Sponsored message
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

The Brief

The most important stories for you to know today
  • Researchers worry about ongoing experiments
    The front of Royce Hall on the UCLA campus is shown as a student walks toward the building.
    A student walks toward Royce Hall on the campus of University of California at Los Angeles on March 11, 2020.

    Topline:

    UCLA on Friday told researchers to "immediately stop spending" funds related to grants that were suspended by the Trump administration earlier this week.

    Why now: The Trump administration suspended at least $212 million in funding because, it said, UCLA did not do enough to address antisemitism on campus, CalMatters reported.

    Why it matters: Grants are often used to pay for supplies as well as graduate student researchers. “Everything I do is funded by" the National Science Foundation, one researcher told LAist. “Without that money, science would not be happening at all."

    Read on ... for more about the effects on academic research.

    UCLA on Friday told researchers whose funding has been suspended by the Trump administration to “immediately stop spending” grant funds, leaving them scrambling to figure out how they’re going to pay for experiments that are underway.

    An email sent by Roger Wakimoto, vice chancellor for research and creative activities, identified hundreds of grants that are now in limbo.

    According to the notice, UCLA learned this week that 300 grants from the National Science Foundation and 500 grants from the National Institutes of Health had been suspended, along with two awards from the Department of Energy.

    “The suspension of this funding — and the interruption of our research projects — is a loss for our country and a loss for the world,” Wakimoto wrote in the email, obtained by LAist, to campus administrators and people leading research.

    How we got here

    The Trump administration suspended at least $212 million in funding because, it said, UCLA did not do enough to address antisemitism on campus during protests and encampments against the Israeli war in Gaza, CalMatters reported.

    This week, the university agreed to pay $6.45 million to settle a lawsuit resulting from those protests brought by students and a faculty member. The same day the settlement was announced, the U.S. Justice Department announced litigation against UCLA over allegations of antisemitism.

    UCLA did not immediately respond to LAist’s request for comment. But two UCLA principal investigators involved in science research — who LAist is not naming because they were not authorized by the university to speak publicly — said the funding freeze could be devastating.

    Grants are often used to fund research projects, covering the salaries of graduate student researchers, in addition to materials and other costs.

    Supplies that keep experiments going or lab animals alive may be impossible to acquire with the grants frozen, one researcher said.

    “Years worth of work can be lost if we can’t buy the little things to keep them going,” the person said.

    What's next

    It’s unclear if UCLA will step in to fulfill those orders, particularly for experiments that need to be continuously maintained.

    “Everything I do is funded by NSF,” the researcher said, referring to the National Science Foundation. “Without that money, science would not be happening at all.”

    The researcher said it's currently unclear whether graduate students will be paid while the grants are frozen.

    The researcher said graduate students may continue to work anyway — because they want to complete their studies.

    “They don't want all the work they've put in to be destroyed,” the person said.

    While the federal funding is not terminated, according to Friday’s email from the UCLA's research vice chancellor, it is effectively frozen.

    “Let me assure you that our goal is to restore funding to UCLA,” Wakimoto wrote.

    How UCLA researchers are reacting

    Researchers who spoke to LAist on Friday worried about the effects the funding freeze would have on their work, including in life sciences that rely on growing stem cells.

    Samantha Butler, a professor in the department of neurobiology, is working on understanding how neurons develop in embryos to help people regain sensation after spinal cord damage.

    “The immediate suspension of funding is simply a catastrophe for anyone like myself who works with living systems,” Butler said. “We can’t put our research on hold.”

    While Butler may be able to bridge the gap in funding with philanthropic funds, Ben Novitch, who is also an investigator at the Broad Stem Cell Research Center, is more reliant on NIH money. Two of his grants — which fund research on human brain development and conditions including autism and Rett syndrome — have been suspended. And he’s unsure what will happen next.

    Both Butler’s and Novitch’s labs use cocktails of expensive liquid to feed stem cells.

    “These are cellular clusters that take months, hundreds of days, to get them to develop,” Butler said. If the cells aren’t fed, they die.

    Irene Chen, a professor in the chemical and biomolecular engineering department, said she would have to halt projects that are fighting “superbug” infections and sepsis. If graduate and postdoctoral students aren’t paid, they could leave UCLA — “a loss of expertise that will take years to recover from,” she said via email.

    “In the meantime,” Chen continued, “antibiotic resistant infections, not to mention scientists in other countries, will get further ahead of us.”

  • Poll finds that more are using the technology

    Topline:

    Fifty six percent of psychologists recently surveyed by the American Psychological Association say they are using AI tools in their practices. A majority of psychologists said they are concerned about potential harms of this technology, with more than 60% saying they are worried about potential data breaches, biased inputs and outputs and social harms.

