Sponsored message
Logged in as
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

The Brief

The most important stories for you to know today
  • Fewer parents know about it than in past years
    A preschool-aged child in a burgundy polo shirt with their curly hair in pigtails holds up a red hashtag-shaped block.
    California is set to fully-implement transitional kindergarten for all 4-year-olds this fall.

    Topline:

    As California makes transitional kindergarten available for all 4-year-olds this fall, fewer parents know about the program than they did just a few years ago, according to surveys conducted by the Stanford Center on Early Childhood.

    The backstory: In 2021, California launched an ambitious plan to make transitional kindergarten (TK) available for all 4-year-olds by the 2025-26 school year, creating a brand new grade level. Since then, districts began accepting more 4-year-olds by expanding the birthday cutoffs each year.

    What’s new: A few years ago, surveys showed 83% of parents with children under 6 had heard about the program. But new surveys done this past winter show that number is down to 65%.

    Why the decline: “ There was a lot more messaging about it when it was a brand new policy,” said Abigail Stewart-Kahn, managing director at the Stanford Center on Early Childhood. She added that parents with children under 6 years old are a “decentralized market” that can be hard to reach — some parents have kids at home, while others have children at daycare or with families. “There’s no first grade teacher to tell them about second grade,” she said. That’s why she said every new school year, there’s a need for “another big splashy set of messages.”

    What’s TK? Read more about it in our guide to transitional kindergarten.

    This fall, California will make transitional kindergarten available for all 4-year-olds.

    Listen 0:46
    California adds a new grade for 4-year-olds this fall — but awareness is down

    But fewer parents know about the program than they did just a few years ago, according to new surveys conducted by the Stanford Center on Early Childhood.

    In 2021, California launched an ambitious plan to make transitional kindergarten (TK) available for all 4-year-olds by the 2025-26 school year, creating a brand new grade level. Since then, districts began accepting more 4-year-olds by expanding the birthday cutoffs each year.

    A few years ago, surveys showed 83% of parents with children under 6 had heard about the program. But new surveys done this past winter show that number is down to 65%.

    “ There was a lot more messaging about it when it was a brand new policy,” said Abigail Stewart-Kahn, managing director at the Stanford Center on Early Childhood.

    She added that parents with children under 6 years old are a “decentralized market” that can be hard to reach — some parents have kids at home, while others have children at daycare or with families.

    “There’s no first grade teacher to tell them about second grade,” she said. That’s why she said every new school year, there’s a need for “another big splashy set of messages.”

    Want to learn more about TK?

  • How to get it after warehouse fire
    White plume of smoke rises above a neighborhood, with palm trees in the foreground.
    White smoke billowed out of a cold storage facility in Boyle Heights on Friday, June 19, 2026.

    Topline:

    The Contaminant Level Evaluation and Analysis for Neighborhoods (CLEAN) project at USC is offering free soil testing for Boyle Heights and East L.A. residents.

    Why now: Following the Logistics warehouse fire in Boyle Heights, many residents have expressed concerns about contaminants from smoke and ash settling into the soil.

    More details: CLEAN is a rapid response soil testing program from the USC Department of Earth Sciences and Public Exchange developed by USC faculty, students and staff to assist local communities impacted by fires in L.A. County.

    Read on... for a step-by-step guide on how to get free soil testing.

    This story first appeared on The LA Local.

    Following the Logistics warehouse fire in Boyle Heights, many residents have expressed concerns about contaminants from smoke and ash settling into the soil. 

    The Contaminant Level Evaluation and Analysis for Neighborhoods (CLEAN) project at USC is offering free soil testing for Boyle Heights and East L.A. residents. 

    CLEAN is a rapid response soil testing program from the USC Department of Earth Sciences and Public Exchange developed by USC faculty, students and staff to assist local communities impacted by fires in L.A. County.

    Residents can collect soil samples and drop them off at Boyle Heights City Hall for CLEAN to collect. 

    Below is a step-by-step guide.

