Sponsored message
Logged in as
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

The Brief

The most important stories for you to know today
  • Fire survivors wait on feds for an extension
    A partially built wooden structure stands among empty dirt lots. A few trees are peppered between the property lines.
    A house under construction in Altadena last year.

    Topline:

    Gov. Gavin Newsom announced Friday that he has requested a yearlong extension of FEMA funding for L.A. fire survivors. Without the extension, the money will run out July 9. Now the decision on FEMA support lies with the federal government.

    Why it matters: The funds have allowed many survivors to afford temporary housing and other daily needs.

    The backstory: Most survivors have yet to return home — 2 in 3 survivors who were living in Altadena or Pacific Palisades at the time of the fires are still displaced, according to the latest survey of more than 2,100 survivors by the nonprofit Department of Angels.

    Read on ... for more on why fire survivors are calling on the feds to extend the funding.

    Gov. Gavin Newsom announced Friday that he has requested a yearlong extension of FEMA funding for L.A. fire survivors. Without the extension, the money will run out July 9.

    Now the decision on FEMA support lies with the federal government.

    The funds have allowed many survivors to afford temporary housing and other daily needs. Most have yet to return home — 2 in 3 survivors who were living in Altadena or Pacific Palisades at the time of the fires are still displaced, according to the latest survey of more than 2,100 survivors by the nonprofit Department of Angels. Nearly 40% of respondents reported they will either soon run out of temporary housing insurance coverage or have already.

    The situation is particularly dire for low-income households: Nearly 80% of respondents making $50,000 or less said they didn’t think they could afford housing for three months once coverage ended.

    “The data is clear: This recovery is not over,” said Angela Giacchetti of the Department of Angels at a news conference organized by the Eaton Fire Collaborative in Altadena on Thursday. “If you are a survivor, you know this in your bones. For many families, it has barely begun. People have just begun to stabilize. We need federal support that reflects the scale of this disaster and systems that survivors can actually navigate and access over time.”

    FEMA assistance isn’t reaching most survivors

    The FEMA Individuals and Households Program can provide funding for survivors of disasters to pay for temporary housing, repair their homes, and respond to other challenges that insurance may not cover. It can also help cover costs if a survivor has no insurance.

    Gil Barel has been relying on FEMA funds to pay rent on a small back house for herself and her son for the last year. She said they still haven’t been able to return to their rent-controlled Pasadena apartment because of smoke damage, though she still has to pay the rent for it.

    A middle aged woman with light skin, brown straight shoulder length hair, wearing a black button up shortsleeved shirt looks at the camera in an indoor space.
    Gil Barel is paying rent on a smoke-damaged apartment in Pasadena while FEMA funds have helped her cut the cost of temporary housing.
    (
    Erin Stone
    /
    LAist
    )

    Barel doesn’t know what they’ll do if the FEMA funding runs out.

    “ I'm really stressed out,” she said. “I think I'm just kind of trying to put that thought aside and hope for the best.”

    But in the 15 months since the fires, most survivors have not accessed FEMA funding. About 60% have received no FEMA assistance beyond the initial $770 payments dispersed in the immediate aftermath of the fires, according to the Department of Angels survey.

    Many have faced denials, according to disaster case manager workers with Catholic Charities of L.A. and lawyers with Legal Aid Foundation of L.A.

    That’s the situation for Gayle Nicholls-Ali and her husband, Rasheed, who lost their Altadena home of 15 years in the Eaton Fire. They’ve relied on their insurance to pay for a rental in Montrose, but that’s rapidly running out. And because they have that insurance, FEMA has denied further support.

    An older man and woman with dark brown skin stand together. The man has long dreads and a green T-shirt. The woman wears light purple rimmed glasses and a black T-shirt and sweatshirt.
    Gayle Nicholls-Ali and her husband, Rasheed, lost their home in the Eaton Fire. They plan to rebuild, but the cost is a major hurdle.
    (
    Erin Stone
    /
    LAist
    )

    “A lot of our ALE [Additional Living Expenses insurance] is going to run out before we even are able to get into a house,” Nicholls-Ali said.