    How psychologists are using AI: Most psychologists are "using AI to help write emails, to help develop homework assignments, to help maybe with some report writing or using AI scribes to assist with documentation," says psychologist Vaile Wright. As more psychologists adopt AI tools, Wright says there is also growing awareness about artificial intelligence tools, especially with respect to patient safety and data privacy. Many also expressed concerns about hallucinations, where the platforms fabricate facts or present inaccurate information.

    Why it matters: "What's clear to us is that we need to help continue to provide both resources to members so that they can and effectively, responsibly incorporate these types of technologies," says Wright. "And we have to ensure that these technologies are regulated in ways that ensure to the best of their ability, safety and efficacy."

    Psychologist Cami Winkelspecht decided to familiarize herself with artificial intelligence tools like ChatGPT and Gemini, after patients started asking her for advice about how they could use the technology responsibly.

    "One of the interesting questions that kids and teenagers, in particular, brought in is how can you utilize AI to help support ideas or editing process or things like that for papers and assignments and presentations, but also make sure that you're not utilizing it to write something for you, [so] that you're not violating your school's honor code" says Winkelspecht, who is a child and adolescent psychologist with a private practice in Wilmington, Delaware.

    "So I have also then started to experiment with it to see what these tools will also do," she says, so she could feel "confident and comfortable" in her own understanding of these platforms, their advantages and risks.

    Winkelspecht is among the 56% of psychologists recently surveyed by the American Psychological Association who are using AI tools in their practices. That's significantly higher than the 29% who said the same last year. And nearly a third of respondents said they use these tools on a monthly basis — up by more than two fold since last year.

    Winkelspecht incorporates AI into some of her office and administrative tasks, like creating templates for letters she has to send to her collaborators — schools and pediatricians. It saves her time, but she can still write and edit the letters each time.

    Most psychologists are "using AI to help write emails, to help develop homework assignments, to help maybe with some report writing or using AI scribes to assist with documentation," says psychologist Vaile Wright, senior director of the Office of Health Care Innovation at the APA.

    "Psychologists are seeing potential opportunities to incorporate AI into their practices, by making their work more efficient, which we think could have downstream effects to reducing burnout, reducing those aspects of the workplace that people don't particularly enjoy," she adds. "And that would then give them more time to really provide patient care. So I think that that's really promising."


    As more psychologists adopt AI tools, Wright says there is also growing awareness about artificial intelligence tools, especially with respect to patient safety and data privacy.

    A majority of psychologists said they are concerned about potential harms of this technology, with more than 60% saying they are worried about potential data breaches, biased inputs and outputs and social harms. Many also expressed concerns about hallucinations, where the platforms fabricate facts or present inaccurate information.

    "What's clear to us is that we need to help continue to provide both resources to members so that they can and effectively, responsibly incorporate these types of technologies," says Wright. "And we have to ensure that these technologies are regulated in ways that ensure to the best of their ability, safety and efficacy."
    Copyright 2025 NPR

  • Sponsored message
  • Rat poison continues to hurt bears, bald eagles
    An image of a mother kit fox and baby coming out of their den in the ground in a grassy field.
    The endangered San Joaquin kit fox is one iconic California species still dying at alarming rates from rat poisoning.

    Topline:

    Rat poison continues to sicken and kill California’s wildlife at alarming rates, despite legislation designed to prevent the use of such chemicals.

    The latest: A recently published report from the California Department of Fish and Wildlife found anticoagulant rodenticides — a fancy name for one of the most toxic types of rat poison — in the bodies of 95% of mountain lions and 83% of bald eagles tested, as well as dozens of other species, including foxes, bobcats, owls, hawks, black bears and endangered California condors.

    Keep reading...for more on why current laws may not be helping and how you can protect wildlife.

    Rat poison continues to sicken and kill California’s wildlife at alarming rates, despite legislation designed to prevent the use of such chemicals.

    That’s according to a recently published report from the California Department of Fish and Wildlife. The 2024 survey found anticoagulant rodenticides — a fancy name for one of the most toxic types of rat poison — in the bodies of 95% of mountain lions and 83% of bald eagles tested, as well as dozens of other species, including foxes, bobcats, owls, hawks, black bears and endangered California condors.

    Even river otters have been poisoned, a sign these chemicals may be seeping into waterways.

    “We’re still seeing too many animals being victims of rat poison,” said Lisa Owens-Viani, director of Berkeley-based nonprofit  Raptors Are the Solution.

    How we got here

    Rats are a big problem in Southern California. And people resort to rat poison to solve the problem, placing it in baits and traps. The problem with that is wild animals also fall for the lures. Or, hungry predators feast on the poison-filled rats.

