Sponsored message
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

The Brief

The most important stories for you to know today
  • County supervisors respond to report on LA fires
    A woman wearing black listens to a man in uniform who is speaking to her and gesturing.
    L.A. County Supervisor Kathryn Barger and county Fire Chief Anthony Marrone in January.

    Topline:

    The L.A. County Board of Supervisors voted Tuesday to implement a set of recommendations aimed at improving emergency alerts and evacuations in the aftermath of January’s megafires. In a 5-0 vote, the board also directed the county chief executive to look into restructuring the Office of Emergency Management, one of the report’s key recommendations.

    The context: In a lengthy and at times tense meeting, the supervisors heard the results of a so-called after-action report, which was released last week and laid out a number of failures during the devastating fires. The report highlights fragmented communication with the public, antiquated and ineffective technology and severe understaffing in the county's Office of Emergency Management. Those failures — combined with historically strong winds in a region that hadn’t seen significant rain in about eight months — were magnified by multiple simultaneous fires that stretched overtaxed agencies, the report said.

    The cost: Supervisor Holly Mitchell questioned how the county should prioritize the laundry list of costly changes the report calls for. "What must be done first?" Mitchell asked. "Because none of this will be free."

    Read on ... to learn why supervisors were frustrated with some parts of the report and what they are planning for the Office of Emergency Management.

    The L.A. County Board of Supervisors voted Tuesday to implement a set of recommendations aimed at improving emergency alerts and evacuations in the aftermath of January’s megafires.

    In a lengthy and at times tense meeting, the supervisors heard the results of a so-called after-action report, which was released last week and laid out a number of failures during the devastating fires. The report highlights fragmented communication with the public, antiquated and ineffective technology and severe understaffing in the county's Office of Emergency Management. Those failures — combined with historically strong winds in a region that hadn’t seen significant rain in about eight months — were magnified by multiple simultaneous fires that stretched overtaxed agencies, the report said.

    In a 5-0 vote, the board also directed the county chief executive to look into restructuring the Office of Emergency Management, one of the report’s key recommendations.

    "The Eaton and Palisades Fires were not isolated events — they were harbingers of a new era of climate-driven disasters," the motion from supervisors Kathryn Barger and Lindsey Horvath reads in part. "Los Angeles County must act now to modernize its emergency infrastructure."

    The meeting offered a replay of the county's response in the hours and days after the fires that sparked Jan. 7. Consultants with the McChrystal Group, the contractor tasked by the county to produce the report, presented timelapse maps of the spread of both fires and the corresponding evacuation zones.

    The county sheriff and fire chief also addressed the board, painting a picture of agencies desperately in need of updated equipment and better communication to address L.A.'s next big disaster.

    Supervisor Holly Mitchell questioned how the county should prioritize the laundry list of costly changes the report calls for.

    "What must be done first?" Mitchell asked. "Because none of this will be free."

    Several other after-action reports, which typically come with lengthy lists of recommendations, are also in the works, supervisors heard Tuesday. Those reports’ topics will include evacuations of people with disabilities, as well as recovery and repopulation; plus state reports with detailed timelines of the fires and a comprehensive review of the response.

    Here are three big takeaways from Tuesday’s meeting...

    A new county department for emergencies?

    The board's motion focuses specifically on the Office of Emergency Management, which currently runs out of the county CEO's office. OEM, as it is known, is responsible for planning for and responding to emergencies in the county, but it has a staff of just 37 people and no operating budget, according to the after-action report.

    San Diego County has 43 employees in a similar role, according to a comparison in the report. New York City has more than 200.

    The after-action report called L.A. County's emergency preparedness staffing “fundamentally inadequate" for its "complex emergency management needs.”

    The supervisors' motion directs the county CEO to produce a report on how to restructure OEM as its own county department, akin to the Fire Department or the new Department of Homeless Services and Housing — and how to pay for it.

    Holes in the report

    The 132-page report ran through the county's emergency response protocols and holes in its systems, but it was missing input from non-county agencies that helped with the fire response.

