Sponsored message
Logged in as
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

The Brief

The most important stories for you to know today
  • LAUSD weighs future of athletic fields
    High school football athletes seen from the knees down play on a green and red artificial grass field.
    An artificial turf field at Laguna Beach High School. Los Angeles Unified is studying whether to continue to install similar fields at its high schools. Generally, turf fields are made up of fibers attached to a mat over a layer of plastic, rubber or natural pellets.

    Topline:

    The Los Angeles Unified School District is weighing the future of its turf and natural grass athletic fields. The district is in the midst of a study and collecting feedback from parents, students, staff and other stakeholders.

    Why it matters: The outcome of the study will inform the immediate replacement of seven deteriorated high school athletic fields and future projects. Currently, about 20% of the district’s athletic fields are synthetic turf and about 80% are natural grass. The concentration rises in high schools’ combination soccer/football fields, which are 40% synthetic. Researchers have raised concerns about the artificial turf’s impact on children’s health and the environment— for example, artificial turf can get hot enough to burn skin.

    Why now: The study is the result of a unanimously adopted November 2025 board resolution that also prohibited the installation of artificial turf at early education centers, elementary and middle schools.

    Weigh in: The district is hosting a series of hybrid meetings through mid-May and is inviting people to complete a survey to collect feedback. The first in-person meeting is 6 p.m. Tuesday at Cleveland High School in Reseda and online.

    Read on … to learn more about how LAUSD is evaluating its athletic fields.

    The Los Angeles Unified School District is weighing the future of its artificial turf and natural grass athletic fields. The district is in the midst of a study and collecting feedback from parents, students, staff and other stakeholders.

    The outcome of the study, expected this summer, will inform the immediate replacement of seven deteriorated high school athletic fields and future projects.

    The vast majority of the district’s turf, from front lawns to baseball fields, is natural grass, Krisztina Tokes, LAUSD’s chief of facilities, told LAist.

    The percentage of synthetic turf increases if you isolate the district’s athletic fields — about 20% of the district’s athletic fields are synthetic turf and about 80% are natural grass. The concentration is highest in high schools’ combination soccer/football fields, 40% of which are synthetic.

    “Synthetic turf was used at many of those school sites where we anticipated there would be very high use,” Tokes said. For some, the district shared the fields with city and youth sports programs.

    Synthetic turf has a higher upfront cost than natural grass but requires less maintenance and water.

    The LAUSD high schools up for field replacement

    Downtown L.A.:

    • Roybal Learning Center— downtown L.A.

    Northeast L.A.:

    • Sonia Sotomayor Art & Sciences Magnet

    San Fernando Valley:

    • Cesar E. Chavez Academies — San Fernando Valley

    South L.A.:

    • Fremont High School
    • Marquez High School
    • Maya Angelou Community High School

    West L.A.:

    • University High School Charter

    Together these schools enroll about 10,000 students.

    In recent years, researchers have raised concerns about the artificial turf’s impact on children’s health and the environment— for example, artificial turf can get hot enough to burn skin.

    About a decade ago, LAUSD had to replace seven turf fields at the cost of $8.8 million because of defective materials, including plastic pellets that melted in the heat. The district later recovered $3.6 million from contractors associated with the fields, according to a report from the LAUSD inspector general.

    Why this process is starting now

    The study is the result of a unanimously adopted November 2025 board resolution that also prohibited the installation of artificial turf at early education centers, elementary and middle schools.

    “No 4-year-old, no elementary student should be playing on surfaces hot enough to burn their skin or expose our children to chemicals,” said Rocío Rivas, the board’s vice president, during the meeting.

    Student board member Jerry Yang said his peers wrote to him with concerns about artificial turf.

    “In a dense, urban city like Los Angeles, where the amount of green space is often a reflection of a community's income level, it is all the more important that we switch away from artificial turf,” Yang said.

    Speakers during public comment also called on the district to move away from synthetic turf.

    The study will consider four key topics: playability, health and safety, environmental impact and cost and maintenance. The district has also brought on consultants LPA and Core America to help evaluate the fields’ environmental impact, health and safety.

    LAUSD isn't the only district weighing the future of its athletic fields.

    The Santa Monica-Malibu Unified School District recently completed a study that found synthetic turf increases field availability and saves water but that the findings about health and safety are less clear.

    Here’s how to weigh in

    The district is hosting a series of hybrid meetings and is inviting people to complete an online survey to collect feedback.

    May 7 

    When: 6 p.m.
    Where:

    May 12 

    When: 6 p.m.
    Where:

    Past meetings

    Tuesday, April 28 

    When: 6 p.m.

    Where:

    Thursday, April 30

    When: 6 p.m.

    Where:

    Have questions about these meetings or a story to share?

