Sponsored message
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

The Brief

The most important stories for you to know today
  • 4 things you should know about the risk
    A sign on a pole has an arrow pointed upward and reads: Tsunami evacuation route.
    Tsunami evacuation routes in Seal Beach.

    Topline:

    A massive earthquake, one of the largest in the last century, has generated a tsunami advisory for much of the West Coast, as well as alerts for Alaska and many Pacific islands.

    What to know about tsunamis: Risks differ depending on a number of factors. Generally speaking, Southern California is less likely to see a tsunami than Northern California.

    Read on ... for more on what to watch for and why you should take advisories seriously.

    On Tuesday afternoon, a massive earthquake hit off the coast of eastern Russia.

    The quake, one of the largest in the last century, has generated a tsunami advisory for much of the West Coast, as well as alerts Alaska and many Pacific islands.

    The size of this quake and the wide tsunami advisory had us going back to a question we explored the last time a quake of this magnitude hit offshore: What would it take for a tsunami to hit the California Coast?

    To answer that question, we're revisiting an interview LAist did with Elizabeth Cochran in 2016. She's a seismologist with the U.S. Geological Survey.  She left us with these takeaways:

    1. Risk for tsunami really depends on the quake's location

    "If we had a subduction zone event — that's where you would have the sea floor being pushed upwards and as a result the water would also be pushed upwards and then flow away from that spot — that's when you get a tsunami generated," Cochran explained. She added: "Going up farther north in California and into Oregon and Washington, there's a pretty high hazard for tsunamis if there's a large earthquake."

    2. Long distance quakes have been felt in California 

    Cochran told us in 2016 — when a magnitude 6.5 earthquake hit 100 miles off the coast of Eureka — that the area was "fairly active for earthquakes."

    That quake was felt justly slightly on land and did not result in a tsunami. But, she cautioned, distance from land didn't mean the coast was safe.

    "We could have a tsunami affect the entire West Coast of the U.S. from a large magnitude earthquake that occurs as far away as Alaska or even in Japan," Cochran said. "So you can have these tsunamis that travel across the entire ocean basin and affect regions fairly far away.  We have seen that in the past with some larger events."

    3. The time from quake to tsunami wave could be minutes or hours

    Cochran noted that several factors go into when a tsunami hits ground.

    "It depends how far away you are from where that earthquake occurs and where that tsunami is generated," she said. "Tsunamis travel approximately at the speed of a jumbo jet so it can actually take hours for a tsunami to transverse across the Pacific Ocean."

    She said that the good news is there's a system in place to monitor ocean activity.

    "For those types of events where you're looking at tsunamis generated far away, there are a number of ocean buoys that detect the tsunami and can be used to issue a warning," Cochran explained. "It's more difficult for local tsunamis because the time is, of course, quite a bit shorter. They can occur within minutes of the earthquake. That's why the recommendation is, if you're near the coast and you feel strong shaking, that you should move inland."

    4. If you do feel a quake, best head to high ground

    Cochran said we should always take any warnings seriously and to stay away from the beaches. If you ever feel a quake near the ocean, always move inland just to be safe.

    For more information on the dangers faced in your area and evacuation procedures, visit the Governor's Office of Emergency Services website, MyHazards. Note: A version of this story also ran in late 2024 after 7.0 earthquake shook parts of Northern California and briefly prompted a wide tsunami warning.

    We have earthquake resources

    We don't want to scare you, but a Big One is coming to Southern California. We don't know when, but we know it'll be at least 44 times stronger than Northridge and 11 times stronger than the Ridgecrest quakes in 2019. To help you get prepared, we've compiled a handy reading list:

    Listen to our podcast

    Listen 31:11
    The Big One: The Earthquake
    You’re at Union Station when the big one hits. The next two minutes are terrifying. By the time you make your way outside, the Los Angeles you know is gone. Experience what the first hours after a massive earthquake could be like.

  • Heavy rain now predicted for Christmas week
    The view through a car window of a rainy LA; there are water drops on the glass, four windblown palm trees are silhouetted against a grey sky, and the Chase sign on a bank building glows white and blue in the eerie light.
    Heavy rain in Marina Del Rey a few years back.

    Topline:

    The National Weather Service is now forecasting major rainfall for the week of Christmas in L.A. and Ventura counties.

    Storm duration: The heaviest rain is expected to arrive late Tuesday night into Wednesday day. Less intense rain is expected to stick around through Christmas until Saturday, according to the weather service.

    A map with different areas denoted in orange and red, indicating rain fall levels.
    Rainfall total from the storm arriving Christmas week, according to the National Weather Service on Saturday.
    (
    Courtesy National Weather Service
    )

    How much rain? In all, about  4 to 6 inches of rain is expected for the coast and valleys in L.A. and Ventura counties from the storm, and between 6 to 12 inches for the foothills and mountains.

    Impact: "We could see significant and damaging mudslides and rock slides. We could see flooded freeways and closures," said David Gomberg, lead forecaster at NOAA in a weather briefing on Saturday.

    Winds: Damaging winds are also in the forecast, particularly between Tuesday night and Wednesday  in the mountains and foothills, Gomberg said, potentially resulting in  downed trees and power outages.

  • Sponsored message
  • Judge blocks homelessness changes, rebukes agency
    A large concrete building behind some green trees with a sign on the front that says "Department of Housing and Urban Development"
    The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development faces legal challenges over proposed major changes to homelessness funding.

    Topline:

    The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development cannot impose dramatically different conditions for homelessness programs for now, according to an oral ruling Friday by U.S. District Judge Mary McElroy in Rhode Island.

    Why it matters: McElroy granted a preliminary injunction to a group of states, cities and nonprofits who said a last minute overhaul of how to spend $4 billion on homelessness programs was unlawful. She also agreed with their argument that it likely would push many people back onto the streets in the middle of winter, causing irreparable harm.

    The backstory: HUD has sought to dramatically slash funding for permanent housing and encourage more transitional housing that mandates work and treatment for addiction or mental illness. The overhaul – announced last month — also would allow the agency to deny money to local groups that don't comply with the Trump administration's agenda on things like DEI, the restriction of transgender rights and immigration enforcement.

    Read on ... for more on the legal battle over HUD changes.

    The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development cannot impose dramatically different conditions for homelessness programs for now, according to an oral ruling Friday by U.S. District Judge Mary McElroy in Rhode Island.

    McElroy granted a preliminary injunction to a group of states, cities and nonprofits who said a last minute overhaul of how to spend $4 billion on homelessness programs was unlawful. She also agreed with their argument that it likely would push many people back onto the streets in the middle of winter, causing irreparable harm.

    "Continuity of housing and stability for vulnerable populations is clearly in the public interest," said McElroy, ordering HUD to maintain its previous funding formula.

    The National Alliance to End Homelessness, one of the plaintiffs, said in a statement the order "means that more than 170,000 people – families, seniors, veterans, and people with disabilities — have respite from the government's assault."

    HUD has sought to dramatically slash funding for permanent housing and encourage more transitional housing that mandates work and treatment for addiction or mental illness. The overhaul — announced last month — also would allow the agency to deny money to local groups that don't comply with the Trump administration's agenda on things like DEI, the restriction of transgender rights and immigration enforcement.

    "HUD will continue working to provide homelessness assistance funding to grantees nationwide," said HUD spokeswoman Kasey Lovett in a statement to NPR. "The Department remains committed to program reforms intended to assist our nation's most vulnerable citizens and will continue to do so in accordance with the law."

    'Chaos seems to be the point'

    McElroy expressed frustration with a series of HUD actions in recent weeks. Just hours before a Dec. 8 hearing, the agency withdrew its new funding notice, saying it would make changes to address critics' concerns. But on Friday, HUD's attorney said the new version would not be ready until the end of the day.

