Sponsored message
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

The Brief

The most important stories for you to know today
  • Won't be used for surveillance, they say
    Police officers wearing black uniforms, hard hats and batons stand in the middle of a street.
    Reinforcements from the Santa Ana Police Department arrive during a local protest that followed the Minneapolis police killing of George Floyd.

    Topline:

    The Santa Ana Police Department wants $250,000 to purchase drones. Their request will come in front of city leaders on Tuesday because of a state law that requires law enforcement agencies to seek council approval to purchase military equipment — such as drones.

    Why drones: Santa Ana PD  Commander Mat Sorenson said purchasing drones will help the police department “improve response times” and make “tactical decisions” on the ground.

    Why it matters: The ask is likely to get some pushback. Some residents say that money could be better spent on community programs. Such issues are especially sensitive in Santa Ana. The city is the only openly declared sanctuary city in Orange County, with a quarter of the city’s population being non-U.S. citizens. And many of those residents are fearing for their safety as immigration enforcement actions have ramped up in Southern California.

    Why drones are controversial: Criticis have expressed concerns about the use of facial recognition technology, and how the data drones collect will be stored. But Sorenson told residents last week the drones would not be used for surveillance.

    Listen 0:38
    The controversial reason why Santa Ana PD wants $250,000

    The Santa Ana Police Department wants $250,000 to purchase drones.

    Their request will come in front of city leaders on Tuesday because of a state law that requires law enforcement agencies to seek council approval to purchase military equipment — such as drones.

    The ask is likely to get some pushback. Some residents say the money could be better spent on community programs.

    Police  Commander Mat Sorenson said purchasing drones will help the police department “improve response times” and make “tactical decisions” on the ground.

     ”When we deployed drones here, we borrowed them from other agencies,” Sorenson said at a community meeting last week.

    He said they're looking to add drones to their repertoire to use as a “reactionary tool” not for surveillance.

    “ I'm not gonna make any promises here right now, but we are more than likely not going down the facial recognition route," he said. "For all intents and purposes, our drones will be a flying body, you know, use it deployed on actual calls for service where somebody's called the police. We're not randomly gonna be using it to surveil people or just fly around looking for crime.”

    Sorenson said they're researching drone models and in the process of creating a drone-use policy with language borrowed from the American Civil Liberties Union to assure the public that the police department is “not using it inappropriately.”

    How widespread is drone useage by law enforcement?

    If successful, Santa Ana would join other cities throughout Southern California — including Los Angeles, Huntington Beach, Irvine, Beverly Hills and Burbank — in deploying drones as a way to amplify police coverage.

    But the expansion of law enforcement drone programs have triggered concerns about privacy and accountability.

    What's the backstory

    Sorenson made his comments at a sparsely-attended community meeting last week where Santa Ana police presented a report on how military equipment weapons were used in the city in the last year.

    But the meeting included an admission that the police department had “messed up.”

    State law Assembly Bill 481, which was passed in 2022, requires law enforcement to make annual public reports describing how and why military equipment was deployed, including summaries of complaints, internal investigations and potential violations related to the equipment.

    But the city never did that — until last week.

    The 10 or so people who attended the meeting responded to the drone news by expressing concerns about the use of facial recognition technology, and how the data drones collect will be stored.

    Why this matters

    Such issues are especially sensitive in Santa Ana. The city is the only openly declared sanctuary city in Orange County, with a quarter of the city’s population being non-U.S. citizens. And many residents are fearing for their safety as immigration enforcement actions have ramped up in Southern California.

    Many people fear that the Santa Ana Police Department is not doing enough to protect its residents from ICE activities and say law enforcement has been overly aggressive in its response to anti-ICE protests.

    Santa Ana City Councilmember Johnathan Hernandez has said the city’s police forces shot him with rubber bullets eight times while he was out protesting.

    "I still have the bruises on my back from the eight shots that my own officers fired at me,” he said during a council meeting back in June. “I still have the holes in my black shirt that my own officers from this city fired at me. I had no weapons on me.”

    What do critics say?

    Community members echoed some of these concerns when Sorenson spoke about the drone purchase. They asked the police department to divest from military grade weapons and instead use that funding for community programs.

    How to watchdog your police department

    One of the best things you can do to hold officials accountable is pay attention.

    AB481 requires police departments, including those at transit agencies, school districts and university campuses, sheriff’s departments, district attorney’s offices and probation departments, to provide reports about the use of military equipment.

