Members of UPTE-CWA Local 9119 rally during a strike Wednesday.
(
Julie Leopo
/
LAist
)
Topline:
Some 57,000 University of California healthcare, service, research and technical employees kick off a multi-day unfair labor practice strike on Wednesday.
The backstory: The workers are represented by two unions locked in strained negotiations with the UC system.
Why it matters: The move could disrupt patient care and other campus functions statewide. University Professional and Technical Employees (UPTE) Local 9119 Executive Vice President Matias Campos, a staff pharmacist at UC San Francisco, said core emergency services will remain available at university hospitals. The strike includes about thousands of workers from UCLA, UC Irvine and UC Riverside.
What the union wants: The unions are calling for higher wages and more career growth opportunities. They have also charged the university with unfair labor practices before the California Public Employment Relations Board. Those charges, which include instituting restrictions that limit free speech, are a foundation for the strike.
What does the University of California say? The university system has accused the unions of bargaining in bad faith. A spokesperson said there’s no staffing crisis, as the unions claim, and that it has agreed to higher wages.
Read on ... for details of what the unions and the UC system have proposed.
Tens of thousands of University of California employees walked off the job Wednesday as contract negotiations hit a wall.
The strike threatens to disrupt patient care, research and other campus functions statewide.
Picket lines began early in the morning, with rallies on campuses midday.
Two unions are on strike:
AFSCME Local 3299, which includes 37,000 service workers, patient care technical workers and other skilled craft workers.
University Professional and Technical Employees (UPTE) Local 9119, which includes 20,000 clinical researchers, IT analysts, mental health counselors and nurse case managers.
Both are currently in the middle of strained contract negotiations with the university system.
The unions and UC have accused each other of bargaining in bad faith, and the unions have also accused the university system of unfair labor practices, a tipping point that led to this week's strikes.
What do the UC workers want?
The demands from each union share a lot of overlap, including wage increases of 8% or more each of the next three years, a $25 minimum wage retroactive to 2023 and better benefits.
UPTE also highlighted its demands for clearer career growth pathways. Its leadership says the goal is to fix a staffing and retention crisis that harms research and patients.
Left, Maryam Azizadah, 23, UCLA Health Assistant Clinical Research Coordinator speaks to a crowd of union members on Feb. 26, 2025 in Los Angeles while Jeanna Harris, UCLA Health Case Manager, right, looks on.
(
Julie Leopo
/
LAist
)
Maryam Azizadah is a research coordinator at UCLA. She said better pay and benefits would help recruit and keep colleagues.
“It's really hard to not make mistakes when you have so many patients and so many of these really detailed protocols for these cancer research trials,” she said. “If we don't have enough time to be meticulous it ends up affecting the research.”
Julia Mangione, a research coordinator at UC Irvine, said people are constantly leaving for better paying jobs.
"We hear that people work two or three research jobs just to make ends meet, or they have to work outside of their field to pay the bills," she said. "But they stay in research because they care about their patients, they care about their participants, and they're deeply passionate about the work."
The university maintains there is no staffing crisis. In a statement, UC spokesperson Heather Hansen said the system has been hiring more staff and that turnover is improving among UPTE-represented employees.
But others LAist talked to said they're not feeling supported.
A member from the AFSCME Local 3299, which includes 37,000 service workers, patient care technical workers and other craft workers, greets his family member, a fruit vendor, on the sidewalk.
(
Julie Leopo
/
LAist
)
The UPTE-CWA Local 9119 take to the streets on Feb. 26, 2025.
(
Julie Leopo
/
LAist
)
Max Belasco, a UCLA graduate, is now an IT worker at his alma mater’s law school. On top of his work on campus, he provides technical support for the Immigrant Family Legal Clinic at several community schools in the Koreatown and Pico Union area.
Belasco told LAist that colleagues often feel the need to apply for external positions to gain leverage when attempting to advance in their UC careers.
“That opens us up to [potentially] losing a lot of institutional knowledge, which is very specialized inside of IT,” he said.
Anushree Belur, a psychologist at the UC Irvine student counseling center, said she’s had to call out sick twice this month.
“What we are noticing is when we get burnt out, that leads to greater absences,” she said. “We’re not able to take care of ourselves, and we feel it ... There are times when your body feels the stress.”
