Sponsored message
Logged in as
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

The Brief

The most important stories for you to know today
  • LA County agrees to pay $25 million
    Isaias Cervantes' mother, Rosa Padilla and sister Yajaira Cervantes spoke at a press conference outside the Board of Supervisors' meeting Tuesday. They both wear beige colored tops and look into the camera. A sign behind them reads: "Justicia Para Isaiahs"
    Isaias Cervantes' mother, Rosa Padilla (L) and sister Yajaira Cervantes (R) spoke at a press conference outside the Board of Supervisors' meeting Tuesday.

    Topline:

    Los Angeles County supervisors signed off on a $25-million settlement Tuesday in the case of a 28-year-old man who was paralyzed after he was shot by a sheriff’s deputy during a scuffle at the man’s home three years ago.

    The backstory: Isaias Cervantes was 25 and experiencing a mental health crisis in March 2021 when the shooting occurred at his home in the east L.A. County city of Cudahy, according to one of the family’s attorneys.

    Cervantes, who is also deaf, is now paralyzed from his chest down.

    "Helping his voice matter": Cervantes’ sister said she hoped that families caring for loved ones living with autism would get more support. And she hoped her brother’s life would change for the better.

    “He likes the fact that there’s people supporting him and that there’s a community that’s also helping him and for his voice to matter," Yajaira Cervantes said after the board's decision.

    Los Angeles County supervisors signed off on a $25-million settlement Tuesday in the case of a 28-year-old man who was paralyzed after he was shot by a sheriff’s deputy during a scuffle at the man’s home three years ago.

    Isaias Cervantes was 25 and experiencing a mental health crisis in March 2021 when the shooting occurred at his home in the southeast L.A. County city of Cudahy, according to one of the family’s attorneys.

    Cervantes, who is also deaf, is now paralyzed from his chest down.

    Attorney Austin Dove said Cervantes uses a wheelchair and has been deprived of the things he loves: horseback riding, dancing and helping his father at work.

    Isaias Cervantes stands with his right thumb up and left hand petting a horse.
    Isaias Cervantes
    (
    Courtesy of the Cervantes family
    )

    The family sued the Sheriff’s Department in 2021, claiming civil rights violations, excessive force, assault and negligence.

    “There were so many things that could have been done differently and the harms are extreme,” Dove told LAist.

    Listen 0:49
    LA County Approves $25 Million Settlement With Family of Man With Autism Who Was Shot, Paralyzed By Sheriff’s Deputy

    In a statement, the Sheriff’s Department said it conducted an internal investigation and found the shooting to be within policy.

    “Any call for service that results in a shooting is traumatic for all involved and in situations where we encounter an individual who is experiencing a mental health crisis it adds an additional layer of complexity,” the department said.

    The L.A. County CEO’s office said it would not comment on the settlement.

    The Cervantes case is the latest in which L.A. County was ordered or agreed to pay millions to plaintiffs. Last fiscal year, the county paid more than $257 million to satisfy 22 judgments and settle 320 lawsuits, a 212% increase over the previous fiscal year, according to a county report.

    Among them was a lawsuit filed by the family of Andres Guardado, who claimed the department used excessive force when a sheriff’s deputy shot and killed Guardado outside an auto body shop in Compton. The department claimed Guardado reached for a gun he had previously placed on the ground.

    The county agreed to pay $8 million to Guardado’s family.

    What we know about the shooting

    On March 31, 2021, one of Cervantes’ family members called 911 and said he “was having a mental health crisis and creating a disturbance by pushing other family members,” according to a 20-minute narrated video produced by the sheriff’s department that includes the 911 call, body-worn camera footage and additional department commentary.

    Two deputies responded to the call and showed up at the Cervantes home. In bodycam video, Cervantes appears to resist as deputies grab each of his arms in an apparent attempt to handcuff him.

    Because the deputies’ cameras fell off during the struggle, the footage does not capture key moments of the encounter. The view of the struggle is largely obstructed, but audio is still picked up. One deputy can be heard yelling, “He’s going for my gun!”

    The other deputy fired a single shot, hitting Cervantes “in the left side of his torso,” according to the department.