    How to collect your sample: 

    1. Review USC’s CLEAN project guide
    2. Submit this survey– Your sample ID will be provided upon completing the survey. Make sure to save your ID as this is how the CLEAN team keeps track of your sample and provides results to you. 
    3. Before getting started, gather your materials and protective equipment. (ADD points)
      1. Disposable gloves and an N95 or KN95 facemask
      2. Plastic spoon or shovel
      3. Ziploc bags (2 per composite samples)
      4. Permanent marker 
      5. Masking tape (for bag label)
      6. 9-digit sample ID code (from your survey)
    4. Select your sampling zones
      1. Your sampling zones are where you will be collecting the soil from. Your zones can be your front or back yard, garden, etc. The picture on page four of the guide shows the different zones in a home and though your home may not have all zones, what’s important is that you understand what zones you’re collecting from and labeling them accordingly.
    5. Once you’re wearing your protective gear and have your equipment, you are now ready to collect the sample.
      1. Collect two spoonfuls of soil for 2-5 different spots within a single zone
      2. Drop all spoonfuls from the zone into one Ziploc bag. By the end of collecting, the bag should have about a cup size of soil in it.
      3. Seal your Ziploc bag and for extra protection, put it over another Ziploc bag. This bag will now contain the zone’s composite sample. 
      4. Then repeat for every other zone you want to test. You should have one composite sample per zone you test. (e.g. one for the garden, one for the front yard, etc.)
    6. Using a permanent marker, label each Ziploc bag with your unique sample ID and the zone name either on tape or directly on the bag. 
    7. Then you repeat steps 5 and 6 for each zone you are testing. 

    After collection 

    Once you have finished collecting your samples, make sure to wash your hands. If you suspect your soil to be contaminated, CLEAN suggests limiting access to that area, wiping or taking shoes off before entering your home, and preventing children from playing in bare soil.  

    CLEAN will test all samples for lead and some select samples will be tested for Arsenic, Chromium(VI), and Mercury. Testing for lead can take up to four weeks, while tests for other materials may take longer.

    Where to submit your sample

    After collecting and labeling your soil samples, you can submit them using one of the following methods:

    Option 1: Drop Off Your Sample

    Boyle Heights City Hall
    Address: 2130 E. 1st Street, Los Angeles, CA 90033
    Hours: Monday–Friday, 9 a.m.–5 p.m.

    Option 2: Mail Your Sample

    CLEAN Project
    Address: 3651 Trousdale Parkway, USC ZHS 117B, Los Angeles, CA 90089

    Who to contact: 

    If you have any questions or concerns, contact cleanproject@usc.edu

  • Sponsored message
  • Video billboards score a major win in court
    A low angle view of a person walking down a sidewalk past a vertical digital billboard. On that side of the street are apartment buildings and homes, and across from it is a movie theater and a stadium at the corner.
    A person walks past a digital billboard on Prairie Ave. in Inglewood on April 18, 2026, in Los Angeles.

    Topline:

    A Los Angeles Superior Court judge ruled Tuesday that the city of Inglewood can, for now, continue its deal allowing WOW Media to run its digital billboards along the city’s major roads.

    The backstory: Last summer, companies tied to SoFi Stadium, Kia Forum and Intuit Dome sued to block the agreement, arguing that the city had violated competitive bidding rules and policies governing the use of public roads and sidewalks.

    More details: Superior Court Judge Joseph Lipner rejected several claims brought by the stadiums, saying in a 25-page ruling that WOW’s agreement with the city adhered to rules governing the public right–of-way, the legal term for publicly accessible roads, sidewalks and other paths.

    Read on... for more on the judge's ruling.

    This story first appeared on The LA Local.

    Inglewood’s video billboards just secured a big legal victory.  

    A Los Angeles Superior Court judge ruled Tuesday that the city of Inglewood can, for now, continue its deal allowing WOW Media to run its digital billboards along the city’s major roads. 

    Last summer, companies tied to SoFi Stadium, Kia Forum and Intuit Dome sued to block the agreement, arguing that the city had violated competitive bidding rules and policies governing the use of public roads and sidewalks.

    The stadiums, which run their own massive digital billboards on its properties, also claimed the city’s dealings with WOW breached their contracts with the city. Court records previously reviewed by The LA Local suggested the yearslong relationship between Mayor James Butts and SoFi Stadium owner Stan Kroenke was fraying.

    At one point, Butts claimed the city’s SoFi Stadium development agreement was void.

    The dispute also moved beyond the courts and onto the streets when stadiums launched a ballot initiative aimed at banning WOW’s billboards. WOW fired back with a pair of its own ballot initiatives aimed at stadium taxes and parking fees.