She said those absences translate into more disruption for students.
How might the strikes affect patient care?
UPTE executive vice president Matias Campos, a staff pharmacist at UC San Francisco, said core emergency services will remain available at university hospitals.
“We ask that patients contact their provider to suss out what will be impact[ed],” he added. “We anticipate that procedures will need to be rescheduled,” along with “non-urgent clinic patient visits, to accommodate the large number of workers that will be striking.”
On Wednesday afternoon, UC Irvine spokesperson John Murray said via email that the university's inpatient and outpatient locations remain open for patient care, and that about 850 healthcare professionals were brought in to temporarily backfill positions.
“This has been a hard choice,” said Michael McGlenn, a clinical psychologist at UC San Diego.
Members of AFSCME Local 3299 demonstrate on the UCLA campus Wednesday.
(
Julie Leopo
/
LAist
)
He and his colleagues support the mental health of over 45,000 students.
“We care very much about our patients,” he added. “I will be honest: [I] don't love the idea of leaving them with delayed care.”
But according to McGlenn, students already “have to wait weeks, if not longer, to see a provider for their first appointment.” Then they have to wait “more weeks” for follow-up appointments. In his view, students are already being harmed by the status quo.
“The only way we can make sure that our clinics are appropriately staffed and that they have the resources we need is if we do go on strike,” he said.
Education editor Ross Brenneman contributed to this story.
The CoreCivic California City Immigration Processing Center in California City on Sept. 22, 2025.
(
Miguel Vasconcellos
/
CalMatters
)
Topline:
Private prison company CoreCivic will continue operating two large ICE detention centers in California after selling the properties to the Department of Homeland Security.
More details: CoreCivic said it anticipates that the sale of the Otay Mesa Detention Center in San Diego County and the California City Detention Facility in Kern County will bring the company an estimated net proceeds of approximately $1.1 billion. The sale closed on July 2, according to a recent filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, with the federal government paying $739.2 million for the 1,994-bed Otay Mesa facility and $732.6 million for the newly-opened 2,560-bed California City facility.
Why it matters: The purchase comes as the Department of Homeland Security sits on an unprecedented influx of cash. The 2025 federal budget gave the department roughly $170 billion for immigration enforcement and detention, including $45 billion specifically earmarked for expanding detention capacity through fiscal year 2029.
Read on... for more on what this sale means.
The private prison company CoreCivic has sold two of the largest immigration detention facilities in California to the U.S. Department of Homeland Security in a deal worth $1.5 billion, the company announced Monday.
CoreCivic said it anticipates that the sale of the Otay Mesa Detention Center in San Diego County and the California City Detention Facility in Kern County will bring the company an estimated net proceeds of approximately $1.1 billion.
CoreCivic said in a news release that it expects to continue running the day-to-day operations of both facilities under existing contracts with the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement. The company acknowledged in its filing that the terms of those contracts could be renegotiated now that the federal government owns both properties outright.
They also might not be renewed. CoreCivic's contract in California City contract runs through August 2027, and its Otay Mesa contract is in effect through December 2029, with an option to extend for five more years.
The purchase comes as the Department of Homeland Security sits on an unprecedented influx of cash. The 2025 federal budget gave the department roughly $170 billion for immigration enforcement and detention, including $45 billion specifically earmarked for expanding detention capacity through fiscal year 2029.
The acquisition of the two sites is another step in the federal government’s plan to build out national immigration detention capacity that isn’t reliant on the two largest private prison contractors, according to a brief from the Brennan Center for Justice at NYU Law from February.
The proposed transition away from private detention was described at the time as the “ICE Detention Reengineering Initiative” in U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement documents released by the city of Social Circle, Georgia, where city leadership was worried about the strain on city services from a major detention facility housing between 7,500 and 10,000 people.
“This new model will allow ICE to create an efficient detention network by reducing the total number of contracted detention facilities in use while increasing total bed capacity, enhancing custody management, and streamlining removal operations,” according to the unsigned ICE memo.
The Department of Homeland Security’s purchasing program surprised local officials in at least five states, who only learned of the purchases and their purpose after the deals closed. Some of those projects have run into legal challenges, according to the New York Times, though the agency appears to be moving forward with four warehouse acquisitions.
