Sponsored message
Logged in as
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

The Brief

The most important stories for you to know today
  • But should you buy one?
    A Volkswagen ID.4 electric vehicle charges via a fast charger in Torrance, Calif., on February 23, 2024. A federal program to fund fast chargers across the U.S. has been on pause for six months, but the Trump administration is now restarting it.
    A Volkswagen ID.4 electric vehicle charges via a fast charger.

    Topline:

    In August, used electric cars typically cost about $900 more than similar gas-powered ones, which is the lowest gap on record. But the trend also begs the question whether even well-priced used EVs are a bad investment in an asset that will continue to depreciate at an alarming rate.

    Is now a good time to buy a used EV? Experts say that depends on the car, and on how the buyer would use it. If you're in the market for a car that goes sub 200 miles on full charge, maybe not. Those cars don't hold value as well as cars with ranges from 300 to 400 miles. Or you could ignore range or depreciation and buy the cheapest car possible. This works well for people who only need a car for around town.

    Other things to consider: Any premium paid for an EV is likely easily made up in gas savings and far lower maintenance costs. Additionally, an income-qualified buyer can get up to $4,000 federal tax credit on a used EV costing under $25,000 or as much as $7,500 for a new one Many states, municipalities, and utilities offer rebates as well. But the federal credits go away at the end of month, which could cause electric car prices to inch upward.

    The deals on used electric vehicles right now are shocking.

    In 2017, a brand-new Nissan Leaf carried a price tag of about $35,000; today, that same car is yours for less than $6,500. This story repeats across the market. A Hyundai Kona that rolled off the showroom floor in 2021 for more than $43,000 has fallen below $16,000. Even newer models aren’t spared from this kind of depreciation. Take the 2024 Hyundai Ioniq 5: it debuted with a sticker close to $62,000, but after 8,000 miles and less than 12 months on the road, at least one is selling for around $37,000. The drops are even starker in the luxury segment. An Audi e-Tron GT supercar that cost about $124,000 just three years ago is now offered at $52,000. All of this is before government incentives that could bring costs even lower.

    In August, plummeting prices sparked a 59 percent year-over-year surge in used EV sales, according to the research firm Cox Automotive. But the trend also begs the question whether even well-priced used EVs are a bad investment in an asset that will continue to depreciate at an alarming rate. Experts say that depends on the car, and on how the buyer would use it.

    “I would buy one now,” said Stephanie Valdez Streaty, director of industry insights at Cox Automotive. In August, used electric cars typically cost about $900 more than similar gas-powered ones, she added, which is the lowest gap on record. It’s a premium that is likely easily made up in gas savings and far lower maintenance costs because an EV won’t need, say, oil changes. “There’s a really strong value proposition to buying a used EV,” Valdez Streaty said.

    But even a deep discount may not be enough for some people to shake off their earlier experiences, or perceptions, about electric cars, said John Helveston, an engineer and professor at George Washington University who studies technology adoption. As he put it, “If you bought a used Leaf even a few years ago, your experience was likely not great.”

    That’s because until recently, batteries often deteriorated rapidly, which led to untenable driving ranges and often regrettable purchases. But Helveston said the landscape has changed dramatically, with a trend toward more efficient technologies and bigger packs that don’t degrade as fast. Still, most warranties only kick in once the capacity has fallen below 70 percent. So, Helveston said, the car’s original range remains critical and is one of the best indications of how quickly it might depreciate.

    “If you’re sub-200 miles as your new starting range, they don’t hold their value very well,” he said. Conversely, that’s why Teslas — with ranges in the 300- or 400-mile realm — have historically depreciated considerably more slowly.

    Although research by Helveston and others has shown that EVs depreciate much more quickly than gas-powered vehicles in the first two to three years, the good news is that after that the rates of decline converge and all cars lose value at a similar pace.

    Incentives are another factor to consider. Right now an income-qualified buyer can get up to $4,000 federal tax credit on a used EV costing under $25,000 or as much as $7,500 for a new one. Many states, municipalities, and utilities offer rebates as well. But the federal credits go away at the end of month, which could cause electric car prices to inch upward. On the other hand, a loophole in those incentives led to a glut of leased electric vehicles — more than a million of which are set to hit the used market within the next few years, which could exert downward pressure on prices. It’s unclear how all those elements will interact.