    Without FEMA or insurance support, they’ll have to find a way to pay rent on top of a mortgage. They also face a big gap in the cost of their rebuild versus how much their insurance covers. Nicholls-Ali said without the help of FEMA and other sources of funding, recovering feels further out of reach.

    Funds for long-term recovery still in limbo

    FEMA funding extensions have been routine in past disasters, including the 2023 wildfires in Hawaii and after devastating flooding in North Carolina in 2024.

    But the agency has faced significant cuts during the second Trump administration, and there are indications that disaster aid is becoming increasingly political. For example, President Donald Trump has approved aid for just 23% of requests from states with a Democratic governor and two Democratic senators, compared to 89% for states that with Republican governors and senators, according to an analysis by Politico.

    The state has also not received more than $33 billion for long-term recovery, which can help pay for infrastructure upgrades and repairs, as well as help rebuild schools, parks and homes. That money was requested by state and local leaders shortly after the January 2025 fires and hasn’t been appropriated by Congress.

  • Another lawsuit to block limits to mail in voting
    A stack of mail in ballots. They are white envelpes with a third of the envelope colored red on the left hand side. On the envelope is a return address and the word "vote!"

    Topline:

    Just days after the U.S. Supreme Court gave President Donald Trump a procedural win in his effort to limit mail-in voting, California Attorney General Rob Bonta announced a new lawsuit intended to protect the state’s power over how elections are administered.

    The lawsuit: California is able to sue despite the high court’s ruling because of developments that occurred after justices took up the previous case. The court majority this week essentially ruled that California sued too early over the executive order and it noted that the administration had not yet handed down formal rules that would affect voting. That changed late last week when the U.S. Postal Service issued final rules requiring states to turn over a list of eligible mail voters, redesign ballot envelopes with the Postal Service’s approval and include new tracking barcodes.

    USPS and Trump's order: Under the order, the Postal Service would not deliver ballots to voters who are not in a federal database the administration wants to build, and would not deliver ballots in states that do not comply with its rules. Bonta called the Postal Service rules a “clear violation of the Constitution,” which designates states as the primary authority over elections. Given its challenges in court, it is unclear whether the Postal Service’s new rule will affect the November elections.

    Just days after the U.S. Supreme Court gave President Donald Trump a procedural win in his effort to limit mail-in voting, California Attorney General Rob Bonta announced a new lawsuit intended to protect the state’s power over how elections are administered.

    The lawsuit, filed in federal court in Massachusetts on Wednesday, makes good on Gov. Gavin Newsom’s pledge to sue again over Trump’s mail-in voting executive order immediately after the Supreme Court decision.

    California is able to sue despite the high court’s ruling because of developments that occurred after justices took up the previous case.

    The court majority this week essentially ruled that California sued too early over the executive order and it noted that the administration had not yet handed down formal rules that would affect voting.

    That changed late last week when the U.S. Postal Service issued final rules requiring states to turn over a list of eligible mail voters, redesign ballot envelopes with the Postal Service’s approval and include new tracking barcodes.

    Under Trump’s order, the Postal Service would not deliver ballots to voters who are not in a federal database the administration wants to build, and would not deliver ballots in states that do not comply with its rules.

    Bonta called the Postal Service rules a “clear violation of the Constitution,” which designates states as the primary authority over elections.

    The Democratic-led states joining with California in the lawsuit argue that because neither the president nor the Postal Service have the constitutional authority to run elections, the latest changes are unlawful and will undermine mail-in voting — including the more than 89% of voters in California who used mail-in ballots in the latest June primary.

    “President Trump doesn’t get to rewrite our voting system on a whim,” said Bonta during an online press conference Wednesday. “And the United States Postal Service cannot sidestep the laws that govern the postal service just to carry out the president’s agenda.”

    Although Trump uses mail-in voting himself, he is an outspoken critic of the method, citing unsubstantiated claims that it increases voter fraud. Last year he said he wanted to “lead a movement to get rid of mail-in ballots.”

    Given its challenges in court, it is unclear whether the Postal Service’s new rule will affect the November elections.

    This article was originally published on CalMatters and was republished under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives license.

  • Sponsored message
  • 'Infiniti Room' artist dies at 97
    Several screens project an image of  woman wearing a red wig and a red top with white and black polka dots.
    The documentary 'Kusama Infinity' screens at LACMA.