    "The timing seems to be strategic," McElroy said, asserting there was no reason the document could not have been ready before the hearing. "The constant churn and chaos seems to be the point."

    In defending the agency, attorney John Bailey said HUD was simply trying to change its policies to reflect President Donald Trump's executive orders, which he called "legal directives." The judge interjected repeatedly to explain that he was conflating things, noting Congress — not the president — makes laws.

    'It's kind of shocking'

    HUD's changes were announced in November with little notice and only weeks before local homeless service providers must apply for new funding.

    "Our agencies are just scrambling right now to try to respond," said Pam Johnson with Minnesota Community Action Partnership, whose members provide housing and other services for homeless people. "It also just reverses 40 years of bipartisan work on proven solutions to homelessness. So it's really, it's kind of shocking."

    For decades, U.S. policy favored permanent housing with optional treatment for addiction or mental illness Years of research has found the strategy is effective at keeping people off the streets.

    But many conservatives argue it's failed to stop record rates of homelessness.

    "What is the root cause of homelessness? Mental illness, drug addiction, drug abuse," HUD Secretary Scottt Turner said recently on Fox Business Network. "During the Biden administration, it was just warehousing. It was a homeless industrial complex."

    Turner and others who support the changes say the goal is to push people towards self-sufficiency.

    But local advocates say mental health and substance abuse are not the main factors driving homelessness.

    "It's poverty. Poverty, low income and significant lack of affordable housing," says Julie Embree, who heads the Toledo Lucas County Homelessness Board in Ohio.

    Many in permanent housing have disabilities that make it hard to work full time, she said. Embree agrees with Trump administration goals like efficiency and saving money, but says pushing people back into homelessness, where they're more likely to land in jail, the courts or a hospital, is not cost-effective.

    "One emergency room visit is just as expensive as a month of sustaining this [permanent housing] program," she said.

    In Los Angeles, Stephanie Klasky-Gamer with LA Family Housing said there is a need for more transitional housing, but not at the expense of long-term housing. And the idea that programs could simply switch from one to the other is not only unrealistic, it's illegal.

    "You cannot take a building that has a 75-year deed restriction and just — ding! — call it interim housing," she said.

    Those challenging HUD say providers who own such properties – or states who've invested millions of dollars in permanent housing projects — face "significant financial jeopardy" if their funding is not renewed.

    In addition to the legal challenges, members of Congress from both parties have questioned HUD's sudden shift on homelessness. Advocates have lobbied lawmakers to step in and, at the least, push for more time to prepare for such a massive overhaul.

  • Trump reaches agreements with drugmakers
    an older man in a dark blue suit with a red tie stands at a microphone and talks while two men and a woman in suits stand behind him and watch
    President Donald Trump unveiled deals with nine pharmaceutical companies on drug prices in a White House event Friday.

    Topline:

    President Donald Trump said the administration has reached agreements with nine more drugmakers to bring their U.S. drug prices more in line with what other wealthy countries pay.

    Why it matters: Fourteen companies in total have now reached what the administration calls most-favored-nation pricing deals. They agreed to charge the U.S. government no more for new drugs than the prices paid by other well-off countries. The agreements will allow state Medicaid programs to access lower prices from the nine new companies.

    Read on ... for more on the administration's work to bring down prescription drug prices.

    President Donald Trump said the administration has reached agreements with nine more drugmakers to bring their U.S. drug prices more in line with what other wealthy countries pay.

    Fourteen companies in total have now reached what the administration calls most-favored-nation pricing deals. The companies that took part in Friday's announcement were: Amgen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Genentech, Gilead Sciences, GSK, Merck, Novartis and Sanofi.

    They agreed to charge the U.S. government no more for new drugs than the prices paid by other well-off countries. The agreements will allow state Medicaid programs to access lower prices from the nine companies. In a statement, the White House said the change will result "in billions of dollars in savings."

    The drugmakers also agreed to invest at least $150 billion in manufacturing operations in the U.S. The president is seeking to increase domestic production of pharmaceuticals.

