Sponsored message
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

The Brief

The most important stories for you to know today
  • CA colleges address complicated applications
    Two dark-haired women sit on a couch while another woman holding a tablet computer leans over to address them.
    Amy Gonzales, left, CalFresh project director, and Melys Bonifacio Araujio-Jerez, center, a CalFresh program assistant, work with student Johanna Granda to fill out an intake form at Chico State last month.

    Topline:

    Work part-time, don’t but earn too much. Enroll in college at least part-time, but be ready to miss class or work for an interview. Wait hours on the phone for your interview, then months for your paperwork to be processed. These are just some of the hoops college students have to go through to receive CalFresh, the federally funded food benefit program also known as SNAP.

    The context: Across California, between 400,000 and 750,000 college students meet SNAP eligibility but only about one-fifth receive federal food assistance, leaving around $140 million untapped, according to the California Policy Lab. While several campuses offer food pantries, meal donation programs and staff dedicated to helping students apply for CalFresh, many students still struggle to meet their nutritional needs.

    Why it matters: In California in 2023, 66% of students reported food insecurity, meaning they lacked reliable access to healthy and nutritious food, according to the California Student Aid Commission.

    So why aren’t students enrolling? Two big obstacles trip them up: the application process and eligibility requirements.

    Read on ... for more on how colleges are trying to make it easier for students to apply.

    Work part-time, don’t but earn too much. Enroll in college at least part-time, but be ready to miss class or work for an interview. Wait hours on the phone for your interview, then months for your paperwork to be processed. These are just some of the hoops college students have to go through to receive CalFresh, the federally funded food benefit program also known as SNAP.

    Across California, between 400,000 and 750,000 college students meet SNAP eligibility but only about one-fifth receive federal food assistance, leaving around $140 million untapped, according to the California Policy Lab. While several campuses offer food pantries, meal donation programs and staff dedicated to helping students apply for CalFresh, many students still struggle to meet their nutritional needs.

    In California in 2023, 66% of students reported food insecurity, meaning they lacked reliable access to healthy and nutritious food, according to the California Student Aid Commission.

    Students who don’t have enough food experience problems with mental and physical health, earn lower grades and graduate at lower rates, research finds. They are more likely to miss or drop classes and may not have the money to buy course materials. Meanwhile, students who do receive SNAP perform better academically, researchers have found.

    So why aren’t students enrolling in CalFresh? Two big obstacles trip them up: the application process and eligibility requirements.

    Applying for CalFresh is a lengthy process

    To apply for CalFresh, college students must first find out if they are eligible, then fill out the online application. If they have questions, they can seek out CalFresh staff at their campus or contact a county CalFresh office. Next, students set up a phone appointment with the county and submit the required documents, such as proof of enrollment, pay stubs and rental agreements. While the GetCalFresh website suggests which documents are “usually required,” students report inconsistencies in what agents ask them to submit.

    When Kelly Zamudio transferred to UC Davis in fall 2024, she knew money would be tight. She had used her savings to move into campus housing. “Over the summer, I became really scared,” she said. She immediately applied for CalFresh and got a part-time job. When she received conflicting messages about which housing documents were required for her application, she had to seek clarification from a CalFresh representative. That person also told Zamudio that processing her paperwork would take 10 days. Four months after submitting her application, she finally received her EBT card at the beginning of 2025.

    If students do get CalFresh, they must apply for recertification — first after six months and then annually, or sooner if their job changes. Recertification requires another application and interview. Researchers at the California Policy Lab found that students are six times more likely to drop CalFresh in the month when their recertification is due.

    Between 2022 and 2023, Chico State researchers surveyed 1,340 public college students throughout California who qualify for CalFresh and found 62% of them don’t enroll, according to Stephanie Bianco, director of the Center for Healthy Communities at Chico State, which contracts with the state to run over 30 health and wellness programs across California and conducts health research. In their survey responses, students said they didn’t think they were eligible, didn’t have time to apply, or felt others needed aid more than they did.