    Topline:

    Japanese artist Yayoi Kusama, who splashed her signature polka dots on paintings, sculptures and museum installations around the world, has died, her studio said Thursday. She was 97.

    Distinctive work: Kusama, one of Japan’s most respected contemporary artists, was widely exhibited around the world, including the Museum of Modern Art and the Whitney Museum of American Art in New York. Repetitive motifs were her trademark, in various shapes, resembling netting, swirls or worms, but most often dots, dancing proudly on her canvases, or as sparkling balls or dots of light in her installations, in all their vibrant psychedelic glory. Kusama's "Infiniti Rooms" are permanent exhibits at Los Angeles' Broad Museum.

    Read on... for more on Kusama's life and legacy.

    TOKYO (AP) — Japanese artist Yayoi Kusama, who splashed her signature polka dots on paintings, sculptures and museum installations around the world, has died, her studio said Thursday. She was 97.

    Kusama died Aug. 14 at a hospital in Tokyo, Yayoi Kusama Studio said.

    “She continued to paint until her final days, never setting aside her brush, and continued exploration of forever love and eternal soul,” the studio’s statement said. “We will carry forward Kusama’s wishes and, through art, continue to bring hope and strength for the future to people around the world.”

    Kusama, one of Japan’s most respected contemporary artists, was widely exhibited around the world, including the Museum of Modern Art and the Whitney Museum of American Art in New York.

    Repetitive motifs were her trademark, in various shapes, resembling netting, swirls or worms, but most often dots, dancing proudly on her canvases, or as sparkling balls or dots of light in her installations, in all their vibrant psychedelic glory.

    “Polka dots are fabulous,” Kusama said in a 2012 interview with The Associated Press, appearing in her signature orange bobcut wig and polka dot-covered attire.

    “I want to create a thousand paintings, maybe two thousand paintings, as many as I can draw,” she said in her childlike but matter-of-fact tone. “I will keep painting until I die.”

    Kusama insisted she drew the way she saw the world -- covered with spots, part of the hallucinations she said she had from childhood. She was in and out of psychiatric institution for decades, although her sickness did not hold her back as she was one of the first Japanese women to go to New York to pursue her art, in 1957.

    Although soft-spoken and shy in her mannerisms, she was always unabashedly bold in the assertion of her dotty vision, not only in sticking to the style for decades but also in making it accessible to the masses.

    In her later years, as the times caught up with her art, she enjoyed fame. She signed on with fashion brands like Louis Vuitton as well as other licensed products like teacups, T-shirts and key chains with her illustrations, including replicas of her likeness that were used in show windows and other marketing.

    In 2008, Christie’s auctioned her work for $5.8 million. In 2016, she won the most prestigious award Japan gives its artists, the Order of Culture.

    Upon receiving the award, she told reporters she was more determined than ever to pursue her art, stressing that the sincerity and devotion she had demonstrated in her personal life were crucial parts of her artistic legacy.

    “I feel there is little left in my life, but I am now still fighting to the death for my art,” she said. “I am giving all I have so that many people will continue to be interested in my art, even after I am dead.”

    Kusama was called pop, avant-garde, feminist, just to name some of the categories thrown at her, most of which Kusama brushed off as not quite representative of her art.

    She was born in a middle-class family but felt misunderstood, as her parents wanted her to simply get married. They wanted to buy her kimono, not paints and brushes. She knew she had to get away. She chose America.

    When she arrived in New York, the fad was “action painting,” characterized by dribbles, swooshes and smears, not dots. She suffered years of poverty and obscurity. But she kept painting dots.

    She put circles of paper on people’s bodies, and once a horse, in “happening” anti-war performances in the late 1960s, which got some people arrested for obscenity but helped get media attention for her art. While in New York, she befriended artists like Andy Warhol, Georgia O’Keefe and Joseph Cornell, who praised her innovative style.

    Over the years, Kusama has made quirky but stunningly celebratory works like “Macaroni Girl,” a female figure plastered with macaroni, which expresses the fear of food; “The Visionary Flowers,” giant sculptures of twisting tulips, and “Mirrored Corridor,” a room with mirrors that delivers an illusion of a field of phallic protrusions speckled with dots.

