Sponsored message
Logged in as
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

The Brief

The most important stories for you to know today
  • Board finalizes hundreds of layoff notices
    A bald man with medium light skin tone, a moustache and goatee
    The LAUSD board voted Thursday to eliminate hundreds of central office positions as part of a fiscal stabilization plan.

    The Los Angeles Unified Board voted 5-2 Thursday to approve the elimination of 657 jobs concentrated in the school district’s central office.

    “ All of us recognize that a reduction in force creates significant uncertainty and personal hardships for employees, families, and school communities,” said Andres Chait, acting superintendent. “I want to be very clear that this action is not in any way a reflection of employee performance or dedication, but rather a difficult and necessary response to structural fiscal conditions.”

    The job reductions will save the district an estimated $90 million annually and are part of a fiscal stabilization plan adopted last June in response to multiple years of deficit spending.

    Before the vote, district staff previewed a plan to cut an additional $3.6 billion from LAUSD’s budget in the next three years, including through thousands of additional layoffs. The board described the proposal as “painful,” “shitty,” and “a doomsday scenario.”

    “The district must take urgent action to ensure its solvency and to protect our current and future students,” said Saman Bravo-Karimi, the district’s chief financial officer.

    How many people will lose their job?

    Thursday’s vote finalizes preliminary layoff notices issued earlier this year to information technology workers, office technicians, and staff that support parents and families.

    Labor leaders pushed back on the job cuts during the meeting.  

    ”We're not going to allow this district to balance its budget on the backs of low-wage education workers,” said Max Arias, executive director of SEIU Local 99, which represents school support staff included in the reduction in force.

    Here’s how the board voted

    Yes

    • Board Member Sherlett Hendy Newbill (BD-1)
    • Board President Scott Schmerelson (BD-3)
    • Board Member Nick Melvoin (BD-4)
    • Board Member Kelly Gonez (BD-6)
    • Board Member Tanya Ortiz Franklin (BD-7)

    No

    • Board Vice President Rocío Rivas (BD-2)
    • Board Member Karla Griego (BD-5)

    “ I understand that there's an, an economic outlook that is not positive, and that there are hard decisions to be made, but I still believe that layoffs should be the last thing that we should be considering,” said Karla Griego, one of two board members who voted against the cuts.

    It’s still unclear how many employees will ultimately leave the district by June 30— retirements and resignations can create openings for people who would otherwise lose their jobs.

    A new contract with SEIU Local 99 has yet to be ratified by the board, but once that happens it will undo part of the reduction in force, restoring 157 IT techs and additional positions that would have been bumped into lower positions as a result of those layoffs.

    Laid-off employees will be placed on a reemployment list in order of seniority and eligible for openings in their classification for about three years. The district also plans to hold workshops on resumé writing, interviewing and other job search skills.

    The board also approved a reduction in hours or assigned days for an additional 74 positions.

    What’s next?

    Even with the reduction in force and higher-than-expected state funding, CFO Bravo-Karimi reiterated that the district faces a growing deficit.

    The most recent forecast predicts a $1.4 billion deficit in the 2027-28 school year and a $3.6 billion deficit in the 2028-2029 school year.

    “We have faced challenging fiscal outlooks before,” Bravo-Karimi said. “ But what we're facing now… is over twice the size of past shortfalls.”

    The County Office of Education requires districts at risk of becoming insolvent to submit a plan to reduce the deficit.

    LAUSD adopted a fiscal stabilization plan last June and will consider an outline of further cuts next month.

    The newest plan outlines $3.6 billion over three years, including through:

    • An estimated 6,000 layoffs that could represent more than 10% of the current workforce
    • Mandatory furlough days 
    • The elimination of funding allocated to the district’s highest-need learners through the Student Equity Needs Index (SENI)
    • Cutting the majority of funding for the Black Student Achievement Plan
    • Increasing healthcare costs for employees
    • Consolidating schools

    District leaders said more details of the plan are forthcoming.

    “Every decision we make has to balance two realities: continuing to invest in students and staff while preparing for ongoing fiscal uncertainty,” said acting superintendent Chait.

    Find Your LAUSD Board Member

    LAUSD board members can amplify concerns from parents, students and educators. Find your representative below.