    Superior Court Judge Joseph Lipner rejected several claims brought by the stadiums, saying in a 25-page ruling that WOW’s agreement with the city adhered to rules governing the public right–of-way, the legal term for publicly accessible roads, sidewalks and other paths.

    The judge also ruled that the city was not required to open a competitive bidding process for the agreement because WOW and its patented spiral video kiosks were uniquely positioned to fulfill the contract. 

    But Lipner said he did not have jurisdiction to rule on allegations by the Forum and Intuit Dome that the city breached their development contracts.

    A close up of a vertical digital billboard showing an ad. On top reads "WOW." An apartment building, gas station, and stadium are in the background.
    A spiral video kiosk is seen on Prairie Ave. in Inglewood on Saturday, April 18, 2026, in Los Angeles, Calif.
    (
    Dania Maxwell
    /
    The LA Local
    )

    Butts told The LA Local that the court’s findings speak for themselves and touted the revenue the billboards bring the city. Inglewood has made as much as $7.4 million in billboard revenue in a year, according to budget documents. 

    WOW celebrated Lipner’s ruling in a statement to The LA Local, calling the stadiums’ court case and ballot initiative part of an “expensive misinformation campaign.” 

    “The court’s ruling makes clear that the city followed the law and acted in the best interests of its residents,” WOW CEO Scott Krantz said. “It has become abundantly clear that the stadium duopolists want complete control of every facet of Inglewood life.” 

    A spokesperson for Hollywood Park, the complex that includes SoFi Stadium, said it plans to appeal and that the case raised important questions.

    “We respectfully disagree with the court’s decision regarding the city’s long-term agreement with WOW and continue to believe that leasing public rights-of-way in this manner is inconsistent with state and municipal law,” the spokesperson wrote. 

    Beyond a possible appeal by the stadiums, Lipner wrote that the parts of the case he did not rule on will be transferred to another court department to be calendared for future proceedings.

  • We discuss 'Supergirl,' ‘The Invite,’ others
    Two female presenting people with medium-light skin tones sitting at a dining table. Both are looking at something not visible and seem confused.
    Penélope Cruz and Olivia Wilde in The Invite.

    The topic:

    Larry Mantle and LAist film critics review this weekend’s latest movie releases in theaters and on streaming platforms.

    The films:

    • Supergirl Wide Release                                  
    • The Invite In Select Theaters|Expands Wide July 10                                 
    • Jackass: Best and Last Wide Release                       
    • Lucky Strike Wide Release 
    • Coroner to the Stars Laemmle Glendale|Available on Digital & VOD July 14              
    • Peter Asher: Everywhere Man Laemmle Royal [West LA]|Laemmle NoHo               
    • Animals in War Available on Digital & VOD|Streaming on Film Movement Plus          
    • Maddie's Secret In Select Theaters                                                    
    • Woody Guthrie and The Ghost of Tom Joad Today Streaming on PBS SoCal  

    The critics:

  • Judge declares mistrial in arson case
    A home with fire behind it.
    The Palisades Fire, seen here on Jan. 7, went on to devastate whole neighborhoods, destroying thousands of homes and killing 12 people.

    Topline:

    A judge declared a mistrial on Friday for a former Pacific Palisades resident accused of starting a fire that led to last year’s destructive Palisades Fire after the jury said it was deadlocked after about two days of deliberations.

    Why it matters: The Palisades Fire in 2025 burned for more than three weeks across 23,000 acres. It killed 12 people, destroyed homes, businesses and displaced thousands of residents, some of whom still haven’t been able to return to their neighborhoods more than a year later.

    The backstory: Firefighters initially kept the Lachman Fire contained to about 8 acres, but it continued to burn underground in the days following. A strong, widespread windstorm spread the remnants to the surface and into nearby communities, becoming the Palisades Fire on Jan. 7.

    Read on... for more on the case, how we got here and what's next.

    A judge declared a mistrial on Friday for a former Pacific Palisades resident accused of starting a fire that led to last year’s destructive Palisades Fire after the jury said it was deadlocked.

    Jonathan Rinderknecht, 30, was facing up to 45 years in federal prison for one count of destruction of property by means of fire, one count of arson affecting property used in interstate commerce and one count of timber set afire.