    “There’s no crystal ball on this,” said Kevin Roberts, director of economic and market intelligence at the website CarGurus, via e-mail. “But given recent trends, we don’t expect to see the price volatility in used EVs that we’ve seen in the past.”

    The bad news is that shopping for used EVs can be a bit of black box.

    “With a gas car, between age and mileage you know a lot about that car. In the EV, people have no clue,” said Helveston. Battery health, he explained, is more linked to how the car was used than its age or mileage. If, for example, an owner only used super-fast Level 3 chargers, the battery would take much more of a beating than someone who primarily charged in their garage. Plus, even with recent improvements in battery tech, it’s still hard to predict exactly how a battery will perform five or 10 years out.

    “There is this huge gap of information and because of that there’s a hesitance to buy it,” said Helveston. There are, however, some things people can do to mitigate those concerns. The first is to ask the dealer or seller to charge a car to 100 percent capacity before the test drive. Then compare the range on the dashboard to the manufacturer’s stated figure when the car was new. That should provide a rough approximation of remaining battery capacity. After a few years, the pack should retain 90 to 95 percent of its rating.

    Valdez Streaty said that it’s not uncommon for dealers to either not have or not know how to access battery health information, though that process may become more standardized in coming years. In the meantime, she said, the used car auction that Cox operates — Manheim — rates batteries on a scale of 1 to 100. It’s the largest auction network in North America and is used by many dealers, which may be able to pass along any information they receive about the battery.

    “Definitely you want something that’s going to be above 80 percent,” she said.

    The other option is to ignore range or depreciation and buy the cheapest car possible and drive it into the ground. This works well for people who only need a car for around town — most people don’t drive more than 40 miles a day — and don’t care about features. This is what Helveston did when he bought a 10-year-old Leaf off Facebook Marketplace for $5,000. It had a remaining range of just 60 miles, but he drives no more than 30 per day.

    “The miles are double what I need,” he said, and he doesn’t have to pay for gas or oil changes, either. “If it dies on me, I only invested five grand in it and I’ll buy another one.”

    This article originally appeared in Grist at https://grist.org/economics/used-evs-have-never-been-cheaper-but-are-they-a-good-deal/.

    Grist is a nonprofit, independent media organization dedicated to telling stories of climate solutions and a just future. Learn more at Grist.org

  • Weekly showcase to curate at NextFest LA
    Six people are standing in the center of room with a backdrop that reads The Rehearsal. A woman is in the center holding a microphone and singing. To her right there two men holding a saxophone and a guitar. To her left are two other performers. The crowd is pictured in front of the band.
    Orange County-based singer-songwriter Natasha Mangali performing at The Rehearsal. She will be performing at NextFest LA on Sunday.

    Topline:

    South L.A. is becoming a hot spot for live music, thanks in part to a weekly showcase called The Rehearsal. It gives emerging artists a chance to perform at Mercado La Paloma — for free. The venue also provides free photography, access to their recordings and more.

    Why it matters: Yesi Ortiz co-founded The Rehearsal as a way to fight the music industry’s pay-to-play culture and lift that financial burden off the shoulders of new talent. She says artists often have to pay for stage time, as well as their own photography, sound engineering and even recordings of their performances.

    “There’s this constant cost that comes with just trying to perform your artwork in front of people,” Ortiz said. “And now you’re in the negative, when you’ve already been in the negative with ... the cost of producing and songwriting that just to perform kind of feels really defeating.”

    The Rehearsal aims to be a solution by waiving performance fees and creating an ecosystem of support. Its founders have their own experience in the music industry — Ortiz is a former host at the radio station Power 106. Co-founders David Tam and Levi Downey are music producers and Shani Bernard is an artist who performs as Marvelous Xe.

    How it works: Artists have the option to pay what they can. They’ll get access to professional photography and recordings of their performances, which are also live-streamed on YouTube, followed by a Q&A.

    “We want to be able to give them the tools that they need to be the next Billie Eilish or whoever they want to become as their future,” she said.

    Performers: Ortiz says The Rehearsal is not an open mic. Instead, the showcase looks for artists who are “intentionally working on their craft” and putting effort into their career. The rise of artificial intelligence is an even bigger motivator to “discover real artists and a real community that believes in supporting that.” Previous performers include artist Ryck Jane, Coup Deville and sahn.

    What’s next: The Rehearsal will be curating the main stage at NextFest LA, an indie music festival happening at the L.A. County Fair on Sunday. You can find tickets here or send a DM to The Rehearsal on their Instagram for free tickets. They’ll be showcasing several artists, including Orange County-based singer-songwriter Natasha Mangali.

    “She’s a Filipina that combines her Tagalog and English in her music as well. She’s got like a very R&B, soulful sound to her and then you mix all these hip-hop elements,” Ortiz said. Mangali recently performed during The Rehearsal’s eighth season. You can watch her set here.

    Upcoming events: The Rehearsal is currently booking artists for its ninth season.

    You can also check out its upcoming pop up show, the Juneteenth BBQ Bash, on June 19.

  • Sponsored message
  • The success of Thursday's launch could impact IPO
    A man is pictured from behind, standing next to a pickup truck. IN the distance is a tall rocket, standing against a grey, overcast sky.


    Topline:

    Later on Thursday, SpaceX is set to conduct a launch of a heavily redesigned version of its Starship rocket. It'll be a critical test of the largest rocket ever built. The launch comes a little under a month before investors expect SpaceX's much-anticipated initial public offering.

    Launch impact on SpaceX's IPO: The launch is "super important for the IPO," said Franco Granda, a senior researcher who covers SpaceX for the data firm, PitchBook. He believes that if Starship's launch goes badly, it could cause investors' excitement for the IPO "to diminish quite dramatically." SpaceX is spending billions of dollars per year developing Starship. The development is eating up the profits from its launch business, which operated at a $662 million loss in the first quarter of this year.

    About the Starship rocket: Starship is unlike any rocket ever built. Standing at around 400 feet in height, it's made of durable, but heavy, stainless steel. To overcome its bulk, the spacecraft sits atop an enormous booster called "Super Heavy" that shoots it skyward with 33 Raptor engines. After Starship separates from the booster, it can ignite its six engines to get to space, while the booster is capable of flying back to earth and landing at its launchpad. SpaceX CEO Elon Musk has said that the ultimate goal is to make Starship return to the pad, allowing the entire system to be reused almost instantaneously. If it works, it would radically lower the cost of launches.

    As SpaceX prepares for its public offering, it's undergoing a critical test of the largest rocket ever built.

    Later on Thursday, the company is set to conduct a launch of a heavily redesigned version of its Starship rocket. The new rocket will fly using dozens of new Raptor 3 engines powered by a novel fuel system in the booster. It will also carry upgraded avionics, satellites, and test ports for a future refueling system that could allow Starship to one day reach other destinations like the Moon and even Mars.

    The launch comes a little under a month before investors expect SpaceX's much-anticipated initial public offering. Many analysts expect SpaceX to raise up to $75 billion, and to be valued at up to $1.5 trillion. The amount raised could make this the largest IPO ever, and make SpaceX one of the most valuable companies in the world.

    But a lot of that may rest on how Starship performs.

    The launch is "super important for the IPO," said Franco Granda, a senior researcher who covers SpaceX for the data firm, PitchBook. He believes that if Starship's launch goes badly, it could cause investors' excitement for the IPO "to diminish quite dramatically."

    "Even though tests are inherently tests, and failure typically doesn't dictate what happens later on, I think SpaceX will want to get this one right," he said.

    Financial disclosures released on Wednesday show just how critical the test is. SpaceX is spending billions of dollars per year developing Starship. The development is eating up the profits from its launch business, which operated at a $662 million loss in the first quarter of this year.

    Cheap, frequent launches key to the business model

    Starship is unlike any rocket ever built. Standing at around 400 feet in height, it's made of durable, but heavy, stainless steel. To overcome its bulk, the spacecraft sits atop an enormous booster called "Super Heavy" that shoots it skyward with 33 Raptor engines. After Starship separates from the booster, it can ignite its six engines to get to space, while the booster is capable of flying back to earth and landing at its launchpad.

    SpaceX CEO Elon Musk has said that the ultimate goal is to make Starship return to the pad, allowing the entire system to be reused almost instantaneously. If it works, it would radically lower the cost of launches.

    That's key to SpaceX's short-term and long-term vision. The rocket is expected to carry larger, more capable satellites for the company's Starlink internet service. It's also being developed into a lunar lander for NASA and as a possible rocket to Mars. Most recently, Musk proposed that Starship could be used to launch data centers into space, where they could use solar power to run AI chips.

    "Starship is a critical piece of the puzzle," Musk said during an event in March to unveil a new chip fabrication facility. To achieve SpaceX's goals, "you need massive payload to space, and Starship will enable that."

    The new financial disclosure document reveals just how much of SpaceX's future relies on Starship's development. 

    "Any failure or delay in the development of Starship at scale or in achieving the required launch cadence, reusability and capabilities thereafter would delay or limit our ability to execute our growth strategy," the document says. 

    It also puts real numbers on how much money SpaceX is spending to develop the giant rocket. In 2025, the company spent a little over $3 billion dollars. In the first quarter of 2026, it spent another $930 million on Starship development.

    A conical shape rocket engine is on display on front of a white industrial building.
    SpaceX's new Raptor 3 engines deliver more thrust and contain numerous technological improvements, but they have yet to be tested in flight.
    (
    SpaceX
    )

    Success is far from assured. The first version of Starship launched in April of 2023, but failed to separate from its booster and tumbled out of control before exploding. It took three tries before the rocket eventually reached space. The second version of the spacecraft was plagued by multiple failed attempts throughout 2025, though its final two launches went as expected.

    This third version is an ambitious redesign, said Scott Manley, an engineer and YouTuber who closely tracks Starship's development. Manley said that the latest version of Starship is more refined. Heat tiles appear more carefully placed, and clunky, temporary fixes, like a "hot staging ring" that was bolted onto the booster after the first accident, have been integrated into the design.

    "It looks more like a rocket and less like a bunch of grain silos welded together," he said.

    Manly said he's particularly interested in how the rocket's new Raptor 3 engines perform. The engines have been heavily redesigned to increase thrust and eliminate the need for bulky shielding on the bottom of the rocket. The engines have been extensively tested, but they haven't been to space before. "We don't know how they're going to perform under flight circumstances."

    Even if the newest version of Starship flies as expected, the space launch company faces a long path towards making the behemoth rocket work as a business proposition. Starship's heat shield has not yet proven durable enough to survive multiple trips through the atmosphere and the spacecraft itself has yet to attempt a landing at the pad in Brownsville, Texas.

    Getting all the parts of Starship to work as planned is far more complex than what SpaceX has done with its existing rocket, the Falcon 9, said Tim Farrar, the president of TMF associates, which analyzes mobile satellite services. Starship is "a multidimensional problem that they haven't actually solved yet," he said.

    "You can't justify a valuation well in excess of a trillion dollars based on what SpaceX is doing today," Farrar said. "You've got to believe that Musk will come up with something much bigger than that."
    Copyright 2026 NPR

  • Newsom order aims to protect workers from AI
    A white man in a suit and tie gestures in front of an oversized seal of the state of California.
    California Gov. Gavin Newsom speaks during a press conference on Feb. 1, 2023, in Sacramento

    Topline:

    Amid tech layoffs, anxiety around artificial intelligence and a forthcoming run for president, Gov. Gavin Newsom today signed an executive order that calls for state agencies to explore ways to mitigate job losses stemming from AI.

    About the executive order: The order, among other things, tells state agencies to explore severance policies, subsidized employment and other ways to help displaced workers. It also calls for a report on the impact of AI on the California labor market. In addition, it calls for the study of increased job training , stock compensation, cooperative business ownership for workers and how unions are negotiating over AI.

    The context: The latest order comes a day after Facebook owner Meta laid off 8,000 workers, with CEO Mark Zuckerberg citing AI in a memo to staff after the cuts. Tech companies Cisco and Block also recently cited AI after laying off thousands of workers. The order also comes two days after the California Senate passed the No Robo Bosses Act, which prevents businesses from using decisions made by AI and other automated systems as the sole reason a person gets fired or disciplined.

    Amid tech layoffs, anxiety around artificial intelligence and a forthcoming run for president, Gov. Gavin Newsom today signed an executive order that calls for state agencies to explore ways to mitigate job losses stemming from AI.

    The order, among other things, tells state agencies to explore severance policies, subsidized employment and other ways to help displaced workers. It also calls for a report on the impact of AI on the California labor market.

    In addition, it calls for the study of increased job training , stock compensation, cooperative business ownership for workers and how unions are negotiating over AI.

    Newsom signed executive orders last month and in 2023 simultaneously putting in place AI protections and encouraging state agencies to use the technology.

    The latest order comes a day after Facebook owner Meta laid off 8,000 workers, with CEO Mark Zuckerberg citing AI in a memo to staff after the cuts. Tech companies Cisco and Block also recently cited AI after laying off thousands of workers. The order also comes two days after the California Senate passed the No Robo Bosses Act, which prevents businesses from using decisions made by AI and other automated systems as the sole reason a person gets fired or disciplined. Newsom vetoed a similar bill last fall.

    In February, AFL-CIO president Liz Shuler, members of the California Labor Federation and labor leaders in Democratic primary states pledged to pull support for a Newsom 2028 presidential campaign if he didn’t take steps to protect workers from artificial intelligence. Newsom’s veto of the predecessor of the No Robo Bosses Act was named as a reason for that pledge.

    In a statement shared with CalMatters, California Labor Federation president Lorena Gonzalez said the executive order is welcome but not enough.

    "We are glad that Governor Newsom is acknowledging the potential harm of AI on workers, but it's not enough to just study the issue, we have to take action now. Catastrophic job loss from AI is not inevitable, it's a political choice,” she said.

    This article was originally published on CalMatters and was republished under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives license.

  • Permits over a rapid bus go to court
    A digital rendering of a bus station. On the lefthand side is a digital advertisement showing a woman with a blue graduation cap and gown. To the right of the fake advertisement is a metal pole atop of which is a sign showing which bus routes run through this station. The main part of the image, from the center to the right, shows a gray and silver bus stop that has shade. A woman is sitting on a bench next to a man standing up. There's another man on the right side walking into the bus stop.
    The 19 mile-long bus rapid transit route that features 22 stops through North Hollywood, Burbank, Glendale, Eagle Rock and Pasadena.

    Topline:

    Los Angeles Metro is suing the city of Burbank over its refusal to grant construction permits for the local portion of a rapid bus route from North Hollywood to Pasadena.

    The lawsuit: According to a copy of the complaint filed on May 19 in L.A. County Superior Court, Metro argues that Burbank doesn’t have the authority to refuse the construction permits under the California Environmental Quality Act and an agreement forged between the countywide transportation agency and the city.

    A revelation for council: The Burbank City Council only learned about the lawsuit halfway through a six-hour meeting about the bus route held on May 20.

    Read on … for more about the lawsuit, how the council meeting unfolded and more.

    Los Angeles Metro is suing Burbank over its refusal to grant construction permits for the local portion of a rapid bus route from North Hollywood to Pasadena.

    The Burbank City Council only learned about the lawsuit halfway through a six-hour meeting about the bus on May 20. After the revelation, council members wondered aloud if Metro was watching the live stream and questioned what the purpose of the meeting was if they were now, apparently, in active litigation.

    The special meeting was called to update the public over staff’s concerns about how a new state housing law could affect zoning around the long-planned bus stops along Olive Avenue.

    “It turned out the update was more than we thought,” Burbank City Attorney Joseph McDougall said during the meeting. McDougall said the city hadn’t yet been served as of Wednesday evening.

    According to a copy of the complaint filed on May 19 in L.A. County Superior Court, Metro argues that Burbank doesn’t have the authority to refuse the construction permits under the California Environmental Quality Act and an agreement forged between the countywide transportation agency and the city.

    Metro is asking the court to direct Burbank to “cease conditioning issuance, approval, or processing” of project permits on any of the city’s issues with the design of the bus route.

    Fast facts about the project

    In 2022, Metro’s Board gave final approval for a 19 mile-long bus rapid transit route that features 22 stops through North Hollywood, Burbank, Glendale, Eagle Rock and Pasadena.

    Bus rapid transit projects are those that typically feature dedicated bus lanes, signal priority and enhanced stations. Think of a bus rapid transit as a light rail on wheels instead of tracks.

    The bus rapid transit project is funded in part with nearly $270 million of local sales taxes collected through Measure M, which county voters approved in 2016.

    Metro is looking to break ground in July 2026 so the bus is operational in time for the 2028 Olympic Games.

    A map showing a route running through North Hollywood, Burbank, Glendale, Eagle Rock and Pasadena. The route is shown with different colors indicating the kind of bus lanes. Generally, there are different kinds of dedicated bus lanes that make up most of the route with some sections of mixed-flow lanes, which means the bus runs in the same lane as other cars.
    The center of the ongoing battle between Burbank and Metro is the section of yellow in the Burbank portion of the bus rapid transit route showing that the countywide transportation agency wants to construct side-running dedicated bus lanes.
    (
    L.A. Metro
    )

    Competing perspectives on the bus lanes

    The city of Burbank has been resolute through the bus route’s design process that it doesn’t want dedicated lanes along Olive Avenue. The city’s position is that dedicated bus lanes would leave only one driving lane in each direction on the arterial street, causing congestion and spillover traffic on smaller, neighboring streets.

    It has instead advocated for the bus to run with other traffic to preserve all the driving lanes.

    Metro’s position, according to the lawsuit, is that removing dedicated bus lanes would “materially increase travel time and reduce reliability and ridership … undermining the premium transit service that justified the public investment under Measure M.”

    What does housing have to do with this?

    California Gov. Gavin Newsom signed Senate Bill 79 in 2025, which establishes regulations that allow for higher and more-dense housing around specific kinds of transit stops than what local zoning rules would otherwise permit.

    The qualifying transit stops in the region have yet to be determined. Still, David Kriske, Burbank’s assistant community development director for transportation, said the bus rapid transit could trigger the law since the five of the six stops in the city would be serviced by buses traveling along full-time, dedicated lanes.

    In January, Burbank requested Metro do an additional environmental impact review of the project, specifically on any new land use impacts in light of the bill’s passage.

    In a March letter to the city, Ray Sosa, Metro’s chief planning officer, said “the adoption of statewide legislation that could potentially result in development or redevelopment of parcels near project stops does not require Metro to re-open an environmental review concluded nearly four years ago.”

    At Wednesday’s meeting, city officials displayed a poster board showing the potential areas that could be upzoned around the planned bus stops. One incensed public commenter pointed at the map and said it looked like “detonation zones and blast radiuses from Metro into Burbank.”

    Metro's Board voted earlier this year to oppose implementation of the law.

    A digital map of Burbank. It's a street-level map. The focus of the map is a drawn route in blue showing where the bus rapid transit project would travel. There are large red circles drawn onto the map. These indicate where the city of Burbank think new state housing laws could apply.
    This image displayed on a poster board facing the public at the May 20 shows where the city of Burbank thinks SB79 would apply because of Metro's bus rapid transit project.
    (
    City of Burbank
    )

    Look up the case

    Cases filed in the Superior Court of Los Angeles County can be accessed online or in person.

    Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority v. City of Burbank is identifiable by its case number: 26STCP01904.

    Images of the documents filed as part of each case are accessible, too. If you’re looking online, you’ll only be able to see a preview of each document and will have to pay to access the entire document. You don’t have to pay to view the court documents at kiosks at Superior Court locations throughout the county. Printing the documents will cost money, though. 

    More on the lawsuit

    Metro’s legal action isn’t entirely surprising. According to a letter to the city attorney attached to the lawsuit, Metro’s outside counsel had presented a draft of the complaint to the city on May 8.

    Metro said in a statement that it “had little choice but to file a suit” since Burbank has “decided to withhold all permits unless Metro removes dedicated bus lanes or conducts additional environmental review because of the passage of SB 79.”

    How to reach me

    If you have a tip, you can reach me on Signal. My username is kharjai.61.

    The countywide transportation agency’s lawsuit says it has spent nearly $44 million so far on design and pre-construction of the bus route and that “each day of delay increases Metro’s damages and threatens its ability to deliver the project” by the 2028 Games.

    Jonathan Jones, communications manager for Burbank, said the city won't comment on pending litigation.