    District 1 includes Mid City, parts of South L.A. (map)
    Board member: Sherlett Hendy Newbill
    Email: BoardDistrict1@lausd.net
    Call: (213) 241-6382 (central office); (323) 298-3411 (field office)

    District 2 includes Downtown, East L.A. (map)
    Board member: Rocío Rivas
    Email: rocio.rivas@lausd.net
    Call: (213) 241-6020

    District 3 includes West San Fernando Valley, North Hollywood (map)
    Board member: Scott Schmerelson
    Email: scott.schmerelson@lausd.net
    Call: (213) 241-8333

    District 4 includes West Hollywood, some beach cities (map)
    Board member: Nick Melvoin 
    Email: nick.melvoin@lausd.net
    Call: (213) 241-6387

    District 5 includes parts of Northeast and Southwest L.A. (map)
    Board Member: Karla Griego
    Email: district5@lausd.net
    Call: (213) 241-1000

    District 6 includes East San Fernando Valley (map)
    Board Member: Kelly Gonez
    Email: kelly.gonez@lausd.net
    Call: (213) 241-6388

    District 7 includes South L.A. and parts of the South Bay (map)
    Board Member: Tanya Ortiz Franklin
    Email: tanya.franklin@lausd.net
    Call: (213) 241-6385

  • Newsom signs package of 7 bills
    Aerial photo of two long, windowless gray data center buildings with rows of cooling equipment on their roofs, running alongside a road in a suburban area.
    A block of Equinix data centers sit across the street from a Prime data center on Great Oaks Blvd. in South San Jose on Aug. 31, 2026.

    Topline:

    Gov. Gavin Newsom signed seven data center bills into law on Monday, signaling a tide change toward regulation of the industry.

    Why it matters: Three of the new laws shift electric infrastructure costs away from residential customers and toward data center operators, three more mandate disclosures of water usage and other resources, and the last one makes data centers ineligible for environmental review exemptions.

    The backstory: Newsom’s signature on the new laws represents a significant departure from his actions on data centers last year, when he vetoed a water disclosure bill over concerns that regulation could stifle AI growth and signed into law only a single stripped-down environmental study bill.

    Facing growing public backlash and a pivot from his own past vetoes, Gov. Gavin Newsom signed a sweeping package of seven bills on Monday that aim to force the data center industry to pay its own way in California.

    Three of the new laws shift electric infrastructure costs away from residential customers and toward data center operators, three more mandate disclosures of water usage and other resources, and the last one makes data centers ineligible for environmental review exemptions.

    Newsom, in a written statement, contrasted the new regulations with President Donald Trump’s hands-off approach to data centers and artificial intelligence.

    “We know that we don’t have to sell out Californians or sacrifice our well-being to innovate and succeed,” the statement read. “California has proven that time and time again. With these laws, we are ensuring that Californians remain in the driver’s seat — and that those profiting from data centers aren’t doing so at our expense.”

    Trump has aggressively pushed to accelerate data center development nationwide, arguing that they represent a significant economic opportunity for states that embrace them. He said last week at the All-In Summit, an invite-only conference for business leaders, that the industry is the “oil of the next 20, 25 years.”

    Newsom’s signature on the new laws represents a significant departure from his actions on data centers last year, when he vetoed a water disclosure bill over concerns that regulation could stifle AI growth and signed into law only a single stripped-down environmental study bill.

    Environmental advocates and the lawmakers behind this year’s bills previously told CalMatters that intensifying public backlash to data center construction propelled the legislation this year, despite a flood of lobbying funds from Big Tech and other business interests that aimed to soften the proposals.

    “When you’re looking down the barrel of public outcry that says we don’t want [data centers] at all, and you’ve got localities that are saying they’re going to ban them, then you know the atmosphere has changed,” Assemblymember Diane Papan, a San Mateo Democrat who authored two of the bills which were signed into law on Monday, previously told CalMatters.

    Other state legislatures as well as Congress are also advancing new measures to regulate the industry. In May, a Gallup poll found seven in 10 Americans oppose data center construction in their communities, while a July Public Policy Institute of California poll found similar opposition statewide. Hundreds of cities nationwide — including Monterey Park and Bay Area cities like Pittsburg — have either passed data center bans or walked back approvals following public outcry.

    Arnab Pal, the executive director of Deploy Action, a nonprofit that promotes clean energy, told CalMatters the new laws are a good step toward preventing data centers from harming consumers through utility rate increases or environmental damage. Still, Pal said, more can be done to ensure such projects actually benefit everyday people through advancements to the electrical grid and the acceleration of clean energy infrastructure.