    One of the deputies was injured in the scuffle, suffering “facial abrasions, bilateral eye contusions, corneal abrasions and a cervical sprain,” the department said.

    A long legal battle

    The lawsuit filed in 2021 against L.A. County named both deputies involved in the incident: David Vega and Jonathan Miramontez.

    Six months after the incident, the district attorney’s office filed criminal charges against Cervantes, accusing him of assault and resisting an officer by violence.

    More than a dozen advocacy groups, including the Autism Society of L.A., sent a letter to District Attorney George Gascón’s office urging him to drop the charges.

    “This is a person with autism who is also deaf and now paralyzed because of the shooting by the L.A. County Sheriff’s Department,” Judy Mark, president of Disability Voices United, said at the time.

    The charges were later dropped. Gascón’s office does not usually publicly disclose the specific reasons when it declines to pursue charges, but Dove said the office cited insufficient evidence.

    Mental health team not called in

    Law enforcement agencies have acknowledged, to some extent, the need for teams of medical professionals to respond to calls involving people in mental health crisis. L.A. County has Mental Evaluation Teams, known as MET, that consist of a specially-trained deputy and a Department of Mental Health clinician.

    Lt. John Gannon, who previously headed up the Mental Evaluation Teams said in 2021 that if a deputy knows a call involves a person living with autism in crisis, they should notify MET.

    “If patrol knows a call involves an autistic person in crisis, they would indeed notify MET to co-respond,” Gannon said in an email.

    He told LAist in 2021 that MET was not called to respond to the Cervantes incident.

    ‘No closure’

    Dove said this week that he hoped the settlement would help the family members get the resources they need to care for Cervantes, who still has bullet fragments in his back from the incident.

    “There’s no closure ... when you have this sort of permanent paralysis injury,” Dove said.

    On Tuesday, Dove, members of Cervantes’ family and others held a news conference outside of the board of supervisors’ meeting before they voted to approve the settlement.

    Cervantes’ sister said she hoped that families caring for loved ones living with autism would get more support. And she hoped her brother’s life would change for the better.

    “It’s sad to see him suffering,” Yajaira Cervantes said. “He likes the fact that there’s people supporting him and that there’s a community that’s also helping him and for his voice to matter.”

    Assistance For Mental Health Crises Or Support

    If you or someone you know is in crisis and needs immediate help, call or text the Suicide and Crisis Lifeline at 988, or visit the 988 website for online chat.

    For more help:

  • Feds seized 15 around SoFi this weekend
    A green soccer pitch sits empty as some people begin to fill the stadium seats.
    A view of L.A. Stadium before the FIFA World Cup match between USA and Paraguay begins.

    Topline:

    The FBI seized about 15 drones flying near SoFi Stadium and L.A. Memorial Coliseum on Friday and Saturday for violating temporary flight restrictions.

    Why it matters: "No Drone Zones" have been put in place by the Federal Aviation Administration on match days at World Cup stadiums and venues hosting official fan festivals.

    The restrictions: Drones are prohibited at SoFi within a three-nautical-mile radius and up to 3,000 feet above ground level. They are also banned at the Coliseum for the official fan festival within a one-nautical-mile radius and up to 1,000 feet above ground level.

    The FBI seized about 15 drones near SoFi Stadium and L.A. Memorial Coliseum on Friday and Saturday for violating temporary flight restrictions, Amir Ehsaei, special agent in charge of counterterrorism and crisis response at the FBI's Los Angeles Field Office, told LAist. Multiple operators were cited.

    Stadiums hosting World Cup games and official fan festival venues are designated as "No Drone Zones" by the Federal Aviation Administration on match days.

    “We have a zero-tolerance policy when it comes to drones violating the temporary flight restrictions," Ehsaei said.

    He said drone detection teams are deployed at all SoFi games. "We will be out at other places depending on the nature — the size, the scope — [and] different intelligence that we'll get based on  threat assessments."

    Drones are prohibited at SoFi within a three-nautical-mile radius and up to 3,000 feet above ground level. They are also banned at the Coliseum for the official fan festival within a one-nautical-mile radius and up to 1,000 feet above ground level.