    The phone interview causes the most problems. Zamudio missed her first phone appointment because of work. The soonest appointment she could get was a month later. Another UC Davis student, Alonso Rodríguez Villalobos, had to wait on the phone for three hours past his appointment time.

    Recent data show that more than a quarter of college applicants were denied benefits because they missed their interview. Some campus CalFresh coordinators advise students to call in as soon as possible on the day of their appointment.

    “We tell them … ‘Call immediately, stay on the wait line, and know that it could take up to three hours,’” said Nadia Hernandez Arteaga, a graduate student and part-time CalFresh coordinator at Sonoma State University.

    Sonoma State is one of about 50 campuses with CalFresh outreach programs that support students from pre-screening through recertification. The outreach program is funded primarily by student fees along with an annual $18,000 grant from the Chico State Center for Healthy Communities, according to Sonoma State spokesperson Jeff Keating.

    County CalFresh staffing levels vary, which affects how long the application process takes. And, while California law requires a county-campus liaison for CalFresh for every campus, the Legislature does not provide funding for the positions, according to Amy Gonzales, director of CalFresh programs for Chico State. So county staff overseeing student applications often also handle county resident applications and other responsibilities, she said.

    Suzanna Martinez, a UC San Francisco researcher, interviewed county agency workers who process student CalFresh applications in 10 California counties. The employees said the requirements are confusing, the application process is intimidating, and students have trouble providing documents.

    “Several staff members voiced that they did not feel that the student rules were equitable, noting the extra ‘hoops’ students had to overcome to be eligible,” according to the report. Slightly more than half suggested getting rid of the federally mandated rules for students altogether. During the COVID pandemic when eligibility requirements were loosened nationwide, student enrollment rose from 127,000 in 2019 to nearly 163,000 in May 2023.

    Ian Kaled Rodriguez, a fourth-year computer science student at Chico State, applied to CalFresh in January 2022 after his first semester. His campus housing required a meal plan, but the cafeteria was too far to get to between classes. He got a job and saved money by buying ramen, 10 for $5. “Just, like, breakfast, dinner, lunch, ramen. Just keep eating ramen,” he said.

    “I was just, like, starving,” Rodriguez said. So he submitted a CalFresh application. But when the county called him for an interview, he was surprised. He’d never received an appointment time. He was even more surprised, he said, when the case worker told him he’d need to submit documents. He had nothing prepared.

    Rodriguez was ultimately approved for CalFresh. But his card was denied the first time he tried to buy groceries. His caseworker said he should have received a code as well. A week later, he received the code in the mail.

    Today, Rodriguez explains the whole process to Chico State students applying for CalFresh. He works part time for the Center for Healthy Communities, a job he likens to being the “middleman.”

    However, even his job doesn’t protect him from snafus. Last month, Rodriguez lost his benefits even though he’d submitted his recertification on time. When he tried to use his card, there were no funds. That day, he spent an hour and a half on hold with the county before giving up. He called early the next day and waited 40 minutes before an agent responded, only to tell him that “his file had just been sitting there,” he said. The agent’s supervisor was able to reload his card by that afternoon.

    Strict requirements hamper eligibility

    Federal researchers confirm that a confusing tangle of requirements blocks students from getting SNAP throughout the country.

    In addition to making less than $2,510 per month, students must be enrolled in school at least half-time, be between 18 and 49 years old, and be a citizen of the U.S. Students also must meet one of many federal criteria, such as working at least 20 hours a week, participating in a federal or state work-study program, having a child, receiving CalWorks or a federally funded Cal Grant for low-income students, or being enrolled in an educational or training program approved by the state.

    Many students who experience food insecurity don’t qualify for any of the CalFresh requirements.

    “Some of them don't have Cal Grant A or B, they didn't qualify for work study ... and they're working 15 hours a week, so they don't quite hit that mark of 20 hours to qualify. So it's hard because the students are [still] in this place of need,” said Micheala Bietz, community service and basic needs coordinator at Sonoma State.

    Eligibility rules exclude certain populations, such as part-time students or those without permanent legal status, even if they meet the income criteria.