    “I don't think these bills are the end of this fight; I think we're gonna have to do a lot of implementation on the back end and, as other states roll out their policies next year, I think California is going to look back and be like, ‘maybe we should have done more,’” Pal said. “I'm interested to see what we do next year on this.”

    Business interests that oppose the measures, like the Data Center Coalition — which counts companies like Google, Microsoft and OpenAI among its members — warn that further regulation could push the data center industry out of California. According to the latest figures from the Data Center Coalition, the industry contributed 665,500 jobs, more than $159 billion in economic activity, and $14.1 billion in federal, state, and local taxes in California in 2024.

    Khara Boender, the director of government affairs west for the Data Center Coalition, told CalMatters that “the data center industry shares the goal of ensuring growth of this critical infrastructure is responsible and well managed,” but more work needs to be done “to promote responsible data center growth while maintaining California as a key, competitive market in the global economy.”

    Newsom signed the following bills:

    • Senate Bill 1168, SB 886 and Assembly Bill 2383, which shift electric infrastructure costs away from residential customers and toward data center operators
    • AB 2469, AB 1577 and AB 2619, which mandate disclosures or estimates of water usage and other resources
    • SB 887, which makes data centers ineligible for blanket environmental review exemptions, and offers fast-tracked approval for facilities that meet state standards for water and energy conservation

    This article was originally published on CalMatters and was republished under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives license.

  • Sponsored message
  • Newly signed law takes effect January 2028
    People walk on a concrete patio surrounded by trees. A sign reading "Fresno City College" in white lettering on a red background is on the left.
    Students walk on the campus of Fresno City College

    Topline:

    Gov. Gavin Newsom has signed a pair of bills that will create a new system for approving community college bachelor’s degrees.

    Why it matters: The bills take effect Jan. 1, 2028, and will create a five-tiered system determining how many bachelor’s degrees each district can offer. Districts will be placed into tiers based on the percentage of students who complete a degree or certificate or transfer to a four-year university. Districts with higher graduation and transfer rates will be allowed to create more bachelor’s degrees — up to the maximum of 12.

    What's next: The legislation does make at least one significant change supported by the community colleges: It only prohibits degrees that duplicate CSU programs offered in the same local service area as the community college proposing the degree.

    Gov. Gavin Newsom has signed a pair of bills that will create a new system for approving community college bachelor’s degrees.

    Senate Bill 960 and Assembly Bill 2694, which were sent to Newsom as a two-bill package, will let community college districts create between two and 12 new bachelor’s degrees to fill local workforce needs.

    The bills take effect Jan. 1, 2028, and will create a five-tiered system determining how many bachelor’s degrees each district can offer. Districts will be placed into tiers based on the percentage of students who complete a degree or certificate or transfer to a four-year university. Districts with higher graduation and transfer rates will be allowed to create more bachelor’s degrees — up to the maximum of 12.

    The tiered system, which was among several last-minute amendments to the legislation, has drawn backlash from community college presidents and chancellors, who say the system will pit colleges against one another.

    However, the legislation does make at least one significant change supported by the community colleges: It only prohibits degrees that duplicate CSU programs offered in the same local service area as the community college proposing the degree. In the past, duplication wasn’t tied to location, and community colleges sometimes faced duplication objections from CSU campuses located in different regions of the state.

    The legislation also allows for certain circumstances when community colleges can create bachelor’s degrees even if a nearby CSU campus has a similar program. That will be permitted if the CSU program has had a transfer acceptance rate of less than 75% for three consecutive years.

    EdSource is an independent nonprofit organization that provides analysis on key education issues facing California and the nation. LAist republishes articles from EdSource with permission.

  • Pasadena Humane's popular fundraiser returns
    Hand-drawn portraits of dogs and cats in colored pencil and marker next to small reference photos of the pets.
    Pasadena Humane's popular "poorly drawn pets" fundraiser returns after exceeding expectations last year.

    Topline:

    Pasadena Humane’s popular “poorly drawn pets” fundraiser is returning for another year, and the artists are already deep into drawing as of Monday.

    Why it matters: “There’s just one tiny disclaimer: we’re much better at caring for animals than drawing them,” Pasadena Humane shared on social media. “Some of our artists are genuinely talented. Others… well, let’s just say your pet may come out looking artistically interpreted.”

