Sponsored message
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

The Brief

The most important stories for you to know today
  • Newsom's new plan focuses on boys' mental health
    A young boy writes in a workbook with a pencil in a classroom setting.

    Topline:

    Gov. Gavin Newsom has issued a new executive order directing state agencies to expand mental health services and support systems for boys and young men, aiming to address what experts call a deepening crisis of loneliness and depression among this group.

    Bridging the gap: With fewer young men attending college and higher suicide rates amongst them, the directive underscores the need for early intervention and more male role models in education and counseling.

    Mental health focus: Newsom's order tasks agencies with promoting mental health and help-seeking behavior among boys and men, especially through schools and community services.

    Gov. Gavin Newsom has ordered statewide agencies to expand access to mental health support, along with educational and workforce opportunities, in response to what experts say is a growing crisis of loneliness and depression among boys and young men.

    Newsom’s executive order, issued last week, aims to address rising rates of suicide, unemployment and gaps in educational achievement for men in their 20s and early 30s in California.

    “Too many young men and boys are suffering in silence — disconnected from community, opportunity, and even their own families,” said Newsom on Wednesday. “This action is about turning that around.”

    The governor orders the California Health and Human Services Agency, alongside programs like the Children and Youth Behavioral Health Initiative, to “support the mental health and help-seeking behavior” of boys and men and improve access to services in schools and the behavioral health system.

    The directive highlights ongoing early childhood interventions and integrated social and health services in community schools, but it does not include new funding or programming.

    Work and education pathways

    Low workforce participation and college attendance for men is a trend that has worsened over the last decade.

    The college-going rate for young men who completed high school in California is 57%, compared to 68% for young women. Rates are even lower for some racial and ethnic groups — 49% for Black and Latino men, 40% for Indigenous men.

    Labor force participation for men without college degrees is also at an all-time low: 1 in 9 men between 25 and 54 are neither employed nor looking for work.

    Newsom references several programs in his executive order that tackle this, including the Master Plan for Career Education, a framework to ensure billions of dollars are spent correctly across a dizzying array of agencies under the banner of career education. The governor previously announced that $20 million will be available to support apprenticeships through the Master Plan.

    California Volunteers and the Labor and Workforce Development Agency are also instructed to examine opportunities to increase participation from men.

    A crisis of loneliness

    Newsom attributes a trend of “disconnected youth,” who are neither in school nor in the workforce, to a growing “crisis of loneliness.” Nearly 1 in 4 men under 30 years old report having no close friends, and 42% of teenage boys report experiencing feelings of loneliness.

    Evy Lowe, a social worker and senior director at the Child and Family Guidance Center, said that in recent years, most of the boys and young men she has worked with have become more anxious due to persistent loneliness and isolation from the COVID-19 pandemic. But in her 30 years of serving children and families, Lowe said that schools have also missed the nuances of behavior between boys and girls who need support.

    “Boys tend to be diagnosed with acting out behaviors — like ADHD or oppositional defiance — and what’s missed is their depressive or anxiety behaviors,” Lowe said. “Our boys are sometimes labeled as ‘non-compliant’ versus needing support, and so they shut down because of low self-esteem, or they might act out in anger and frustration because of lack of coping skills, lack of understanding and lack of support.”

    The executive order also directs the California Department of Education to identify ways to recruit more men as teachers and school counselors through a previous $1 billion investment in teacher workforce expansion. Only 23% of teachers and 23% of school counselors across the country are men, and many educators say male teachers and counselors can model healthy leadership and emotional support for boys.

    “There’s just not a lot of examples in our society of men who are strong and can get things done, but also find some strength and vulnerability and can open up emotionally,” said Marlon Morgan, CEO of nonprofit Wellness Together and a former school counselor. “I’d like to see [the state] continue to invest in roles like wellness coaches and recruit more men, especially for our boys.”