    Researchers say improved and mandated data-sharing will make it easier for campuses to identify eligible students and help them apply for CalFresh.

    The California State University’s director of basic needs, Carolyn O’Keefe, said in the past two years California’s higher education systems have been working to improve data sharing and streamline the application process. “We've done a pretty good job at ensuring that the students that are eligible know that they're eligible,” she said.

    But data collection is uneven. Not all campuses track student eligibility and CalFresh enrollment rates and data collection and sharing varies from county to county. Butte County, where need is high and resources low, does not have the staff or financial resources to track student enrollment in CalFresh, said Gonzales at Chico State.

    Chico State’s Basic Needs Center, which houses the campus food pantry and gives emergency housing vouchers and cash grants to students, tracks how many students apply for CalFresh each semester. But the center doesn't know how many of those applications get approved. “I would love to have data on that,” Gonzales said.

    Lawmakers try to increase CalFresh recipients

    California legislators have made some efforts to expand student CalFresh enrollment. In 2021, they passed laws requiring county liaisons to work with colleges on increasing student participation and requiring public colleges to give students information about CalFresh during orientation. They also funded basic need centers at California public colleges, with $15 million for the California State University system and $30 million for community colleges each year. In 2019 the University of California system began receiving $15 million annually for students’ basic needs; that amount increased by $800,000 in 2023.

    In 2022, colleges had to start notifying students in writing of their CalFresh eligibility. In September 2024 Gov. Gavin Newsom approved two bills to further expand the reach of CalFresh. One requires the California Department of Social Services to start tracking data by July 1, 2025 on eligible students who don’t participate in CalFresh.

    The other law, Assembly Bill 2033, stipulates that at least one market must accept CalFresh on each public college and university campus. However, a report released by UCLA in January quoted a respondent, who said, “We surveyed a lot of campuses, and I think only about 12% to 15% of all schools accept EBT somewhere on their campus. And that's pretty bad, considering that they all can.”

    While SNAP is a federally funded program, states can refine policies and eligibility requirements. In California, legislative efforts have focused on the work requirement. In 2014, the state passed a bill to clarify that certain training programs, such as the Educational Opportunity Program, qualify as work. More recently, Assembly Bill 396 in 2021 allows public higher education institutions to apply for state certification for more training programs to qualify as work, from research assistantships to entire degree programs.

    At UC Davis, Rodríguez Villalobos was denied CalFresh in the fall of 2024 because he didn’t meet the work requirement. The psychology major needed a mentor to approve his research project, which would have qualified as one of the state-approved training programs that replaces the work requirement. Finally, earlier this month, Rodríguez Villalobos found a research mentor and started working with him; he will now reapply for CalFresh.

    “AB 396, has been a total game changer,” said Aydin Nazmi, an epidemiologist and public health specialist at Cal Poly San Luis Obispo.

    Under that law thousands of programs, referred to as “Local Programs that Increase Employability,” at all public universities and colleges now give CalFresh eligibility to participating full-time college students.

    “It's pretty safe to say California is the national leader in college student basic needs initiatives and movements and advocacy,” Nazmi said.

    Nazmi has tracked student participation in CalFresh on his campus since 2010, when fewer than 100 students received the benefits. After the bill passed in 2021, CalFresh enrollment more than doubled. Today, more than 4,400 Cal Poly students use CalFresh.

    Nazmi says that CalFresh meets students' food needs better than campus-run services like food pantries and donating meal swipes. Research shows the best intervention is “money in your pocket,” he said, adding “the good thing about CalFresh is that it is money in your pocket earmarked for food, for groceries only.”

    Lizzy Rager contributed to this story. Moore and Rager are contributors with the College Journalism Network, a collaboration between CalMatters and student journalists from across California. CalMatters higher education coverage is supported by a grant from the College Futures Foundation.

    This article was originally published on CalMatters and was republished under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives license.

