The Brief

During the pandemic, longtime Bay Area college and career counselor Jon Siapno started developing a chatbot that could answer high schoolers’ questions about their future education options. He was using IBM’s question-answering precursor to ChatGPT, Watson, but when generative artificial intelligence became accessible, he knew it was a game-changer.

“I thought it would take us maybe two years to build out the questions and answers,” Siapno said. “Back then you had to prewrite everything.”

An AI-powered chatbot trained on information about college and careers and designed to mimic human speech meant students at the Making Waves Academy charter school in the East Bay city of Richmond could soon text an AI Copilot to chat about their futures. The idea was that students could get basic questions out of the way — at any hour — before meeting with counselors like Siapno for more targeted conversations.

Almost one-quarter of U.S. schools don’t have a single counselor, according to the latest federal data, from the 2021-22 school year. California high schools fare better, but the state’s student-to-counselor ratio when ChatGPT debuted the following year was still 464-to-1, a far cry from the American School Counselor Association’s recommended ratio of 250-to-1.

Siapno wasn’t the only one to see generative AI’s potential to scale advising. A flood of bots designed to help people navigate their college and career options have surfaced over the last two years, often with human-sounding names like Ava, Kelly, Oli, Ethan and Coco. It’s unclear how many California high schools tell students to use any of them, but the power of generative AI and the scale at which young people are already turning to chatbots in their personal lives is giving some people pause.

Julia Freeland Fisher is education director at the Clayton Christensen Institute, a nonprofit research organization that studies innovation. She recently sounded the alarm about the consequences of letting students develop relationships with AI-powered college and career counselors instead of human ones.

“It’s so tempting to see these bots as cursory,” Freeland Fisher said. “‘They’re not threatening real relationships.’ ‘These are just one-off chats.’ But we know from sociology that these one-off chats are actually big opportunities.”

Sociologists talk about “social capital” as the connections between people that facilitate their success. Among those connections, we have “strong ties” in close friends, family and coworkers who give us routine support, and “weak ties” in acquaintances we see less regularly. For a long time, people thought weak ties were less important, but in 1973 Stanford sociologist Mark Granovetter wrote about “the strength of weak ties” and a flood of studies since then have confirmed how important those more distant acquaintances can be for everything from job searches to emotional support.

As California considers regulating AI companions for young people, policymakers, tech companies and schools must consider how the burgeoning market for AI-driven college and career guidance could inadvertently become the source of a new problem.

“We’re creating this army of self-help bots to help students make their way through school and toward jobs,” Freeland Fisher said, “but those very same bots may be eroding the kinds of network-building opportunities that help students break into those jobs eventually.”

‘Like a mentor in your pocket’

The Making Waves Academy ensures all its graduates meet minimum admissions requirements to California’s four-year public colleges. Nine out of 10 of them do pursue higher education, and while there, staff at the Making Waves Education Foundation offer 1:1 coaching, scholarships, budget planning and career planning to help them graduate on time with no debt and a job offer.

Patrick O’Donnell, CEO of Making Waves, said his team has been thinking about how to scale the kinds of supports they offer for years now, given the scarcity of counselors in schools.

“Even if counselors wanted to make sure they were supporting students to explore their college and career options, it’s almost impossible to do and provide really personalized guidance,” O’Donnell said.

Early superusers of the Making Waves AI CoPilot were 9^th and 10^th graders hungry for information but boxed out of meetings with school counselors focused on helping seniors plan their next steps.

CareerVillage is another California nonprofit focused on scaling good college and career advice. CareerVillage.org has been aggregating crowd-sourced questions and expert answers since 2011 to help people navigate the path to a good career.

When ChatGPT came out, co-founder and executive director Jared Chung saw the potential immediately. By the summer of 2023, his team had a full version of their AI Career Coach to pilot, thanks to help from 20 other nonprofits and educational institutions. Now “Coach” is available to individuals for free online, and high schools and colleges around the country are starting to embed it into their own advising.

At the University of Florida College of Nursing, a more specialized version of Coach, “Coach for Nurses,” gives users round-the-clock career exploration support. Shakira Henderson, dean of the college, said Coach is “a valuable supplement” to the college’s other career advising.