    As the only male school counselor in a Northern California district of 11,000 students, Morgan said he often led his school’s anger management group and met with boys struggling with anger or aggression. He’d teach them how to regulate “acting out” or “acting in” behaviors by talking about feelings of sadness or fear with each other. Early intervention, paired with peer support, helped prevent boys from resorting to violence or self-harm, he said, especially in contrast to detentions, suspensions or expulsions, which only further isolate those students.

    “When you see a boy who’s disconnected, feels hopeless, helpless, and then starts to make a plan to act out that anger on someone,” Morgan said, “if that boy could have been deeply connected socially and felt the value in meaningful relationships, they would have been able to get some of that sadness out that eventually became anger.”

    Newsom’s order instructs state agencies to develop recommendations to support boys and young men, as well as those around them, affected by violence. In California, men aged 15 to 44 die by suicide at three to four times the rate of women, often by firearms. Almost half of female homicide victims are also killed by a current or former male intimate partner.

    Research suggests that these cycles of violence can take root in early childhood or adolescence, when schools excessively punish boys for their behavior. Pre-school boys are 4.5 times more likely to be suspended than girls, and Black boys are three times more likely to be suspended or expelled than their white peers.

    Punitive measures significantly increase the rate of school dropouts, juvenile incarceration and negative life outcomes for boys and young men. Schools with fewer support staff are also more likely to punish instead of provide mental health intervention, especially when boys exhibit stress responses that are mischaracterized as aggression.

    “It’s easier for boys to feel like they are a problem than to consider that they might have a problem,” Morgan said.

    Barriers to access

    The executive order also directs the California Health and Human Services Agency to examine gender disparities. Boys and young men are far less likely to seek mental health treatment than girls and young women; of those, young Black men receive the least services, despite higher rates of depression and suicide.

    “We appreciate Gov. Newsom’s recognition of the urgent mental health needs facing young men and boys, especially Black youth who are too often overlooked,” said Christopher Nellum, executive director of EdTrust-West. “With sustained investment in culturally affirming support, diverse educators, and broader pathways to success, California has a real opportunity to lead with equity-minded practices and accountability.”

    For Angela Vázquez, advocacy director of mental health at the Children’s Partnership, the governor’s directive places a tall order on programs that may not be able to deliver sustainable mental health support to young men. Most one-time state investments, through the $4.7 billion Children and Youth Behavioral Health Initiative, for example, are set to expire in 2027.

    Newly hired mental health clinicians and wellness coaches may be sustained by Medi-Cal reimbursement; however, most non-clinical programs like the Youth Mental Health Academy, which can promote social connection and peer support among boys, will likely come to an end.

    “The vast majority of state resources associated with these initiatives are one-time funds that are nearly exhausted,” said Vázquez. “It remains to be seen where the long-term funding for these efforts, particularly for non-clinical youth development programs and community-defined practices, will be resourced from.”

    While Proposition 1, a mental health and substance abuse treatment initiative that voters approved in 2024, preserves an estimated $318 million for youth-focused early intervention services, the state spends nearly all of its $6.4 billion revenue to treat adults experiencing severe mental and behavioral health disabilities. According to Vázquez, the executive order does little to prioritize prevention, such as classroom-based infant and early childhood mental health consultations, which significantly reduces preschool suspensions and risk of incarceration for young Black boys.

    An analysis by Manatt Health estimates that federal cuts will cause roughly 151,000 children in the state to lose their Medi-Cal coverage — a significant source of funding for school-based mental health services — and boys and young men in California may further lose access to new or improved services without the state protecting access to health care.

    “Drastic cuts to Medi-Cal, our state’s housing crisis, and violent immigration enforcement from the (Trump) administration threaten families from meeting their basic health and economic needs — which inevitably leads to a chronic stress response,” Vázquez said.

    “Those interventions are of limited value if low-income children and families in California, the majority of whom are of color, cannot access those services in a timely manner,” she said.

    EdSource reporter Emma Gallegos contributed to this report.

  • Dodgers fans grapple with loyalty ahead of it
    A man with medium skin tone, wearing a blue Dodgers shirt, speaks into a microphone standing behind a podium next to others holding up signs that read "No repeat to White House. Legalization for all" and "Stand with you Dodger community." They all stand in front of a blue sign that reads "Welcome to Dodger Stadium."
    Jorge "Coqui" H. Rodriguez speaks at a press conference outside Dodger Stadium on Wednesady to demand the Dodgers not visit the White House following their 2025 World Series win.

    Topline:

    Less than 24 hours before season opener, longtime Dodgers fans demand the team divest from immigration detention centers and decline the White House visit.

    More details: More than 30 people joined Richard Santillan on Wednesday morning for a press conference held near 1000 Vin Scully Drive to convey a message directly to the team. “We are demanding that the Dodgers stop participating in funding of inhumane treatment of families and do not go to the White House to celebrate with the criminal in chief,” Evelyn Escatiola told the crowd. “Together we have the power to make a change.”

    The backstory: The team’s 2025’s visit to the White House drew ire from the largely Latino fan base, citing the Trump administration’s ongoing attacks on immigrants. In June, the team came under further scrutiny when rumors swirled online that federal immigration agents were using the stadium’s parking, which immigration authorities later denied in statements posted on social media accounts.

    Read on ... for more on how some fans are feeling leading up to Opening Day.

    This story first appeared on The LA Local.

    Since 1977, Richard Santillan has been to every Opening Day game at Dodger Stadium. 

    “The tradition goes from my father, to me, to my children and grandchildren. Some of my best memories are with my father and children here at Dodger Stadium,” Santillan told The LA Local, smiling under the shade of palm trees near the entrance to the ballpark Wednesday morning. He was there to protest the team less than 24 hours before Opening Day.

    Santillan, like countless other loyal Dodgers fans, is grappling with his fan identity over the team’s decision to accept an invitation to the White House and owner Mark Walter’s ties to ICE detention facilities.

    More than 30 people joined Santillan on Wednesday morning for a press conference held near 1000 Vin Scully Drive to convey a message directly to the team. 

    “We are demanding the Dodgers stop participating in funding of inhumane treatment of families and do not go to the White House to celebrate with the criminal in chief,” Evelyn Escatiola told the crowd. “Together, we have the power to make a change.”

    Escatiola, a former dean of East Los Angeles College and longtime community organizer, urged fans to flex their economic power by “letting the Dodgers know that we do not support repression.”

    Jorge “Coqui” Rodriguez, a lifelong Dodgers fan, spoke to the crowd and called on Dodgers ownership to divest from immigration detention centers owned and operated by GEO Group and CoreCivic.

    A man with medium skin tone, wearing a blue Dodgers t-shirt, speaks into a microphone behind a podium.
    Jorge Coqui H Rodriguez speaks at a press conference outside Dodger Stadium on March 25, 2026, to demand the Dodgers not to visit the White House following their 2025 World Series win.
    (
    J.W. Hendricks
    /
    The LA Local
    )

    In a phone interview a day before the protest, Rodriguez told The LA Local he did not want the Dodgers using his “cheve” or beer money to fund detention centers. 

    “They can’t take our parking money, our cacahuate money, our cheve money, our Dodger Dog money and invest those funds into corporations that are imprisoning people. It’s wrong,” Rodriguez said. 

    Rodriguez considers the Dodgers one of the most racially diverse teams and said the players need to support fans at a time when heightened immigration enforcement has become more common across L.A.

    The team’s 2025’s visit to the White House drew ire from the largely Latino fan base, citing the Trump administration’s ongoing attacks on immigrants. 

    In June, the team came under further scrutiny when rumors swirled online that federal immigration agents were using the stadium’s parking, which immigration authorities later denied in statements posted on social media accounts.

    The team again came under fire after not releasing a statement on the impacts of ICE raids on its mostly Latino fan base at the height of immigration enforcement last summer. The team later agreed to invest $1 million to support families affected by immigration enforcement.

    When he learned the Dodgers were pledging only $1 million to families in need, Rodriguez called the amount a  “slap in the face.” 

    “These guys just bought the Lakers for billions of dollars and they give a million dollars to fight for legal services? That’s a joke,” Rodriguez said. “They need to have a moral backbone and not be investing in those companies.”