    The report's authors interviewed several county agencies, but other key agencies that were involved in fire response declined to participate, including the Los Angeles police and fire departments, the fire departments of Pasadena and Sierra Madre, the Federal Communications Commission and the Federal Emergency Management Agency.

    Erin Sutton, a partner with McChrystal Group, told the supervisors Tuesday that lack of participation limited the scope of the report.

    "We have very one-sided information," Sutton said.

    Barger and Horvath, who represent the districts affected by the Eaton and Palisades fires, were frustrated by that.

    "I am incredibly disappointed," Barger said, noting that the report was supposed to be a blueprint for the county. "I feel that this report then is lacking in areas that would provide maybe answers to some of these questions."

    Horvath also questioned why the report didn't include mention of false alerts sent out during the fires.

    Sutton pointed to an investigation produced in May by U.S. Rep. Robert Garcia. That report found that the alert sent to nearly 10 million people across L.A. County on Jan. 9 was the result of a technological glitch.

    Horvath also criticized the McChrystal Group’s report for leaving out personal accounts of fire survivors.

    Questions remain about west Altadena

    Fire survivors told the supervisors Tuesday that they still need answers and accountability for what happened in west Altadena, where 18 out of 19 Eaton Fire deaths occurred.

    According to the report, there was a validated report of fire in west Altadena as early as 12:55 a.m on Jan. 8. L.A. County Fire personnel reported that the fire appeared to be moving west across Lake Avenue at 2:18 a.m. But evacuation orders in west Altadena weren't issued until 3:25 a.m., according to the report.

    "That took time," county Fire Chief Anthony Marrone told the supervisors, "probably too much time in retrospect."

    What’s next

    The supervisors set rolling deadlines for the county CEO’s reports on the restructuring of the Office of Emergency Management, the first being in 60 days. That puts the initial reports back to the board into late November.

  • Health secretary has broken many of them
    A man with white hair wearing a grey suit and blue ties speaks into a microphone. He is holding his left hand up, standing at a podium with a blurred painting in the background.
    Secretary of Health and Human Services, Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., speaks during an event.

    Topline:

    One year after taking charge of the nation’s health department, Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. hasn’t held true to many of the promises he made while appealing to U.S. senators concerned about the longtime anti-vaccine activist’s plans for the nation’s care.

    The backstory: Kennedy squeaked through a narrow Senate vote to be confirmed as head of the Department of Health and Human Services, only after making a number of public and private guarantees about how he would handle vaccine funding and recommendations as secretary.

    The childhood vaccine schedule: Last month, the CDC removed its universal recommendations for children to receive seven immunizations, those protecting against respiratory syncytial virus, meningococcal disease, flu, covid, hepatitis A, hepatitis B, and rotavirus. The move followed a memorandum from the White House calling on the CDC to cull the schedule.

    Read on... for more about RFK Jr.

    One year after taking charge of the nation’s health department, Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. hasn’t held true to many of the promises he made while appealing to U.S. senators concerned about the longtime anti-vaccine activist’s plans for the nation’s care.

    Kennedy squeaked through a narrow Senate vote to be confirmed as head of the Department of Health and Human Services, only after making a number of public and private guarantees about how he would handle vaccine funding and recommendations as secretary.

    Here’s a look at some of the promises Kennedy made during his confirmation process.

    The childhood vaccine schedule

    In two hearings in January 2025, Kennedy repeatedly assured senators that he supported childhood vaccines, noting that all his children were vaccinated.

    Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) grilled Kennedy about the money he’s made in the private sector from lawsuits against vaccine makers and accused him of planning to profit from potential future policies making it easier to sue.

    “Kennedy can kill off access to vaccines and make millions of dollars while he does it,” Warren said during the Senate Finance Committee hearing. “Kids might die, but Robert Kennedy can keep cashing in.”

    Warren’s statement prompted an assurance by Kennedy.

    “Senator, I support vaccines,” he said. “I support the childhood schedule. I will do that.”

    Days later, Sen. Bill Cassidy of Louisiana, chair of the Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee, declared Kennedy had pledged to maintain existing vaccine recommendations if confirmed. Cassidy, a physician specializing in liver diseases and a vocal supporter of vaccination, had questioned Kennedy sharply in a hearing about his views on shots.