    Violators could face fines of up to $100,000 and federal criminal charges.

  • Sponsored message
  • Residents debate local impact
    a woman in a sweatshirt and jeans walks along a platform next to a train that says "E EAST LA"
    A woman exits the train at the Metro E Line Indiana station in East L.A. on April 15, 2025.

    Topline:

    Residents in East LA are weighing the promise of a new Metro E Line extension with concerns over construction disruptions, small-business impacts and whether more outreach is needed about the project.

    What is the project: The 4.7-mile extension of the Metro E Line would connect East Los Angeles to Montebello with four new stations. The project would relocate the existing Atlantic and Pomona station underground, and include a mix of underground, aerial and street-level track transit.

    Read on ... for more about the pros and cons locals see for the extension.

    Residents in East LA are weighing the promise of a new Metro E Line extension with concerns over construction disruptions, small-business impacts and whether more outreach is needed about the project.

    The 4.7-mile extension of the Metro E Line would connect East Los Angeles to Montebello with four new stations. The project would relocate the existing Atlantic and Pomona station underground and include a mix of underground, aerial and street-level track transit.

    The $7.9 billion project is expected to open for service between 2035 and 2037, according to Metro.

    Construction will begin in 2029 and last approximately eight to 10 years, pending full funding approval. It’s part of a wider plan to connect the E Line to the city of Whittier, though officials say the work will be built in two phases due to funding constraints.

    While officials say the project is intended to reduce traffic congestion and ease pressure on local roads, residents at a recent community meeting focused more on the immediate impact and communication.

    Concerns over construction and local impact

    “Thirty days for comment on a complex issue like this is ridiculous. … We need better outreach,” said East LA resident Clara Solis about a 30-day public comment period ending June 26.

    Solis and others also raised concerns about how construction could affect traffic and disrupt local commerce, pointing to past transit projects.

    “How is this going to impact the businesses? When the Gold Line went through, a lot of our businesses really suffered economically. We want to see a presentation on that. You should have a presentation just on how it’s going to impact the businesses,” Solis added.

    a series of interconnected dots and lines with city names and station names
    A map shows the Eastside Transit Corridor Phase 2 project will extend the E Line nearly nine miles east from East Los Angeles to the City of Whittier. ()
    (
    Courtesy Metro
    )

    Calls for broader outreach

    East LA resident Kristie Hernandez said community outreach for the project should also extend to people who do not necessarily live within the immediate 200-foot project radius.

    “We need to understand that folks who don’t necessarily live within that close proximity also frequent that area when they drive,” said Hernandez.

    Hernandez advocated for a 90-day public comment window and also called for presentations on underground infrastructure, especially in the wake of the East LA pipeline that was punctured during construction work in late May.

    “We do not want that to happen again,” she said.

    A promise for greater mobility

    Lucia Martinez spoke favorably about the extension plans, considering that she relies on buses to get around East LA to do her shopping. She said she looks forward to using the Metro to travel to the Citadel as well as to the hospital in Pasadena.

    “As an older woman who became aware of this project, I think it is amazing because I am someone who does not drive,” she said.

    LA Documenter Rafael Cazzorla contributed reporting for this story. LA Documenters trains and pays LA residents to take notes at local government meetings around Los Angeles. You can find meeting notes and audio at losangeles.documenters.org

  • Scientist celebrate FDA approval
    one hand with two bracelets around the wrist reaches up to apply sunscreen to another hand against a blue sky background
    A sunscreen ingredient used in Europe and Asia that blocks UVA and UVB rays has been approved for use in the U.S.

    Topline:

    For the first time in nearly three decades, the Food and Drug Administration approved a new chemical UV filter for use in sunscreens sold in the U.S. And that has many dermatologists cheering.

    Why it matters: The new ingredient is called bemotrizinol, and it has several advantages over the chemical sunscreen ingredients previously available in the U.S., says Dr. Heather Rogers, a dermatologist in Seattle and a fellow of the American Academy of Dermatology.

    The backstory: In the U.S., sunscreens are regulated as over-the-counter drugs rather than cosmetics, as they're classified in Europe. That means ingredients need to undergo rigorous testing for safety and efficacy before they can be approved for use in the U.S.