    Kusama, who has also made films and published several novels, said she wasn’t sure where she got her ideas. She just picked up her brush and started drawing. The process was so mysterious sometimes she surprised herself, she told AP.

    “I think, ‘Oh, I drew that? I was thinking that,’” she said.

    But she appeared happy to have her art be the focus of media attention and praise, reading one of her poems to a reporter or tackling her artworks with gusto for photos.

    But she was also a charmingly disarming mix of vulnerability and defiance — at one moment, declaring herself “an artistic revolutionary,” and then the next, mumbling: “I am so afraid, all the time, of everything.”

    ___

    Associated Press writer Mari Yamaguchi contributed to this report.

  • LAHSA to investigate possible errors
    The driver of a car looks at an RV that appears to have an interior light on.
    Volunteers spot an RV that people appear to be living in during LAHSA's annual homeless count on Jan. 21, 2026. The volunteers added the RV to their tally of temporary shelters.

    Topline:

    The Los Angeles City Council on Wednesday called for a review of this year’s point-in-time homeless count, citing potential errors including a possible overcount of unhoused people in some parts of the city and an undercount of people staying in shelters elsewhere.

    About the concerns: Council President Marqueece Harris-Dawson said he believes LAHSA’s count numbers for one area in South L.A. appeared to have grown far larger than he and his office have seen evidence for on the ground. Councilmembers Bob Blumenfield and Imelda Padilla said the count initially left out data for people who were provided shelter in their districts.

    What’s next: The Los Angeles Homeless Services Authority, also known as LAHSA, says it will investigate potential errors and issue a formal update as requested by the City Council.

    Read on . . . to see what the people being counted had to say.

    The Los Angeles City Council on Wednesday called for a review of this year’s point-in-time homeless count, citing potential errors, including a possible overcount of unhoused people in some parts of the city and an undercount of people staying in shelters elsewhere.

    Council President Marqueece Harris-Dawson said during the meeting he believed there were “glaring problems” with homeless count numbers for some parts of his district because they didn’t align with what he and others had observed.

    He pointed to one part of South L.A. where the numbers of unhoused residents skyrocketed, according to the agency responsible for the count — the regional L.A. Homeless Services Authority, or LAHSA.

    LAHSA’s count of unsheltered people in that census tract was more than 10 times higher in 2026 than previous years, and Harris-Dawson says that is not accurate.

    Councilmember Bob Blumenfield said this year’s count did not initially include some people staying at shelters in his district, because of what he described as a “glitch” in how some data was counted.

    The council voted unanimously to call for the review.

    After the meeting Wednesday, LAHSA told LAist that it would launch an investigation.

    Ahmad Chapman, a spokesperson for the agency, said in a statement that the annual count “produces reliable regional-level estimates” of the unhoused people living in the region, but that it would follow the City Council’s directives.

    “We recognize the specific concerns raised by the Council, and we will ensure a disciplined evaluation by leveraging the expertise of our Risk Management Department throughout this internal review,” Chapman said. “Our priority is to identify precise operational or technical issues, report our findings back to the City, and make appropriate changes to our process.”

    It is not yet clear when the review will be completed or when updated numbers will be released.

    Questions about the count

    LAHSA conducts the point-in-time count as required by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. It is used by the federal government to determine how millions of dollars in federal grants are distributed and gives local officials an annual snapshot of how many people are unhoused in their districts.

    Errors have been found in the count in the past, and observers have questioned its accuracy.

    An LAist investigation found that the 2024 count was complicated from policy changes at LAHSA, shifting guidelines and technical problems.

    The next year, a report by the RAND Corporation found the count had gotten less accurate and captured just 68% of the unsheltered population in Skid Row, Venice and Hollywood.

    Blumenfield said during the Wednesday meeting that he has had issues with the count’s data in his district nearly every year. He noted there had been problems in previous years with the app LAHSA used for the count not working properly. He also claimed LAHSA overcounted RVs.

    LAist asked LAHSA about Blumenfield’s comments but the agency’s response did not refer specifically to that particular claim about the RVs.

    As for this year, Blumenfield said some people in his district who stayed in shelters that were part of the state’s Project Homekey program were initially excluded from the count because of the aforementioned “glitch.” He did not explain during the meeting how LAHSA had missed the Homekey shelters.