    “If confirmed, he will maintain the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices’ recommendations without changes,” Cassidy said during a speech on the Senate floor explaining his vote for Kennedy.

    A few months after he was confirmed, Kennedy fired all the incumbent members of the vaccine advisory panel, known as ACIP, and appointed new members, including several who, like him, oppose some vaccines. The panel’s recommendations soon changed drastically.

    Last month, the CDC removed its universal recommendations for children to receive seven immunizations, those protecting against respiratory syncytial virus, meningococcal disease, flu, covid, hepatitis A, hepatitis B, and rotavirus. The move followed a memorandum from the White House calling on the CDC to cull the schedule.

    Now, those vaccines, which researchers estimate have prevented thousands of deaths and millions of illnesses, are recommended by the CDC only for children at high-risk of serious illness or after consultation between doctors and parents.

    In response to questions about Kennedy’s actions on vaccines over the past year, HHS spokesperson Andrew Nixon said the secretary “continues to follow through on his commitments” to Cassidy.

    “As part of those commitments, HHS accepted Chairman Cassidy’s numerous recommendations for key roles at the agency, retained particular language on the CDC website, and adopted ACIP recommendations,” Nixon added. “Secretary Kennedy talks to the chairman at a regular clip.”

    Cassidy and his office have repeatedly rebuffed questions about whether Kennedy, since becoming secretary, has broken the commitments he made to the senator.

    Vaccine funding axed

    Weeks after Kennedy took over the federal health department, the CDC pulled back $11 billion in covid-era grants that local health departments were using to fund vaccination programs, among other initiatives.

    That happened after Kennedy pledged during his confirmation hearings not to undermine vaccine funding.

    Kennedy replied “Yes” when Cassidy asked him directly: “Do you commit that you will not work to impound, divert, or otherwise reduce any funding appropriated by Congress for the purpose of vaccination programs?”

    A federal judge later ordered HHS to distribute the money.

    The National Institutes of Health, part of HHS, also yanked dozens of research grants supporting studies of vaccine hesitancy last year. Kennedy, meanwhile, ordered the cancellation of a half-billion dollars’ worth of mRNA vaccine research in August.

    A discredited theory about autism

    Cassidy said in his floor speech that he received a guarantee from Kennedy that the CDC’s website would not remove statements explaining that vaccines do not cause autism.

    Technically, Kennedy kept his promise not to remove the statements. The website still says that vaccines do not cause autism.

    But late last year, new statements sprung up on the same webpage, baselessly casting doubt on vaccine safety. “The claim ‘vaccines do not cause autism’ is not an evidence-based claim because studies have not ruled out the possibility that infant vaccines cause autism,” the page on autism now misleadingly reads.

    The webpage also states that the public has largely ignored studies showing vaccines do cause autism.

    That is false. Over decades of research, scientific studies have repeatedly concluded that there is no link between vaccines and autism.

    A controversial 1998 study that captured global attention did link the measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine to autism. It was retracted for being fraudulent — though not until a decade after it was published, during which there were sharp declines in U.S. vaccination rates.

    KFF Health News is a national newsroom that produces in-depth journalism about health issues and is one of the core operating programs at KFF—an independent source of health policy research, polling, and journalism. Learn more about KFF.

    This article first appeared on KFF Health News and is republished here under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

  • 11 ways to celebrate in LA
    A young woman smiles as she holds two bouquets of flowers with more bouquets around her near a street.
    Celeste Lopez traveled from Maywood to sell flowers in Boyle Heights for Valentine's Day, May 12, 2024.

    Topline:

    Looking for more last-minute plans for Valentine’s weekend? Here’s a list of the 11 best V-Day events happening in Los Angeles.

    A local bakery: Valentine’s Day is here, and in Highland Park, that means Delicias Bakery & Some is transforming from a family-owned panadería into an intimate evening restaurant for the weekend. This is the second year Delicias will host a Valentine’s event as part of its “Moodnight” series.