    So how do you know if they're in compliance? It’s simple, enter the law enforcement agency's name and AB 481 in any search engine and a public page should pop up.

    You can learn more about the use of equipment at community meetings law enforcement agencies are required to hold to provide transparency and discuss the policies that affect your community.

    How to watchdog local government

    Your city council, board of supervisors, school board and more all hold public meetings that anybody can attend. These are times you can talk to your elected officials directly and hear about the policies they’re voting on that affect your community.

    • Read tips on how to get involved.
    • The next scheduled board meeting is 5:30 p.m. Tuesday, Aug. 19. (The meeting starts with an hour-long closed session from 4 to 5:30 p.m.) You can check out the Santa Ana City Council full calendar and learn how to submit a public comment here.
  • Body recovered from riverbed in Fountain Valley
    An overhead shot of a river with a freeway overpass.
    Conditions along the Santa Ana River can become dangerous during heavy rains.

    Topline:

    An unidentified body was recovered from the bed of the Santa Ana River just before noon on Jan. 1, according to the Orange County Fire Authority.

    What we know: Officials said a witness called 911 to report a person in the riverbed near the intersection of Warner Avenue and Harbor Boulevard in Santa Ana. The person traveled about two miles downstream before the search and rescue crew recovered their body in the city of Fountain Valley.

    The response: About 60 firefighters from OCFA and the Fountain Valley and Costa Mesa fire departments contributed to the water rescue effort.

    The danger of moving water: With more rain in the forecast this weekend, keep in mind that just six inches of fast-moving water can knock down most people, while 12 inches can carry away most cars.

    How to stay safe: Emergency officials recommend limiting travel as much as possible during heavy rain and floods, including by car. If you see flooding in your path, remember the slogan, “Turn around, don’t drown.” LAist also has a guide on driving safely in the rain.

  • Sponsored message
  • Why Trump administration is challenging new law
    People carry signs reading: TANNC Amazon UPL Strike in white, gold and black.
    Manny Ruiz strikes alongside other workers with Teamsters 2785 at Amazon Warehouse DCK6 in the Bayview District in San Francisco on Dec. 19, 2024. Amazon workers at multiple facilities across the U.S. went on strike to fight for a union contract.

    Topline:

    Under a law taking effect Jan. 1, California seeks to uphold the labor and unionization rights of private-sector employees, as the federal agency that has held that power for decades is in limbo.

    Where things stand: The new law’s future is unclear because the Trump administration is challenging it.

    Why now: The law, which grants more powers to the California Public Employment Relations Board, is a response to the National Labor Relations Board lacking a quorum. President Donald Trump fired the NLRB’s chairperson, Gwynne Wilcox, days after he began his second term in January. His two nominees to the board have yet to be confirmed, so the federal board has been without the three members it needs for a quorum for months.

    California under a law taking effect today seeks to uphold the labor and unionization rights of private-sector employees, as the federal agency that has held that power for decades is in limbo.

    But the new law’s future is unclear because the Trump administration is challenging it.

    The law, which grants more powers to the California Public Employment Relations Board, is a response to the National Labor Relations Board lacking a quorum.

    President Donald Trump fired the NLRB’s chairperson, Gwynne Wilcox, days after he began his second term in January. His two nominees to the board have yet to be confirmed, so the federal board has been without the three members it needs for a quorum for months.

    Assemblymember Tina McKinnor, the Inglewood Democrat who wrote the bill, said when the governor signed it in September that “California will not sit idly as its workers are systematically denied the right to organize due to employer intransigence or federal inaction.”

    The NLRB sued California over the law in October, saying in its lawsuit that the state is trying to assert authority over “areas explicitly reserved for federal oversight.”

    On the legal challenge to the law, Terry Schanz, McKinnor’s chief of staff, referred CalMatters to the state attorney general. Attorney General Rob Bonta’s office is responsible for defending the law in court. A spokesperson for Bonta said the office would have nothing to say about it.

    With the NLRB unable to fulfill its duties, states are trying to fill the gap in enforcing the National Labor Relations Act, which Congress passed in 1935. But labor experts contacted by CalMatters do not have high hopes for the California law, which is similar to a law passed in New York this year. They said courts, including the Supreme Court, have ruled that states cannot decide matters pertaining to federal labor law because of preemption, the doctrine that a higher authority of law overrides a lower authority.

    “It’s difficult to imagine a scenario where the courts do not overturn these (state) laws,” said John Logan, professor and chairperson of Labor and Employment Studies at San Francisco State University.

