Sponsored message
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

The Brief

The most important stories for you to know today
  • Trader Joe's vs. Aldi's: Who wins?
    An assortment of wine bottles and cups appears on a newsroom table.. Left to right, a set of blue Solo cups, then two bottles of Charles Shaw wine, then two bottles of Winking Owl wine, then a set of red solo cups.
    These were the wines we tried for the taste test - and no, it didn't feel right to bring proper wine glasses.

    Topline:

    With Dry January over for those who observe, we thought it'd be a great time to test out two bottles of wine to see how much they're really worth.

    The test: Two $3.49 bottles of wine — Aldi's Winking Owl brand and Trader Joe's Charles Shaw (aka four-buck Chuck — inflation comes for us all). How do they compare when testers don't know which is which?

      The response: Lots of reactions from LAist staff members from raves to boost, ending in a vote on which one was better — see the full results below.

      Go deeper: If four-buck Chuck is out of the question for you, we've also got recommendations for some slightly more expensive wines.

      Dry January is officially over for those who observe, and what better way to ring in the rest of the year than some wine that won't break the bank?

      Maybe you're trying to save money as part of a New Year's resolution, or maybe you're finding ways to rein in your budget to make up for the rent increase that could come this month. Or maybe you've always wanted to try $5 wines, but didn't want to risk ending up with one you hated.

      Whatever your reason, we thought we'd hit up Trader Joe's and Aldi and put our taste buds to the test — in the interest of public service journalism, of course.

      Our taste test

      A few of our extremely scientific ground rules for the tasting:

      1. We limited ourselves to two bottles of wine you can buy for $3.49, Aldi's Winking Owl brand and Trader Joe's Charles Shaw (aka four-buck Chuck — inflation comes for us all).
      2. We only tried the merlot to keep the comparisons 1:1 — sorry we didn't try more varieties, it was a Wednesday!
      3. Our 10 taste testers didn't know which wine was which to avoid confirmation bias.

      First up: Aldi's Winking Owl merlot, which most people described as having an earthy taste. Reactions were mixed, to say the least.

      "It tastes like spoiled grape juice," managing editor Jason Wells said.

      Our resident fine wine expert, editor George Kiriyama, who in the course of our research pointed us to a three-figure wine that he favors, was also unsparing in his assessment.

      "It tastes like a $3.49 wine," he said. "I like my wine dry, so this is not hitting it for me."

      But the wine was a hit for others in the newsroom.

      "I think if you pair this with a nice cheese, this is a fun wine," education editor Ross Brenneman said.

      Then, our team moved on to our next entry, Trader Joe's four-buck Chuck, which at least a few staff members said was an old college standby for them.

      Our intern Anne To, recently turned 21, who we asked to take part in the survey since we didn't expect her to already have a discerning palette, gave the wine a middling review.

      "It's not as bitter as other wines I've tasted, but it leaves my mouth feeling gross after I drink it," she said.

      Others noted that this wine might be best for some specific uses.

      "I would drink this at the end of the night, there's no more bottles of the good stuff," senior human resources generalist Cynthia Covarrubias — a Winking Owl aficionado — said. "And at the end of the night, you wouldn't want to use good stuff if you can't remember it."

      Surprisingly, the wine did win over our resident wine expert Kiriyama, who said this was "much better than the other one."

      But while the four-buck Chuck was less polarizing overall, lots of people still preferred Winking Owl. When it came time to take a vote, the results ended in a tie, although a couple tie-breaking votes gave the victory to Trader Joe's.

      "Does that make me basic?" editor Dana Littlefield, who helped break the tie, asked. She was answered with a resounding no in the newsroom.

      Full disclosure: I was the other tiebreaker who favored the four-buck Chuck. I thought both brands were very drinkable — for reference, my wine of choice is Bota Box — but I thought the four-buck Chuck was much smoother, sweeter, and more pleasant all-around.

      And while we didn't try this ourselves, the consensus was that both wines would work to make sangria, though the jury's still out on whether that's a compliment.

      What do wine experts say?