    Why now: LAist takes you inside the artists’ studio at Pasadena Humane.

    The backstory: Last year, officials said the fundraiser exceeded expectations, raising around $11,000 for the shelter from more than 450 submissions.

    Read on ...to go behind the scenes.

    It’s back!

    Pasadena Humane’s popular “poorly drawn pets” fundraiser is returning for another year, and the artists are already deep into drawing as of Monday.

    Here’s how it works: you’ll be asked to make a donation through this Facebook post, comment on the post with a photo of your pet, and volunteers will respond in about a day with their best attempt at your four-legged friend. If you don’t have a Facebook account, you can also participate here via email.

    “There’s just one tiny disclaimer: we’re much better at caring for animals than drawing them,” Pasadena Humane shared on social media. “Some of our artists are genuinely talented. Others… well, let’s just say your pet may come out looking artistically interpreted.”

    Last year, officials said the fundraiser exceeded expectations, raising around $11,000 for the shelter from more than 450 submissions. Dogs and cats are most common, but people have also sent in photos of their birds, turtles, hamsters and horses in years past.

    LAist takes you inside the artists’ studio at Pasadena Humane.

    Meet the people behind the 'poorly drawn pets'

    Volunteers and staff filed in and out of what’s been turned into the official drawing room Monday morning. Pens, colored pencils, markers and Sharpies were scattered all over the table in between pieces of paper and small printed photos of pets.

    I asked Julie Nakahara, Pasadena Humane’s director of partnerships and events, how she would describe her artistic ability as she sketched out a lounging cat.

    “That of a toddler,” Nakahara replied. “All right, maybe fourth grade.”

    Her strategy was to outline the pet first in pencil before thickening the lines with a Sharpie, adding pops of color through the small details in the photo.

    “[The cat’s] enjoying the sunshine, and so I tried to reflect it in my drawing,” she said. “Not sure if that's a true reflection, but I did the best I can.”

    A woman sketches a cat on paper, surrounded by Crayola colored pencils and markers on a wooden table.
    Julie Nakahara, Pasadena Humane’s director of partnerships and events, sketches out submission #49.
    (
    Makenna Cramer
    /
    LAist
    )

    Robbin Huntingdale, a Pasadena resident and volunteer, had a colorful, Lisa Frank-style approach to her picture of two pups.

    “I kind of felt like the more I add, the more interesting it'll be, and the less you'll notice that it doesn't look like the photo,” she said to a roar of laughter in the room.

    But markers seemed to be a bold choice among the artists. As Mia Dunn, chief philanthropy officer, put it: “I'm a colored pencil girl, because they can be erased.”

    Kevin McManus, PR and communications director, was trying to do justice to the two dogs he was drawing. He said he came up with a story as he sketched, describing one dog as the older brother and the other as its young punk with a look of “what did I do wrong?”

    “It's a really fun way for us to raise money for the shelter,” McManus said. “Ultimately, that's what we're here for. To raise money for the pets in our care, for the programs that we do year-round.”

    You have until 12 p.m. Wednesday to submit your pets for the fundraiser.

  • Many outside relief zones say they feel abandoned
    A man and a woman stand outside a home as they pose for a portrait photo.
    Joaquin Angeles and Aurora Flores pose for a portrait outside their home in East Los Angeles on Aug. 27, 2026.

    Topline:

    Boyle Heights and East L.A. residents outside the relief zones designated for the warehouse fire say the same smoky, noxious air left them sick and facing steep bills.

    Who qualified for Lineage assistance? Nearly 800 homes inside a designated area were eligible for assistance from Lineage during its recovery operations, according to the company. The support included free air purifiers, masks, air conditioners, temporary housing, grocery vouchers, utility assistance and cash assistance that were often delivered door-to-door by the company.

    Navigating help hasn’t been easy: Residents outside the boundary have had to find alternative resources on their own. “The wind doesn’t have a boundary, why would you make a map?” Cynthia, who chose not to share her last name due to immigration concerns, recalls asking herself as she navigated long lines at city and county resource centers. City and county agencies initially offered temporary shelters, air purifiers and masks, and later added mobile health clinics, grocery gift cards and resource centers in Boyle Heights and East L.A. But residents also reported being turned away at distribution sites depending on whether they lived in Boyle Heights or unincorporated East L.A.

