPR

  • Trump's mail voting restrictions rejected

    Topline:

    The Supreme Court has sided against President Donald Trump, rejecting his efforts to enact new mail-in voting restrictions for the midterm election.

    The context: The ruling released Monday by the high court means the U.S. Postal Service is expected to continue delivering ballots as usual. Voting by mail has already begun in states including Alabama, North Carolina and Wisconsin, with more soon to follow — including Western states such as Hawaii, Oregon and Washington, where elections are held primarily or fully with mail ballots.

    Why it matters: Under the still-blocked USPS plan, which followed an executive order by Trump, states would have had to turn over lists of voters' names and addresses and have certain specific barcodes on ballot envelopes in order to have them delivered by the mailing agency.

    How we got here: Earlier this month, a federal judge in Boston had issued a preliminary injunction against USPS, blocking the mailing agency from imposing those new ballot requirements on states. The judge found the requirements are likely illegal because the Postal Service has no authority to control mail-in voting. Now, a majority of the Supreme Court decided to keep that injunction in place.

    Updated September 14, 2026 at 21:18 PM ET

    The Supreme Court has ruled against President Trump, rejecting his efforts to enact new mail-in voting restrictions for the midterm election.

    The ruling released Monday by the high court means the U.S. Postal Service is expected to continue delivering ballots as usual.

    Voting by mail has already begun in states including Alabama, North Carolina and Wisconsin, with more soon to follow — including Western states such as Hawaii, Oregon and Washington, where elections are held primarily or fully with mail ballots.

    Under the still-blocked USPS plan, which followed an executive order by Trump, states would have had to turn over lists of voters' names and addresses and have certain specific barcodes on ballot envelopes in order to have them delivered by the mailing agency.

    Earlier this month, a federal judge in Boston issued a preliminary injunction against USPS, blocking it from imposing those new ballot requirements on states. The judge found the requirements are likely illegal because the Postal Service has no authority to control mail-in voting. A second federal judge issued another preliminary injunction late Sunday.

    Now, a majority of the Supreme Court decided to keep that injunction in place. The court said the Trump administration was unlikely to succeed on the merits of its challenge.

    Conservative Justice Brett Kavanaugh wrote a short concurring opinion, saying "there is at least a fair prospect that the final rule falls within the Postal Service's statutory authority." But, he added, "applying the rule in the 2026 elections would be arbitrary and capricious in violation of the Administrative Procedure Act because state and local election officials do not have sufficient time to reasonably implement the rule before the elections."

    Indeed several Republican state election officials, including from the mostly vote-by-mail state of Utah, signed on to a Supreme Court brief, warning that any attempt to carry out the USPS plan now "will almost certainly lead to mistakes, delays, and confusion for both voters and election officials."

    Conservative Justices Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas dissented from the order, and would have granted the administration's request to pause the Boston-based judge's ruling.

    While the USPS plan remains paused for the midterms, the legal fight will likely continue over how the agency may try to implement it for future federal elections.

    For now, challengers of the proposal are celebrating their victory.

    "Today, the Supreme Court refused to allow the federal government to throw our elections into chaos just weeks before Election Day. The Postal Service exists to deliver Americans' mail — not to rewrite election rules, demand voters' personal information, or decide which ballots make it through the system," Celina Stewart, CEO of the League of Women Voters, said in a statement.

    New York State Attorney General Letitia James said in a separate statement that she was "truly relieved" by the high court's ruling.

    "Voters should never have to wonder whether a ballot they legally cast will be counted because the federal government suddenly changed the rules," said James, whose state was among the 24 mainly Democratic-led states that sued alongside Washington, D.C. "We will keep fighting to make sure every eligible ballot is counted come November. Now, I encourage all eligible Americans to get out and vote — and vote early."

    Trump said he issued the call for USPS to change its rule for mail ballots as a way to stop illegal voting by non-U.S. citizens, a problem that many studies and audits show is extremely uncommon. For this legal fight over the USPS plan, the administration's lawyers have provided the courts with no evidence of mail-voting fraud.

    Trump has been a vocal critic of the way about one-third of voters cast ballots in the last two federal elections. In 2024, the share of voters who reported casting ballots by mail was higher among Democrats (37%) than Republicans (24%), according to a national survey by the MIT Election Data and Science Lab.