    Read on ... for four key things to know about this coming change.

    For the first time in nearly three decades, the Food and Drug Administration approved a new chemical UV filter for use in sunscreens sold in the U.S. And that has many dermatologists cheering.

    "This is a very big deal," says Dr. Heather Rogers, a dermatologist in Seattle and a fellow of the American Academy of Dermatology.

    The new ingredient is called bemotrizinol, and it has several advantages over the chemical sunscreen ingredients previously available in the U.S., Rogers says.

    "It hits like really every box for us that we have been waiting for as dermatologists and consumers," Rogers says.

    Here's what you need to know about this new ingredient and how it could lead to better sunscreens sold stateside.

    1. It blocks both UVA and UVB rays

    Rogers says in general, you want to use sunscreens that are broad spectrum, meaning they protect against both UVA rays — the longer wavelengths that cause premature aging and wrinkles — and UVB rays, which lead to sunburns. Both types of UV rays can cause skin cancer.

    She says the sunscreens currently sold in the U.S. do an excellent job of protecting against UVB rays, but the chemical UV filters available in sunscreens in the U.S. until now aren't as good at blocking out UVA rays.

    In general, chemical sunscreens sold in the U.S. rely on an ingredient called avobenzone to block out UVA rays, says Kelly Dobos, a cosmetic chemist who teaches at the University of Cincinnati.

    But avobenzone by itself isn't photo stable, meaning its protection can start to break down rapidly when exposed to sunlight. And as avobenzone breaks down, it can release molecules that lead to skin irritation, says Alexa Friedman, a senior scientist with the nonprofit Environmental Working Group, or EWG.

    By contrast, bemotrizinol offers protection against both UVA and UVB rays all on its own, and it is photo stable, so it breaks down more slowly, offering better protection, Rogers says.

    "So if you go a little longer than two hours to reapply your sunscreen, there will be more protection left," Rogers says. However, she says you should still reapply sunscreen every two hours.

    2. It's long been used in other countries 

    Bemotrizinol has been widely used in European and Asian sunscreens for decades. But it has taken 20 years for the FDA to approve its use in this country.

    That's because in the U.S., sunscreens are regulated as over-the-counter drugs rather than cosmetics, as they're classified in Europe. That means ingredients need to undergo rigorous testing for safety and efficacy before they can be approved for use in the U.S.

    "It's really expensive and time consuming," Dobos says. The European company DSM-Firmenich spent at least $18 million over more than two decades in its push to gain FDA approval for bemotrizinol.

    3. It has a well-documented safety profile

    However, all that testing means bemotrizinol has more safety data to back it up than any other chemical sunscreen ingredient currently approved in the U.S., says Friedman of EWG.

    "This ingredient is exciting because we have that data to support its safety," Friedman says.

    Friedman says animal testing showed bemotrizinol doesn't lead to concerns like reproductive harm, while clinical testing on humans found that it does not irritate the skin, even after repeated application over time, "which is hopefully how people are using sunscreens."

    And because bemotrizinol's molecules are larger, it's not readily absorbed by the skin and into the bloodstream, she says.

    That's important, because studies have shown that some of the other chemical sunscreen UV filters sold in the U.S. can be absorbed in the bloodstream, prompting calls for more safety data and leading to a backlash against sunscreen on social media fueled by misinformation. Rogers says that trend is concerning because skin cancer is the most common form of cancer.

    "We just need to have sunscreen that people will use, that they'll trust," Rogers says. "And this ingredient is going to allow that to happen. And that is very exciting."

    And bemotrizinol is also considered to be non-irritating, Friedman says. That should be welcome news to people who've been put off by chemical sunscreens in the past.

    4. It could lead to sunscreens that look better on you

    Until now, Rogers says, the only sunscreen ingredient available in the U.S. that offered the aforementioned advantages of bemotrizinol — photo stable, non-irritating, minimally absorbed into the skin and with good broad spectrum protection against both UVA and UVB rays — was zinc oxide.

