Sponsored message
Logged in as
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

The Brief

The most important stories for you to know today
  • How often is arson to blame for wildfires?
    A fire vehicle blocks a road where a raging fire is visible behind it.
    A firefighters backs up his car at City Creek Road as the Line Fire burns in the San Bernardino Mountains, forcing evacuations for neighborhoods.
    Topline:
    San Bernardino County authorities announced this week that a 34-year-old man had been arrested and accused of igniting the Line Fire, which has burned more than 37,000 acres in San Bernardino County.

    So how often is arson to blame for wildfires in California?

    What fire authorities say : According to Cal Fire officials, about 10-15% of wildfires over the last five years were were the result of arson.

    By the numbers: Pointing to published data from 2022 as an example, Gianni Muschetto, staff chief of law enforcement at Cal Fire, said there were 358 arson fires in the state that year, amounting to about 12,000 burned acres.

    San Bernardino County authorities announced this week that a 34-year-old man had been arrested and accused of igniting the Line Fire, which has burned more than 37,000 acres in San Bernardino County.

    So how often is arson to blame for wildfires in California?

    What do the numbers show?

    Gianni Muschetto, staff chief of law enforcement at Cal Fire, said about 10-15% of wildfires in the last five years were the result of arson.

    Pointing to published data from 2022 as an example, he said there were 358 arson fires in the state that year, amounting to about 12,000 burned acres. Each time, firefighters and members of the public were put at risk.

    “It’s not an accident, it’s not lightning. It’s a reckless or malicious act,” Muschetto told LAist.

    He mentioned the Park Fire, which fire authorities have said was set in July by a man accused of pushing a burning car down a gully near Chico. It’s reportedly the fourth-largest wildfire in recorded state history.

    The blaze burned nearly 430,000 acres in Butte and Tehama counties.

    “None of us, in our lifetime, are going to see those forests come back to what they were,” Muschetto said.

    What are the common causes of wildfires?

    Wildfires can be started by natural causes, like a lightning strike, but far more often people are to blame. According to the National Park Service, nearly 85% of wildland fires in the U.S. are caused by human action.

    Safety tips

    Fire officials often point to neglecting campfires, operating machinery (like a faulty lawnmower) or discarding lit cigarettes as ways people may unintentionally ignite dry brush.

    But there are times when it’s no accident. It’s arson.

    In 2022 and 2021, Cal Fire identified arson as a cause in more than 350 fires each year, according to the department's most recent published data. Arson was the cause more often than campfires, playing with fire, electrical power, lightning and smoking.

    But it was less than a few other causes, like burning debris. In one of those years, 2021, there were more fires caused by vehicles — 419 — than arson.

    Cal Fire authorities had more recent data for arson-related arrests. Those arrests nearly doubled last year when compared to five years earlier. Last year, there were 111 arrests on suspicion of arson in Cal Fire areas. In 2018, there were 61.

    Within that five-year stretch, the most arson-related arrests happened in 2022, when there were 162, according to Cal Fire.

    Muschetto attributed the higher numbers, in part, to video evidence captured on cellphones and home security cameras.

    “It allows us to identify those responsible for starting fires a lot more than we’ve been able to in the past,” he said.

    How can suspected arson be reported?

    Members of the public can call Cal Fire’s hotline if they suspect arson. The phone number is 800-468-4408.

    Callers can remain anonymous.

    What are some notable arson arrests?  

    Line fire — Justin Wayne Halstenberg, a 34-year-old contract delivery driver from Norco, was arrested Tuesday, on suspicion of starting the fire, which burned thousands of acres in L.A. and San Bernardino counties.

    San Bernardino County Sheriff Shannon Dicus said Halstenberg is suspected of intentionally setting the fire, and that investigators were looking into the possibility that he may be responsible for setting others. The sheriff said automatic license plate readers captured a license plate of a vehicle connected to Halstenberg near where the Line Fire began.

    Dicus declined to say exactly how the fire was set, noting the investigation is in its early stages.

    Halstenberg is expected to appear in court Friday.

    Park Fire — Ronnie Dean Stout II, 42, was arrested on suspicion of arson in connection with the massive blaze that started near Chico.

    Cal Fire said a man they identified as Stout was seen pushing a car that was already on fire into a gully in an area called Alligator Hole. The car went 60 feet down an embankment, spreading flames that eventually burned more than 400,000 acres and destroyed more than 700 structures.

    Stout has pleaded not guilty and has denied pushing the car — he said it rolled — down the hill, according to The Sacramento Bee.