    According to reporting from the Los Angeles Times, former Dodgers pitcher Clayton Kershawsaid last week that he is looking forward to the trip.

    “I went when President [Joe] Biden was in office. I’m going to go when President [Donald] Trump is in office,” Kershaw said. “To me, it’s just about getting to go to the White House. You don’t get that opportunity every day, so I’m excited to go.”

    The Dodgers have yet to announce when their planned visit will take place. 

    Santillan sometimes laments his decision to give up his season tickets in protest of the team. His connection to the stadium and the memories he has made there with family and friends will last a lifetime, he said. On Thursday, he will uphold his tradition and be there for the first pitch of the season, but with a heavy heart.

    “It’s a family tradition, but the Dodgers have a lot of work to do,” he said.

  • Sponsored message
  • Warmer weather has caused more biting flies
    A zoomed in shot of a fuzzy black fly with some white spots.
    The warmer weather and high water flow are causing an early outbreak of black flies in the San Gabriel Valley.

    Topline:

    The warmer weather and high water flow are causing an early outbreak of black flies in the San Gabriel Valley, according to officials.

    What are black flies? Black flies are tiny, pesky insects that often get mistaken for mosquitoes. The biting flies breed near foothill communities like Altadena, Azusa, San Dimas and Glendora. They also thrive near flowing water.

    What you need to know: Black flies fly in large numbers and long distances. When they bite both humans and pets, they aim around the eyes and the neck. While the bites can be painful, they don’t transmit diseases in L.A. County.

    A population spike: Anais Medina Diaz, director of communications at the SGV Mosquito and Vector Control District, told LAist that at this time last year, surveillance traps had single-digit counts of adult black flies, but this year those traps are collecting counts above 500.

    So, why is the population growing? Diaz said the surge is unusual for this time of year.

    “We are experiencing them now because of the warmer temperatures we've been having,” Diaz said. “And of course, all the water that's going down through the river, we have a high flow of water that is not typical for this time of year.”

    What officials are doing: Officials say teams are identifying and treating public sources where black flies can thrive, but that many of these sites are influenced by natural or infrastructure conditions outside their control.

    How to protect yourself: Black flies can be hard to avoid outside in dense vegetation, but you can reduce the chance of a bite by:

    • Wearing loose-fitted clothing that covers the entire body. 
    • Wearing a hat with netting on top. 
    • Spraying on repellent, but check the label. For a repellent to be effective, it needs to have at least 15% DEET, the only active ingredient that works against black flies.
    • Turning off any water features like fountains for at least 24 hours, especially in foothill communities.

    See an uptick in black flies in your area? Here's how to report it

    SGV Mosquito and Vector Control District
    Submit a tip here
    You can also send a tip to district@sgvmosquito.org
    (626) 814-9466

    Greater Los Angeles Vector Control District
    Submit a service request here
    You can also send a service request to info@GLAmosquito.org
    (562) 944-9656

    Orange County Mosquito and Vector Control
    Submit a report here
    You can also send a report to ocvcd@ocvector.org
    (714) 971-2421 or (949) 654-2421

  • Rent hike to blame
    A black and brown dog lays down on a brown sofa on the foreground. In the background, a man wearing a plaid shirt sits.
    Jeremy Kaplan and Florence at READ Books in Eagle Rock.
    Topline:
    Local favorite mom and pop shop READ Books in Eagle Rock is facing displacement due to a steep rent hike. The owners say they’re just one of several small businesses along Eagle Rock Boulevard struggling to keep up with lease increases.

    The backstory: Over the past 19 years, many in the neighborhood have come to love READ Books for its eclectic collection of used titles and their shop dog Florence.

    What happened? The building where Kaplan and his wife Debbie rent was recently sold and the rent increased by more than 130% to $2,805 a month, Kaplan said. He told LAist it was an increase his small business simply could not absorb.

    What's next? While he looks for a new spot, Kaplan says he’s forming a coalition of local businesses and activist groups to see what can be done to help other small businesses facing similar displacement. He wants to address the displacement issue for businesses like his, which have made Eagle Rock the distinctive neighborhood that it is today.