    In addition, the companies agreed to make some of their most popular drugs available at lower prices to consumers who pay out of pocket through a government website called TrumpRx.com. The TrumpRx website is expected to launch in early 2026, and would take consumers to pharmaceutical companies' direct-to-consumer websites to fulfill orders.

    For example, Merck will reduce the price of Januvia, a medication for Type 2 diabetes, from $330 to $100 for patients purchasing directly through TrumpRx, the White House said. Amgen will reduce the price of Repatha, a cholesterol-lowering drug, from $573 to $239 when purchased through TrumpRx.

    In exchange for these concessions, the companies will be exempt from possible administration tariffs for three years.

    The extent of savings for consumers under the agreements is unclear. Medicaid and its beneficiaries already pay some of the lowest prices for drugs. And people with health insurance could spend less on copays for their medicines than paying cash for them through the drugmakers.

    Separately, Trump said during the press event that he would like to get health insurers to lower their prices, too.

    "I'm going to call a meeting of the insurance companies," he said. "I'm going to see if they [will] get their price down, to put it very bluntly."

  • New leader has strong gender, abortion opinions
    a red-headed woman in a black suit jacket stands and speaks at a microphone
    Bethany Kozma speaks to a U.N. meeting in September 2025. She has just been named to lead the Department of Health and Human Services Office of Global Affairs — a job known as the "diplomatic voice" of HHS.
    Topline:
    America's new top health diplomat is Bethany Kozma. The job she took on this week — leading the Department of Health and Human Services Office of Global Affairs — does not have a high profile. And Kozma herself is not a familiar name in the world of public health.

    Why it matters: But it is a position with power — and Kozma has a record of public statements and activism on health issues, equating abortion with "murder" and campaigning against gender-affirming care.

    What is the job? The office is sometimes referred to as the "diplomatic voice" of HHS. As director, Kozma will have considerable influence over how the U.S. shapes health policy in other countries in the wake of the Trump administration's foreign aid cuts and withdrawal from the World Health Organization.

    Read on ... for more on Kozma's position on a number of controversial issues.

    America's new top health diplomat is Bethany Kozma.

    The job she took on this week — leading the Department of Health and Human Services Office of Global Affairs — does not have a high profile. And Kozma herself is not a familiar name in the world of public health.

    But it is a position with power — and Kozma has a record of public statements and activism on health issues, equating abortion with "murder" and campaigning against gender-affirming care.

    The office sometimes is referred to as the "diplomatic voice" of HHS. As director, Kozma will have considerable influence over how the U.S. shapes health policy in other countries in the wake of the Trump administration's foreign aid cuts and withdrawal from the World Health Organization.

    Kozma declined to be interviewed for this story. She doesn't appear to have a background in global health based on publicly available information online. The HHS website offers few details about her professional profile. In response to questions about her qualifications and vision for the role, HHS responded with this statement.

    "The Office of Global Affairs (OGA) advances the Trump administration's agenda and priorities by bringing common sense, transparency and gold-standard science to global partners. Under Secretary Kennedy's leadership, OGA is committed to strengthening the United States' position as the global gold-standard for public health and ensuring Americans are protected at home and abroad."

    Who is Bethany Kozma?

    Kozma began her career in public service during the George W. Bush administration, working at the White House Homeland Security Council. During the Obama years, she re-entered public life as an activist.

    In a 2016 commentary for The Daily Signal, a conservative news website founded by the Heritage Foundation, she argued against the Obama administration's guidance that public schools should allow children to use the bathroom that comports with their identity.

    "This radical agenda of subjective 'gender fluidity' and unrestricted shower and bathroom access actually endangers all," she stated, noting that "predators" could abuse the policy.

    In 2017, she joined the Trump administration as senior adviser for Gender Equality and Women's Empowerment in the United States Agency for International Development, eventually being promoted to deputy chief of staff. In videos obtained and released by ProPublica, Kozma recalls calling the U.S. a "pro-life" country in a closed-door U.N. meeting about women's rights in 2018, when access to abortion still was protected nationally by Roe v. Wade.