    • For the meetings: contact LAUSD’s community relations team at (213)-241-1340. 
    • To share your experience with with LAist, you can reach me by email or on Signal where my username is @mdale.40.

  • Lineage completes food waste cleanup
    Crews clean up debris from a burned building.
    Crews navigate around piles of debris and puddles of water on the eastern edge of the Lineage warehouse as they begin cleanup efforts on June 25, 2026.

    Topline:

    Lineage Logistics has removed all food waste inside the Boyle Heights cold storage that burned down in June, the company and air quality officials said this afternoon.

    Why it matters: Putrid odor from an estimated 88 million pounds of food rotting inside the burned facility has blanketed Boyle Heights and surrounding communities.

    The backstory: The fire started on June 17 and burned for about a week, displacing many Boyle Heights residents and causing widespread air quality issues across the region.

    What's next: Now, Lineage has seven days to remove debris, power wash and disinfect certain areas.

    Lineage Logistics has removed all food waste inside the Boyle Heights cold storage that burned down in June, the company and air quality officials said this afternoon.

    Now, Lineage has seven days to remove debris, power wash and disinfect certain areas.

    The fire started on June 17 and burned for about a week, displacing many Boyle Heights residents and causing widespread air quality issues across the region.

    Then putrid odor from an estimated 88 million pounds of food rotting inside the facility began to blanket Boyle Heights and surrounding communities.

    Lineage said total cleanup cost is expected to run more than $100 million.

    "The City gave Lineage 45 days to remove the biohazard food waste; today is day 60 on the City’s timeline," said L.A. City Councilmember Ysabel Jurado, whose district includes Boyle Heights, in a statement today.

    The food waste removal, Jurado added, "does not erase two months of odors, pests, and disruption."

    South Coast AQMD said it has received more than 4,900 odor complaints from surrounding communities since July 12 and has issued 38 notices of public health and safety code violations.

    Last week, a L.A. City Council committee voted to withhold permits to rebuild the warehouse, pending a full investigation by the fire department. That motion heads to the full City Council for consideration.

  • Sponsored message
  • Will lanes be reduced?
    Large green laws in front of the hills of Griffith Park. A tall church like building is in the middle of the image among large trees.
    Forest Lawn Drive, which has become a contentious street safety topic in the run up to the mayoral election, provides access to Griffith Park.

    Topline:

    In a last-minute move, state legislators added language to a bill on Friday evening that street safety advocates say would threaten a long-planned project to slow speeding cars on Forest Lawn Drive near Griffith Park in Los Angeles.

    The details: The proposal, which would amend a transportation budget-related bill if approved, targets projects that would reduce lanes on roads that provide access to “two or more adjacent cemeteries” in cities with populations over 2 million. Los Angeles is the only city in California large enough to meet that requirement.

    The context: Since 2022, the Los Angeles Department of Transportation and the city council office of Nithya Raman, who is running for mayor, have studied and planned to reduce the number of lanes along a one-mile stretch of Forest Lawn Drive. L.A. Mayor Karen Bass has requested city departments to pause work, citing “significant community opposition.”

    In a last-minute move, state legislators added language to a bill on Friday evening that street safety advocates say would threaten a long-planned project to slow speeding cars on Forest Lawn Drive near Griffith Park in Los Angeles.

    The proposal, which would amend a larger bill if approved, targets projects that would reduce lanes on roads that provide access to “two or more adjacent cemeteries” in cities with populations over 2 million. Los Angeles is the only city in California large enough to meet that requirement.

    Since 2022, the Los Angeles Department of Transportation and the city council office of Nithya Raman, who is running for mayor, have studied and planned to reduce the number of lanes along a one-mile stretch of Forest Lawn Drive. The proposal would cut the number of lanes to three — two through-lanes and one center turn lane.

    The stretch of road is the point of entry for Forest Lawn’s Hollywood Hills location and Mount Sinai Memorial Park. The cemeteries are home to the graves of famous actors such as Debbie Reynolds and Brittany Murphy, at Forest Lawn, and comedians Don Rickles and Bob Saget at Mount Sinai.

    Forest Lawn Memorial-Parks and Mortuaries, which operates a chain of cemeteries including the Hollywood Hills location, has spent hundreds of thousands of dollars lobbying against the project at the state and local levels, according to an LAist review of lobbying activity. Mount Sinai has also advocated against the project.

    “After years of work to finally make this street safer, Sacramento is threatening that progress because powerful interests objected,” Michael Schneider, CEO of Streets for All, said in a post on the street advocacy group’s website condemning the bill’s language. 

    The project

    According to the L.A. Department of Transportation, Forest Lawn Drive has seen more than 95 collisions, resulting in four deaths, since 2013. Earlier this month, a driver died on the road after their "vehicle collided into a tree and became engulfed in flames,” according to the LAPD.