    Pucca x Garu Valentine’s: A massive pop-up featuring 50+ vendors, themed flash tattoos, matcha, and handmade goods at the Galleria Mall.

    Read on... for more events happening in L.A.

    This story was originally published by The LA Local on Feb. 12, 2026.

    Valentine’s Day is here, and in Highland Park, that means Delicias Bakery & Some is transforming from a family-owned panadería into an intimate evening restaurant for the weekend.

    This is the second year Delicias will host a Valentine’s event as part of its “Moodnight” series.

    “Our customers are family, and we wanted to create a safe, welcoming place for people to gather at night, unwind, and enjoy fellowship, great food and music,” Matthew Rivera, an event organizer and Delicias’ business partner, told The LA Local.

    Delicias has been operating since 1991, offering Mexican recipes from pan dulce and breakfast burritos to aguas frescas and coffee.

    It is run by sisters Emily and Roxanne Sanchez. Delicias began hosting evening events in partnership with FAMI Goods in 2025.

    “Moodnight” transforms the bakery into a social hub for the Northeast Los Angeles community.

    The first event is Friday, Feb. 13, for Galentine’s Day, when Delicias will host “Lovers x Friends,” an after-hours dinner featuring house-made pizzas for two and music inspired by Outkast’s The Love Below.

    Rivera called it “a celebratory event for friendship, filled with high energy and an upbeat atmosphere.”

    On Saturday, Feb. 14, Delicias is splitting Valentine’s Day into two events.

    During the day, there will be bouquets and portraits, along with brunch featuring chilaquiles and raspberry compote waffles.

    At night, the bakery will offer a candlelit dinner with specialty pizzas and a café de olla brownie sundae for dessert.

    “Moodnight transitions into a more intimate, sultry atmosphere with R&B jams playing throughout the night,” Anisha Sisodia, Delicias’ creative director said.

    Heart-shaped conchas will also be available for takeout over the weekend. “[It’s] a glimpse of what Moodnight will continue to bring to the community throughout the year,” Sisodia added.

    Looking for more last-minute plans for Valentine’s weekend? Here’s a list of the 11 best V-Day events happening in Los Angeles.

    Six posters are displayed on a window. The posters show people holding heart-shaped concha pan dulce and a box displaying the Mexican sweet bread with text that read "Delicias presents Valentine's Heart Conchas."
    A poster for Valentine’s Day outside Delicias in Highland Park.
    (
    Cristabell Fierros
    /
    The LA Local
    )

    No. 11: Galentine’s Edition at Wallflower Market

    Where: San Fernando Valley | 5275 Craner Ave. (Lawless Brewery)
    When: Friday, Feb 13 | 5 p.m.– 10 p.m.
    The Vibe: Enjoy flash tattoos, DIY embroidery, food trucks and “portraits with your furry friend” at this Friday night market.
    More info here

    No. 10: Bloodline Group Show at Superchief Gallery

    Where: Historic South Central | 1965 S. Los Angeles St.
    When: Friday, Feb 13 | 7 p.m.– 11 p.m.
    The Vibe: Kick off the weekend with a Valentine-inspired fashion show celebrating self-expression. V-Day attire is highly encouraged.
    More info here

    No. 9: Pucca x Garu Valentine’s at Little Tokyo Galleria

    Where: Downtown LA | 333 S. Alameda St.
    When: Saturday, Feb 14 | 12 p.m.– 5 p.m.
    The Vibe: A massive pop-up featuring 50+ vendors, themed flash tattoos, matcha, and handmade goods at the Galleria Mall.
    More info here

    No. 8: V-Day Live Band Karaoke at Alana’s Coffee

    Where: Mar Vista | 12511 Venice Blvd.
    When: Saturday, Feb 14 | 7 p.m.
    The Vibe: Wind down with some coffee and sing your heart out with a live band at this vibey Mar Vista spot.
    More info here

    No. 7: Frogtown Heart Walk Love + Art

    Where: Frogtown | 2479 Fletcher Dr.
    When: Saturday, Feb 14 | 12 p.m.– 5 p.m.
    The Vibe: Celebrate by the LA River with live music, arts and crafts, fresh bouquets, and local vendors.
    More info here

