The Brief

The Pasadena Unified School District board voted 4-3 Thursday night to cut $24.5 million from next year’s budget by eliminating dozens of positions from schools and central administration.

The vote determined the lion’s share of the district’s planned $30.5 million budget reduction and represents about 16% of the district's $189 million projected general fund next school year.

“We are losing people that we care about and love,” Superintendent Elizabeth Blanco said. “I'm not going to deny that. But our programs are going to be different. They're still going to be here.”

Among the cuts are $17.2 million in librarians, teachers, gardeners and school office staff.

The board eliminated just over $5 million in district administration and canceled more than $2.2 million of contracted services such as professional development.

Though the majority of the board supported an amendment to make steeper cuts to administration and partially restore the athletics budget and several teaching positions, the split vote revealed competing visions of how to move the district forward with fewer resources.

“Overall in looking at these cuts, I'm still not sure exactly what we're doing wrong in our spending,” said board member Kimberly Kenne.

How did the community respond?

The district tasked a group of staff, parents, students, labor partners and community members with evaluating and ranking programs and positions to eliminate from schools.

As of Thursday, more than 1,000 people had signed an online petition urging the district leadership to reconsider the proposal. More than a hundred parents, educators and students filled the board’s chambers and two overflow rooms.

Many spoke in support of the programs and funding recommended for elimination, including arts, science, athletics and librarians.

Lyric Mims, left, is a junior in Thurgood Marshall Secondary School’s Academy for Creative Industries and attended Thursday's board meeting, along with dozens of other students, educators and parents.

(

Mariana Dale

/

LAist

)

Pasadena High School sophomore Cory Collins-Lopez said he considered going to a charter school during his freshman year.

“I felt like I was just going to the school and not really belonging there,” Collins-Lopez said. But that feeling changed after playing for the water polo and swim teams.

“Those sports have been a very major factor in my enjoyment and sense of belonging at the school at this current moment,” Collins-Lopez said.

Pasadena Unified competes for students with dozens of local private and charter schools. The proliferation of private schools dates to the 1970s, when white families fled the district to evade desegregation.

Parent Gina Cohen said she pulled two of her five children from PUSD schools to access more special education services and arts programs.

“I would love for my children to stay in this district, but we are being pushed out one talent, interest and special need at a time,” Cohen said.

What are the details of the final plan?

After more than an hour and a half of discussion, the board altered the district’s recommendations and:

• Restored about six career and technical education teachers at the district’s high schools. 
• Reduced cuts to athletics by more than a half-million dollars, with each high school eliminating between $100,000 and $143,000 based on student enrollment. 
• Increased central office cuts from $3.6 million and about 28 positions to $5.1 million and 38 positions. 

The teachers union estimated layoffs for about 40 educators, including science and arts teachers.

Jonathan Gardner, United Teachers of Pasadena president, urged the board to cut more administrative positions during Thursday's meeting.

(

Mariana Dale

/

LAist

)

Library services across the district will be reduced to part time.

“Middle school libraries, in particular, are designed to get kids joyfully reading and writing and we do,” said Octavia E. Butler Magnet librarian Natalie Daily. “But it takes being there every day.”

For example, Butler has held a science-fiction festival inspired by the school’s namesake, a PUSD alumna, for the past four years.

Also among the layoffs are dozens of members from unions representing school support staff, including custodians, security guards and the gardeners who helped restore campuses after the Eaton Fire.

A student at the 2024 Octavia E. Butler Library Science Fiction Festival. “It's just ways for kids to be engaged in both science and art and creation,” librarian and organizer Natalie Daily said of the event at the time.

(

Julie Leopo

/

LAist

)

Cuts to athletics would be spread across high schools. Previously, district staff predicted that schools would have to eliminate some of their teams.

John Muir High School Athletic Director Alfredo Resendiz said the change will allow the school to preserve its 17 athletic programs, though teams will likely play fewer games and need to do more fundraising.

“ We're gonna be working overtime during the Thanksgiving break [at] all sites to make sure that we get those numbers and keep as many teams as possible while trying to offer the full athletic experience for every student athlete," Resendiz said.

Impact to the central office

Ahead of the vote Thursday, many parents expressed concerns that schools shouldered too much of the burden, as opposed to central administration.

While the board ultimately decreased the central office budget, nearly half of the board’s members voted against the amendment.