Coach for Nurses personalizes its conversation and advice based on a user’s career stage, interests and goals. It is loaded with geographically specific, current labor market information so people can ask questions about earnings in a specific job, in a specific county, for example. Coach can also talk people through simulated nursing scenarios, and it’s loaded with chat-based activities and quizzes that can help them explore different career paths.

Henderson is clear on the tool’s limitations, though: “AI cannot fully replace the nuanced, empathetic guidance provided by human mentors and career advisors,” she said. People can assess an aspiring nurse’s soft skills, help them think about the type of hospital they’d like most or the work environment in which they’d thrive. “A human advisor working with that student will be able to identify and connect more than an AI tool,” she said.

Of course, that requires students to have human advisors available to them. Marcus Strother, executive director of MENTOR California, a nonprofit supporting mentoring programs across the state, said Coach is worlds better than nothing.

“Most of our young people, particularly young people of color in low-income areas,” Strother said, “they don’t get the opportunities to meet those folks who are going to be able to give them the connection anyway.”

By contrast, Coach, he said, is “like having a mentor in your pocket.”

‘A regulatory desert’

Last month, California state Sen. Steve Padilla, a San Diego Democrat, introduced legislation to protect children from chatbots. Senate Bill 243 would, among other things, limit companies from designing chatbots that encourage users to engage more often, respond more quickly or chat longer. These design elements use psychological tricks to get users to spend more time on the platform, which research indicates can create an addiction that keeps people from engaging in other healthy activities or lead them to form unhealthy emotional attachments to the bots.

The addictive nature of certain apps has long been a critique of social media, especially for young people. In Freeland Fisher’s research for the Clayton Christensen Institute, she included a comment from Vinay Bhaskara, the co-founder of CollegeVine, which released a free AI counselor for high schoolers called Ivy in 2023.

“I’ve seen chat logs where students say, ‘Ivy, thank you so much. You’re like my best friend,’ which is both heartwarming, but also kind of scary. It’s a little bit of both,” the report quotes him as saying.

Reached by phone, Bhaskara said his company’s tool is designed to be friendly and conversational so students feel comfortable using it. Millions of students have used the chatbot for free on CollegeVine’s website and more than 150 colleges in California and around the country have offered the technology to their own students. After seeing how many millions of emails, text messages and online chat sessions have happened outside of working hours, Bhaskara now argues the insight and support students have gotten from the chatbot outweigh the risks.

In announcing Padilla’s bill, his office referenced a number of cases in which chatbots directed children who had become attached to them to do dangerous things. At the most extreme, a Florida teen took his own life after a Character.AI chatbot he had become romantically involved with reportedly encouraged him to “come home to me.” Padilla said his bill wouldn’t keep young people from getting the benefits of college and career advising from chatbots; it would offer reasonable guidelines to address a serious need.

“This is a regulatory desert,” Padilla said. “There are no real guardrails around some of this.”

Freeland Fisher said the AI companions that young people are turning to for friendship and romantic relationships represent a far greater risk than AI-powered college and career advisors. But she said schools and tech developers still need to be careful when they seek out an AI solution to the counselor shortage.

Maybe the only current danger is replacing conversations with school advisors. Eventually, though, sophisticated tools that capture more of students’ time and attention in the quest to fill a greater need could end up replacing conversations with other adults in their lives.

“These other supports matter down the line,” Freeland Fisher said. When students spend more time with chatbots and, indeed, learn to prefer interactions with bots over humans, it contributes to social isolation that can limit young people’s ability to amass all-important social capital. “That’s part of the warning that we’re trying to build in this research,” Freeland Fisher said. “It’s not to say ‘Don’t use bots.’ It’s just to have a much fuller picture of the potential costs.”

For their part, Making Waves and CareerVillage are taking some responsibility for the risks chatbots represent. Making Waves is actually retiring the AI Copilot this summer as the foundation shifts its mission to finding a way to use technology to help kids build social capital, not just get answers to questions about college and career. And CareerVillage has already put safeguards in place to address some of Padilla’s concerns.

While Coach does tell users the more they interact with the chatbot the more personalized its recommendations become, Chung, the executive director, said Coach is designed to only discuss career development. “If you try to go on a long conversation about something unrelated, Coach will decline,” Chung said. He described a series of guardrails and safety processes the company put in place to make sure users never become emotionally attached to the chatbot.

“It’s work,” Chung said, “but I’m going to be honest with you, it’s not impossible work.”

Data reporter Erica Yee contributed to this reporting.