    Read on... for what small businesses can do.

    A local favorite mom-and-pop bookshop in Eagle Rock is facing displacement due to a steep rent hike. The owners say theirs is just one of several small businesses along Eagle Rock Boulevard struggling to keep up with lease increases.

    Over the past 19 years, many in the neighborhood have come to love READ Books for its eclectic collection of used titles and shop dog Florence.

    Co-owner Jeremy Kaplan said it’s been a delight to grow with the community over the years.

    “Like seeing kids come back in, who were in grade school and now they’re in college,” Kaplan said.

    But the building where Kaplan and wife Debbie rent was recently sold, and the rent increased by more than 130% to $2,805 a month, Kaplan said. He told LAist it was an increase his small business simply could not absorb.

    Kaplan said he originally was given 30 days notice of the rent increase. After some research, assistance from Councilmember Ysabel Jurado’s office and some pro-bono legal help, Kaplan said he pushed back and got the 90-day notice he’s afforded by state law.

    California Senate Bill 1103 requires landlords to give businesses with five or less employees 90 days’ notice for rent increases exceeding 10%, among other protections.

    Systems Real Estate, the property management company, did not immediately respond to LAist’s request for comment.

    What can small businesses do? 

    Nadia Segura, directing attorney of the Small Business Program at pro bono legal aid non-profit Bet Tzedek said California law does not currently allow for rent control for commercial tenancies.

    Outside of the protections under SB 1103, Segura said small businesses like READ Books don’t have much other recourse. And even then, commercial landlords are not required to inform their tenants of their protections under the law.

    “There’s still a lot of people that don’t know about SB 1103. And then it’s very sad that they tell them they have these rent increases and within a month they have to leave,” Segura said.

    She said her group is seeing steep rent hikes like this for commercial tenants across the city.

    “We are seeing this even more with the World Cup coming up, the Olympics coming up. And I will say it was very sad to see that also after the wildfires,” Segura said.

    Part of Bet Tzedek’s ongoing work is to advocate for small businesses, working with landlords who are increasing rents to see if they are willing to give business owners longer leases that lock in rents.

    What’s next 

    After READ Books posted about their situation on social media, commenters chimed in to express their outrage and love for the little shop.

    While he looks for a new spot, Kaplan says he’s forming a coalition of local businesses and activist groups to see what can be done to help other small businesses facing similar displacement. He wants to address the displacement issue for businesses like his, which have made Eagle Rock the distinctive neighborhood that it is today.

    Owl Talk, a longtime Eagle Rock staple selling clothing and accessories in a unit in the same building as READ Books, is facing a “more than double” rent increase, according to a post on their Instagram account.

    Kaplan said he’s been in touch with the office of state Assemblywoman Jessica Caloza and wants to explore the possibility of introducing legislation to set up protections for small businesses like his, including rent-control measures or a vacancy tax for landlords. Kaplan said he also reached out to the office of state Sen. Maria Durazo.

    By his count, Kaplan said there are about a dozen businesses within surrounding blocks that are at risk of closing their doors or have shuttered due to rent increases or other struggles.

    When READ Books was founded during the Great Recession, Kaplan said he knew it was a longshot to open a bookstore at the same time so many were struggling to stay in business.

    “It was kind of interesting to be doing something that neighborhoods needed. That was important to me growing up, that was important to my children, that was important to my wife growing up,” Kaplan said.

    “And then somebody comes in and says, ‘We’re gonna over double your rent.”

  • Ballots to be sent out
    A person sits in the carriage of a crane and places solar panels atop a post. The crane is white, and the number 400 is printed on the carriage in red.
    A field team member of the Bureau of Street Lighting installs a solar-powered light in Filipinotown.

    Topline:

    The Los Angeles City Council approved a plan in a 13-1 vote on Tuesday to send ballots to more than half a million property owners asking if they are willing to pay more per year to fortify the city’s streetlight repair budget, most of which has essentially been frozen since the 1990s. The item still requires L.A. Mayor Karen Bass’ signature, but her office confirmed to LAist on Wednesday that she’ll approve it.