All expressed reservations about eliminating additional central office positions, which include people responsible for payroll, curriculum development, the special education department and the educational channel, KLRN, which broadcasts the board meetings and other district events.

District staff said it was unclear how these responsibilities would be redistributed to school sites.

“It's just hard to conceive burdening a system that's already burdened and still being able to bring our best to our classrooms,” said board member Michelle R. Bailey.

How did PUSD get to this point?

For the past several years, PUSD has spent more money than it brings in.

One factor is that PUSD, like many districts in the region, is enrolling fewer students, and the state funds schools based on average daily attendance.

“Over the past 30 years, Pasadena Unified has faced a mounting fiscal calamity, one that you can no longer ignore or postpone,” Octavio Castelo, director of business advisory services for the Los Angeles County Office of Education, said at Thursday’s meeting. “Despite your best efforts and intentions, the district has not been able to live within its means.”

LACOE has warned that without significant reductions in spending, the district will not be able to meet its financial obligations and risks losing the ability to govern itself. He said the district is projected to have $149.4 million of deficit spending between 2025 and 2028.

“This is not a temporary shortfall,” Castelo said. “It's a structural crisis.”

The board must now submit a fiscal report to the county in the beginning of December. Layoff notices related to the cuts would be issued by March 2026 and the changes would take effect next school year.

Tell us how you feel

Share your thoughts on the budget cuts with this form:

A bipartisan majority in the Republican-led House voted on Wednesday to end the war with Iran, the clearest rebuke yet of President Donald Trump's handling of the conflict and the subsequent economic fallout.

The war powers resolution passed by a vote of 215 to 208, with four Republicans joining Democrats in support.

The resolution had originally been set for a vote two weeks ago, but Republican leaders sent House members home early for a May recess when it appeared the largely Democratic-backed measure had enough Republican votes for passage. However, the extended break didn't shift GOP support to kill the measure.

Ahead of the vote, House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., defended Trump's decision to attack Iran.

"Remember … Iran declared war on us 47 years ago. They chant 'death to America.' The president is trying to keep the people safe," Johnson told reporters.

The vote is mostly symbolic. Democrats, despite multiple attempts, have been unable to pass a war powers resolution through the Republican-led Senate. Even if the measure passed in Congress, it would almost certainly be vetoed by President Trump, whose administration has questioned the constitutionality of the War Powers Act.

Still, Senate Democrats have been inching closer. Last month, they won support on a procedural measure to set up a war powers vote after a handful of Republicans broke ranks to join them. A final vote has yet to be scheduled.

The administration has furiously pushed against the effort in both the House and Senate. Wednesday's vote signals his support for the war may be slipping even among some members of his own party.

Now more than 90 days into the conflict, some Republicans have expressed frustration that the war does not appear to have a clear end in sight. Talks to end the war have yet to gain clear traction, casting doubt on a fragile ceasefire. Just hours before the vote, Iran and the U.S. traded strikes in the Persian Gulf.

The conflict began on Feb 28 with strikes by U.S. and Israeli forces on Iran. Under the 1973 War Powers Act, the president has 60 days to end hostilities if there has been no congressional authorization – though he is able to seek a 30-day extension. The same law also gives Congress the ability to end hostilities by voting on a resolution to end military action, subject to presidential veto.

The top Democrat on the House Foreign Affairs Committee, Rep. Gregory Meeks, D-N.Y., warned ahead of the May recess when the vote was delayed that the plan was sure to pass.

"Let's be clear: Republicans pulled this vote because they knew they were going to lose it," Meeks said. "They know this war is a political and strategic disaster."
Copyright 2026 NPR

Electric vehicles offer many opportunities to save money: on gas, on oil changes, on engine maintenance. But, it turns out, insurance isn’t one of them. In fact, the latest data shows that EVs typically cost $3,159 per year to insure — nearly $1,000 more than gas-powered cars. It’s an added burden that could make the payback period on EVs significantly longer.

On average, the insurance gap between electric and internal combustion engine, or ICE, vehicles was 42%, according to a report released by the insurance-comparison marketplace Insurify. But it varies drastically by state and model. The most expensive locale was Washington, D.C., where coverage cost $6,394 versus $4,124 for ICE cars. Maine was the cheapest at $1,476, just $184 more than a conventional car. The difference was most pronounced in Rhode Island, which has a 73% spread.

