The Brief

The Pasadena Unified School District board voted 4-3 Thursday night to cut $24.5 million from next year’s budget by eliminating dozens of positions from schools and central administration.

The vote determined the lion’s share of the district’s planned $30.5 million budget reduction and represents about 16% of the district's $189 million projected general fund next school year.

“We are losing people that we care about and love,” Superintendent Elizabeth Blanco said. “I'm not going to deny that. But our programs are going to be different. They're still going to be here.”

Among the cuts are $17.2 million in librarians, teachers, gardeners and school office staff.

The board eliminated just over $5 million in district administration and canceled more than $2.2 million of contracted services such as professional development.

Though the majority of the board supported an amendment to make steeper cuts to administration and partially restore the athletics budget and several teaching positions, the split vote revealed competing visions of how to move the district forward with fewer resources.

“Overall in looking at these cuts, I'm still not sure exactly what we're doing wrong in our spending,” said board member Kimberly Kenne.

How did the community respond?

The district tasked a group of staff, parents, students, labor partners and community members with evaluating and ranking programs and positions to eliminate from schools.

As of Thursday, more than 1,000 people had signed an online petition urging the district leadership to reconsider the proposal. More than a hundred parents, educators and students filled the board’s chambers and two overflow rooms.

Many spoke in support of the programs and funding recommended for elimination, including arts, science, athletics and librarians.

Lyric Mims, left, is a junior in Thurgood Marshall Secondary School’s Academy for Creative Industries and attended Thursday's board meeting, along with dozens of other students, educators and parents.

(

Mariana Dale

/

LAist

)

Pasadena High School sophomore Cory Collins-Lopez said he considered going to a charter school during his freshman year.

“I felt like I was just going to the school and not really belonging there,” Collins-Lopez said. But that feeling changed after playing for the water polo and swim teams.

“Those sports have been a very major factor in my enjoyment and sense of belonging at the school at this current moment,” Collins-Lopez said.

Pasadena Unified competes for students with dozens of local private and charter schools. The proliferation of private schools dates to the 1970s, when white families fled the district to evade desegregation.

Parent Gina Cohen said she pulled two of her five children from PUSD schools to access more special education services and arts programs.

“I would love for my children to stay in this district, but we are being pushed out one talent, interest and special need at a time,” Cohen said.

What are the details of the final plan?

After more than an hour and a half of discussion, the board altered the district’s recommendations and:

• Restored about six career and technical education teachers at the district’s high schools. 
• Reduced cuts to athletics by more than a half-million dollars, with each high school eliminating between $100,000 and $143,000 based on student enrollment. 
• Increased central office cuts from $3.6 million and about 28 positions to $5.1 million and 38 positions. 

The teachers union estimated layoffs for about 40 educators, including science and arts teachers.

Jonathan Gardner, United Teachers of Pasadena president, urged the board to cut more administrative positions during Thursday's meeting.

(

Mariana Dale

/

LAist

)

Library services across the district will be reduced to part time.

“Middle school libraries, in particular, are designed to get kids joyfully reading and writing and we do,” said Octavia E. Butler Magnet librarian Natalie Daily. “But it takes being there every day.”

For example, Butler has held a science-fiction festival inspired by the school’s namesake, a PUSD alumna, for the past four years.

Also among the layoffs are dozens of members from unions representing school support staff, including custodians, security guards and the gardeners who helped restore campuses after the Eaton Fire.

A student at the 2024 Octavia E. Butler Library Science Fiction Festival. “It's just ways for kids to be engaged in both science and art and creation,” librarian and organizer Natalie Daily said of the event at the time.

(

Julie Leopo

/

LAist

)

Cuts to athletics would be spread across high schools. Previously, district staff predicted that schools would have to eliminate some of their teams.

John Muir High School Athletic Director Alfredo Resendiz said the change will allow the school to preserve its 17 athletic programs, though teams will likely play fewer games and need to do more fundraising.