    Councilmember Imelda Padilla said she, too, had observed that some numbers from shelters in her district were not reflected in LAHSA’s data.

    Blumenfield said LAHSA had been slow to respond previously when confronted with these complaints.

    “We approach LAHSA,” he said, “and oftentimes it takes months and months to finally get a resolution.”

    An area of concern

    The latest count showed homelessness in District 8, covering much of South L.A., increased by 128% from 2025 to 2026.

    Harris-Dawson said the rise didn’t align with what he and others in his office had seen on the streets.

    In one census tract covering the residential West Park Terrace neighborhood, LAHSA reported that the number of unhoused people observed during the count — not including dwellings like vehicles or encampments — went from fewer than 20 in recent years to 277 in 2026.

    “The census tract is in the neighborhood I live in, so I know for a fact that this cannot be the correct number,” Harris-Dawson said during the Wednesday council meeting. “We'd notice 25 new homeless people, much less two hundred and fifty.”

    He told LAist he expects a review of the count to provide “a number reflective of the reality on site.”

    But some people who live in the area told LAist this week that they do believe homelessness has been on the rise since last year.

     Derrick Johnson told LAist he grew up near the St. Andrews Recreation Center, where for the past six months he has been staying in an RV.

    Like others he pointed to who live around him on the same street, he was in permanent supportive housing through a Section 8 voucher until it expired.

    He said he felt the services meant to help had failed him and rent was too high, so he decided to spend $4,200 on an RV.

    A man sits in a plastic lawn chair on the street in front of his RV.
     Derrick Johnson points to his RV he lives in on Aug. 26, 2026. Johnson says his Section 8 permanent supportive housing voucher expired without him knowing, pushing him back to living on the streets.
    (
    Jordan Rynning
    /
    LAist
    )

    “ I did the program . . . I did all that, and you telling me I ain't got no spot?” he said. "F— y'all, I got me an RV now.”

    Vincent Benton doesn’t have an RV. He told LAist he doesn’t have a tent or sleeping bag to stay in.

    He said he has family nearby who try to help him, but drug use and a criminal record have kept him unhoused for now.

    “I blow in the wind, and wherever the wind takes me, you know, I go for broke,” he said.

    A man sits on a park bench with his dog.
    Vincent Benton sits on a bench at the St. Andrews Recreation Center with his dog, May-Two, on Aug. 26, 2026.
    (
    Jordan Rynning
    /
    LAist
    )

    He said he’s been seeing more unhoused people coming to the area looking for a place to stay.

    “ In a minute, all of South Central gonna look like downtown LA,” he said.

    How to reach me

    If you have a tip, you can reach me on Signal. My username is  jrynning.56.

  • New data: ER visits spike among the unhoused
    A man experiencing homelessness stands on a street lined with tents and motorhomes. Skyscrapers are seen in the distance.
    People experiencing homelessness are far more likely to get sick from extreme heat.

    Topline:

    Visits to the emergency room spike when it gets really hot, according to public health data. But for many years one of the populations most affected by extreme heat — the unhoused — have been left out of that data. Now, we know this: Californians experiencing homelessness are 38% more likely to visit the emergency room because of extreme heat, despite accounting for less than half a percentage point of the total population.

    The findings: A new analysis by Tracking California,found that unhoused people were also 11% more likely to visit the hospital for heart and respiratory illness on high heat days, which may reflect how heat can exacerbate preexisting conditions like heart disease, or coincide with air pollution like smog that gets worse during hot days,
    said Shubhayu Saha, executive director of Tracking California.

    The context: The solutions, however, are not simple and require addressing entrenched societal problems — a lack of affordable housing, high electricity bills that can force people to keep their A/C off even if they have it, and unequal access to shade and green space outdoors.

    Read on... for more on the findings and possible solutions.

    Visits to the emergency room spike when it gets really hot, according to public health data. But for many years one of the populations most affected by extreme heat — the unhoused — have been left out of that data.

    Now, we know this: Californians experiencing homelessness are 38% more likely to visit the emergency room because of extreme heat, despite accounting for less than half a percentage point of the total population.

    That’s according to a new analysis by Tracking California, a program that collects and analyzes data on health hazards across the state.

