Sponsored message
Logged in as
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

The Brief

The most important stories for you to know today
  • What can California learn from New Mexico?
    A woman with medium skin-tone high fives a child who's holding a pencil and writing in a workbook.
    New Mexico will become the first state to offer universal childcare for families in November.

    Topline:

    New Mexico will become the first state to offer universal childcare. Early childhood experts say states like California can learn from that system.

    What’s new: Starting in November, New Mexico will remove the income eligibility requirements for free childcare.

    How NM differs: Unlike California, New Mexico has a dedicated funding stream in the form of a sovereign wealth fund from oil and gas revenue. In 2022, voters there approved a constitutional amendment to set aside money from the multi-billion dollar fund for early childcare.

    What California can learn: New Mexico has invested in creating more child-care centers and incentivizing centers to raise wages for child-care providers. “ I think an important takeaway for a state like California is how much the conversation and the investment in New Mexico is about the supply side of the equation,” said Anne Hedgepeth, senior vice president of policy and research at Child Care Aware of America.

    When New Mexico’s governor announced earlier this month that the state will offer free child care for families regardless of income, early childhood advocates in California took note.

    Listen 0:46
    New Mexico will be the first state to offer universal child care. What could that mean for California?

    Donna Sneeringer is president of the Child Care Resource Center, which provides childcare resources to families in Southern California.

    “ It certainly is a sea change,” she said. “We’re excited to learn more.”

    New Mexico has been offering free childcare for families who make up to 400% of the federal poverty level, and starting in November, it will remove the income eligibility requirements — making the program universal for families.

    “ That's really unique. We don't have anywhere else in the country that's done that so far,” said Anne Hedgepeth, senior vice president of policy and research at Child Care Aware of America.

    New Mexico Gov. Michelle Lujan Grisham said the move would save families an average of $12,000 a year.

    “By investing in universal childcare, we are giving families financial relief, supporting our economy, and ensuring that every child has the opportunity to grow and thrive,” she said.

    How does the New Mexico system work? 

    Unlike California, New Mexico has a dedicated funding stream in the form of a sovereign wealth fund from oil and gas revenue. In 2022, voters there approved a constitutional amendment to set aside money from the multi-billion dollar fund for early childcare.

    New Mexico is the second-largest crude oil-producing state.

    California’s funding of subsidized childcare and early education comes through a mix of federal dollars and the state’s general fund, Sneeringer said, adding, “One of the ways that New Mexico is able to do this is because they have identified a funding stream to be able to support and pay for it.”

    There’s also the question of scale. New Mexico is much smaller than California, with 2.1 million residents. L.A. County alone has nearly 10 million.

    “Based on the size of our population, the dollars it would take to offer a universal system are going to take significant new investment,” Sneeringer said.

    But Sneeringer points to local jurisdictions in California that have taken their own initiatives in recent years to infuse dollars into their local childcare systems, like San Francisco and Alameda County, where voters approved a half-cent sales tax.

    What does California currently offer? 

    As a state, California offers free or low-cost childcare to families through a mix of childcare programs for families making below a certain income. These include childcare vouchers and spots at centers funded through the California State Preschool Program.

    The only “universal” program with no income requirements in California is offered for 4-year-olds through the form of transitional kindergarten in the public school system — a program that just was fully implemented statewide this year.

    Hedgepeth with Child Care Aware said the state can learn from New Mexico in a couple of ways. There, the state is investing in creating more childcare centers and incentivizing centers to raise wages for childcare providers.

    “ An important takeaway for a state like California is how much the conversation and the investment in New Mexico is about the supply side of the equation,” Hedgepeth said. “If you can't find a spot when you need it, that affordability doesn't mean very much to a family.”

    Child-care costs

    In California, it costs an average of $22,628 to have an infant in a childcare center, according to the group Child Care Aware.

    California and the union that represents family childcare providers are working to increase reimbursement rates for childcare providers.

    New Mexico also created a dedicated state agency to coordinate the early childhood education system beginning in 2020.

    “ That governance can help you bring together different funding streams in different programs,” Hedgepeth said.

    In California, the early childhood and preschool programs are managed by the California Department of Social Services and the Department of Education.

    What’s possible in California? 

    Since California’s system is funded by the general fund, those dollars can fluctuate based on financial headwinds, and Sneeringer said the state is going to be entering “treacherous budget waters” with the passage of H.R. 1, which President Donald Trump has called the “Big, Beautiful Bill.”

    “There are going to be a lot of conversations at the state level around what California values and wants to continue to try to support,” she said. “ The good news is by New Mexico taking this step forward, they are elevating the conversation.  We're eager certainly to learn from them and see what could be replicated both in California but also at the national level.”

  • What's legal, what's not, why it barely works
    A street vendor stands under a rainbow umbrella peeling fruit in front of a cart. In the distance is an arch with a sign that reads "Whittier Blvd. East Los Angeles."
    A fruit vendor sells on Whittier Boulevard in East L.A.