  • Dodgers fans grapple with loyalty ahead of it
    A man with medium skin tone, wearing a blue Dodgers shirt, speaks into a microphone standing behind a podium next to others holding up signs that read "No repeat to White House. Legalization for all" and "Stand with you Dodger community." They all stand in front of a blue sign that reads "Welcome to Dodger Stadium."
    Jorge "Coqui" H. Rodriguez speaks at a press conference outside Dodger Stadium on Wednesady to demand the Dodgers not visit the White House following their 2025 World Series win.

    Topline:

    Less than 24 hours before season opener, longtime Dodgers fans demand the team divest from immigration detention centers and decline the White House visit.

    More details: More than 30 people joined Richard Santillan on Wednesday morning for a press conference held near 1000 Vin Scully Drive to convey a message directly to the team. “We are demanding that the Dodgers stop participating in funding of inhumane treatment of families and do not go to the White House to celebrate with the criminal in chief,” Evelyn Escatiola told the crowd. “Together we have the power to make a change.”

    The backstory: The team’s 2025’s visit to the White House drew ire from the largely Latino fan base, citing the Trump administration’s ongoing attacks on immigrants. In June, the team came under further scrutiny when rumors swirled online that federal immigration agents were using the stadium’s parking, which immigration authorities later denied in statements posted on social media accounts.

    Read on ... for more on how some fans are feeling leading up to Opening Day.

    This story first appeared on The LA Local.

    Since 1977, Richard Santillan has been to every Opening Day game at Dodger Stadium. 

    “The tradition goes from my father, to me, to my children and grandchildren. Some of my best memories are with my father and children here at Dodger Stadium,” Santillan told The LA Local, smiling under the shade of palm trees near the entrance to the ballpark Wednesday morning. He was there to protest the team less than 24 hours before Opening Day.

    Santillan, like countless other loyal Dodgers fans, is grappling with his fan identity over the team’s decision to accept an invitation to the White House and owner Mark Walter’s ties to ICE detention facilities.

    More than 30 people joined Santillan on Wednesday morning for a press conference held near 1000 Vin Scully Drive to convey a message directly to the team. 

    “We are demanding the Dodgers stop participating in funding of inhumane treatment of families and do not go to the White House to celebrate with the criminal in chief,” Evelyn Escatiola told the crowd. “Together, we have the power to make a change.”

    Escatiola, a former dean of East Los Angeles College and longtime community organizer, urged fans to flex their economic power by “letting the Dodgers know that we do not support repression.”

    Jorge “Coqui” Rodriguez, a lifelong Dodgers fan, spoke to the crowd and called on Dodgers ownership to divest from immigration detention centers owned and operated by GEO Group and CoreCivic.

    A man with medium skin tone, wearing a blue Dodgers t-shirt, speaks into a microphone behind a podium.
    Jorge Coqui H Rodriguez speaks at a press conference outside Dodger Stadium on March 25, 2026, to demand the Dodgers not to visit the White House following their 2025 World Series win.
    (
    J.W. Hendricks
    /
    The LA Local
    )

    In a phone interview a day before the protest, Rodriguez told The LA Local he did not want the Dodgers using his “cheve” or beer money to fund detention centers. 

    “They can’t take our parking money, our cacahuate money, our cheve money, our Dodger Dog money and invest those funds into corporations that are imprisoning people. It’s wrong,” Rodriguez said. 

    Rodriguez considers the Dodgers one of the most racially diverse teams and said the players need to support fans at a time when heightened immigration enforcement has become more common across L.A.

    The team’s 2025’s visit to the White House drew ire from the largely Latino fan base, citing the Trump administration’s ongoing attacks on immigrants. 

    In June, the team came under further scrutiny when rumors swirled online that federal immigration agents were using the stadium’s parking, which immigration authorities later denied in statements posted on social media accounts.

    The team again came under fire after not releasing a statement on the impacts of ICE raids on its mostly Latino fan base at the height of immigration enforcement last summer. The team later agreed to invest $1 million to support families affected by immigration enforcement.

    When he learned the Dodgers were pledging only $1 million to families in need, Rodriguez called the amount a  “slap in the face.” 

    “These guys just bought the Lakers for billions of dollars and they give a million dollars to fight for legal services? That’s a joke,” Rodriguez said. “They need to have a moral backbone and not be investing in those companies.”