This story first appeared on The LA Local.

Since 1977, Richard Santillan has been to every Opening Day game at Dodger Stadium. 

“The tradition goes from my father, to me, to my children and grandchildren. Some of my best memories are with my father and children here at Dodger Stadium,” Santillan told The LA Local, smiling under the shade of palm trees near the entrance to the ballpark Wednesday morning. He was there to protest the team less than 24 hours before Opening Day.

Santillan, like countless other loyal Dodgers fans, is grappling with his fan identity over the team’s decision to accept an invitation to the White House and owner Mark Walter’s ties to ICE detention facilities.

More than 30 people joined Santillan on Wednesday morning for a press conference held near 1000 Vin Scully Drive to convey a message directly to the team. 

“We are demanding the Dodgers stop participating in funding of inhumane treatment of families and do not go to the White House to celebrate with the criminal in chief,” Evelyn Escatiola told the crowd. “Together, we have the power to make a change.”

Escatiola, a former dean of East Los Angeles College and longtime community organizer, urged fans to flex their economic power by “letting the Dodgers know that we do not support repression.”

Jorge “Coqui” Rodriguez, a lifelong Dodgers fan, spoke to the crowd and called on Dodgers ownership to divest from immigration detention centers owned and operated by GEO Group and CoreCivic.

Jorge Coqui H Rodriguez speaks at a press conference outside Dodger Stadium on March 25, 2026, to demand the Dodgers not to visit the White House following their 2025 World Series win.

(

J.W. Hendricks

/

The LA Local

)

In a phone interview a day before the protest, Rodriguez told The LA Local he did not want the Dodgers using his “cheve” or beer money to fund detention centers. 

“They can’t take our parking money, our cacahuate money, our cheve money, our Dodger Dog money and invest those funds into corporations that are imprisoning people. It’s wrong,” Rodriguez said. 

Rodriguez considers the Dodgers one of the most racially diverse teams and said the players need to support fans at a time when heightened immigration enforcement has become more common across L.A.

The team’s 2025’s visit to the White House drew ire from the largely Latino fan base, citing the Trump administration’s ongoing attacks on immigrants. 

In June, the team came under further scrutiny when rumors swirled online that federal immigration agents were using the stadium’s parking, which immigration authorities later denied in statements posted on social media accounts.

The team again came under fire after not releasing a statement on the impacts of ICE raids on its mostly Latino fan base at the height of immigration enforcement last summer. The team later agreed to invest $1 million to support families affected by immigration enforcement.

When he learned the Dodgers were pledging only $1 million to families in need, Rodriguez called the amount a  “slap in the face.” 

“These guys just bought the Lakers for billions of dollars and they give a million dollars to fight for legal services? That’s a joke,” Rodriguez said. “They need to have a moral backbone and not be investing in those companies.”

According to reporting from the Los Angeles Times, former Dodgers pitcher Clayton Kershawsaid last week that he is looking forward to the trip.

“I went when President [Joe] Biden was in office. I’m going to go when President [Donald] Trump is in office,” Kershaw said. “To me, it’s just about getting to go to the White House. You don’t get that opportunity every day, so I’m excited to go.”

The Dodgers have yet to announce when their planned visit will take place. 

Santillan sometimes laments his decision to give up his season tickets in protest of the team. His connection to the stadium and the memories he has made there with family and friends will last a lifetime, he said. On Thursday, he will uphold his tradition and be there for the first pitch of the season, but with a heavy heart.

“It’s a family tradition, but the Dodgers have a lot of work to do,” he said.

A local favorite mom-and-pop bookshop in Eagle Rock is facing displacement due to a steep rent hike. The owners say theirs is just one of several small businesses along Eagle Rock Boulevard struggling to keep up with lease increases.

Over the past 19 years, many in the neighborhood have come to love READ Books for its eclectic collection of used titles and shop dog Florence.

Co-owner Jeremy Kaplan said it’s been a delight to grow with the community over the years.

“Like seeing kids come back in, who were in grade school and now they’re in college,” Kaplan said.

But the building where Kaplan and wife Debbie rent was recently sold, and the rent increased by more than 130% to $2,805 a month, Kaplan said. He told LAist it was an increase his small business simply could not absorb.