    No. 6: I Love Everything East LA Festival

    Where: East LA | 4801 E. 3rd St. (East LA Civic Center)
    When: Saturday, Feb 14 | 10 a.m.– 4 p.m.
    The Vibe: A free community festival packed with activities, food trucks, live music, and a fashion show.
    More info here

    No. 5: Valentine’s Singles Party at El Condor

    Where: Silver Lake | 3701 Sunset Blvd.
    When: Saturday, Feb 14 | 8 p.m.– 12 AM
    The Vibe: A night for the single folk,s featuring live music and pop-up speed dating in the heart of Silver Lake.
    More info here

    No. 4: Galentine’s Day at Common Space

    Where: South Bay | 3411 W. El Segundo Blvd., Hawthorne
    When: Saturday, Feb 14 | 1 p.m.– 6 p.m.
    The Vibe: Head to the taproom for a pressed flower workshop, tarot readings, local food, and drinks.
    More info here

    No. 3: Love Notes at Gloria Molina Grand Park

    Where: Downtown LA | 200 N. Grand Ave.
    When: Saturday, Feb 14 | 3 p.m.– 7 p.m.
    The Vibe: A free, family-friendly celebration featuring music, screen-printing, and radio dedications, followed by a drone light show.
    More info here

    No. 2: Valentine’s Brunch at Homegirl Cafe

    Where: Chinatown | 130 W. Bruno St.
    When: Saturday, Feb 14 | 9 a.m.– 2 p.m.
    The Vibe: Homeboy Industries’ “Second Saturday” is hosting a community brunch. No reservations are needed — just show up and enjoy.
    More info here

    No. 1: Moodnight at Delicias

    Where: Highland Park | 5567 N Figueroa St.
    When: Saturday, Feb 13, Feb. 14 | 6 p.m. – 10 p.m.
    The Vibe: At night, the bakery will offer a candlelit dinner with specialty pizzas and a café de olla brownie sundae for dessert.
    More info here

  • CA files suit on Ed Dept's threat to hold funds
    A crowd of people in attendance in a meeting in a medium sized room. Many hold signs, including some that read "Let them teach," "OUSDrecall.com," and "We don't need you to tell us who our kids are!"
    Packed crowd anticipates discussion on Orange Unified Parental Notification Policy on Sept. 8, 2023.

    Topline:

    California filed a lawsuit this week challenging the U.S. Department of Education’s threat to withhold funding over the state’s policy on gender identity disclosure.

    More details: California Attorney General Rob Bonta asked the Northern District of California Court on Wednesday for a temporary restraining order against “an unconstitutional attempt to impose new conditions on $4.9 billion in federal education funding,” according to a statement from Bonta’s office.

    The backstory: At issue is whether school staff should notify parents if they believe their child may be transgender or gender-nonconforming. California and LGBTQ+ advocates contend that policies requiring parental notification may forcibly “out” transgender students to their parents against their will. But the Trump administration and conservatives have portrayed the state’s stance as an attack on parents’ rights.

    Read on... for more on the lawsuit.

    California filed a lawsuit this week challenging the U.S. Department of Education’s threat to withhold funding over the state’s policy on gender identity disclosure.

    California Attorney General Rob Bonta asked the Northern District of California Court on Wednesday for a temporary restraining order against “an unconstitutional attempt to impose new conditions on $4.9 billion in federal education funding,” according to a statement from Bonta’s office.

    “We will not stand by as U.S. ED uses baseless claims to attack crucial education funding,” Bonta said. “We will continue to fight to protect California’s schools and students from unfair attacks and work to ensure a discrimination-free educational environment for all students.”

    At issue is whether school staff should notify parents if they believe their child may be transgender or gender-nonconforming. California and LGBTQ+ advocates contend that policies requiring parental notification may forcibly “out” transgender students to their parents against their will. But the Trump administration and conservatives have portrayed the state’s stance as an attack on parents’ rights.

    “Parents are the most natural protectors of their children. Yet many states and school districts have enacted policies that imply students need protection from their parents,” said U.S. Secretary of Education Linda McMahon in a statement on Jan. 28.

    Last month, McMahon claimed its investigation found that the California Department of Education “abused its authority by pressuring school officials to withhold information about students’ so-called ‘gender transitions’ from their parents.”

    Assembly Bill 1955, a 2024 state law, prohibits school boards from passing resolutions that require teachers and school staff to notify parents if they believe a child is transgender or gender-nonconforming. It was passed in the wake of decisions by several school boards to require that parents be notified. In one high-profile incident, State Superintendent Tony Thurmond was ousted from a school board meeting in Chino Valley for speaking against a parental notification policy that the board later passed.

    Last March, the U.S. Department of Education’s Student Privacy Policy Office opened an investigation into whether the California Department of Education’s policies violated federal privacy laws. That includes the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act, known as FERPA, which grants parents the right to request and review their children’s educational records until they turn 18.

    The investigation found that California “put districts in a position of having to choose between complying with FERPA or getting sued by the State.” The investigation report noted that CDE “coerces school districts to withhold information about students’ gender identity.”

    Bonta disputes this interpretation of FERPA, stating that the law only requires disclosure of education records, not general information. The lawsuit states that CDE has issued guidance to districts clarifying that parents have the right to request their children’s education records under FERPA, even if those records contain information about a student’s sexual orientation, gender identity or gender expression.

    The suit states that the Trump administration has “failed to demonstrate even a single violation of FERPA” and that the focus on the investigation appears to be “motivated by discriminatory animus against transgender people, including transgender students.”

    “This is a flagrant attempt by the U.S. Department of Education to intimidate the California Department of Education and California’s local education agencies under the guise of enforcing FERPA,” said Bonta in a statement.

    The CDE released guidance regarding FERPA on Wednesday in a letter to public school agencies. It outlines the exceptions to what is included in education records, including personal staff notes, law enforcement records, employee records and records by medical or mental health professionals for students at least 18 years old.

    This isn’t the only legal battle California is involved in regarding parental notification. Two Escondido Union School District teachers filed a lawsuit in 2023, claiming that state and district policies preventing the “outing” of transgender students violated their constitutional free speech and religious rights. Last month, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit blocked the order from a federal judge who sided with the teachers. Plaintiffs asked the U.S. Supreme Court to reinstate the federal judge’s ruling.

    EdSource is an independent nonprofit organization that provides analysis on key education issues facing California and the nation. LAist republishes articles from EdSource with permission.

  • LA advocates raise human rights concerns
    An empty and green soccer field is surrounded by empty stands. An electronic sign above the field reads "SoFi Stadium."
    SoFi Stadium in Inglewood is the Los Angeles venue for the FIFA World Cup 2026.

    Topline:

    The head of Immigration and Customs Enforcement this week addressed growing questions about the presence of ICE agents during World Cup games hosted in Los Angeles and other U.S. cities this summer.

    What he said: At a congressional hearing, Todd Lyons, the agency's head, said that ICE would play a key role in security for the tournament — but it's investigatory, not enforcement branch.

    Why now? Observers concerned about the combination of millions of international visitors and stepped up immigration enforcement in L.A. and other host cities, also point out that host cities have not released required human rights action plans.

    Read on... for what we know about the report and why advocates are worried.

    The head of Immigration and Customs Enforcement this week addressed growing questions about the presence of ICE agents during World Cup games hosted in Los Angeles and other U.S. cities this summer.

    Todd Lyons, the agency's head, said at a congressional hearing that ICE will play a key role in security for the tournament. But he said it would be ICE’s investigatory branch — not it's enforcement division.

    The answer did not satisfy Congressmember Nellie Pou (D-NJ) of New Jersey. Pou asked Lyons to publicly commit to ICE pausing operations at FIFA matches and related public events.

    "You realize that if they feel that they're going to be wrongfully incarcerated or wrongfully pulled out," Pou said of potential World Cup visitors. "That's going to hurt this entire process."