    Topline:

     A recent AirTalk segment highlights the decades-long debate over street vending in Los Angeles. Despite efforts by the City Council and statewide law, enforcement remains murky at best, even though it's a fixture of Los Angeles culture.

    Why now? During a recent debate, Mayor Karen Bass made a series of comments that cast street vending in an unsavory light, prompting an almost immediate backlash from her opponent, Nithya Raman, who has devised her own nine-point plan to address street vending if elected.

    Why is it important? Street vendors are as much a part of L.A.'s identity as its restaurants — but the system meant to support them is so broken that only a fraction operate with full legal standing. As this becomes a defining issue in the mayor's race, it's worth knowing the difference between political rhetoric and how the rules actually work on the ground.

    Last month, street vending became a flashpoint during one of the recent debates for L.A. mayor when incumbent Karen Bass said, "I do not think that you should have a food vendor in front of a restaurant. Period," drawing a comparison to unhoused encampments.

    The remarks set off an almost immediate backlash. Mayoral candidate Nithya Raman, who has her own 9-point plan to support street vendors, said Bass "took a shot" at the street vending community and reiterated her commitment to work toward regulations and legalizing their operations.

    Bass's office later eased its stance, saying it had directed the LAPD to stop issuing criminal citations to street vendors — and to dismiss any that had been issued in error.

    Street vending remains part of the Los Angeles landscape, and the backlash from the debate brought to light just how confusing its legality can be. To understand how we got here, it helps to start with the basics.

    Is street vending legal?

    Yes. Since SB 946 in 2018, state law has decriminalized it. That means cities and counties can't criminally cite vendors or ban them from specific zones. They can, however, still enforce health and safety rules — things like sidewalk clearance and ADA access.

    So why does it feel unregulated?

    On a recent segment for AirTalk, Memo Torres of L.A. Taco pointed to a stark gap between L.A.'s vending population and its permitted vendors. According to an email from the California Restaurant Association reported by FOX 11, an estimated 50,000 street vendors operate across Los Angeles — yet only 53 hold permits specifically for food sales.

    Why so few permits? 

    Vending requirements largely mirror restaurant-grade standards — large refrigeration units, multi-basin sinks — that don't fit the reality of most vendor setups: flat-top griddles, folding tables, pop-up tents.

    That isn't to say there haven't been efforts by the city to address the permitting gap. In 2024, the City Council, with Raman's backing, voted to drop the annual permit fee from $541 to $27.51.

    Raman's mayoral campaign has since proposed another potential fix: extending a state permit category — currently used by vendors at farmers markets who share equipment like a communal three-compartment sink — to street vendors, so operators wouldn't need their own restaurant-grade setup to qualify.

    What about health and safety?

    County health inspectors technically oversee street food vendors, but both industry and vendor advocates agree enforcement is inconsistent — leaving reliable data on violations hard to come by.

    Are vendors and restaurants actually enemies?

    A 2015 Economic Roundtable study found that businesses located near street vendors were more likely to see job growth than those without nearby vendors.

    What’s next 

    Proposals like Raman's permitting reforms aim to close the gap — but for now, most of L.A.'s vendors remain outside the formal system.

  • Sponsored message
  • LA opens season in Australia against 49ers
    Exterior of the Melbourne Cricket Ground showing two large banners flanking the entrance: one featuring a San Francisco 49ers player in a red jersey on the left, and another featuring a Los Angeles Rams player in a blue jersey on the right. Several people are walking near the "Welcome" entrance below.
    Outside the Melbourne Cricket Ground ahead of the NFL game between the Rams and 49ers. (AP Photo/Asanka Brendon Ratnayake)

    Topline:

    The longest road trip in NFL history has brought the San Francisco 49ers and the Los Angeles Rams to Australia’s sports capital for a season opener in front of more than 100,000 football-hungry fans packed into the Southern Hemisphere’s largest stadium.

    Why it matters: The NFC West rivals are playing Australia’s first NFL game, and the starkly differing ways in which they made this epic journey have attracted almost as much attention as the two star-studded rosters preparing to put on a show.

    The backstory: The 49ers have been Down Under for more than a week, adjusting their body clocks and winning over thousands of Aussie fans who appreciate their commitment to the historic moment. The Rams were only scheduled to arrive in Melbourne around dawn Thursday, roughly 28 hours before the Friday morning kickoff that’s necessary to play the game Thursday night in prime time in the U.S. That’s because head coach Sean McVay is convinced they can thwart jet lag and optimize their game readiness by staying home on California time.

    What's next: The Rams and 49ers kick off at 5:35 p.m. Thursday night on Netflix.

    The longest road trip in NFL history has brought the San Francisco 49ers and the Los Angeles Rams to Australia’s sports capital for a season opener in front of more than 100,000 football-hungry fans packed into the Southern Hemisphere’s largest stadium.