    In response to concerns about speed and safety, the Department of Transportation proposed reducing the number of lanes. The project would also install plastic posts to separate vehicular traffic from cyclists.

    Both cemeteries along the affected portion of Forest Lawn Drive have opposed the project from the start, saying the reduction in lanes would “create severe gridlock.”

    How to reach me

    If you have a tip, you can reach me on Signal. My username is kharjai.61.

    The city’s analysis of how traffic could be impacted show that the lane reduction would result in a driving delay of about 15 seconds during weekday evening rush hour and by a little more than a minute and a half during weekend peak hours, when traffic is heavier.

    The project was set to break ground earlier this summer before state legislators and L.A. Mayor Karen Bass requested city departments to pause work, citing "significant community opposition."

    A woman wearing a cream-colored pants suit sits on a chair behind a microphone.
    L.A. Mayor Karen Bass during a talk with LAist's public affairs show AirTalk.
    (
    Courtesy of Loyola Marymount University
    )

    Bass is facing Raman in a runoff race for the L.A. mayor’s seat this November. The project has become a heated campaign issue with Bass wanting to block the work and Raman supporting the project.

    “This last minute amendment to the legislation is clearly meant to stop one road safety project in my district, which is designed to save lives while keeping travel times nearly unchanged for commuters,” Raman said in a statement shared by her campaign.

    A woman in a blue suit jacket wearing sunglasses with TV cameras behind her.
    L.A. Councilmember and mayoral candidate Nithya Raman at a press conference to speak in support of safety updates following a fatal crash that occurred on Forest Lawn Drive, on Tuesday, August 18, 2026.
    (
    Christina House/Los Angeles Times via Getty Images
    /
    Los Angeles Times
    )

    The mayor's office did not immediately respond to an email seeking comment

    The bill

    If the added language is approved, State Senate and Assembly bills 194 would require Los Angeles to get approval from the City Council and the mayor and hold a public hearing before reducing “the number of vehicle travel lanes on a street that provides the only access to two or more adjacent cemeteries.”

    The proposed bill change comes at the tail end of the legislative session, meaning lawmakers would have until midnight on Aug. 31 to either advance or reject the legislation.

    A joint statement from Forest Lawn and Mount Sinai cemeteries said the legislation, if passed, would represent a “momentous victory.”

    “The proposed legislation places important safeguards around any future effort to reduce vehicle lanes on the only street providing access to these adjacent cemeteries,” the statement reads.

    Lobbying money

    Records held by the California Secretary of State show that Forest Lawn Memorial Parks and Mortuaries paid a lobbying firm $125,000 between April and June to advocate the governor’s office and state legislature regarding “transportation issues.” No additional details are available.

    Assemblymember Rick Chavez Zbur, who represents the project area, confirmed to LAist that he heard from Governmental Advocates, Inc., the lobbying firm retained by the cemetery. Zbur said the firm and other stakeholders reached out to his office about “the harmful impact of the proposed projects on access to the cemeteries and the surrounding area.”

    According to city records, lobbyist Rick Taylor and Associates received $360,000 from a law firm working on behalf of the cemetery between 2025 and 2026. Reports filed with the L.A. City Ethics Commission about the lobbying activity list opposition to the Forest Lawn Drive transportation project as the subject.

    Status of the project

    According to an Aug. 24 statement from the mayor’s office received before the proposed state language was introduced, alternative plans that preserve the four lanes of traffic and include protected bike lanes “are being reviewed.”

    The mayor’s office said the project will break ground following additional community outreach.

  • Inglewood won’t be required to post records online
    A judge has rolled back an earlier ruling requiring Inglewood to post records of police misconduct online.

    Topline:

    After Inglewood systematically violated state law, a judge reminded the city it was required to release records on police misconduct and use of force — but rolled back an earlier ruling that would have required the records to be posted online.

    Why now: Barring an appeal, the decision brings five years of legal wrangling between the city and the American Civil Liberties Union of Southern California closer to a conclusion.

    This story first appeared on The LA Local.

    After Inglewood systematically violated state law, a judge reminded the city it was required to release records on police misconduct and use of force — but rolled back an earlier ruling that would have required the records to be posted online.

    Barring an appeal, the decision brings five years of legal wrangling between the city and the American Civil Liberties Union of Southern California closer to a conclusion.

    Inglewood won’t face serious consequences for the pattern of breaking California public records law, but the city must pay attorney fees for the ACLU and Trisha Shanklin, who joined the ACLU’s 2021 lawsuit. Inglewood police fatally shot Shanklin’s sister, Kisha Michael, and Marquintan Sandlin in 2016.

    LA Superior Court Judge Amy Carter said the city will not have to proactively post the records online, which another judge had previously ordered the city to do for the next three years. Carter said during a Wednesday hearing that such a requirement would have to come from state legislators, not a judge.