    According to reporting from the Los Angeles Times, former Dodgers pitcher Clayton Kershawsaid last week that he is looking forward to the trip.

    “I went when President [Joe] Biden was in office. I’m going to go when President [Donald] Trump is in office,” Kershaw said. “To me, it’s just about getting to go to the White House. You don’t get that opportunity every day, so I’m excited to go.”

    The Dodgers have yet to announce when their planned visit will take place. 

    Santillan sometimes laments his decision to give up his season tickets in protest of the team. His connection to the stadium and the memories he has made there with family and friends will last a lifetime, he said. On Thursday, he will uphold his tradition and be there for the first pitch of the season, but with a heavy heart.

    “It’s a family tradition, but the Dodgers have a lot of work to do,” he said.

  • Sponsored message
  • Warmer weather has caused more biting flies
    A zoomed in shot of a fuzzy black fly with some white spots.
    The warmer weather and high water flow are causing an early outbreak of black flies in the San Gabriel Valley.

    Topline:

    The warmer weather and high water flow are causing an early outbreak of black flies in the San Gabriel Valley, according to officials.

    What are black flies? Black flies are tiny, pesky insects that often get mistaken for mosquitoes. The biting flies breed near foothill communities like Altadena, Azusa, San Dimas and Glendora. They also thrive near flowing water.

    What you need to know: Black flies fly in large numbers and long distances. When they bite both humans and pets, they aim around the eyes and the neck. While the bites can be painful, they don’t transmit diseases in L.A. County.

    A population spike: Anais Medina Diaz, director of communications at the SGV Mosquito and Vector Control District, told LAist that at this time last year, surveillance traps had single-digit counts of adult black flies, but this year those traps are collecting counts above 500.

    So, why is the population growing? Diaz said the surge is unusual for this time of year.

    “We are experiencing them now because of the warmer temperatures we've been having,” Diaz said. “And of course, all the water that's going down through the river, we have a high flow of water that is not typical for this time of year.”

    What officials are doing: Officials say teams are identifying and treating public sources where black flies can thrive, but that many of these sites are influenced by natural or infrastructure conditions outside their control.

    How to protect yourself: Black flies can be hard to avoid outside in dense vegetation, but you can reduce the chance of a bite by:

    • Wearing loose-fitted clothing that covers the entire body. 
    • Wearing a hat with netting on top. 
    • Spraying on repellent, but check the label. For a repellent to be effective, it needs to have at least 15% DEET, the only active ingredient that works against black flies.
    • Turning off any water features like fountains for at least 24 hours, especially in foothill communities.

    See an uptick in black flies in your area? Here's how to report it

    SGV Mosquito and Vector Control District
    Submit a tip here
    You can also send a tip to district@sgvmosquito.org
    (626) 814-9466

    Greater Los Angeles Vector Control District
    Submit a service request here
    You can also send a service request to info@GLAmosquito.org
    (562) 944-9656

    Orange County Mosquito and Vector Control
    Submit a report here
    You can also send a report to ocvcd@ocvector.org
    (714) 971-2421 or (949) 654-2421

  • Rent hike to blame
    A black and brown dog lays down on a brown sofa on the foreground. In the background, a man wearing a plaid shirt sits.
    Jeremy Kaplan and Florence at READ Books in Eagle Rock.
    Topline:
    Local favorite mom and pop shop READ Books in Eagle Rock is facing displacement due to a steep rent hike. The owners say they’re just one of several small businesses along Eagle Rock Boulevard struggling to keep up with lease increases.

    The backstory: Over the past 19 years, many in the neighborhood have come to love READ Books for its eclectic collection of used titles and their shop dog Florence.

    What happened? The building where Kaplan and his wife Debbie rent was recently sold and the rent increased by more than 130% to $2,805 a month, Kaplan said. He told LAist it was an increase his small business simply could not absorb.

    What's next? While he looks for a new spot, Kaplan says he’s forming a coalition of local businesses and activist groups to see what can be done to help other small businesses facing similar displacement. He wants to address the displacement issue for businesses like his, which have made Eagle Rock the distinctive neighborhood that it is today.