    Lyons responded: "ICE is dedicated to ensuring that everyone that visits the facilities will have a safe and secure event."

    Why it matters

    The exchange laid bare growing concerns from some lawmakers and community groups about the combination of millions of international visitors coming to the soccer spectacle and aggressive immigration enforcement in L.A. and other host cities.

    Kathryn Schloessman, L.A. host committee head, called the matter "above my pay grade" when asked to address concerns about potential ICE activity at FIFA's fan festival, which is scheduled for June 11 to 15.

    " We are working very closely with our public safety and security partners," Schloessman told LAist. "That's their job to make sure we're delivering a safe and secure event."

    Every host city committee including Los Angeles is supposed to release a "human rights action plan" ahead of the games. Those plans should outline how the host city is planning to protect freedom of expression and handle security and workers' rights.

    But those plans have not yet been finalized and made public, less than five month out. That has some critics ringing an alarm.

    " It's a very poor report card on turning in your homework for Los Angeles and all other host cities," said Minky Worden with Human Rights Watch.

    FIFA declined to comment on the status of the local reports. A spokesperson for the Los Angeles World Cup 2026 Host Committee said that the L.A. action plan is under review with community stakeholders.

    What we know about World Cup security

    The World Cup will be staged across Mexico, Canada and eleven U.S. cities including Los Angeles, where eight matches will take place at SoFi Stadium in Inglewood. The tournament is expected to attract up to 7 million international visitors to the U.S., and the federal government has allocated $625 million in funding for security tied to the event.

    At a briefing in December, Andrew Giuliani, the executive director for the White House's World Cup task force, told reporters that the Department of Homeland Security is "coordinating daily" with host cities on security for fan zones, stadiums and base camps — where athletes will train throughout the tournament.

    Homeland Security's leading role in security for an event as massive as the World Cup is standard procedure — the department is also taking the lead for the 2028 Olympics. What's less clear is exactly the part ICE will play.

    A man looks out of the frame and sits behind a microphone.
    Acting Director of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) Todd Lyons testifies during a House Homeland Security Committee hearing on Feb. 10, 2026 in Washington, DC.
    (
    Samuel Corum
    /
    Getty Images
    )

    What we know about ICE's role in security

    Lyons, the ICE leader who addressed Congress this week, said it would be the agency's Homeland Security Investigations that would take on a key role. That's the department's criminal investigation unit, which is separate from its "Enforcement and Removal Operations" branch that has been conducting escalated immigration sweeps across Los Angeles — and the nation — since June.

    That said, the federal government has not promised that immigration enforcement will stay away from the tournament.

    “International visitors who legally come to the United States for the World Cup have nothing to worry about," Tricia McLaughlin, Homeland Security spokesperson, told the Athletic. "What makes someone a target for immigration enforcement is whether or not they are illegally in the U.S. — full stop.”

    DHS did not respond to LAist's requests for more information on the role ICE specifically will play in World Cup security.

    Human rights concerns

    These open questions and the ongoing immigration raids have alarmed human rights advocates. A group of leading advocacy organizations in December called on FIFA and local host cities to commit to "ensuring effective protections against racial profiling, arbitrary detention, and unlawful immigration enforcement during the tournament."

    Jamil Dakwar, the ACLU's human rights director, pointed to the deployment of the National Guard in cities including Los Angeles last year.

    “The Trump administration has aggressively pursued a systematic anti-human rights campaign to target, detain, and disappear immigrants in communities across the US," he said in a statement. "We call on FIFA to honor its human rights commitments, not capitulate to Trump’s authoritarianism.”

    FIFA put out a Human Rights framework for the coming World Cup in 2024. That guide, outlining a focus on inclusivity, workers rights, and a grievance procedure for human rights concerns, is intended to be a structure for each host city's own human rights action plan.

    Details about the games in L.A.

    L.A. will be the first U.S. city to host a World Cup match. The U.S. Men's National Team will play its first game at SoFi Stadium in Inglewood on June 12, with a 6 p.m. kickoff.

    A fan festival at L.A. Memorial Coliseum June 11 to 15 is expected to attract huge crowds of revelers.