    Read on... for more on what residents have said they feel abandoned.

    This story first appeared on The LA Local.

    Cynthia remembers the sound of her 1-year-old daughter’s cries as she tried to desperately explain to a caseworker over the phone how the Lineage warehouse fire had affected her family financially. 

    She had stopped working as a sidewalk vendor because of the unhealthy air, and her family was unsure how they would pay rent that month. 

    “I felt like, I don’t know, I was going insane,” said Cynthia, who chose not to share her last name due to immigration concerns.

    When the 32-year-old mother reached out to Lineage for assistance, she was told she didn’t qualify for relief, even though her East L.A. home was less than 1.5 miles away. The company said its relief was only intended “for those closest to the warehouse.” 

    “We were close enough to receive the smoke and ash but not to receive aid,” she told Boyle Heights Beat. 

    Cynthia is among many residents who say they were left out of assistance from Lineage because of where they live. Residents outside the established boundary say they breathed the same smoke, smelled the same stench and suffered through headaches, nausea and high utility bills as their neighbors who qualified for help.

    Their question has been simple: If the air has no border, why did we? 

    A mother holds up her daughter in a kitchen facing away towards a stove.
    Cynthia holds her daughter while cooking next to her air purifier and air monitor.
    (
    J.W. Hendricks
    /
    The LA Local
    )

    Who qualified for Lineage assistance?

    Nearly 800 homes inside a designated area were eligible for assistance from Lineage during its recovery operations, according to the company. The support included free air purifiers, masks, air conditioners, temporary housing, grocery vouchers, utility assistance and cash assistance that were often delivered door-to-door by the company. 

    Earlier this month, Lineage said it had provided support to 90% of the 797 households within the designated area and spent over $3.3 million on the recovery and relief effort. Lineage CEO Greg Lehmkuhl told Boyle Heights Beat that the company had made multiple attempts to reach the remaining households.  

    “Our bilingual hotline remains open,” said Lehmkuhl. “We remain committed to supporting the community.”

    Lineage first presented a map outlining the area closest to the warehouse as it announced a new wave of assistance at a community town hall on July 9

    The map was later expanded to include all 797 homes and a larger part of East L.A. after L.A. County Supervisor Hilda Solis pushed for more support, according to her office. 

    Now, the map covers households located between Union Pacific Avenue and the 5 Freeway, Los Palos Street and Herbert Avenue, all less than one mile from the Lineage warehouse. 

    The map with the outlined sections from 1 to 3 across multiple blocks.
    The map with the outlined resources was presented by Lineage at an AQMD hearing on Aug. 6.
    (
    Courtesy of Lineage
    )

    Why the boundary matters

    The expanded map still left out residents like Cynthia, who lives with her husband and baby just one block north of the 5 Freeway. 

    But it meant residents like Joaquin Angeles, who lives near Eastman Avenue Elementary School, would qualify. 

    Angeles, however, said the support has been lackluster. 

    “We haven’t been given what we really need,” Angeles said.

    Angeles said his family received an air purifier with no filters and a faulty air conditioner that turns off after just five minutes. He has not yet received the $200 Southern California Edison credit Lineage promised. 

    On Aug. 25, more than two months after the warehouse caught fire, his family was able to move into an Airbnb for nearly three weeks. While it allowed them a chance to finally breathe and not worry about what chemicals may be lingering in the air, the support came far too late, Angeles said. 

    By then, his wife and son had already racked up medical bills of more than $1,300 each for emergency room visits for shortness of breath, respiratory infections and painful skin rashes. 

    “We don’t have money to spare. We’re renting and living paycheck to paycheck,” Angeles said. “Aside from the illness itself, it’s a psychological blow. You feel discriminated against; you feel like they don’t care.”

    A woman with medium skin tone, wearing a green dress, shows a rash on her arm.
    Joaquin Angeles’s wife, Aurora , shows scarring from a rash on her arm after being exposed to smoke coming from the Lineage fire at her home in East Los Angeles.
    (
    Isaac Ceja
    /
    Boyle Heights Beat
    )

    Who created the boundary? 

    It remains unclear who initially identified the 797 homes. 

    Lineage said it did not create the map. A company spokesperson said the map originated with the Boyle Heights Unified Recovery Command, a centralized body made up of city departments established to coordinate updates during the remediation process. 