      You don't have to take a bunch of journalists' word for it. LAist called up a couple experts to get their takes on the wines we tried. We talked to certified sommelier Brianne Cohen, who's reviewed all of the Trader Joe's $3.49 wines.

      "You're getting exactly what you pay for," Cohen said. "What I can tell you is that they move a lot of wine, that's for sure. And I think for most wine drinkers who are just looking to have a simple, inexpensive wine on their dinner table or whatever it is, I think it will satisfy most people."

      Cohen doesn't have an Aldi nearby, but we got another wine expert, Lucia Palm, to try out the Winking Owl merlot.

      "I’ll be honest, I really didn’t like it," Palm wrote in an email to LAist. "I think it’s a perfect example of a CA wine that is mass produced to stay away from! It tasted like cherry cough syrup and wood chips."

      So there you have it: It really is a matter of taste, but if one of these wines sounds good to you, maybe it's worth giving one of these wines a shot next time you're at the store. After all, they'll only cost you $3.49.

      And if you've made it to the end of this article and decided you'd rather spend a few extra bucks for some $5 or $8 wine, we've got just the guide for you.

      Ashley Rusch contributed reporting to this article.

    1. Thousands gather in downtown LA to protest Trump
      A teenage girl, surrounded by other teenagers, holds up a sign that says "We are skipping our lessons to teach u one."
      Thousands of students from schools across Los Angeles walked out Wednesday in peaceful protest of the Trump administration’s immigration policies.

      Topline:

      Thousands of students from schools across Los Angeles walked out Wednesday in peaceful protest of the Trump administration’s immigration policies. The Los Angeles Unified School District estimated 4,400 students from about two dozen schools participated.

      Hear it from a student: “The reason I came out is 'cause we're so young and I feel like people always think that like young people don't have a voice and in reality we have one of the strongest voices,” said Jazlyn Garcia, a senior at  Alliance Gertz-Ressler High School. “I want people to go out and vote for midterms, pre-register to vote.”

      Why now: Students say the Trump administration's immigration raids threaten their families, communities and education. Alexis, a senior at Brío College Prep, said administrators locked down his campus after agents detained a nearby fruit vendor. “He was a part of our community,” Alexis said. “He would always be out there selling fruits to us after school.”

      What's next: San Fernando Valley students at more than 40 schools plan to walk out Friday. “Los Angeles Unified supports the rights of our students to advocate for causes important to them,” a district spokesperson wrote in a statement to LAist. “However, we are concerned for student safety at off-campus demonstrations as schools are the safest place for students.” The district encouraged students to exercise their rights in on-campus discussions and demonstrations.

      Thousands of students from schools across Los Angeles walked out Wednesday in peaceful protest of the Trump administration’s immigration policies.

      The Los Angeles Unified School District estimated 4,400 students from about two dozen schools participated.

      “ I think it's really empowering that we aren't being discouraged to [protest], but it's also really discouraging to have to live through this,” said Roybal Learning Center senior Melisa. 

      “The reason I came out is 'cause we're so young and I feel like people always think that like young people don't have a voice and in reality we have one of the strongest voices,” said Jazlyn Garcia, a senior at  Alliance Gertz-Ressler High School. “I want people to go out and vote for midterms, pre-register to vote.”

      Leonna, a senior at Downtown Magnets High School and daughter of immigrants from Cambodia, said she was thinking of her neighbors.  “We need to protect the people that make sure that the economy is running and make sure that our lives are the way that they are every day.”

      Students said the Trump administration's immigration raids threaten their families, communities and education.

      Alexis, a senior at Brío College Prep, said administrators locked down his campus after agents detained a nearby fruit vendor. “He was a part of our community,” Alexis said. “He would always be out there selling fruits to us after school.”

      San Fernando Valley students at more than 40 schools plan to walk out Friday.

      “Los Angeles Unified supports the rights of our students to advocate for causes important to them,” a district spokesperson wrote in a statement to LAist. “However, we are concerned for student safety at off-campus demonstrations as schools are the safest place for students.”

      The district encouraged students to exercise their rights in on-campus discussions and demonstrations.

    2. Sponsored message
    3. More homes damaged by landslide could be eligible
      A broken mountain road. An orange cone to the right of frame.
      Land movement made a section of Narcissa Drive impassable in September 2024.

      Topline:

      Rancho Palos Verdes city officials announced Tuesday that five more homes ravaged by land movement could be eligible for a buyout. That’s because the city is set to receive around $10 million from a FEMA grant.

      How we got here: Land movement in the Portuguese Bend area has increased in Rancho Palos Verdes in recent years, triggered by above-average rainfall since 2022. Those landslides have left around 20 homes uninhabitable and forced dozens of people off the grid after being stripped of power, gas and internet services.

      About the grant: Any time a state of emergency is declared in a state, that state, in this case California, can apply for the Hazard Mitigation Grant from FEMA. Those funds are then allocated to cities, tribal agencies and other communities for projects that will help reduce the impact of disasters. The city has a buyout program underway for around 22 homes, also funded through a FEMA grant.

      What’s next: Rancho Palos Verdes has applied for additional federal funds to buy out homes in the area, with the goal of demolishing the structures and turning the lots into open space.

    4. USC appoints its top lawyer, Beong-Soo Kim
      A man in a blue suit and with medium-light skin tone and East Asian features smiles for a portrait in front of a stately brick walkway.
      The University of Southern California board of trustees has appointed interim president Beong-Soo Kim to be its 13th president.

      Topline:

      The University of Southern California board of trustees has appointed interim president Beong-Soo Kim to be its 13th full president. Kim was named as the interim leader in February 2025 and began the role this summer.

      Who is he? Kim most recently served as USC’s senior vice president and general counsel and as a lecturer at the law school. Prior to joining USC, he worked at Kaiser Permanente and was a federal prosecutor for the Central District of California.

      What’s he stepping into? Kim succeeds Carol Folt, who was brought on to stabilize the university following a series of scandals under the administration before hers. She formally stepped down from her role in July, following criticism of her ability to handle student protests and concerns over fiscal stewardship.

      What’s happened under Kim’s interim presidency: USC faced a $200 million dollar deficit last fiscal year; Kim oversaw the layoffs of hundreds of employees since July.

      The University of Southern California board of trustees has appointed interim president Beong-Soo Kim to be its 13th full president.

      Kim was named as the interim leader in February 2025 and began the role this summer. He most recently served as USC’s senior vice president and general counsel, and as a lecturer at the law school. Prior to joining USC, he worked at Kaiser Permanente and was a federal prosecutor for the Central District of California.

      Kim succeeds Carol Folt, who was brought on to stabilize the university following a series of scandals under the administration before hers. She formally stepped down from her role in July, following criticism of her ability to handle student protests and concerns over fiscal stewardship.

      Soon after his term began, Kim oversaw the university’s effort to manage a $200 million deficit, which also led to hundreds of layoffs.

      “We did have to make some difficult decisions last year with respect to our budget and layoffs,” Kim told LAist. “And I'm really pleased that as a result of those difficult decisions, we're now in a much stronger financial position and really for a number of months have been really focusing on the opportunities that we see on the horizon.”

      In a call with LAist, and joined by USC board chair Suzanne Nora Johnson, Kim touched on bright spots and some of his priorities. He also touched on the relationship between USC and the Trump administration before a sudden ending to the call.

      This interview has been lightly edited for clarity.

      LAist: You've talked about addressing the mass layoffs and budget challenges. What do you see as the way forward?

      Beong-Soo Kim: Our research expenditures have actually been going up over the last year, over the last couple of years. We're focusing on: How do we provide the best possible educational value to our students? We're focusing on how to maintain and strengthen our academic culture of excellence, open dialogue and engagement with different viewpoints.

      And we're also really kind of leaning into artificial intelligence and asking questions as a community about how we incorporate AI responsibly into our education, into our operations, into our research. And there are obviously a lot of important ethical questions that we're working on, and it's really an quite an exciting time to be in the position that I'm in.

      What are you excited for?