    “We always knew that unhoused individuals were at much higher risk on extreme heat days, and now there is that empirical evidence,” said Shubhayu Saha, executive director of Tracking California.

    Their report found that unhoused people were also 11% more likely to visit the hospital for heart and respiratory illness on high heat days, which may reflect how heat can exacerbate preexisting conditions like heart disease, or coincide with air pollution like smog that gets worse during hot days, Saha said.

    The solutions, however, are not simple and require addressing entrenched societal problems — a lack of affordable housing, high electricity bills that can force people to keep their A/C off even if they have it, and unequal access to shade and green space outdoors.

    Addressing the acute need

    Meanwhile, local shelters and doctors have been responding to acute needs.

    In the San Bernardino Valley, Dr. Rodney Borger has recently treated unhoused patients for burns, from laying on hot pavement, and severe dehydration.

    On Skid Row in L.A., UCLA physician Mary Marfisee has treated more and more patients with severe dehydration, heat rashes and heat exhaustion. Among the chronically unhoused, she said, addiction and mental health issues can also interact with heat in dangerous ways.

    A person places a stethoscope on another person's back outdoors.
    Dr. Mary Marfisee conducts a brief breathing check on a woman on Los Angeles' Skid Row last year.
    (
    Zaydee Sanchez
    /
    For NPR
    )

    “The medications for mental illness can affect the hypothalamus, and that's your set point for temperature regulation,” Marfisee said. “Mental illness itself can lead to those temperature regulation difficulties, so they think they're cold, when they're really not.”

    Yolanda Breland,  the senior director of community engagement at the Los Angeles Mission, has noticed the increase in homelessness, and more challenges related to the heat.

    “ It's too hot for them to be in their tents or under any type of shelter because that just retains the heat,” she said.

    Breland also said this week they’ve seen a big increase in people coming to the mission’s lobby and courtyard, where they can access air conditioning, cold water, showers, misters and shade.

    Protect yourself from dangerous heat

    As we endure the hottest heat wave of the summer so far, it’s key to recognize early warning signs of heat exhaustion or stroke, including headache, dizziness, nausea, excessive sweating and muscle cramps.

    The best prevention is staying hydrated and out of the sun — know where you can find a cool place if home isn’t, such as libraries, community centers or other cooling centers. Also be sure to check on vulnerable neighbors and family members. And never leave kids or pets in the car.

    ER visits for heat in general on the rise

    It’s not just the unhoused — people with housing account for the vast majority of heat-related visits to the ER.

    According to publicly available data, emergency room visits have been steadily rising with the heat in July and August across much of Southern California.

    In L.A. County, most of the cases involve adults over 65 and people in the hottest areas, said Dr. Nichole Quick,  chief science officer at the county’s Public Health Department.

    In Riverside County, meanwhile, the most affected group showing up in the data are men between 18 and 44.

    “In the Coachella Valley especially, we have large farm worker populations,” said Dr. Shunling Tsang, the county’s deputy public health officer.

    A chart shows a bar graph of emergency room visits to hospitals in L.A. County, alongside daily temperature data. The cases rise with the higher temperatures.
    Emergency room visits have been steadily rising during the hotter months, according to L.A. County's public health data dashboard.
    (
    Courtesy L.A. County Department of Public Health
    )

    Having more detailed data can help improve public health responses, since every community is different, said Dr. David Eisenman, who developed ZIP code level data of excess ER visits due to heat from 2008 to 2018.

    And as human-caused climate change drives up average temperatures and worsens heat waves, that work will only become more urgent.

    Four bar graphs show the impact of heat illness on various demographics in Riverside County.
    In Riverside County, middle-aged men in the Coachella Valley are most impacted by heat illness, likely reflecting the experience of farmworkers.
    (
    Courtesy Riverside University Health System
    )

    “That way city officials, public health departments, emergency planners, also parks and recreation people can make informed decisions about where they want to prioritize putting their resources,” he said.

    Still, such data remains limited — community health centers and other clinics that primarily serve low-income households are not part of that public health data, Saha said.

    “Just being able to track what is happening in a range of different health facilities,” he said, “would really give us a much better picture of who is at risk and what we can do for them.”