    Read on... for what small businesses can do.

    A local favorite mom-and-pop bookshop in Eagle Rock is facing displacement due to a steep rent hike. The owners say theirs is just one of several small businesses along Eagle Rock Boulevard struggling to keep up with lease increases.

    Over the past 19 years, many in the neighborhood have come to love READ Books for its eclectic collection of used titles and shop dog Florence.

    Co-owner Jeremy Kaplan said it’s been a delight to grow with the community over the years.

    “Like seeing kids come back in, who were in grade school and now they’re in college,” Kaplan said.

    But the building where Kaplan and wife Debbie rent was recently sold, and the rent increased by more than 130% to $2,805 a month, Kaplan said. He told LAist it was an increase his small business simply could not absorb.

    Kaplan said he originally was given 30 days notice of the rent increase. After some research, assistance from Councilmember Ysabel Jurado’s office and some pro-bono legal help, Kaplan said he pushed back and got the 90-day notice he’s afforded by state law.

    California Senate Bill 1103 requires landlords to give businesses with five or less employees 90 days’ notice for rent increases exceeding 10%, among other protections.

    Systems Real Estate, the property management company, did not immediately respond to LAist’s request for comment.

    What can small businesses do? 

    Nadia Segura, directing attorney of the Small Business Program at pro bono legal aid non-profit Bet Tzedek said California law does not currently allow for rent control for commercial tenancies.

    Outside of the protections under SB 1103, Segura said small businesses like READ Books don’t have much other recourse. And even then, commercial landlords are not required to inform their tenants of their protections under the law.

    “There’s still a lot of people that don’t know about SB 1103. And then it’s very sad that they tell them they have these rent increases and within a month they have to leave,” Segura said.

    She said her group is seeing steep rent hikes like this for commercial tenants across the city.

    “We are seeing this even more with the World Cup coming up, the Olympics coming up. And I will say it was very sad to see that also after the wildfires,” Segura said.

    Part of Bet Tzedek’s ongoing work is to advocate for small businesses, working with landlords who are increasing rents to see if they are willing to give business owners longer leases that lock in rents.

    What’s next 

    After READ Books posted about their situation on social media, commenters chimed in to express their outrage and love for the little shop.

    While he looks for a new spot, Kaplan says he’s forming a coalition of local businesses and activist groups to see what can be done to help other small businesses facing similar displacement. He wants to address the displacement issue for businesses like his, which have made Eagle Rock the distinctive neighborhood that it is today.

    Owl Talk, a longtime Eagle Rock staple selling clothing and accessories in a unit in the same building as READ Books, is facing a “more than double” rent increase, according to a post on their Instagram account.

    Kaplan said he’s been in touch with the office of state Assemblywoman Jessica Caloza and wants to explore the possibility of introducing legislation to set up protections for small businesses like his, including rent-control measures or a vacancy tax for landlords. Kaplan said he also reached out to the office of state Sen. Maria Durazo.

    By his count, Kaplan said there are about a dozen businesses within surrounding blocks that are at risk of closing their doors or have shuttered due to rent increases or other struggles.

    When READ Books was founded during the Great Recession, Kaplan said he knew it was a longshot to open a bookstore at the same time so many were struggling to stay in business.

    “It was kind of interesting to be doing something that neighborhoods needed. That was important to me growing up, that was important to my children, that was important to my wife growing up,” Kaplan said.

    “And then somebody comes in and says, ‘We’re gonna over double your rent.”

  • Ballots to be sent out
    A person sits in the carriage of a crane and places solar panels atop a post. The crane is white, and the number 400 is printed on the carriage in red.
    A field team member of the Bureau of Street Lighting installs a solar-powered light in Filipinotown.

    Topline:

    The Los Angeles City Council approved a plan in a 13-1 vote on Tuesday to send ballots to more than half a million property owners asking if they are willing to pay more per year to fortify the city’s streetlight repair budget, most of which has essentially been frozen since the 1990s. The item still requires L.A. Mayor Karen Bass’ signature, but her office confirmed to LAist on Wednesday that she’ll approve it.