    El Dorado fire — A San Bernardino couple who set off pyrotechnics during a gender-reveal party in 2020 and inadvertently ignited the blaze that turned into the 22,000-acre El Dorado fire were sentenced in February.

    The fire killed a U.S. Forest Service firefighter and injured others. Five homes were destroyed.

    Refugio Manuel Jimenez Jr. pleaded guilty to involuntary manslaughter and was sentenced to a year in county jail and placed on probation for a term of two years. He was also ordered to do community service, according to the L.A. Times.

    Angelina Jimenez pleaded guilty to three misdemeanor counts of recklessly causing a fire to another’s property and was placed on probation for a year. She, too, was ordered to complete community service.

    Where can I find wildfire resources?

    Check our more wildfire coverage from the LAist newsroom.

  • Time to get your shot given 2026's trend

    Topline:

    The annual flu season usually starts in October or November. But this year, it looks like the flu started to pick up in early September.

    Why now: The timing of the flu season isn't the only thing that's odd. It's also unusual that flu activity seems to have started in Western states, such as California, Washington, Hawaii and Alaska, experts say.

    The backstory: It's unclear why flu activity would have started so early, and in such an unusual part of the country. But one clue might be a new variant that evolved a mutation, which appears to make it better at evading existing immunity, especially among teenagers.

    What's next: Experts suggest scheduling your flu shot.

    Fall has only just begun, but it's already time to start thinking about the quintessential winter bug: the flu.

    The annual flu season usually starts in October or November. But this year, it looks like the flu started to pick up in early September.

    "There are enough signs pointing in the same direction to make me think, 'OK, yes. This is the start of flu season,'" says Caitlin Rivers, an epidemiologist at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health.

    The percentage of people testing positive for the flu in the West has been rising steadily since around the beginning of September, she says. And the number of people showing up in emergency departments because of the flu has also been rising for weeks, she adds.


    "It's very uncommon to see flu activity rising this early. It's activity that we might normally see more like November or December," she says.

    The timing of the flu season isn't the only thing that's odd. It's also unusual that flu activity seems to have started in Western states, such as California, Washington, Hawaii and Alaska.

    "It typically starts in the South and then expands from there," Rivers says. "So two uncommon developments there."

    Rivers stresses that the amount of flu activity is still very low in most parts of the country. But that's starting to change as the flu picks up nationwide.

    It's unclear why flu activity would have started so early, and in such an unusual part of the country. But one clue might be a new variant that evolved a mutation, which appears to make it better at evading existing immunity, especially among teenagers.

    "That's our best argument for what's going on right now in terms of this early flu season," says Dr. Alex Greninger, a virologist who heads infectious disease diagnostics at the University of Washington. Doctors there are seeing as much flu right now as they usually would around Christmas, and the mutated variant appears to be common, he says.

    So Greninger, Rivers and others are urging people to think about getting their flu shot earlier than usual.

    "It's crucial that people get an influenza vaccine," says Scott Hensley, a virologist at the University of Pennsylvania. "And this might be a year that people might want to get a vaccine early."

    But the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention hasn't been promoting flu shots as it usually does. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., who oversees the CDC, is a long-time vaccine skeptic.

    "It is disappointing that CDC is quiet given that flu kills of hundreds of kids a year and can result in tens of thousands of hospitalizations and tens of thousands of deaths," says Dr. Demetre Daskalakis, who resigned last year as the director of the National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to protest what he called political interference at the agency.

    The CDC declined to make an official available to NPR for this story. In a statement, a CDC spokesperson said, "CDC is developing a communications strategy to provide clear, accessible information about influenza vaccination and other critical steps people can take to protect themselves during respiratory virus season. This includes information about the benefits and risks of vaccination to support informed decision-making."
    Copyright 2026 NPR

  • Sponsored message
  • Actor-comedian shares rare photos from his life
    A photo of a man sitting at a dinner table, covering his face with one hand
    Photos from Jeff Garlin's debut photography book "Best Seat in the House: Moments No One Asked Me To Capture...But I Did Anyway"

    Topline:

    Actor-comedian Jeff Garlin has a knack for capturing moments in his life. His new photography book, Best Seat in the House: Moments No One Asked Me to Capture...But I Did Anyway, compiles some of his personal favorite photos of colleagues and friends. Garlin joined AirTalk, LAist 89.3's daily news show, to discuss it.

    Listen: to hear Garlin talk about playing Jeff Greene in Curb Your Enthusiasm, personal stories about his relationship with some of the biggest stars in comedy, mental health struggles and his feelings on analog and digital cameras.