Health inspections at ICE centers
California law allows state and local officials to inspect immigrant detention centers, and Democratic leaders have drawn attention to conditions inside since President Donald Trump began his second term. Eight ICE detention centers are operating within the state, up from six since former President Joe Biden left office.
Sen. Alex Padilla, a Democrat, has visited both of the sites CoreCivic sold to the federal government and spoken up for the needs of detainees, including access to healthcare.
"Too many people who pose no threat to public safety and should not be in detention are nevertheless being held in unacceptable conditions with inadequate access to medical care, legal counsel, clean water, nutritious food, and other basic necessities," he said in a written statement. "Whether these facilities are operated by a private contractor or owned by the federal government, my expectations remain the same."
The Otay Mesa facility has been at the center of an ongoing legal fight over local health inspections. San Diego County officials sued the federal government and CoreCivic in March after claiming health inspectors were blocked from a full inspection under a 2024 state law. A federal judge later granted county health officials access to the detention center.
Private prison companies CoreCivic and GEO Group have fought back against California’s 2024 county-inspection law in court, arguing that states can’t pass laws that directly burden the federal government’s core functions. GEO Group has argued the state law is unconstitutional because it steps on federal authority over immigration detention centers.
“This is Trump’s mass detention agenda getting bigger, more permanent, and more expensive — with CoreCivic getting a billion-dollar payday while still running the cages. DHS may own the building, but it does not own the law," San Diego County Supervisor Terra Lawson-Remer said in a written statement about the sale.
An aerial view of the Otay Mesa Detention Center in San Diego on May 20, 2026.
(
Adriana Heldiz
/
CalMatters
)
California City opened last year in eastern Kern County about 100 miles north of Los Angeles in a site the company previously operated as a state prison.
California City opened last year in eastern Kern County about 100 miles north of Los Angeles in a site the company previously operated as a state prison. A federal lawsuit is ongoing about whether the facility opened without proper permits in remote California City.
Grisel Ruiz, a staff attorney from the Immigrant Legal Resource Center, said the change in ownership does not change her organization’s opinion that the facility opened without the required permits.
The organization intends to ask California City’s planning commission on Tuesday to deny the permits and shut down the facility. Attorney General Rob Bonta has urged the same.
“The sale to DHS doesn’t change the fact that CoreCivic must still lawfully operate the facility,” said Ruiz.
Ruiz also noted the sale deal appeared favorable for CoreCivic in that they get the profits from the sale of the property, as well as revenue from continuing to operate the facilities for Immigration and Customs Enforcement
“They get to have their cake and eat it too,” said Ruiz.
CoreCivic said the sale prices were set through a federal government process in which independent appraisers account for replacement cost, depreciation and land value to determine fair market value. Spokesman Ryan Gustin said the appraisals were reviewed by the government for compliance with federal standards.
“The process was marked with rigor and integrity,” he said in an emailed statement.
More sales possible
The company also disclosed that it is having ongoing talks with ICE about selling the federal government additional detention facilities, though it said those discussions are in the early stages of a deal and may not close.
Maryland-based CoreCivic said the proceeds from the sale, which would be about $1.1 billion after taxes and transaction costs, could go toward paying down its bank credit and retiring $238.5 million in senior notes coming due in 2027. Any remaining funds are earmarked for further debt reduction or possibly stock buybacks.
Patrick Swindle, the president of CoreCivic, said in the news release, “We are pleased with the sales of these two mission-critical facilities for the Company’s government partner, while reflecting our role as a long-term, flexible solutions provider to government.”
Temperatures could reach 86 degrees in downtown L.A.
(
Myung J. Chun
/
Getty Images
)
QUICK FACTS
Today’s weather: Partly cloudy then sunny
Beaches: 72 to 77 degrees
Mountains: Mid 80s to mid 90s
Inland: 90 to 98 degrees
Warnings and advisories: Heat advisory and extreme heat warning
What to expect: A warming trend will bring hot temperatures to Southern California this week, with some areas expected to hit triple digits.
Read on ... for more details.
QUICK FACTS
Today’s weather: Partly cloudy then sunny
Beaches: 72 to 77 degrees
Mountains: Mid 80s to mid 90s
Inland: 90 to 98 degrees
Warnings and advisories: Heat advisory, extreme heat
The summer heat is now in full swing, bringing with it scorching temperatures for some areas of Southern California over the next few days.