    Both zinc oxide and titanium dioxide are mineral UV filters. Both chemical sunscreens and mineral sunscreens work by absorbing UV rays from the sun. Mineral sunscreens also reflect some UV rays. The bigger difference is that mineral sunscreens sit on the surface of the skin, while chemical sunscreens get absorbed into the skin, Rogers says.

    The downside of mineral sunscreens is that they can leave an unattractive white cast on the skin — think of lifeguards with white paste on their noses. "Particularly if you're a person of color, zinc is going to make you look pale, white or ashy, which really makes it hard to use on a regular basis," Rogers says.

    Bemotrizinol, on the other hand, is transparent on the skin, and because it protects against both UVA and UVB rays on its own, it doesn't have to be mixed with as many other chemical filters and stabilizers to achieve broad spectrum protection, Dobos adds. She says that should lead to more aesthetically pleasing, less greasy sunscreen formulations in the near future.

    "I think it's a real win for public health," Dobos says. "If we can make a sunscreen that consumers like to use and want to use and apply in the proper amounts, I think that's something that's really going to be a win for consumers."

    DSM-Firmenich has exclusive rights to market bemotrizinol in the U.S. for 18 months. It will be sold under the brand name Parsol Shield. The company says the first sunscreen products containing the ingredient should start hitting American store shelves around September.

  • DOJ approves Warner acquisition, CA pushes back

    Topline:

    The Justice Department yesterday approved Paramount's proposed $111 billion takeover of Warner Bros. Discovery.

    How we got here: The decision came after the DOJ concluded its antitrust investigation into the pending merger. The department said in a statement that it found that the deal posed no threat to competition or consumers of film, broadcast television or streaming.

    What's next: The decision clears the way for a merger of two rival Hollywood studio titans: Paramount, the owner of CBS, including CBS News, will swallow the much larger Warner, which includes HBO and CNN. But several states, including California, have raised antitrust concerns. The European Union is investigating as well.

    The Justice Department on Friday approved Paramount's proposed $111 billion takeover of Warner Bros. Discovery.

    After concluding its antitrust investigation into the pending merger, the department said in a statement that it found that the deal posed no threat to competition or consumers of film, broadcast television or streaming.

    The decision clears the way for a merger of two rival Hollywood studio titans: Paramount, the owner of CBS, including CBS News, will swallow the much larger Warner, which includes HBO and CNN.

    The DOJ''s Antitrust Division concluded that a union of two studio giants isn't anti-competitive because the streaming market has expanded the competition for conventional Hollywood studios, which includes Netflix, Apple and Amazon, as well as smaller streamers. The Justice Department's view is that, for the same reason, consumers won't lose out because there are plenty of other places to get entertainment.

    Several states, including California, have raised antitrust concerns. The European Union is investigating as well.

    California Attorney General Rob Bonta, who has been investigating the deal for antitrust violations, said in a post on social media following the Justice Department's approval: "The merger of Warner Bros and Paramount is not a done deal and remains under investigation by my office."

    In a statement following the decision, Paramount described the deal as "pro-competitive," and would result in "a stronger company better positioned to compete against dominant technology platforms in an industry increasingly defined by intense competition for audiences, talent, technology, and investment."

    The company said it planned to complete the merger as soon as possible, "delivering its benefits to consumers, creators, and the entertainment industry as a whole."

    The consolidation will put media mogul David Ellison — son of Oracle co-founder Larry Ellison — at the helm of Warner Bros. studio as well as its cable and streaming properties, including CNN and HBO. The Ellison family took over Paramount and CBS last summer.

    In the months leading up to the regulatory approval, critics in Hollywood feared the deal would consolidate an already concentrated media landscape and lead to fewer jobs and less creative content.

    In April, thousands of directors, actors, writers and other industry talent — including Kristen Stewart, Pedro Pascal and Javier Bardem — signed an open letter opposing the merger.

    The elder Ellison is also a financial backer and adviser to President Trump on artificial intelligence. Critics of recent changes at CBS under the Ellisons' control are concerned that, as they say has happened with CBS News, the acquisition would make CNN more friendly to Trump.

    NPR's Carrie Johnson and Mandalit del Barco contributed to this story.
    Copyright 2026 NPR