“ We're gonna be working overtime during the Thanksgiving break [at] all sites to make sure that we get those numbers and keep as many teams as possible while trying to offer the full athletic experience for every student athlete," Resendiz said.

Impact to the central office

Ahead of the vote Thursday, many parents expressed concerns that schools shouldered too much of the burden, as opposed to central administration.

While the board ultimately decreased the central office budget, nearly half of the board’s members voted against the amendment.

All expressed reservations about eliminating additional central office positions, which include people responsible for payroll, curriculum development, the special education department and the educational channel, KLRN, which broadcasts the board meetings and other district events.

District staff said it was unclear how these responsibilities would be redistributed to school sites.

“It's just hard to conceive burdening a system that's already burdened and still being able to bring our best to our classrooms,” said board member Michelle R. Bailey.

How did PUSD get to this point?

For the past several years, PUSD has spent more money than it brings in.

One factor is that PUSD, like many districts in the region, is enrolling fewer students, and the state funds schools based on average daily attendance.

“Over the past 30 years, Pasadena Unified has faced a mounting fiscal calamity, one that you can no longer ignore or postpone,” Octavio Castelo, director of business advisory services for the Los Angeles County Office of Education, said at Thursday’s meeting. “Despite your best efforts and intentions, the district has not been able to live within its means.”

LACOE has warned that without significant reductions in spending, the district will not be able to meet its financial obligations and risks losing the ability to govern itself. He said the district is projected to have $149.4 million of deficit spending between 2025 and 2028.

“This is not a temporary shortfall,” Castelo said. “It's a structural crisis.”

The board must now submit a fiscal report to the county in the beginning of December. Layoff notices related to the cuts would be issued by March 2026 and the changes would take effect next school year.

Tell us how you feel

Share your thoughts on the budget cuts with this form:

The Los Angeles City Council decided Tuesday to put off the full effects of a major new state housing law by allowing low-rise apartment buildings in some neighborhoods where such housing has long been banned.

All council members voted in favor of those plans except for Traci Park, who was absent from the meeting.

California’s Senate Bill 79 is set to take effect July 1. The law overrides local limits on housing development by allowing apartment buildings between five and nine stories tall near train stations and rapid bus stops.

However, cities are allowed to postpone those changes until 2030 by developing their own incremental plans for more housing. L.A. elected leaders have chosen to delay. They’re doing so through the city’s new Low-Rise Ordinance, which aims to allow buildings up to four stories tall in 57 neighborhoods near transit lines.

Why it matters

L.A. lawmakers have tried many approaches to bring down L.A.’s high rents. But they have consistently voted to stop apartment developers from encroaching on the nearly three-quarters of city residential land reserved for single-family homes.

Pushed by state lawmakers, city leaders are now having to accept some changes in single-family neighborhoods located near public transit lines.

The reaction

Some local officials and homeowners have expressed frustration over new state limits on their ability to stop development in low-density zones. But advocates for more development said the council’s decision will help address high rents by allowing more housing in areas that have long been off-limits to new apartments.

“The City Council voted to open up high-resource single-family neighborhoods near transit stations,” said Scott Epstein, policy director with Abundant Housing L.A. “This reform is long overdue and will help build a future where Angelenos of all incomes can find homes in the neighborhoods of their choice.”

Where will the projects be allowed?

Officials with the city’s planning department said residents can see whether Low-Rise Ordinance projects will be allowed in their neighborhood by clicking on this interactive map and making two selections from the “layer list” menu: “Opportunity Station Sites Eligible for Low Rise” and “Sites Eligible for Low Rise Outside of Opportunity Station.”

The map shows that some of the areas eligible for new apartment buildings under this plan include Westside neighborhoods within a half-mile of the E Line’s Westwood/Rancho Park station, pockets of the San Fernando Valley near G Line stops, and parts of Eagle Rock along Colorado Boulevard’s planned North Hollywood to Pasadena rapid bus line.

Is this a done deal?

Both plans — the decision to delay full SB 79 implementation, and the new Low-Rise Ordinance — now go to Mayor Karen Bass for final approval. Council members are also considering some tweaks they say would help Low-Rise Ordinance projects get built.

Those changes would include letting developers build denser projects if they reserve more units for low-income renters, as well as rules that would let developers build ground-level parking instead of costlier underground parking. The council’s planning committee voted Tuesday to forward those suggestions to the full City Council for further debate.

There’s a new tool to fight illegal fireworks this Fourth of July: drones.

“A drone’s real-time aerial view can help officers assess situations faster, improve safety, support faster response times and ensure the right resources are sent where they’re needed most,” the Anaheim Police Department stated in an Instagram post.

Anaheim's department is the latest law enforcement agency using the technology to quickly identify illegal fireworks use. The Downey City Council is expected to vote Tuesday night on potential new fines and new rules that would allow local law enforcement to use drones to patrol neighborhoods for illegal fireworks usage.

How it works

Here's how the tech is put to use: Seconds after authorities receive a call reporting illegal fireworks activity, drones can take to the air, hovering above neighborhoods and businesses to find a specific location and an offender. The surveillance devices are equipped with night vision and zoom lenses that allow first responders to record high definition videos right from their Real Time Crime Center at the station.

Then, officers can determine whether to send out a patrol car or issue a citation for the incident.

Why it matters

The city’s drone usage comes as law enforcement agencies across Southern California brace for the annual flood of complaints about illegal firework use at this time of the year. Drones make the most effective use of time and resources, experts say.

“We'll typically see about 2,000 calls and about 300 related to fireworks,” Anaheim’s chief communications officer Mike Lyster explained about the Fourth of July. “It really is a better use of resources on what is always a very, very busy holiday for us.”

Drones allow officials to collect enough evidence to issue these citations. In Anaheim, the punishment starts at $1,000 and climbs to $3,000 by the third offense. But authorities say the goal is to curb illegal fireworks use altogether due to the risk of injury and wildfires.

Lyster hopes that people will think twice about using illegal fireworks this holiday — not just because of the fines — but because of its negative impact on local communities.

“The Palisades fire was ultimately started by illegal fireworks, and sadly, not in our city, but in our neighboring city, a young Anaheim girl died in an illegal fireworks incident last year,” Lyster said.

Where are drones already in use?

More cities are testing this method in order to crack down on illegal firework use. Sacramento, San Bernardino and Riverside are just a few of the other areas that have adopted this technology in recent years.

How do I know what's legal?

If you have any questions about what is legal or not in your community, a quick Google search can help.

Each county goes by different regulations for the types of fireworks you can use — if at all.

For example, parts of Anaheim allow “safe and sane” fireworks to be used only on the Fourth of July between 10 a.m and 10 p.m. This includes non-explosive, non-aerial devices like fountains, sparklers and smoke balls. State-approved fireworks will have a State Fire Marshal seal.

LAist staffer Anjanette Gile also contributed to this report.

The story first appeared on The LA Local.

Your neighborhood has a reporter. Have you met them yet?

On Saturday, coffee shops across L.A. are turning into places where you can tell a journalist exactly what’s been bugging you about your block … while drinking amazing coffee.

From Boyle Heights to Silver Lake to Inglewood to Long Beach, local reporters will be set up at neighborhood coffee shops from from 10 a.m. to 3 p.m. — to hear what’s on your mind. Got a tip about a pothole that’s been eating tires for years? A landlord the city keeps ignoring? A community hero nobody’s written about? We want to hear it all!

It’s part of Local News Day LA, a pop-up series organized by The LA Local that connects you with your local reporter and give you a chance to become the source instead of just the reader.

LAist has been meeting community members in person through LAist Listens tabling events by popping up at local businesses.

See below for the full list of participating media outlets and coffee shops — The LA Local and our media partners hope you’ll join us:

LAist will be joining The LA Local and other local media partners for Local News Day LA on June 27.

(

The LA Local

)

Where to find a journalist

1. The LA Local – Koreatown, Pico Union, Westlake will be hosted by Open Market
2. The LA Local – Inglewood and South LA will be hosted by Asteroid Vinyl Cafe
3. Boyle Heights Beat will be hosted by Picaresca Cafe
4. CalMatters will be hosted by Yia Caffe 
5. Calo News will be hosted by Cruzita’s Deli and Cafe
6. The Eastsider will be hosted by Rosebud Coffee (Highland Park location)
7. LAist will be hosted by Cafe Calle
8. Los Angeles Radio Collective will be hosted by Spoke Bicycle Cafe
9. LA Sentinel will be hosted by Patria Coffee
10. LA Taco will be hosted by Cafecito Organico (Silverlake location)
11. LA Public Press will be hosted by Holy Grounds Coffee & Tea
12. Long Beach Post will be hosted by Wrigley Coffee
13. Q Voice News will be hosted by Hot Java
14. USC Annenberg Media will be hosted by South LA Cafe (Western location)

Come enjoy a cup of coffee (or tea) with us while supplies last. 

A coalition of 17 states and a trade association representing U.S. wholesalers and distributors have sued California to block the enforcement of a stringent recycling law that aims to reduce plastic packaging waste.

The lawsuit, filed Monday in federal court, argues that California’s recently finalized regulations that will gradually require companies to scale back single-use plastics and ensure all packaging is recycling or compostable should be struck down. The plaintiffs called the regulations “onerous mandates” that will cause steep price increases in everyday necessities that will be passed on, at least in part, to consumers.

“Once again, California is trying to enact a policy that negatively impacts the rest of the country. If California goes unchecked, consumers will be forced to pay more for basic necessities,” Nebraska Attorney General Mike Hilgers, who led the coalition, said in a news release.

The law, called the Plastic Pollution Prevention and Packaging Producer Responsibility Act, was enacted in 2022.

“Virtually every product packaged or shipped in plastic containers, as well as a significant number of other types of packaging materials that merely incorporate plastics, fall into the Act’s remarkable sweep,” the lawsuit said.

The National Association of Wholesaler-Distributors, which represents companies that import and distribute goods in California, also joined the lawsuit.

“California is not entitled to pronounce nationwide policies,” Eric Hoplin, the trade association’s president and CEO, said in a statement. “Because the Act extends California’s regulatory reach far beyond its borders and brings within its sweep conduct wholly unconnected to California, the Act violates principles of federalism, the horizontal separation of powers, and due process.”

The lawsuit argues the law violates both the U.S. and California constitutions. It asks the court to declare California’s law invalid and unenforceable, and halt its implementation.

The lawsuit names as defendants Zoe Heller, director of California’s recycling agency known as CalRecycle, and the Circular Action Alliance, a nonprofit involved with implementing the law.

Melanie Turner, a spokesperson for CalRecycle, said in an emailed statement that the agency does not comment on pending litigation and that it remained focused on implementing the law.

The alliance said in a statement that it was aware of the lawsuit and closely monitoring developments while at the same time working to implement the law’s “ambitious goals.”

In a May news release announcing regulations under the law, state officials said the changes would fight plastics pollution while protecting the interests of taxpayers and local governments.

“California is shifting the responsibility of managing single-use plastic and packaging onto the producers. New packaging reforms lower waste costs for communities and decrease garbage and pollution across the state,” Environmental Protection Secretary Yana Garcia said in a statement. “This approach pushes producers to innovate and design packaging that truly supports a circular economy.”

Joining Nebraska in the lawsuit were 16 other states with Republican attorneys general: Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Indiana, Iowa, Louisiana, Missouri, Montana, North Dakota, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Texas, Utah and West Virginia.Environmental groups also have sued over the law. A coalition that included the Natural Resources Defense Council recently filed a complaint over what it said in a news release were “weakened” final regulations for the “landmark” law.