Starting Tuesday, a heat advisory kicks in for interior mountains and valleys in L.A. County, with temperatures in the mid 80s to 90s. Meanwhile, closer to the coast, temperatures will hover in mid 70s.
In Orange County, high temperatures along the coast will range from 71 to 80 degrees, and from 79 to 86 degrees more inland. In the Inland Empire, temperatures there will reach up to 98 degrees.
In Coachella Valley, there's an extreme heat warning since temperatures are expected to reach up to 113 degrees on Tuesday.
Come Wednesday, temperatures will continue to increase, so make sure to stay hydrated and check in on loved ones.
Staying safe in the heat
Don't wait until you're thirsty to drink water or electrolyte-replacements
Drink cool water, not extremely cold water (which can cause cramps)
Avoid sweetened drinks, caffeine, and alcohol
Protect a pet from excessive heat
Never leave a pet or animal in a garage
Never leave a pet or animal in a vehicle
Never leave a pet or animal in the sun
Provide shade
Provide clean drinking water
Protect a human from excessive heat
Check in frequently with family, friends, and neighbors. Offer assistance or rides to those who are sick or have limited access to transportation. And give extra attention to people most at risk, including:
Elderly people (65 years and older)
Infants
Young children
People with chronic medical conditions
People with mental illness
People taking certain medications (i.e.: "If your doctor generally limits the amount of fluid you drink or has you on water pills, ask how much you should drink while the weather is hot," says the CDC)
Keep up with LAist.
If you're enjoying this article, you'll love our daily newsletter, The LA Report. Each weekday, catch up on the 5 most pressing stories to start your morning in 3 minutes or less.
The Americans' World Cup exit on Monday was the same as it ever was: Eliminated yet again in the Round of 16 at the hands of a European team — this time, Belgium, by a score of 4-1.
How we got here: From the moment they stepped onto the Seattle field, the U.S. was outclassed by their opponent, No. 9-ranked Belgium. Countless turnovers and defensive lapses were seized on by the Belgians, who needed only nine minutes to take a 1-0 lead. The context: The U.S. men's national team came into this FIFA World Cup with a lineup full of players with key roles in Europe's top leagues. They had the name-brand coach — Mauricio Pochettino, of Tottenham, PSG and Chelsea fame. And they had homefield advantage, with every game on U.S. soil for the first time in three decades.
The controversy: The U.S. had entered Monday's game under a cloud of controversy around their striker Folarin Balogun, who was shown a red card in last week's Round of 32 match against Bosnia-Herzegovina. An automatic one-game suspension was set to sideline Balogun, the Americans' leading scorer at the World Cup, for Monday's game. Then, the day before the game, a FIFA disciplinary panel took the highly unusual step of delaying Balogun's suspension by a year to allow him to participate. Then, news broke that President Trump had personally called FIFA president Gianni Infantino to encourage him to review the red card.
Read on... for more on U.S.' exit.
SEATTLE — This time was supposed to be different.
The U.S. men's national team came into this FIFA World Cup with a lineup full of players with key roles in Europe's top leagues. They had the name-brand coach — Mauricio Pochettino, of Tottenham, PSG and Chelsea fame. And they had homefield advantage, with every game on U.S. soil for the first time in three decades.
For weeks, the hype seemed like it might be real: The team's three wins over Paraguay, Australia and Bosnia-Herzegovina were the most ever by a U.S. men's squad in a World Cup. A new generation of American fans filled stadiums by the tens of thousands and tuned in on TV by the tens of millions.
But in the end, the Americans' exit was the same as it ever was: Eliminated yet again in the Round of 16 at the hands of a European team — this time, Belgium, by a score of 4-1.
From the moment they stepped onto the Seattle field, the U.S. was outclassed by their opponent, No. 9-ranked Belgium. Countless turnovers and defensive lapses were seized on by the Belgians, who needed only nine minutes to take a 1-0 lead.
Then, once the Americans equalized on a free kick by midfielder Malik Tillman, Belgium scored yet again in barely a minute of play. Belgian forward Charles De Ketelaere scored both his team's first-half goals.
After halftime, came an embarrassing nail in the coffin that silenced the Seattle sellout crowd for good — a 57th minute roll-in by Hans Vanaken after a slip-up by goalkeeper Matt Freese outside of the penalty area left the goal unguarded. Belgian forward Romelu Lukaku added a stoppage-time goal to seal the final score at 4-1.