    The NFC West rivals are playing Australia’s first NFL game, and the starkly differing ways in which they made this epic journey have attracted almost as much attention as the two star-studded rosters preparing to put on a show.

    The 49ers have been Down Under for more than a week, adjusting their body clocks in the traditional manner and winning over thousands of Aussie fans who appreciate their commitment to the historic moment.

    The Rams were only scheduled to arrive in Melbourne around dawn Thursday, roughly 28 hours before the Friday morning kickoff that’s necessary to play the game Thursday night in prime time in the U.S. That’s because head coach Sean McVay is convinced they can thwart jet lag and optimize their game readiness by staying home on California time.

    Both teams agree this contrast in preparation is not a referendum on the best way to handle a pair of 16-hour flights with a football game in between — even if the rest of the world might see it that way after the final whistle.

    Instead, this game is primarily a difficult early test for both the Super Bowl favorite Rams and the talent-laden 49ers, who also intend to be a title challenger. The coaching staffs and veteran players all know each other thoroughly after a decade of competition between Shanahan and McVay, who are both constantly looking for an edge.

    “I don’t think there’s any right way to do it,” said defensive end Myles Garrett, who will make his Rams debut in Australia. “They have a plan, and I’m sure they consulted different teams and people to find out a way to combat jet lag and such long travel. We’ve done the same thing. I think we’re both riding our methodologies.”

    Garrett will be joined by star cornerback Trent McDuffie and cornerback Jaylen Watson in their debuts with Los Angeles’ revamped defense.

    But Garrett will not be joined at the MCG by Aaron Donald, who ended his 2 1/2-year retirement late last month. The Rams decided the 35-year-old Donald will stay home as he ramps up deliberately for his return — and that’s a beacon of hope for Shanahan, who was sure his old friend McVay would bring Donald to Australia.

    “I’ve never been more excited to be wrong about something,” Shanahan said.

  • Feds to investigate Men’s Central Jail
    The Jail complex in downtown Los Angeles
    The Jail complex in downtown Los Angeles

    Topline:

    The U.S. Department of Justice announced Wednesday that it has opened an investigation into the Men’s Central Jail in downtown Los Angeles, specifically looking into whether L.A. County has failed to provide environmentally safe, humane and habitable conditions for people held there.

    The details: The jail has long been plagued by allegations of poor conditions. Monitors from the American Civil Liberties Union have documented problems including overcrowding, severe mold and mildew, and rodent infestations.

    The context: The federal investigation is expected to focus on conditions within the facility and not the actions of the county sheriff’s deputies who staff it, according to the Justice Department. The new investigation is separate from a 2015 settlement between the county and federal government, which stemmed from allegations of inadequate mental health care provided at county jails.

    What happens next: Investigators will determine whether the county has violated the Eighth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, which protects against cruel and unusual punishment, and 14th Amendment, which guarantees equal protection under the law.

    Reaction: L.A. County Supervisor Kathryn Barger welcomed the investigation, and said she had said for year that the jail was “antiquated, inhumane, and unfit for our workforce and those incarcerated there.”

  • Brush fire sends smoke up over 405
    Smoke rises from a brush fire on a hillside in an aerial photo.
    Smoke rises from a brush fire near the Getty Center on Sept. 9, 2026.

    Topline:

    Firefighters appeared to make quick progress against a brush fire the broke out Wednesday near the Getty Center.

    What we know so far: As of 5 p.m., evacuation warnings had been issued for zones LFD-0895 and LF-0967, although the LAFD said no structures were immediately threatened as the water-dropping helicopters attacked the fire from above.

    Read on ... for more on evacuations and weather conditions.

    This story is no longer being actively updated. For the most up-to-date information about the fire you can check:

    Firefighters appeared to make quick progress against a brush fire the broke out Wednesday near the Getty Center.

    As of 5 p.m., evacuation warnings had been issued for zones LFD-0895 and LF-0967, although the LAFD said no structures were immediately threatened as the water-dropping helicopters attacked the fire from above. Forward progress of the fire was reported stopped shortly after 6 p.m. at a little over 20 acres.

    The fire broke out as Southern California endures high heat and record-breaking humidity.

    The basics

    • Acreage: 20+ acres as of Wednesday evening
    • Containment: Forward progress stopped
    • Structures destroyed: None reported
    • Deaths: None
    • Injuries: Unknown
    • Personnel working on fire: Unknown

    Listen to our Big Burn podcast

    Listen 39:42
    Get ready now. Listen to our The Big Burn podcast
    Jacob Margolis, LAist's science reporter, examines the new normal of big fires in California.

    Fire resources and tips

    Check out LAist's wildfire recovery guide

    If you have to evacuate:

    Navigating fire conditions:

    How to help yourself and others:

    How to start the recovery process:

    What to do for your kids:

    Prepare for the next disaster: