The Brief

Southern California university administrators are now at the center of the turmoil over campus encampments that went up over the Israel-Hamas war.

USC’s faculty senate issued a censure resolution on Wednesday against university president Carol Folt and provost Andrew T. Guzman.

UCLA faculty will vote Friday afternoon on whether to censure Chancellor Gene Block, and will conduct a vote of no confidence.

USC has been in the national spotlight since the provost's decision last month to cancel the valedictorian's traditional commencement address over alleged safety concerns. That student, Asna Tabassum, had come under criticism by pro-Israel student and outside groups for her social media activity; her Instagram bio linked to a slideshow critical of Zionism.

In the weeks since that decision, the university canceled its main commencement ceremony altogether and has faced off with numerous student encampments now seen at universities throughout the country. Many students have been arrested or suspended.

Faculty have been critical of Folt and Guzman's ability to respond to these events, culminating, for now, in the censure resolution on Wednesday.

UCLA has also been under scrutiny for its handling of campus protesters and encampments, with many faculty condemning Block's ability to rise to the occasion.

What is a censure?

A statement of strong disagreement.

In its resolution, the USC Academic Senate wrote that faculty are dissatisfied with how top administrators decided to withdraw a valedictorian’s speech, cancel commencement ceremonies, and the treatment of student protesters and faculty.

“I understand there are many different viewpoints among members of the Trojan Community regarding our recent decisions," Folt said in a statement to LAist.

While Folt didn’t respond directly to the censure motion, she said she’s committed to working with the senate and other faculty through a task force recommended by the academic senate.

What is a vote of 'no confidence'?

Six years ago, USC faculty issued a vote of no confidence against then-president Max Nikias after several scandals rocked the campus. What’s the difference?

A vote of no confidence is basically asking the president to resign. That’s not the case here at USC. The resolution calls for a task force to investigate top administrators' decisions, and faculty say that will lead to transparency

A vote of no confidence is still an option.

"I hope the administration realizes ... it really depends on what they do next," said Devin Griffiths, an associate professor of English and comparative literature at USC. He is not a member of the academic senate, but he helped start the petition that led to the censure resolution, and attended the Wednesday meeting.

"[The academic senate] need to explain to faculty what a vote of no confidence would mean," Griffiths said.

But the bottom line: faculty are upset that top administrators haven’t shared decision-making with faculty or talked to student protestors and faculty to understand the various reasons they’re upset about the encampment and commencement.

How damaging is this action?

There are no real teeth to censure. USC trustees hire and fire the president. It’s unclear whether trustees have lost confidence in Folt.

It took much bigger problems and a no confidence vote for Nikias to step down.         

What's happening at UCLA?

An online petition said to be started by UCLA faculty and staff is asking UCLA Chancellor Gene Block to resign over the police clearing of protestor camps. Block had already announced he’s stepping down this summer.

On Friday, UCLA faculty announced they'd be considering a vote of censure and a vote of no-confidence.

UCLA did not reply to a request for comment.

This story was originally published by Boyle Heights Beat on Nov. 25.

With the holiday season underway, organizations across Boyle Heights and East LA are seeking volunteers to help distribute food, assemble bicycles, sort toys and sponsor families in need.

If you’re looking to donate, volunteer or find ways to give back, we’ve rounded up a list to help you get started.

Build bicycles and organize donations at a toy giveaway

The Weingart East LA YMCA is hosting its 19th Annual Toy Giveaway on Dec. 18, and volunteers are needed to help prepare toys and provide support. Before the event, volunteers can help by assembling bicycles and sorting and organizing toys on Dec. 17 from 9 a.m. to 12 p.m. Volunteers are also needed to assist on event day from 3:30 p.m. to 8 p.m.

Volunteer at local food distributions

The Weingart East LA YMCA hosts a food distribution every Monday and Wednesday to ensure families have access to nutritious meals. Volunteers are needed for each food distribution from 8:45 a.m. to noon.

Drop off toys at First Street businesses

LAFC’s Expo Originals supporters group is collecting new, unwrapped toys and Venmo donations ahead of its annual community toy drive Dec. 14. Venmo contributions will go toward toy purchases, and the last day to donate is Dec. 6. Toys can be dropped off in person at the locations below until Dec. 13.

Donate a new jacket at a homeless shelter

Proyecto Pastoral is collecting new jackets to keep its participants at the Guadalupe Homeless Shelter warm.

Sponsor a family, child or classroom ahead of the holidays

Proyecto Pastoral has many opportunities for the community to give back during its Holiday Drive this year. Those interested in fulfilling holiday wishes for a family, child or classroom have until Dec. 1 to register. Proyecto Pastoral will pair sponsors with community members in need to fulfill items from their wish list.

Individual toys also can be dropped off at Proyecto Pastoral’s office. The toys will be distributed to children who participate in Proyecto Pastoral’s youth programs at their end-of-year celebrations.

Greystar, which manages hundreds of properties in California, has agreed to pay $7 million to settle a lawsuit alleging the company and other landlords used a price scheme to raise rents artificially high.

In January, Greystar was named as a defendant in an antitrust lawsuit filed by California Attorney General Rob Bonta, the U.S. Department of Justice and several other states against software company RealPage, which officials say uses algorithmic models to recommend price increases to subscribers.

Bonta alleges Greystar used RealPage’s system to coordinate rental prices with other landlords by illegally sharing and gathering confidential information. According to his office, RealPage’s “price alignment scheme” affected rentals across the country, especially in multifamily buildings in Southern California, including in Los Angeles, Orange County and San Bernardino.

"Whether it's through smoke-filled backroom deals or through an algorithm on your computer screen, colluding to drive up prices is illegal,” Bonta said in a statement. “Companies that intentionally fuel this unaffordability by raising prices to line their own pockets can be sure I will use the full force of my office to hold them accountable.”

Details on the settlement

Greystar is the largest landlord in the U.S., according to the Department of Justice, managing nearly 950,000 rental units across the country. In California, the company manages about 333 multifamily rental properties that use RealPage’s pricing software, according to Bonta’s office.

Bonta announced last week that as part of the settlement, Greystar has agreed to stop using software that uses competitively sensitive information to set rent prices, including from RealPage.

The company also has agreed to cooperate in the federal prosecution of RealPage and the other landlords named as defendants, such as Camden and Willow Bridge.

Greystar said in a statement to LAist that it’s “pleased this matter is resolved” and the company “remain[s] focused on serving our residents and clients.”

Settlement with RealPage

The U.S. Justice Department’s Antitrust Division filed a proposed settlement with RealPage on Monday to resolve its claims against the company.

If the settlement is approved by the court, RealPage would be required to stop using competitors’ private, sensitive information to set rental prices and remove or redesign features in its software that limited price drops or aligned prices between competitors, according to the Justice Department.

RealPage also would be required to cooperate in the lawsuit against property management companies that have used its software and agree to a court-appointed monitor to make sure it complies with the proposed settlement.

Dirk Wakeham, president and CEO of RealPage, said in a statement Monday that the proposed resolution marks an important milestone for the company and its customers.

"We are pleased to have reached this agreement with the DOJ, which brings the clarity and stability we have long sought and allows us to move forward with a continued focus on innovation and the shared goal of better outcomes for both housing providers and renters,” Wakeham said.

RealPage denies any wrongdoing, attorney Stephen Weissman said in a statement.

Newport Beach voters will decide if they want to replace a state-approved housing plan with one that allows for far fewer new homes in 2026.

Proponents of the plan, called the Responsible Housing Initiative, say the current plan will make the city overcrowded and negatively affect quality of life.

“This isn’t downtown Los Angeles,” said Charles Klobe, president of Still Protecting Our Newport, which backs the Responsible Housing Initiative.

Last week, city leaders voted to put the initiative in front of voters after the Newport Beach Stewardship Association submitted the Responsible Housing Initiative petition with more than 8,000 signatures. The initiative rejects the city’s current housing plan and instead proposes an amendment to the general plan to facilitate the development of 2,900 homes exclusively for extremely low-, very low-, low- and moderate-income households.

The city’s current housing plan, which has the backing of the state, allows for more than 8,000 homes, including the required affordable housing units.

“ We're against the city building more market rate than the state required. We believe it's a giveaway to developers who will fund re-election campaigns of the council,” Klobe said.

What does California law require?

California’s Housing Element Law sets housing targets for local governments to meet, including for affordable units. It allows the state to intervene every eight years to let cities know how much housing they must plan for. The law also requires cities to put together a housing element showcasing how they will achieve the state’s plan. The state then approves of the element or sends it back to cities to reconfigure according to the requirements.

According to California law, Newport Beach needs to build 4,845 new units — 3,436 of which must be affordable for very low-, low- and moderate-income households. According to the city, Newport Beach can’t just plan for affordable housing units “because that would assume all future projects would be 100% affordable, which is not realistic based on previous development experiences.” And so, the city’s rezone plans include more than 8,000 units.

Councilmember Robyn Grant said during the council meeting that she’s not in favor of the state mandate. But, she added, “After extensive legal analysis and public outreach and workshops and hearings and meetings and more meetings, this council approved an updated general plan to bring Newport Beach into compliance and avoid serious penalties, including the loss of local land use control."

Newport Beach did appeal the state’s housing mandates on the grounds that it did not take into account how some of the city’s coastal lands are protected from urban development, but the appeal was rejected.

To learn more about how Newport Beach arrived at its state-approved housing plan, click here.

What is the Responsible Housing Initiative proposing?

The Responsible Housing Initiative counts the number of housing units already in development and proposes an additional 2,900 affordable housing units to meet the state mandate.

Klobe said they believe the initiative will receive state backing because “they claim to want affordable housing and our initiative requires it.”

Supporters of the measure contend the city’s current plan will increase the population, result in excessive traffic and disrupt the quality of life. They also sued Newport Beach for not first going to voters, but they failed in court.

To learn more about the Responsible Housing Initiative, click here.

What’s next

Voters will have a chance to weigh in on the Responsible Housing Initiative in November 2026.