    Frozen budget: Most of the city’s Bureau of Street Lighting budget comes from an assessment that people who own property illuminated by lights pay on their county property tax bill. The amount people pay depends on the kind of property they own and how much they benefit from lighting. A typical single-family home currently pays $53 annually, and in total, the assessments bring in about $45 million annually for the city to repair and maintain streetlights. Changing the amount the Bureau of Street Lighting gets from the assessment requires a vote among property owners who benefit from the lights.

    Ballots: L.A. City Council’s vote gives city staff the green light to prepare and send out those ballots. Miguel Sangalang, who oversees the bureau, said at a committee meeting earlier this month that he expects to send out ballots by April 17. Notices about the ballots will be sent out prior to the ballots themselves.

    Near unanimous vote: L.A. City Councilmember Monica Rodriguez was the only “No” vote on Tuesday, saying she wanted to see a more current strategic plan for the bureau. Sangalang said the bureau developed a plan in 2022 that lays out how money will be spent. Councilmember Imelda Padilla was absent for the vote.

    Vote count: Votes will be weighted according to the assessment amount. Basically, the more you’re asked to pay yearly to maintain streetlights, the more your vote will count. Ballots received before June 2 will be tabulated by the L.A. City Clerk.

    How much more money: According to a report, the amount needed in assessments from property owners to meet the repair and maintenance needs of the city’s streetlighting in the next fiscal year is nearly $112 million.

    Use of the money: Sangalang said at a March 11 committee meeting that the extra funds would be used to double the number of staff to handle repairs and procure solar streetlights, which don’t face the threat of copper wire theft. That would all potentially reduce the time it takes to repair simple fixes down to a week. Currently, city residents wait for months to see broken streetlights repaired.The assessment would come with a three-year auditing mechanism.

    Topline:

    The Los Angeles City Council approved a plan in a 13-1 vote Tuesday to send ballots to more than a half-million property owners asking if they are willing to pay more per year to fortify the city’s streetlight repair budget, most of which essentially has been frozen since the 1990s. The item still requires L.A. Mayor Karen Bass’ signature, but her office confirmed to LAist on Wednesday that she’ll approve it.

    Frozen budget: Most of the city’s Bureau of Street Lighting budget comes from an assessment that people who own property illuminated by lights pay on their county property tax bill. The amount people pay depends on the kind of property they own and how much they benefit from lighting. A typical single-family home currently pays $53 annually, and in total, the assessments bring in about $45 million annually for the city to repair and maintain streetlights. Changing the amount the Bureau of Street Lighting gets from the assessment requires a vote among property owners who benefit from the lights.

    Ballots: L.A. City Council’s vote gives city staff the green light to prepare and send out those ballots. Miguel Sangalang, who oversees the bureau, said at a committee meeting earlier this month that he expects to send out ballots by April 17. Notices about the ballots will be sent out prior to the ballots themselves.

    Near unanimous vote: L.A. City Councilmember Monica Rodriguez was the only “No” vote Tuesday, saying she wanted to see a more current strategic plan for the bureau. Sangalang said the bureau developed a plan in 2022 that lays out how money will be spent. Councilmember Imelda Padilla was absent for the vote.

    Vote count: Votes will be weighted according to the assessment amount. Basically, the more you’re asked to pay yearly to maintain streetlights, the more your vote will count. Ballots received before June 2 will be tabulated by the L.A. City Clerk.

    How much more money: According to a report, the amount needed in assessments from property owners to meet the repair and maintenance needs of the city’s streetlighting in the next fiscal year is nearly $112 million.

    Use of the money: Sangalang said at a March 11 committee meeting that the extra funds would be used to double the number of staff to handle repairs and procure solar streetlights, which don’t face the threat of copper wire theft. That would all potentially reduce the time it takes to repair simple fixes down to a week. Currently, city residents wait for months to see broken streetlights repaired. The assessment would come with a three-year auditing mechanism.