    In August 2020, Sen. Chris Coons, D-Del., and four other Democratic senators issued a letter labeling Kozma and several other political appointees at USAID as "prejudiced" and called for them to be removed from their posts. Kozma has "spoken extensively and derisively of trans people and trans issues," the senators wrote.

    During the Biden administration, she also was involved in Project 2025, the Heritage Foundation's "blueprint" for a new Republican administration. She played a prominent role in Project 2025 training videos, obtained and published by ProPublica.

    In one nearly 50-minute training video focused on left-wing language, she called for a Republican administration to "eradicate 'climate change' references from absolutely everywhere," and said that concerns over climate change are efforts at "population control." She also called gender-affirming care "absolutely infuriating" and said "the idea that gender is fluid is evil." Overall, she argued that changing language around these policies should be a priority for political appointees.

    Kozma joined the second Trump administration as a chief adviser at the HHS Office of Global Affairs. In September, she spoke at a U.N. event commemorating the 30th anniversary of the declaration that denying women's rights is a human rights violation.

    "While many may celebrate so-called successes gained for women over the last 30 years, one must ask what defines true success for women?" she began, adding that "biological reality is rooted in scientific truth and is confirmed by the universal truths that we are endowed by our creator who made us 'male and female.'"

    Those views can be divisive but have garnered some support for Kozma's promotion.

    "Bethany is an excellent pick for global affairs at HHS," says Roger Servino, vice president of domestic policy at The Heritage Foundation. "She was an early champion of protecting children from gender ideology back when the medical establishment was able to silence voices of reason and dissent and she is perfectly placed to help push back on global health bodies trying to impose left wing pseudoscience on the American people and the world."

    What will her goals be at the Office of Global Affairs?

    Kozma is taking over as director of the HHS Office of Global Affairs at a time of drastic change for global health.

    In previous administrations, a main focus of the office was dealing with the World Health Organization. Typically, the director, who usually has a background in public health, is involved in negotiations on sharing data for pathogen surveillance or developing vaccine policy, for example.

    After President Trump withdrew the U.S. from WHO, the administration has started a new strategy: striking deals with individual countries to give health aid in exchange for their meeting certain policy prescriptions. Kozma has been involved in some of those negotiations, but the details aren't quite finalized.

    Some reproductive rights advocates believe Kozma will use her new position to insert anti-abortion and anti-LGBTQ policies into these agreements.

    "[Kozma] is vehemently anti-trans, anti-LGBTQI+, anti-abortion," says Keifer Buckingham, managing director at the Council on Global Equality, a coalition of advocacy organizations that focuses on LGBTQ issues. "For those of us who want to ensure that the provision of U.S. foreign assistance and health doesn't discriminate against people based on who they are, [Kozma's appointment] raises a lot of red flags."

    One particular worry is about the Helms Amendment, a U.S. policy that prohibits foreign aid being used to fund abortion services.

    "There's been speculation that there's an intention by the U.S. government to expand the Helms Amendment beyond abortion to include LGBTQ's as well," says Musoba Kitui, director of Ipas Africa Alliance, a non-profit that works to provide access to abortion and contraception. He's concerned that health groups that serve those populations could lose funding. That speculation is backed up by reporting from The Daily Signal that the administration is planning to prohibit U.S. aid funding for "gender ideology and diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives."

    Given LGBTQ people are often at higher risk for diseases like HIV, such policies could make these communities even more vulnerable, says Kitui.

    "We could see more marginalization, inequality, spikes of infection," he says. While many African governments signing these deals understand those dynamics, Kitui says they may still agree to more restrictive conditions as aid cuts have "starved health systems to a point of desperation."

    Have information you want to share about ongoing changes at federal health and development agencies? Reach out to Jonathan Lambert via encrypted communications on Signal: @jonlambert.12