Generally speaking, luxury brands like Tesla, Mercedes-Benz, and Audi are particularly expensive to insure, with premiums on many models topping $4,000. Volvo, Chevrolet, Ford, and Hyundai offer cars at the lower end of the spectrum. Insurify wouldn’t disclose which insurers had the most expensive rates, but did say Lemonade, Root, and GEICO offered the most affordable EV coverage.

“Insurers were charging those higher premiums to balance their risks,” said Julia Taliesin, an economic analyst and insurance agent at Insurify, who wrote the report. It is based on more than 235 million quotes in Insurify’s proprietary database. Seven states — Alaska, Hawai‘i, North Dakota, New Hampshire, South Dakota, Vermont, and Wyoming — are excluded due to lower quoting volume. But high insurance expenses means it can take more driving before an EV pays for itself through lower fuel and operating costs. Even if electricity were free and gas stays at $4 per gallon it translates to at least 5,800 more miles a year compared to a car that gets 25 mpg.

A primary reason for the disparity is that EVs cost more to fix.

“We do see that there is a delta in the cost of repair for electric vehicles compared to ICE,” said Ryan Mandell, a vice president of strategy and market intelligence at Mitchell, a company which provides data and software related to car repairs. He pegs the difference at about 15%, noting that batteries are relatively expensive to fix and for mechanics to work around and that EVs have complicated electronics. But there are more fundamental factors as well, like the lack of an engine.

Mandell gave the Ford F-150 as an example. From 2022 to 2025 an electric version of the pickup truck, called the Lightning, was available alongside gas-only and hybrid versions. When Mitchell subjected the gasoline and EV models to a front-end crash test the engine in the traditional model actually absorbed quite a bit of the impact. Because it doesn’t have that additional structure, Ford designed the Lightning with additional reinforcement that cost around 30% more to fix.

“The Lightning had more crash parts on the front of the vehicle,” said Mandell. He also noted that Ford requires removing the battery before doing any work, which increases labor costs. “It adds up.”

Repair costs, however, are not the only factor insurers consider. Insurify’s data showed insurance rates for the two trucks are roughly the same, which Taliesin said suggests driver demographics and behavior play a role, too. “One of the most significant is personal driving history and credit history,” she said. Given the Lightning’s much higher cost, the credit scores of owners could potentially be higher. And Insurify’s data shows that the ticket and accident rates for Lightning drivers are about half that of traditional F-150s.

“Factors like climate risk, vehicle theft rates, population density, insurance regulation, repair infrastructure, and EV adoption levels contribute to regional cost differences,” the Insurify report stated. In several states it cited climate-driven extreme weather, such as hurricanes and flooding, as drivers of high costs.

This EV insurance story isn’t unique to the United States. In 2024, BloombergNEF found about the same spread in the United Kingdom and Germany. France saw double the disparity. Overall, though, American EV owners still paid 87% more for insurance than Europeans.

“Several model-specific factors have driven the wider cost gaps in the large and SUV segments,” said Aleksandra O’Donovan, head of electrified transport at BloombergNEF, pointing to the Tesla Model Y as a particularly extreme example. “[The U.S. price] is nearly triple the insurance rate for the same vehicle in Germany.”

From 2023 to 2025, the EV insurance gap in the U.S. grew from 29% to 49%. But this year, it came down slightly, which Taliesin said is among a few good signs for EV drivers. Another is that the disparity among cars made in the last two years was only 18 percent — compared 42% across all years.

That drop is partly because auto insurance prices fell across the board in the last year. But Taliesin also said that ICE cars are catching up to EVs in terms of how complicated and expensive they are to fix. The cost of EV batteries is also trending downward, too. As EV sales have grown, there is more data for companies to base their prices on and more incentive for them to court EV owners.

”We’ve been seeing a ton of insurance-shopping behavior as insurers have been dropping their rates to compete for business,” said Taliesin, who is bullish for consumers. “That’s definitely a welcome reprieve.”

This article originally appeared in Grist at https://grist.org/transportation/the-hidden-cost-of-owning-an-ev-expensive-insurance/.

Grist is a nonprofit, independent media organization dedicated to telling stories of climate solutions and a just future. Learn more at Grist.org