    In a social media post last year, Trump said he is "going to lead a movement to get rid of MAIL-IN BALLOTS" and claimed that "ELECTIONS CAN NEVER BE HONEST WITH MAIL IN BALLOTS/VOTING."

    This year, Trump himself voted by mail in Florida.

    Editor's note: USPS is a financial supporter of NPR.

    Edited by Benjamin Swasey

    Copyright 2026 NPR

  • What he's saying about Caltech's future with JPL
    Ray Jayawardhana, the incoming president of Caltech, walking down a set of stairs
    Caltech president Ray Jayawardhana at his announcement ceremony at Caltech in Pasadena on January 6, 2026.

    Topline:

    Ray Jayawardhana — or Ray Jay for short — has served as Caltech's president officially since the beginning of July. His expertise in astrophysics, coupled with extensive experience in university administration, is what he's using to lead the school while continuing his own research. He sat down with AirTalk, LAist 89.3's daily news show, saying he's optimistic about the school's future and relationship with the Jet Propulsion Lab.

    Why it matters: NASA — which now owns and sponsors JPL — is opening its contracting to other research institutions for the first time, which could mean a bidding war. Losing the contract for Caltech would mean losing a stream of federal funding valued at $3 billion per year.

    What's next? Jayawardhana said he’s confident Caltech and JPL’s partnership will continue, saying that the university's value proposition is unrivaled. NASA’s current contract with Caltech expires in September 2028.

    Listen to the full conversation with Caltech's new president

    Listen 22:22
    New Caltech president Ray Jayawardhana

    Ray Jayawardhana, a seasoned astrophysicist and university administrator, officially took over as Caltech’s 10th president on July 1.

    The newly appointed president sat down with Larry Mantle on AirTalk, LAist 89.3’s daily news program, to talk about his plans for the future of the esteemed university.

    Ray Jay and Caltech — it was in the cosmos

    Jayawardhana, who goes by “Ray Jay,” told Larry he was always interested in the cosmos growing up.

    He shared that, as a teenager in Sri Lanka, he wrote to the Jet Propulsion Lab (JPL) — NASA's leading space exploration center, which is managed by Caltech — to ask for images from the Voyager space missions they were conducting during the 1980s.

    “I waited impatiently for a response, and one day, this large envelope with an oversized wheel of books arrived with a set of images of the outer planets and their moons,” he said. “That just delighted me to no end.”

    Today, he’s the first South Asian American to lead Caltech, overseeing the operations of the same Jet Propulsion Lab he wrote to in the '80s.

    How he came to the U.S.

    After attending St. John’s College in Sri Lanka, he decided to pursue higher education in the United States. He earned an undergraduate degree from Yale and subsequently his doctorate in astronomy from Harvard, quickly establishing himself as one of the world’s most renowned astrophysicists.

    He previously held positions at Cornell University and Johns Hopkins.

    Exoplanetary president

    Aside from his main focus as the school’s head of administration, Ray Jay continues his own research exploring the formation of planets and stars, saying it keeps him intellectually engaged.

    He's part of a team that works with the James Webb Space Telescope to observe and characterize so-called exoplanets — planets around other stars — with an eye toward the potential for life beyond Earth.

    He’s confident in Caltech’s future with JPL

    Universities like Caltech are on rocky terrain amid sweeping federal government cuts of public funding for scientific research.

    Additionally, JPL's future is uncertain. NASA — which now owns and sponsors JPL — is opening its contracting to other research institutions for the first time, which could mean a bidding war.

    A dark sign reads "Jet Propulsion Laboratory - California Institute of Technology" with trees and a white building behind it
    The entrance to NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena, California.
    (
    Robyn Beck
    /
    Getty Images
    )

    Losing the contract for Caltech would mean losing a stream of federal funding valued at $3 billion per year.

    Jayawardhana said he’s confident Caltech and JPL’s partnership will continue, saying that the university's value proposition is unrivaled.

    “It’s not only about the self-interest in continuing to ensure there's federal and public funding for research, it's also about enriching humanity,” he said.

    NASA’s current contract with Caltech expires in September 2028.