    The judge set a new trial date for Oct. 19 and the court ordered Rinderknecht remain detained.

    Assistant U.S. Attorney Bill Essayli said on social media that the evidence against Rinderknecht is "strong."

    "We fully intend to retry this case before a new jury and obtain guilty verdicts on all charged counts," Essayli said.

    It was announced Thursday that the jury had reached a verdict, but when attorneys and Rinderknecht filed into the room, the judge said the opposite — the jury cannot make a unanimous decision on each of the three charges based on a note they shared with the court.

    The jury exchanged further notes with the judge that said there is nothing the court could do to help them reach a unanimous verdict and there were jurors dead set on both sides.

    What happened in court?

    The trial reconvened Friday to figure out the next steps after the jury said it was deadlocked.

    Prosecutors were pushing for the court to tell the jurors to go back to deliberations in an attempt to work it out, but U.S. District Judge Anne Hwang expressed concerns that it could come off as coercion.

    Hwang decided to call the jurors into the courtroom to confirm they cannot reach a unanimous verdict, and that there is nothing else the court could do to help them. All 12 members confirmed that was the case and said the split was 10 not guilty and two guilty.

    Prosecutors argued that Rinderknecht maliciously started a smaller fire — the Lachman Fire — near a hiking trail in the Santa Monica Mountains just after midnight on New Year’s Day 2025. About a week later, it became the Palisades Fire, one of the most destructive wildfires in California history. It killed 12 people and destroyed thousands of structures.

    How we got here

    Firefighters initially kept the Lachman Fire contained to about 8 acres, but it continued to burn underground in the days following. A strong, widespread windstorm spread the remnants to the surface and into nearby communities, becoming the Palisades Fire on Jan. 7.

    According to the criminal complaint, Rinderknecht was working as an Uber driver on New Year’s Eve and dropped a passenger off in the Pacific Palisades before walking up the trail about a block from his former home. Two passengers later described Rinderknecht as appearing angry and agitated that night.

    He took two phone videos from a hilltop clearing about half an hour before the first signs of the Lachman Fire were spotted in the area. According to prosecutors, Rinderknecht unsuccessfully tried to call 911 several times in the following minutes, eventually reporting the fire when he got through to authorities toward the bottom of the trail.

    A man with long brown hair and a beard and mustache stands against a block wall in a hooded sweatshirt.
    This undated photo shows Jonathan Rinderknecht, who was accused of starting the Palisades Fire.
    (
    U.S. Attorney's Office
    )

    Cameras captured Rinderknecht driving away from the area before turning around and following fire trucks to the scene, according to the complaint. Prosecutors said he then hiked back up the same trail to take phone videos of the fire and first responders.

    Officials later said the Palisades Fire was a “holdover” fire, a continuation of the smaller Lachman Fire from six days prior.

    The Palisades Fire burned for more than three weeks across 23,000 acres. It destroyed homes, businesses and displaced thousands of residents, some of whom still haven’t been able to return to their neighborhoods more than a year later.

    About the trial

    Rinderknecht pleaded not guilty to the charges last October, and his trial started earlier this month.

    Steve Haney, his defense attorney, has said prosecutors are trying to blame Rinderknecht for a fire that started nearly a week before.

    "Well what about what happened between Jan. 1 and Jan. 7?" Haney told reporters last fall. "Jonathan wasn't out there with a fire hose putting that fire out at the Lachman location, the Fire Department was. So why are they blaming him for whatever the Fire Department didn't do?"

    Haney said during the trial that “no matter what the government's theory is, the evidence will show Jonathan did not start the Jan. 1 fire," according to LAist’s media partner CBS LA.

    Moving forward

    According to the Los Angeles Fire Department’s after action report, staffing levels on the day the Palisades Fire started fell short of the standard for extreme weather conditions. Despite the high risk, the report said the decision not to deploy more firefighters in advance was made in part to save money.

    Los Angeles Fire Chief Jaime Moore, who was tapped for the top job after the former chief was removed by L.A. Mayor Karen Bass citing the fire response, said things have changed since then.

    Moore told LAist’s AirTalk in January that the department has updated its policies to increase staffing for especially hazardous conditions and promoted training in wildland firefighting, which have different challenges than those in urban environments and contributed to confusion during the Palisades Fire.