    Anticoagulants were one of the final blows to L.A.’s most famous mountain lion, P-22. He was sickened by such rodenticides likely after eating prey that had ingested them. Disoriented and ill, the beloved puma then wandered into the road and was struck by a car just south of his home in Griffith Park. P-22 later died from his injuries.

    An image of the face of famed mountain lion P-22, he looks very unhappy and is suffering from mange.
    Famed mountain lion P-22 suffered from mange linked to rat poisons and died after being struck by a vehicle near Griffith Park.
    (
    Courtesy Center for Biological Diversity
    )

    Why legislation hasn’t solved it

    For more than two decades, California has passed laws to limit the use of certain pesticides. Starting in 2020, the state passed a series of legislation banning some of the most toxic types:

    • The Ecosystem Protection Act of 2020 (AB1788) placed a moratorium on all second-generation anticoagulant rodenticides, which are stronger and last in animal tissue longer than earlier types. 
    • The California Ecosystem Protection Act of 2023 and the Poison-Free Wildlife Act of 2024 expanded that moratorium to first generation anticoagulant rodenticides, including chlorophacinone and warfarin, which are older versions of rat poison that take longer to build up in the body.

    However, there are exemptions in those laws, including the use of such rodenticides in agriculture, certain public health settings, such as hospitals, and other sensitive settings.

    Owens-Viani thinks that’s a big reason why the number of poisonings continue to be high.

    “We're not seeing the decreasing trend that we had hoped for,” she said.

    A thin and mangy bobcat on an operating table.
    A bobcat sickened by rodenticides is cared for at Simi Valley-based wildlife rescue Wildlife Care of Southern California.
    (
    Anna Reams
    /
    Wildlife Care of Southern California
    )

    Jonathan Evans, the Environmental Health Legal Director for the Center for Biological Diversity, noted that some of the state’s best protections against rat infestations — great-horned owls, hawks and other raptors — are also dying at some of the most alarming rates from rat poisons.

    “All of these animals are some of our best rodent control mechanisms. Like these animals feed on rats and mice and can do it very efficiently,” Evans said. “We really should be looking at figuring out why we still have high levels [of poisonings] and what we can do to close the loopholes and make rodent control more ecologically effective."

    Why the problem could get worse

    There are also gaps in the data, meaning the real numbers of poisonings are likely far higher, Evans said.

    As part of its methods to calculate poisoning rates, the Department of Fish and Wildlife has to analyze dead carcasses that often have to be submitted to them by the public, he said.

    “Most of these animals that die of rodenticide poisonings are going to die out in the woods where nobody finds them,” Evans said.

    A cougar looks down toward the ground, lit up at night, with the city night lights in the background. The animal is surrounded by vegetation.
    A mountain lion photographed with a motion sensor camera in the Verdugo Mountains overlooking the city lights of Los Angeles.
    (
    National Park Service
    )

    And now, the state’s Department of Pesticide Regulation is considering rolling back many of these protections by allowing more than 100,000 new locations, including grocery stores, restaurants and even parks, to use most toxic rat poisons.

    Six lawmakers who helped craft the 2024 moratorium on these chemicals sent a letter to the agency earlier this year asking them to rescind the proposal.

    Here’s how you can help protect wildlife 

    • For one, don’t use rodenticides in your yard. Death by anticoagulant rodenticide poisoning is painful and slow — these poisons cause species to slowly bleed out from the inside, with signs in hawks and other raptors often being blood seeping from their beaks and eyes. Larger mammals, such as mountain lions and coyotes, can also develop mange as a result of the poisons weakening their immune systems.
    • Securing your trash, pet food and even bird feeders are other important ways to keep rats (and unwanted wildlife) from your home. Evans noted there are also new technologies, such as fertility control, electric traps and improved methods of fortifying buildings from rats. You can find additional resources for wildlife-safe rodent control from the Center for Biological Diversity and Raptors are the Solution at SafeRodentControl.org or here.
    • And if you do come across wild animal you suspect has been poisoned, report it to your local wildlife rescue agency or animal control office, as well as the California Department of Fish and Wildlife at WHLab@wildlife.ca.gov or (916) 358-2790.
  • Fatal incident on a bus near Expo Park
    An orange bus passes by a street blurred from the movement.
    Wednesday's shooting occurred on a northbound bus along Route 206, according to Metro.
    A person was fatally shot on a Los Angeles Metro bus Wednesday afternoon in South L.A.

    What we know: Metro said the shooting on Route 206 began as an altercation among a group of young men on the street. “A member of the group shot and fatally injured another member of the group,” the transportation agency said to LAist.

    Weapons detection: Since summer 2024, the transportation agency has been testing scanners that can detect concealed weapons at the entrances to rail stations throughout L.A. County and is in the early stages of possibly adopting the same approach for its buses.

    Read on … to learn more about the incident and the status of Metro’s pilot program to test weapons-detection systems on buses.

    A person was fatally shot on a Los Angeles Metro bus Wednesday afternoon in South L.A.

    According to Metro, a group of “young men” got into an altercation on the street.

    That altercation then continued on a bus on Route 206, where “a member of the group shot and fatally injured another member of the group,” the transportation agency said to LAist.

    The suspects fled before police arrived, according to Metro.

    LAist has reached out to the LAPD for further information.

    Safety on Metro

    Since summer 2024, the transportation agency has been testing scanners that can detect concealed weapons at the entrances to rail stations throughout L.A. County and is in the early stages of possibly adopting the same approach for its buses.

    In the latest 12-month-long phase of the pilot, which began in late April, Metro has been testing the technology at two rail stations at a time in two-month increments.

    In a September report to its board, Metro staff said the “most frequently encountered” items during screenings have been “bladed objects.”

    “In most cases, these were legitimate work-related tools that patrons were lawfully transporting,” staff said, adding that only one firearm had been detected as of the report.

    Two men in security uniforms stand along a walk way leading to an outdoor train platform with two cylindrical poles that form an entrance with text that reads "Metro" along the length. Two metro rider walks out of the platform.
    Metro tested its weapons detection system at the San Pedro stop along the A line.
    (
    Samanta Helou Hernandez
    /
    LAist
    )

    In the same September update to its board, Metro staff said the transportation agency remains in “active discussions” with a vendor for its bus-centered program.

    Over the summer, the vendor demoed how the scanners would work on different size buses, according to the update.

    “Further coordination with the vendor will take place to determine which bus or buses will be equipped and when the installation will occur,” Metro staff said in the update. “The pilot has not yet been finalized.”

    According to Metro, systemwide violent crime in September 2025, the latest month for which data is available online, fell nearly 15% compared to last September.

    How to reach me

    If you have a tip, you can reach me on Signal. My username is kharjai.61.

  • How you can help the butterflies
    Two monarch butterflies mating on the dirt.
    At this point in the year, monarch butterflies are starting to leave our coastline to migrate elsewhere.

    Topline:

    Monarch butterflies have been declining in Southern California for decades, but a conservation nonprofit is trying to understand that by pulling together hundreds of volunteers every year to tally them.

    What’s happening? The Xerces Society is running its last period in 2025 for the annual Western Monarch Count. That helps researchers understand population trends.

    Why now? At this time of year, the count tells researchers about how many of these pollinators are leaving our area and their mortality rates. They specifically track a type called an overwintering monarch, which are beefier and live longer than other monarchs. They come here to escape the cold.

    How you can get involved: You can volunteer now to help with next year’s count. You’ll get assigned a site and use binoculars to search for them. Or you can jump in right way by taking photos.

    Read on … to learn how to share photos of monarchs you find and their nectar spots.

    If you’re out in nature this weekend, you might see people combing spots in search of one thing: monarch butterflies.

    The community science initiative, known as the Western Monarch Count, is led by the Xerces Society, a conservation nonprofit that looks for the insects annually. This is the last count for the year, and it runs through Jan. 11.

    The count is run mostly by hundreds of volunteers and partners of the Xerces Society across the state.

    Why the count matters

    Across California, monarch butterflies have been in steep decline in recent decades. The count is one of the ways the Xerces Society is trying to understand what’s happening and how we can help them recover.

    The count looks specifically at the habits of a specific type of monarch known as overwintering monarchs, which travel hundreds of miles to our coast to escape harsh winters. They have special fat reserves in their tiny bodies, which make them beefier than breeding ones, says Sara Cuadra-Vargas, a  conservation biologist at the Xerces Society.

    “ You can think of it … like if your great-great-great-great-grandfather was a superhuman that lived extra long and was extra large,” Cuadra-Vargas said.

    The count happens over three periods, starting in October. This period is called the late-season count, which can show biologists how many monarchs are moving away from our sites and what mortality is looking like.

    How you can help monarchs

    They’re set for volunteers for this count, but you can volunteer for next year’s count by signing up to volunteer here. They require at least 15 hours of commitment — you’ll get set up with training.

    Volunteers typically are assigned a site for the season and go out early in the morning when it’s too cold for monarchs to move. You’ll scan for the orange butterflies with binoculars and document things like habit quality and disturbances.

    Cuadra-Vargas says our region has dozens of confirmed and potential overwintering sites, but the bulk of monarchs are seen in the central coast. In training, she tempers expectations.

    “ We do still get overwintering monarchs here in Southern California, in Los Angeles and Orange counties,” she said, “but it’s a bit of more presence-absence that we’re looking for.”

    That means you also may report where monarchs aren’t anymore, which is an important piece of data for biologists.

    If you want to help out now, though, there’s still a few ways to do it: