The Brief

Temperatures across Southern California once again stretched past 100 degrees on Monday, and remained warm Tuesday, with excessive heat warnings still in effect.

Many school districts announced limited schedules for students to begin the week, as the sun baked buildings not designed for extreme heat.

The Los Angeles Unified School District cut the day short at 12 schools, primarily in the San Fernando Valley. Torrance Unified sent its students home early.

“Many of our classrooms do not have air conditioning units,” a TUSD spokesperson said, “This decision prioritizes the health and safety of our students, staff, and community.”

She added that families are notified via text and email of changing conditions.

Midday at San Pedro High School, an intercom announcement reminded students where they could shelter during an excessive heat warning: “Good morning. The following cooling areas are available to students: the student cafeteria, the auditorium, and room 253 in the science building.”

The varying reactions demonstrate how many districts are straining to respond to increasing temperatures with limited capacity — and funding — for structural change. In the short term, that means trying to reduce students’ exposure to heat. In the long term, it means fixing schools built decades ago.

What is a ‘minimum day’?

Both Torrance and Los Angeles Unified called their modified schedules a “minimum day.”

A minimum day represents the fewest hours a school can teach students and still notch an instructional day; most California schools are required to have 180 instructional days in a school year. Minimum days are an alternative to having a full day off; a loss of instructional days means a potential loss of funding.

Another benefit to keeping warm schools open is that they might still be better than the alternative.

“Many families view schools as a safe and cooler environment, particularly in homes that lack air conditioning," said Elvia Cano, a Long Beach Unified spokesperson.

The minimum time required varies by age; younger children are less able to regulate their body temperatures than older students:

• 180 minutes for kindergarten
• 230 minutes for grades 1-3
• 240 minutes for grades 4-12

Classes often end by 2 p.m., if not earlier.

A Long Beach spokesperson said that the county or state need to make the call about whether to take an entire day off. LAist asked the Los Angeles County Office of Education about what the threshold would be to preempt a school day, but hadn’t heard back as of publication.

For students who aren’t able to go home early in the day, schools might offer supervision between end times and the start of scheduled after-school programs. District representatives suggested reaching out to a school's principal.

How do schools keep students, teachers, and staff cool?

Strategies revolve around a combination of keeping students out of the heat; using a variety of tactics to make classrooms feel cooler; and hydrating.

LAUSD has portable outdoor misting fans and pop-up tents at some elementary schools. Long Beach has equipped classrooms lacking A/C with chilled water dispensers and fans, and added window coverings to limit sunlight.

While districts like LAUSD have a policy that every classroom is air conditioned, that doesn’t always mean buildings are, which can leave staff — like cafeteria workers who already work in warm areas — exposed to heat.

How do schools handle outdoor activities and athletics?

Some SoCal schools are keeping students indoors during recess and have rescheduled games during this latest heatwave. A bill under consideration by Gov. Gavin Newsom would require all districts to create a plan to change on-campus activities like physical education during extreme weather.

And for organized sports, California schools now have to monitor the heat using a special thermometer that measures how heat stresses the human body by calculating the impact of the temperature, humidity, wind, and strength of the sun.

Above a certain reading, schools need to give students more breaks and more water, or cancel activities.

What’s the long-term outlook for keeping students safe from climate change?

About 84% of Long Beach schools are air-conditioned, a district spokesperson said. She added that the remaining schools are in the design or construction phase and should be finished within the next three years, except for Poly High School, which is due for more extensive renovations.

LAUSD earlier this year estimated 50,000 heating, ventilation and air conditioning (HVAC) units need to be replaced across the district, but this week declined to offer LAist data about repair requests during the heatwave. HVAC backlog issues have been a long-running issue in the district. And to beat the heat, it doesn’t help that LAUSD schools have a lot of blacktop; efforts to bring in more green space and shade are expected to take years, if not decades.

And that’s even if there’s money for all the necessary construction.

More than two dozen L.A. County school districts will ask voters to approve measures in the fall election asking for money to renovate buildings, including adding or replacing HVAC units.

As Los Angeles homeowners grapple with the expense of rebuilding after last year’s devastating fires, an L.A. City Councilmember is putting forward an idea that could lower some costs.

Councilmember Traci Park, who represents the Pacific Palisades, has introduced a motion to explore waiving part of the city’s portion of the local sales tax for fire victims who purchase rebuilding materials in the city.

The 1% of the local 9.75% sales tax that goes into the city’s general fund would be given back to consumers under the proposal. The waiver could apply to lumber, appliances and other rebuilding goods purchased within the city.

The motion, introduced Friday by Park and seconded by Councilmember John Lee, says: “The City should do everything within its power to alleviate the financial burden for these residents and businesses in order to facilitate their return and stabilize the Pacific Palisades community.”

Would it make much of a difference? 

Economists told LAist the proposal could help many homeowners mitigate the high cost of rebuilding, but likely wouldn’t tip the scales for under-insured, under-resourced property owners.

“It wouldn't hurt if it's very well designed and easy to use,” said Alexander Meeks, a director at the Santa Monica-based Milken Institute. “But I'm not sure if it's really going to tackle the scale of the financial challenge that survivors are facing.”

Meeks noted that the tax waiver wouldn’t lower up-front costs such as environmental testing, architectural design and permitting. And it may not help homeowners sourcing raw materials from outside the city.

Zhiyun Li, a UCLA Anderson School of Management economist, said the waiver could help some homeowners justify the additional cost of rebuilding more fire-safe structures.

“Homeowners must typically pay out of pocket to upgrade to IBHS+ standards, which are more stringent,” Li said. “The tax waiver could encourage upgrading to IBHS+ standards or investing more in mitigation, thereby reducing future risk and improving the likelihood of maintaining insurance coverage.”

What’s next for the proposal? 

The proposed tax relief would not be available to properties that have been sold since the fires started in January 2025.

The motion has been sent to the City Council’s budget and fire recovery committees. If approved by the full council, it would require the city administrative officer, the Office of Finance and the city attorney to report back to the council within 60 days on options for crafting a tax relief plan.

The motion calls for the report to consider factors such as how to minimize the burden of administering the tax relief, what documentation homeowners would have to submit and what it would cost the city to oversee the program.

Senate and House Republican leadership have resurrected a stalled plan to fund the Department of Homeland Security after a record 47-day funding lapse.

House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., and Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., said in a joint statement on Wednesday that the House will take up a measure passed by the Senate last week to fund most of DHS except Immigration and Customs Enforcement and Border Patrol through the end of September.

Republicans would then attempt to fund ICE and Border Patrol for three years using a party-line budget reconciliation bill that would not require support from Democrats.

"In following this two-track approach, the Republican Congress will fully reopen the Department, make sure all federal workers are paid, and specifically fund immigration enforcement and border security for the next three years so that those law-enforcement activities can continue uninhibited," Thune and Johnson wrote.

The agreement comes nearly a week after House Republicans dismissed an identical plan, refusing to take up the Senate-passed measure and instead passing a 60-day short term funding bill for all of DHS that had little chance of overcoming Democratic opposition in the Senate.

Johnson called the agreement a "joke" and President Donald Trump declined to publicly endorse the deal. Trump had previously resisted any package that did not include his push to overhaul federal elections known as the Save America Act.

"I think any deal they make, I'm pretty much not happy with it," Trump told reporters last week.

Democrats welcomed the agreement as in line with their pledge not to give ICE any more money without reforms after immigration enforcement agents killed two U.S. citizens in Minneapolis. But the deal does not include any of the policy demands Democrats are pressing for, such as a ban on masks for immigration enforcement officers and requiring warrants issued by a judge, not just the agency, to enter homes.

"For days, Republican divisions derailed a bipartisan agreement, making American families pay the price for their dysfunction," Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., wrote in a statement Wednesday. "Throughout this fight, Senate Democrats never wavered."

Trump seemed to bless the revived plan earlier Wednesday, writing on social media that he wants a party-line bill to fund immigration enforcement on his desk by June 1.

"We are going to work as fast, and as focused, as possible to replenish funding for our Border and ICE Agents, and the Radical Left Democrats won't be able to stop us," Trump wrote.

Despite the shutdown, ICE has been minimally impacted because Republican lawmakers approved $75 billion for ICE through another party-line budget reconciliation bill last year.

Congress is on a two-week recess, but the Senate and House could move to fund all of DHS except ICE and CBP as early as Thursday using a procedure known as unanimous consent that allows the chambers to circumvent formal voting as long as no member objects.

Even during a recess when most members are not in Washington, this could be unpredictable, especially in the House, where many hard-line conservatives oppose a deal that does not fully fund DHS.

"Let's make this simple: caving to Democrats and not paying CBP and ICE is agreeing to defund Law Enforcement and leaving our borders wide open again," Rep. Scott Perry, R-Pa., a member of the ultra-conservative House Freedom Caucus, wrote on X. "If that's the vote, I'm a NO."

If a member does object, that could require waiting for another vote when all members are back from recess.

Claudia Grisales contributed reporting.
Copyright 2026 NPR

California clocked its second-worst snowpack on record Wednesday, a potentially troubling signal ahead for fire season.

It’s an alarming end to a winter that saw abnormally dry conditions briefly wiped from California’s drought map in January, for the first time in a quarter-century.

Though precipitation to date has been near average, much of it fell as rain rather than snow. Then March’s record-breaking heat melted most of the snow that remains. The state’s major reservoirs are nevertheless brimming above historic averages and are flirting with capacity, and a smattering of snow, rain and thunderstorms are dousing last month’s heat wave.

But experts now warn that California’s case of the missing snowpack could herald an early fire season in the mountains.

On Wednesday, state engineers conducting the symbolic April 1 snowpack measurement at Phillips Station south of Lake Tahoe found no measurable snow in patches of white dotting the grassy field.

“I want to welcome you call to probably one of the quickest snow surveys we’ve had — maybe one where people could actually use an umbrella,” joked Karla Nemeth, director of the California Department of Water Resources. “We’re getting a lot of questions about are we heading into a hydrologic drought? The answer is, I don’t know.”

State data reports that California’s snowpack is closing out the season at an alarming 18% of average statewide, and an even more abysmal 6% of average in the northern mountains that feed California’s major reservoirs.

Only the extreme drought year of 2015 beat this year’s snowpack for the worst on record, measuring in at just 5% of average on April 1st, when the snow historically is at its deepest.

“I think everyone's anticipating that it will be a long, busy fire season,” said Lenya Quinn-Davidson, director of the UC Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources Fire Network.

“Without a snowpack, and with an early spring, it just means that there’s much more time for something like that to happen.”

‘It’s pretty bizarre up here’ 

In the city of South Lake Tahoe, which survived the massive Caldor Fire in the fall of 2021 without losing any structures, fire chief Jim Drennan said his department is already ramping up prevention efforts.

“It's pretty bizarre up here right now. It really seems like June conditions more than March,” Drennan said. “People are already turning the sprinklers on for their lawns.”

Without more precipitation, an early spring may complicate prescribed burning efforts. But Drennan said fire agencies in the Tahoe basin can start mechanically clearing fuels from forest areas earlier than usual.

“That means we can get more work done,” he said.

It also means homeowners need to start hardening their homes now, said Martin Goldberg, battalion chief and fuels management officer for the Lake Valley Fire Protection District, which protects unincorporated communities in the Lake Tahoe Basin’s south shore.

Goldberg urges residents to scour their yards for burnable materials, create defensible space and reach out to local fire departments with questions. The risks are widespread — from firewood, wooden fences, gas cans, plants, pine needles — even lawn furniture stacked against a house.

“In years past, I wouldn't even think of raking and clearing until May,” Goldberg said. “But my yard's completely cleared of snowpack, and it has been for a couple weeks now.”

‘A haystack fire’

Battalion chief David Acuña, a spokesperson for Cal Fire, said fire season is shaped by more than just one year’s snowpack.

Climate change has been remaking California’s fire seasons into fire years. And California’s recent average to abundant water years have fueled what Acuña called “bumper crops of vegetation and brush.”

“Most of California is like a haystack. And if you’ve ever seen a haystack fire, they burn very intensely because there's layers of fuel,” Acuña said.

Like Quinn-Davidson, Acuña wasn’t ready to make specific predictions about fires to come.

But John Abatzoglou, a professor of climatology at UC Merced, said the temperatures and snowpack conditions this year offer a glimpse of California in the latter decades of this century, as fossil fuel use continues to drive global temperatures higher.

How this year’s fires will play out will depend on when, where and how wind, heat, fuel and ignitions combine. But it foreshadows the consequences of a warmer California for water and fire under climate change.

“This,” Abatzoglou said, “is yet another stress test for the future in the state.”

This article was originally published on CalMatters and was republished under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives license.