    William Gould, a former chairperson of the National Labor Relations Board during the Clinton administration and a professor emeritus at Stanford University, agreed: “In the courts the matter is a dead letter unless (the Supreme Court) shifts gears.”

    That’s what the California and U.S. chambers of commerce, along with other business groups, are hoping, according to their amicus brief in support of the Trump administration’s lawsuit against California: “Under California’s view, every state could have its own labor law for private-sector workers. Dozens of laws would overlap and collide.”

    The California Labor Federation, an umbrella organization for unions that represents about 2 million California workers, said in an amicus brief that even before Trump fired the NLRB chief, the federal agency’s backlog had been a problem, leading to companies being able to delay bargaining in good faith with their employees’ unions without consequences.

    If the California law is overturned, employees who have formed unions but have not succeeded in securing contracts with employers such as Amazon and Starbucks — which are among the companies seeking to have the NLRB declared unconstitutional — may continue to face delays, according to Logan. Or, he said, it’s not clear what would happen if other workers tried to organize and their companies simply fired them.

    “The NLRB defunctness is a scandal which cries out for political reform,” Gould said.

  • Photos from New Year's Eve around the world

    Topline:

    Check out celebrations around the world.

    Why now: As the clock struck midnight across time zones, people gathered to celebrate the new year.

    Keep reading... for those photos.

    As the clock strikes midnight across time zones, people gather to celebrate the new year.

    We take a look at the shared joy and traditions in these photos.
    Copyright 2026 NPR

    Falling balloons and confetti drop on people.
    Reveler use their smartphones to film the falling balloons and confetti as they celebrate the start of 2026 during the New Year countdown event held at a shopping mall in Beijing, early Thursday, Jan. 1, 2026.
    (
    Andy Wong
    /
    AP
    )
    2026 in lights.
    Revellers watch a fireworks and light show for children on Museumplein as part of New Year's Eve celebrations in Amsterdam on December 31, 2025.
    (
    Remko de Waal
    /
    Getty Images
    )
    Large crowd of revelers.
    Members of the public gather to celebrate the New Year during the annual bell-tolling ceremony at the Bosingak Pavilion on January 01, 2026 in Seoul, South Korea.
    (
    Chung Sung-Jun
    /
    Getty Images
    )
    Skyscrapers are lined in lights with fireworks in the dark sky.
    Fireworks explode over skyscrapers during New Year celebrations on January 01, 2026 in Makati, Metro Manila, Philippines.
    (
    Ezra Acayan
    /
    Getty Images
    )
    People hold lighted New Year's wishes.
    People buy batons that read happy New Year 2026 on December 31, 2025 in Bangkok, Thailand. Thousands lined the Chao Phraya river in Bangkok as the country welcomed the new year.
    (
    Lauren DeCicca
    /
    Getty Images
    )
    Fireworks light up the sky.
    Fireworks explode from the Taipei 101 building during the New Year's celebrations in Taipei, Taiwan, Thursday, Jan. 1, 2026.
    (
    Chiang Ying-Ying
    /
    AP
    )
    White fireworks over a bridge.
    Revellers watch the New Year's Eve fireworks from the The Huc Bridge at Hoan Kiem Lake in Hanoi on Jan. 1, 2026.
    (
    Nhac Nguyen
    /
    Getty Images
    )
    People wear 2026 hats.
    People attend the New Year countdown event to celebrate the start of 2026 in the Central district of Hong Kong, on Wednesday, Dec. 31, 2025.
    (
    Chan Long Hei
    /
    AP
    )
    Muli-colored fireworks.
    Fireworks explode around the Burj Khalifa, the world's tallest building, during New Year's Eve celebrations in Dubai, United Arab Emirates, Thursday, Jan. 1, 2026.
    (
    Fatima Shbair
    /
    AP
    )
    2026 is in lights.
    People pose for pictures near illuminated decorations on New Year's Eve in Mumbai, India, Wednesday, Dec. 31, 2025.
    (
    Rafiq Maqbool
    /
    AP
    )
    Fireworks over a domed building.
    Revellers watch fireworks during the New Year celebrations in Karachi on January 1, 2026.
    (
    Rizwan Tabassum
    /
    Getty Images
    )
    Heart arches are lighted.
    Iraqis gather in Baghdad's Al-Zawraa Park during New Year's Eve celebrations on December 31, 2025.
    (
    Ahmad Al-Rubaye
    /
    AFP/Getty Images
    )
    White lights in 2026 along with a deer and a gazebo.
    Onlookers stand beside light ornaments on New Year's Eve at Bakrkoy Square in Istanbul on Dec. 31, 2025.
    (
    Yasin Akgul
    /
    Getty Images
    )
    Two people strike a big bell.
    People strike a giant bell to celebrate the New Year at the Zojoji Buddhist temple, minutes after midnight Thursday Jan. 1, 2026, in Tokyo.
    (
    Eugene Hoshiko
    /
    AP
    )
    People are sillhouetted against a setting sun in a cloudy sky.
    A couple takes a selfie as the last sunset of 2025 is seen over the Mediterranean Sea in Beirut, Lebanon, Wednesday, Dec. 31, 2025.
    (
    Hassan Ammar
    /
    AP
    )
    A ferris wheel is lighted with the word "happy."
    People watch and take photos as the Ferris wheel displays "Happy New Year" in 16 different languages at Pacific Park on Wednesday, Dec. 31, 2025 in Santa Monica.
    (
    Juliana Yamada
    /
    Los Angeles Times via Getty Images
    )