    The command operates under the city’s Emergency Management Department and was created at the direction of L.A. Mayor Karen Bass’ executive orders to speed up the Lineage cleanup and recovery. The Emergency Management Department did not respond to multiple inquiries about the map’s origin. 

    Supervisor Solis’ office told The Beat it had no say in the original map but advocated for the area to be expanded. 

    Navigating help hasn’t been easy

    Residents outside the boundary have had to find alternative resources on their own. 

    “The wind doesn’t have a boundary, why would you make a map?” Cynthia recalls asking herself as she navigated long lines at city and county resource centers.

    City and county agencies initially offered temporary shelters, air purifiers and masks, and later added mobile health clinics, grocery gift cards and resource centers in Boyle Heights and East L.A. But residents also reported being turned away at distribution sites depending on whether they lived in Boyle Heights or unincorporated East L.A. 

    A resident picks up an air purifier next to a stack of boxes from a pop-up resource center.
    A resident picks up air purifiers from a pop-up resource center in Boyle Heights on July 13, 2026.
    (
    Isaac Ceja
    /
    Boyle Heights Beat
    )

    Many often turned to nonprofit organizations already working in the community.

    In her search, Cynthia managed to secure an air purifier from InnerCity Struggle, a $500 prepaid Visa card from El Centro de Ayuda and had her July rent covered by Proyecto Pastoral. She bought a $250 air conditioner to manage the unbearable summer heat and a $300 personal air monitor to track the air quality outside her home. 

    Others haven’t been so lucky. 

    Maria Duran, a Boyle Heights resident who lives outside Lineage’s assistance boundary, said she called 311 to receive an air purifier but was told they had run out. She later learned Proyecto Pastoral had stopped accepting applications for rent and utility assistance because of a waitlist of more than 1,500 people. 

    “We are all being harmed. I feel frustrated. I feel down,” Duran said. 

    Three months after the fire, Duran is struggling to pay a utility bill that nearly tripled over the summer. She continues to deal with stubborn eye irritation that has disrupted her daily life. 

    A person holds up an air purifier.
    Cynthia bought an air purifier following the Lineage fire.
    (
    J.W. Hendricks
    /
    The LA Local
    )

    Nonprofits have been unable to keep up with the demand

    Angela Gutierrez, a community organizing coordinator at Proyecto Pastoral, says the demand for relief reflects the scale of the disaster. 

    Gutierrez lives about one mile from Lineage and said she was also frustrated that she didn’t qualify for assistance from the company. 

    “To me, it was like we were abandoned because of our ZIP codes,” Gutierrez said. “But for Proyecto — for me — there is no ZIP code. To me, everyone is equal. The help is the same.”

    Proyecto Pastoral received about 1,500 requests for assistance before closing its application in the wake of the fire. The organization helped cover rent and utility bills for residents living primarily within a 3-mile radius of Lineage, with emergency funds extending to families living as far as Monterey Park. Its fire relief funds were exhausted last week.

    “It makes me sad and angry, because people were affected by the fire — and it wasn’t just in the immediate area,” Gutierrez said. 

    A close up of a woman holding a child's hand on her lap.
    Cynthia holds her daughter’s hand in her home.
    (
    J.W. Hendricks
    /
    The LA Local
    )

    Is more help on its way?

    Lineage said it remains committed to providing resources to the roughly 80 households that have not yet received assistance. 

    “We’ve been working for weeks to make sure that we support everybody in this area that the county and city determined were impacted,” Lehmkuhl said. 

    The company did not indicate whether it planned to expand its assistance boundary. 

    District 14 Councilmember Ysabel Jurado is pushing for additional funding for the Lineage fire recovery. On Wednesday, the L.A. City Council approved a motion to explore creating a fund of up to $10 million to support the affected community. 

    For residents like Cynthia, the need is urgent. She is already behind on rent and is using a credit card to pay for basic necessities.

    In unincorporated East L.A., Angeles said more should be done to help the families affected. 

    “It is not asking for a favor; it is simply asking for justice,” he said. 

    Correction, Sep. 21, 2026 4:49 pm: This story was updated at 4:48 p.m. on Sept. 21, 2026, to clarify that Proyecto Pastoral received about 1,500 requests for fire assistance. An earlier version incorrectly stated that the organization had helped cover rent and utility bills to 1,500 people