    Over the last decade, California lawmakers have expanded the public’s right to access police misconduct and use-of-force records, but Inglewood has thrown up a series of obstacles to that access.

    The Inglewood City Council voted to destroy decades of internal affairs records in 2018 just weeks before one law went into effect, though Mayor James Butts denied the move was intended to thwart the law, according to LAist. The LA Times reported that the city nearly did it again in 2021 before being blocked by a judge.

    This week’s court ruling found the city has routinely violated the law since then, missing deadlines, sharing incomplete records, and at times, failing to provide any documents at all.

    Tiffany Bailey, an ACLU attorney, celebrated the decision and said it streamlines the civil rights group’s ability to get police records from the city in the future.

    David Loy, an attorney with the First Amendment Coalition, said the case was a great win for the ACLU.

    “These kinds of (public records) delays are not uncommon throughout the state,” Loy said. “I hope and believe this is a signal to other cities to get their house in order.”

    Attorneys for the city declined to comment on the ruling, and Mayor James Butts did not immediately reply to written questions from The LA Local.

    CalMatters maintains a searchable database of police misconduct and use-of-force records called the Police Records Access Project that includes records from the Inglewood Police Department.

  • $4.3B tool expects to reveal new info on universe

    Topline:

    The $4.3 billion Nancy Grace Roman Space Telescope is scheduled for launch Aug. 30.

    Why it matters: Named for NASA's first chief astronomer, the observatory is expected to reveal new information about the expansion of the universe and discover multitudes of planets orbiting distant stars.

    The universe is a strange place — filled with exploding stars, ancient galaxies, and unseen worlds. Now, astronomers are about to get a brand new tool to explore it.

    For new discoveries, everyday mysteries, and the science behind the headlines, follow NPR’s Short Wave podcast.

    The $4.3 billion Nancy Grace Roman Space Telescope is scheduled for launch Aug. 30. Named for NASA's first chief astronomer, the observatory is expected to reveal new information about the expansion of the universe and discover multitudes of planets orbiting distant stars.

    Roman, as it is known to its friends, has an unusual history. About 15 years ago NASA was making plans to build a space telescope that could, among other things, search for exploding stars known as Type 1A supernovas. These supernovas were used as a kind of cosmological measuring stick to uncover a mysterious force called dark energy that was causing the universe to expand — a discovery that earned the Nobel Prize in 2011.

    Cosmologist Daniel Scolnic at Duke University says finding more of them would be key to better understanding that expansion.

    As NASA was developing plans for this new telescope, a call came in from the government office in charge of surveillance satellites.

    "The National Reconnaissance Office reached out to NASA," Scolnic says, "saying, 'We have this amazing satellite sitting in a hangar that we're not using. And what what do you guys think about instead of pointing downwards, we point upwards, and you guys use it?'"

    NASA said yes. It took some substantial modifications, but now that old satellite is set to become NASA's next major space observatory.

    Scolnic says that the new observatory could fundamentally change the scientific model that astronomers use to understand our universe.

    "In the last few years, there have been measurements saying that model might be wrong — and that's something that Roman will absolutely nail, whether the model's right or wrong," he says.

    Another goal of the telescope is to spend a month surveying all the stars in the Milky Way galaxy. Julie McEnery is Roman's project scientist. She says even though Roman has broadly the same sensitivity and sharpness of vision as the currently orbiting Hubble Space Telescope, its design lets it do things much faster.

    "That one month of observations to survey our Milky Way galaxy would take about a century with Hubble," says McEnery.

    Instead of focusing on a single object, Roman is designed to make catalogs of large swaths of the sky, and McEnery says these catalogs will be available to everyone, not just academics.

    "You can be a teacher in a high school in Kentucky and your students have the opportunity to see Roman data at the same time as a professor in Princeton," she says.

    One professor eager to get his hands on Roman data is Scott Gaudi at The Ohio State University. Along with colleagues, Gaudi developed a technique for detecting planets around distant stars. It's called gravitational microlensing, and it measures the way those planets bend the starlight that passes them by.

    Albert Einstein described the idea in 1936 but thought it would be impractical. New technology has proven him wrong — and Gaudi expects Roman will find tons of planets that way.

    "We're looking for planets that are just completely undetectable by any other method," Gaudi says. That includes planets at the center of our galaxy, "that are very analogous to our own solar system planets like Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus and Neptune."

    In addition to new planets, Roman should also reveal new galaxies, helping astronomers to get a better idea of the large-scale structure of the universe.

    But predicting what will be Roman's greatest accomplishments over the course of its five-year mission is a tricky business.

    "The history of astronomy really has shown that when you get a new capability, and especially a survey capability, you learn something new, something unexpected," says Wendy Freedman, an astronomer at the University of Chicago. "Often that turns out to be the most exciting part of a new facility. So I am completely open to what this telescope will find."

    Copyright 2026 NPR