Malik Tillman #17 of the United States celebrates scoring his team's only goal during their World Cup match against Belgium. In what was one of the few bright spots of the game, the U.S. pulled even with Belgium at 1-1. The tie lasted less than two minutes before Belgium scored again.
(
Luke Hales
/
Getty Images
)
The U.S. had entered Monday's game under a cloud of controversy around their striker Folarin Balogun, who was shown a red card in last week's Round of 32 match against Bosnia-Herzegovina. An automatic one-game suspension was set to sideline Balogun, the Americans' leading scorer at the World Cup, for Monday's game.
Then, the day before the game, a FIFA disciplinary panel took the highly unusual step of delaying Balogun's suspension by a year to allow him to participate. Then, news broke that President Trump had personally called FIFA president Gianni Infantino to encourage him to review the red card.
The Royal Belgian Football Association said it would protest Balogun's inclusion in the lineup. But even at full strength, the U.S. were never real contenders in Monday's game.
Belgium will advance to the quarterfinals for the third time in the past four World Cups, where it will face Spain on Friday in Los Angeles.
Copyright 2026 NPR
Numbers are everywhere in kindergarten, but are all students learning the math concepts?
(
Connecticut Public Broadcasting
/
Getty Images
)
Topline:
California could begin testing students as early as kindergarten in math if a bill currently going through the state legislature becomes law.
Why it matters: Proponents of Senate Bill 1067, including state Sen. Akilah Weber Pierson, say the goal is to identify students who are falling behind in math early so they can get help. More than 60% of California students fall below the benchmark on the state’s standardized math test.
How the law would work: By January 2028, schools would have to choose a math test for young learners from a list created by the state’s education department. The state must also provide guidance for educators on how to interpret and explain test results to families. The test results could not be used in teacher evaluations, student grades or to identify a disability.
What's next: The bill passed the state Senate unanimously in May and is now moving through the Assembly.
Read on… to learn more about why it’s challenging to assess young students’ math skills.
California could begin testing students as early as kindergarten in math.
Proponents of Senate Bill 1067, including state Sen. Akilah Weber Pierson, say the goal is to identify students who are falling behind in math early so they can get help. More than 60% of California students perform below the benchmark on the state’s standardized math test.
“Math learning is cumulative, and when students fall behind in the early grades it becomes much harder to catch up,” Weber Pierson wrote in support of the bill. “At its core, this bill is about making sure every child builds a strong foundation in math, opening the door to lasting academic achievement, meaningful career pathways, and lifelong success in California’s innovation economy.”
How the law would work
By January 2028, schools would have to choose a math test for kindergarten, first and second grades from a list created by the state’s education department.
The State Board of Education would set the criteria for the test and consider multiple factors, including learning standards for math and how students’ demographic information, including their primary language, may affect their performance.
Listen
13:35
Listen: AirTalk discusses testing kindergartners in math
The state must also provide guidance for educators on how to interpret and explain test results to families. The results could not be used in teacher evaluations, student grades or to identify a disability.
The Senate Appropriations Committee found it would cost more than $100 million to develop and select the test, train educators and provide ongoing support as the policy is implemented.
What are the possible challenges?
Megan Franke, professor of education and vice chair of professional programs at UCLA, said one challenge is that many standardized assessments do not reflect all students' understanding of mathematical concepts.
“Young children solve problems differently than adults do, and they don't all solve problems in the same way at the same time,” Franke said.
For example, a student who doesn't remember the word for “11” may not lack an understanding of the number system, they just may be struggling with the vocabulary.
“Our number system is a little bit wonky, [in] that we don't count ten-one, ten-two, ten-three,” Franke said. “We made up words — eleven, twelve and thirteen.”
Franke said there may also be other reasons why students struggle with standardized assessments, including difficulty using technology or anxiety.
Franke said a single test, or intervention, is not a long-term solution.
“Really, we should be thinking about schools and how we help schools be these places…where they're creating these rich opportunities for each and every student to learn mathematics,” Franke said.
What's next
The bill passed the state Senate unanimously in May and is now moving through the Assembly. You can sign up to track the bill's progress through the California Legislative Information website.