    Frozen budget: Most of the city’s Bureau of Street Lighting budget comes from an assessment that people who own property illuminated by lights pay on their county property tax bill. The amount people pay depends on the kind of property they own and how much they benefit from lighting. A typical single-family home currently pays $53 annually, and in total, the assessments bring in about $45 million annually for the city to repair and maintain streetlights. Changing the amount the Bureau of Street Lighting gets from the assessment requires a vote among property owners who benefit from the lights.

    Ballots: L.A. City Council’s vote gives city staff the green light to prepare and send out those ballots. Miguel Sangalang, who oversees the bureau, said at a committee meeting earlier this month that he expects to send out ballots by April 17. Notices about the ballots will be sent out prior to the ballots themselves.

    Near unanimous vote: L.A. City Councilmember Monica Rodriguez was the only “No” vote on Tuesday, saying she wanted to see a more current strategic plan for the bureau. Sangalang said the bureau developed a plan in 2022 that lays out how money will be spent. Councilmember Imelda Padilla was absent for the vote.

    Vote count: Votes will be weighted according to the assessment amount. Basically, the more you’re asked to pay yearly to maintain streetlights, the more your vote will count. Ballots received before June 2 will be tabulated by the L.A. City Clerk.

    How much more money: According to a report, the amount needed in assessments from property owners to meet the repair and maintenance needs of the city’s streetlighting in the next fiscal year is nearly $112 million.

    Use of the money: Sangalang said at a March 11 committee meeting that the extra funds would be used to double the number of staff to handle repairs and procure solar streetlights, which don’t face the threat of copper wire theft. That would all potentially reduce the time it takes to repair simple fixes down to a week. Currently, city residents wait for months to see broken streetlights repaired.The assessment would come with a three-year auditing mechanism.

    Topline:

    The Los Angeles City Council approved a plan in a 13-1 vote Tuesday to send ballots to more than a half-million property owners asking if they are willing to pay more per year to fortify the city’s streetlight repair budget, most of which essentially has been frozen since the 1990s. The item still requires L.A. Mayor Karen Bass’ signature, but her office confirmed to LAist on Wednesday that she’ll approve it.

    Frozen budget: Most of the city’s Bureau of Street Lighting budget comes from an assessment that people who own property illuminated by lights pay on their county property tax bill. The amount people pay depends on the kind of property they own and how much they benefit from lighting. A typical single-family home currently pays $53 annually, and in total, the assessments bring in about $45 million annually for the city to repair and maintain streetlights. Changing the amount the Bureau of Street Lighting gets from the assessment requires a vote among property owners who benefit from the lights.

    Ballots: L.A. City Council’s vote gives city staff the green light to prepare and send out those ballots. Miguel Sangalang, who oversees the bureau, said at a committee meeting earlier this month that he expects to send out ballots by April 17. Notices about the ballots will be sent out prior to the ballots themselves.

    Near unanimous vote: L.A. City Councilmember Monica Rodriguez was the only “No” vote Tuesday, saying she wanted to see a more current strategic plan for the bureau. Sangalang said the bureau developed a plan in 2022 that lays out how money will be spent. Councilmember Imelda Padilla was absent for the vote.

    Vote count: Votes will be weighted according to the assessment amount. Basically, the more you’re asked to pay yearly to maintain streetlights, the more your vote will count. Ballots received before June 2 will be tabulated by the L.A. City Clerk.

    How much more money: According to a report, the amount needed in assessments from property owners to meet the repair and maintenance needs of the city’s streetlighting in the next fiscal year is nearly $112 million.

    Use of the money: Sangalang said at a March 11 committee meeting that the extra funds would be used to double the number of staff to handle repairs and procure solar streetlights, which don’t face the threat of copper wire theft. That would all potentially reduce the time it takes to repair simple fixes down to a week. Currently, city residents wait for months to see broken streetlights repaired. The assessment would come with a three-year auditing mechanism.