  • Bipartisan group is working on a compromise

    Topline:

    Millions of Americans are facing higher health care premiums in the new year after Congress allowed Affordable Care Act subsidies to expire.

    Where things stand: Earlier this week, a bipartisan group of senators worked to strike a compromise that could resurrect the enhanced ACA premium tax credits — potentially blunting the blow of rising monthly payments for Obamacare enrollees.

    What's next: Sen. Peter Welch, D-Vt., who is part of that effort, says he thinks the Senate can pass a "retroactive" Affordable Care Act subsidy extension, but "we need President Trump."

    Millions of Americans are facing higher health care premiums in the new year after Congress allowed Affordable Care Act subsidies to expire. But earlier this week, a bipartisan group of senators worked to strike a compromise that could resurrect the enhanced ACA premium tax credits — potentially blunting the blow of rising monthly payments for Obamacare enrollees.

    "There's a number of Republican and Democratic senators who are seeing what a disaster this will be for families that they represent," Sen. Peter Welch, D-Vt., said on Morning Edition Thursday. "That's the common ground here, and it's a doable thing."

    Welch said he joined a bipartisan call Tuesday — first reported by Punchbowl News — in which a handful of senators charted out a possible health care compromise.

    "We could extend the credits for a couple of years, we could reform it," Welch said of the call. "You could put an income cap, you could have a copay, you could have penalties on insurers who commit fraud. You actually could introduce some cost saving reductions that have bipartisan support."

    But according to Welch, this legislation is only doable with President Trump's blessing.

    "It would require that President Trump play a major role in this, because he has such influence over the Republican majority in the House and even in the Senate," Welch said.

    Last fall, Republicans and Democrats fought bitterly over the Obamacare subsidy extension, causing a political standoff that led to the longest government shutdown in U.S. history. Meanwhile, Trump has remained relatively hands-off, withholding his support for any health care legislation.

    Despite these obstacles, Welch said he believes the jump in prices that people across the country now face will break the logjam in Congress.

    "A farmer in Vermont, their premium is going to go from $900 a month to $3,200, a month," Welch said. "So they're going to really face sticker shock. There's going to be a secondary impact, because the hospitals, particularly in rural areas, are going to lose revenue."

    But even if the Senate advanced a compromise bill on the ACA, the House would also have to get behind it. And the lower chamber has its own bipartisan effort on an ACA subsidy extension.

    Just before the recess began in mid-December, four House Republicans joined Democrats in signing a discharge petition on a three-year extension of the ACA subsidies — forcing a floor vote on the bill when the House returns.

    Hours after bucking House Speaker Mike Johnson and joining Democrats, Rep. Brian Fitzpatrick, R-Pa., told Morning Edition back in December that he thinks this vote will get even more Republican support.

    "I don't like the clean extension without any income cap," Fitzpatrick said. "But given the choice between a clean three-year extension and letting them expire, that's not a hard choice for me. And I suspect many of my other colleagues are going to view it the same way."

    Fitzpatrick and Rep. Tom Suozzi, D-N.Y., have held meetings with moderate senators on legislative paths to extend the ACA subsidies, a source familiar with the talks but not authorized to speak publicly tells NPR.

    The Senate returns on Jan. 5 and the House comes back to Capitol Hill on Jan. 6.

    Copyright 2026 NPR