      Well, a couple things that we're really looking forward to are, as part of the anniversary of the United States, we're going to be hosting a National Archives exhibition [of] founding documents in late April. We're also looking forward to helping host the L.A. Olympics in 2028. We have our 150th anniversary coming up in 2030 as a university.

      So there's a lot that's on the horizon. We also have the Lucas Museum opening up across the street later this year and, of course, George Lucas is one of our most beloved Trojan alumni. So there's so much vitality, so much energy on the campus right now.

      USC has, for the most part, avoided the sort of conflicts that the University of California system and elite private institutions across the country have had with the Trump administration. What can you share about how you plan to manage USC’s relationship with the federal government?

      Well, we really make an effort to engage with all levels of government, as well as foundations, the private sector, community groups. That kind of engagement is really more important nowadays. Universities can't just go off on their own. It's important for us to partner and find opportunities to work with others. And that's what we've been doing.

      And that's part of the reason why I think that our research has continued to go strongly. And I give a lot of the credit to our faculty and researchers who can continue submitting grant applications and continue to do research in areas that are critically important to the benefit of our community, our nation, and our world. And I think that we -—

      Suzanne Nora Johnson: —Actually I'm so sorry, but we have to complete the board meeting, and we've got to run. Thank you so much for your time. I really appreciate it. We'll be in touch. Bye. Thanks. Bye.

    5. The city is appealing to the U.S. Supreme Court
      A line of people wait to vote on the right side of the image. On the left side of the image voting booths are shown with Orange County's logo and the words "Orange County Elections." An American flag hangs in the widow behind the people waiting in line.
      Voters wait to cast their ballots inside the Huntington Beach Central Library on Nov. 4, 2025.

      Topline:

      Huntington Beach will ask the U.S. Supreme Court to review a decision striking down the city’s controversial voter ID law.

      What’s the backstory? Huntington Beach voters approved a measure in 2024 allowing the city to require people to show ID when casting a ballot. The state and a Huntington Beach resident promptly sued to block it. But the fight isn't over. The City Council voted unanimously this week to ask the U.S. Supreme Court to weigh in.

      Does the city have a shot? The Supreme Court gets 7,000 to 8,000 requests to review cases each year. The Court grants about 80 of these requests, so the city’s chances of getting the court’s attention are statistically slim.

      Read on ... for more about the legal battle.

      Huntington Beach will ask the U.S. Supreme Court to review a decision striking down the city’s controversial voter ID law.

      What’s the backstory?

      Huntington Beach voters approved a measure in 2024 allowing the city to require people to show ID when casting a ballot. That contradicts state law — voters in California are asked to provide ID when they register to vote but generally not at polling places.

      The ensuing court battle

      The state and a Huntington Beach resident promptly sued the city over the voter ID law and won an appeals court ruling striking down the law. The California Supreme Court declined to review the decision earlier this month. The state also passed a law prohibiting cities from implementing their own voter ID laws.

      Then, the City Council voted unanimously this week to ask the U.S. Supreme Court to weigh in.

      Does the city have a shot?

      The Supreme Court gets 7,000 to 8,000 requests to review cases each year. The Court grants about 80 of these requests, so the city’s chances of getting the court’s attention are statistically slim.

      There’s also a question of whether or not the city’s voter ID case meets the Court’s criteria for review — SCOTUS addresses questions of federal law. Mayor Casey McKeon said it does, in a news release, noting a 2008 Supreme Court decision that upheld a state’s voter ID law — in Indiana. But Huntington Beach is a city, and the question in its voter ID case is whether or not a city can implement its own requirements for voting, even if it clashes with state law.

      Go deeper

      How to keep tabs on Huntington Beach

      • Huntington Beach holds City Council meetings on the first and third Tuesday of each month at 6 p.m. at City Hall, 2000 Main St.
      • You can also watch City Council meetings remotely on HBTV via Channel 3 or online, or via the city’s website. (You can also find videos of previous council meetings there.)
      • The public comment period happens toward the beginning of meetings.
      • The city generally posts agendas for City Council meetings on the previous Friday. You can find the agenda on the city’s calendar or sign up there to have agendas sent to your inbox.