Kaplan said he originally was given 30 days notice of the rent increase. After some research, assistance from Councilmember Ysabel Jurado’s office and some pro-bono legal help, Kaplan said he pushed back and got the 90-day notice he’s afforded by state law.

California Senate Bill 1103 requires landlords to give businesses with five or less employees 90 days’ notice for rent increases exceeding 10%, among other protections.

Systems Real Estate, the property management company, did not immediately respond to LAist’s request for comment.

What can small businesses do? 

Nadia Segura, directing attorney of the Small Business Program at pro bono legal aid non-profit Bet Tzedek said California law does not currently allow for rent control for commercial tenancies.

Outside of the protections under SB 1103, Segura said small businesses like READ Books don’t have much other recourse. And even then, commercial landlords are not required to inform their tenants of their protections under the law.

“There’s still a lot of people that don’t know about SB 1103. And then it’s very sad that they tell them they have these rent increases and within a month they have to leave,” Segura said.

She said her group is seeing steep rent hikes like this for commercial tenants across the city.

“We are seeing this even more with the World Cup coming up, the Olympics coming up. And I will say it was very sad to see that also after the wildfires,” Segura said.

Part of Bet Tzedek’s ongoing work is to advocate for small businesses, working with landlords who are increasing rents to see if they are willing to give business owners longer leases that lock in rents.

What’s next 

After READ Books posted about their situation on social media, commenters chimed in to express their outrage and love for the little shop.

While he looks for a new spot, Kaplan says he’s forming a coalition of local businesses and activist groups to see what can be done to help other small businesses facing similar displacement. He wants to address the displacement issue for businesses like his, which have made Eagle Rock the distinctive neighborhood that it is today.

Owl Talk, a longtime Eagle Rock staple selling clothing and accessories in a unit in the same building as READ Books, is facing a “more than double” rent increase, according to a post on their Instagram account.

Kaplan said he’s been in touch with the office of state Assemblywoman Jessica Caloza and wants to explore the possibility of introducing legislation to set up protections for small businesses like his, including rent-control measures or a vacancy tax for landlords. Kaplan said he also reached out to the office of state Sen. Maria Durazo.

By his count, Kaplan said there are about a dozen businesses within surrounding blocks that are at risk of closing their doors or have shuttered due to rent increases or other struggles.

When READ Books was founded during the Great Recession, Kaplan said he knew it was a longshot to open a bookstore at the same time so many were struggling to stay in business.

“It was kind of interesting to be doing something that neighborhoods needed. That was important to me growing up, that was important to my children, that was important to my wife growing up,” Kaplan said.

“And then somebody comes in and says, ‘We’re gonna over double your rent.”

Topline:

Frozen budget: Most of the city’s Bureau of Street Lighting budget comes from an assessment that people who own property illuminated by lights pay on their county property tax bill. The amount people pay depends on the kind of property they own and how much they benefit from lighting. A typical single-family home currently pays $53 annually, and in total, the assessments bring in about $45 million annually for the city to repair and maintain streetlights. Changing the amount the Bureau of Street Lighting gets from the assessment requires a vote among property owners who benefit from the lights.

Ballots: L.A. City Council’s vote gives city staff the green light to prepare and send out those ballots. Miguel Sangalang, who oversees the bureau, said at a committee meeting earlier this month that he expects to send out ballots by April 17. Notices about the ballots will be sent out prior to the ballots themselves.

Near unanimous vote: L.A. City Councilmember Monica Rodriguez was the only “No” vote Tuesday, saying she wanted to see a more current strategic plan for the bureau. Sangalang said the bureau developed a plan in 2022 that lays out how money will be spent. Councilmember Imelda Padilla was absent for the vote.

Vote count: Votes will be weighted according to the assessment amount. Basically, the more you’re asked to pay yearly to maintain streetlights, the more your vote will count. Ballots received before June 2 will be tabulated by the L.A. City Clerk.

How much more money: According to a report, the amount needed in assessments from property owners to meet the repair and maintenance needs of the city’s streetlighting in the next fiscal year is nearly $112 million.

Use of the money: Sangalang said at a March 11 committee meeting that the extra funds would be used to double the number of staff to handle repairs and procure solar streetlights, which don’t face the threat of copper wire theft. That would all potentially reduce the time it takes to repair simple fixes down to a week. Currently, city residents wait for months to see broken streetlights repaired. The assessment would come with a three-year auditing mechanism.