    Check it out: Garlin has two book signing events in Los Angeles next month. He'll be at Book Soup in West Hollywood on Nov. 2 at 7 p.m. and at the Leica Gallery, also in West Hollywood, on Nov. 15. You can find more info on his book tour on his website.

  • Some call it a 'political stunt'

    Topline:

    The Trump administration last week only sent $500 checks to people who live in one of the 30 states that use Healthcare.gov for their insurance marketplace. They include people, like Allen, who were likely to be hard hit when Congress failed to extend the extra financial help put in place under President Joe Biden. The $90 checks that will be sent to Medicare beneficiaries are only going to certain people enrolled in Medicare Part B. People in Medicare Advantage plans, which are managed by insurance companies, will not get checks.

    Why now: The checks are hitting people's mailboxes just a few weeks before the midterm elections. The text of a letter sent along with the money touts the Trump administration's efforts on health policy and criticizes the Biden administration. "This reads like electioneering," says Kathleen Clark, a professor of legal and governmental ethics at Washington University Law School in St. Louis, Mo. "This reads as though it's intended to influence votes. That is prohibited by law."

    What officials said: The White House did not respond directly to NPR's questions about electioneering, whether the action is a violation of the Hatch Act or if it is a "political stunt," as Allen put it. "This is an out-of-touch criticism," Trump administration spokeswoman Allison Schuster wrote in an email. "Americans were overcharged for the operation of the Obamacare exchange, and President Trump returned their hard-earned money. This President will never stop enabling Americans to take control of their health by implementing policies that put money back in their pockets."

    Ellen Allen has mixed feelings about the check from the U.S. Treasury and letter from President Donald Trump that arrived at her house near Charleston, West Virginia, on Monday.

    "I just can't believe it; I mean, that's crazy," says Allen, who's the executive director of a small nonprofit called West Virginians for Affordable Health Care. She says, in her opinion, sending out these checks is a "political stunt."

    NPR first spoke to Ellen Allen in the summer of 2025. She was 63 years old at the time and knew she needed coverage from Healthcare.gov even as generous federal subsidies for her premiums were ending. She has a serious eye condition and needs expensive drops to preserve her vision. She advocated for the Republican-controlled Congress to extend the subsidies. It didn't. She ended up using retirement savings to pay $1,967 every month for her premiums from January through August 2026.

    Then her birthday came; she turned 65 and was eligible for Medicare. "I was ready at midnight — the first day I could apply, I did," she laughs.

    A second check on the way?

    Allen chose traditional Medicare, which means she could soon be getting another check from the U.S. Treasury. Last week, President Trump announced that $90 checks will be sent to 20 million people enrolled in Medicare.

    "The $90 is — I mean, that's just nothing," Allen says. In her work, she talks to people about healthcare costs all over West Virginia. "People aren't going to be fooled by this," she predicts. "People are hurting. People are feeling the cost of healthcare all year long."

    "If they wanted to do something meaningful, they would work on affordable healthcare instead of just sending out checks every now and then," Allen says.

    Both checks are directed to select groups. The $500 checks mailed by the Trump administration last week were only sent to people who live in one of the 30 states that use Healthcare.gov for their insurance marketplace. They also make more than $64,000 annually for an individual, which is too much money to qualify for subsidies. These are people, like Allen, who were likely to be hard hit when Congress failed to extend the extra financial help put in place under President Joe Biden.

    The $90 checks that will be sent to Medicare beneficiaries are only going to certain people enrolled in Medicare Part B. People in Medicare Advantage plans, which are managed by insurance companies, will not get checks.

    Can Trump do that?

    The checks are hitting people's mailboxes just a few weeks before the midterm elections. The text of a letter sent along with the money touts the Trump administration's efforts on health policy and criticizes the Biden administration.

    "This reads like electioneering," says Kathleen Clark, a professor of legal and governmental ethics at Washington University Law School in St. Louis, Mo. "This reads as though it's intended to influence votes. That is prohibited by law."

    Specifically, it would violate the Hatch Act, "the statute that prohibits using federal power and money to influence partisan political elections," she explains. It may also be a use of funds that's unauthorized by Congress.

    The money for Healthcare.gov enrollees is from fees insurance companies paid to participate in the marketplace, and the money for Medicare beneficiaries is from a general improvement fund. Neither of these funds has been used for direct payments to enrollees before.

    "It looks like a pretty desperate effort to, in essence, bribe the recipients of this letter to vote in gratitude to Trump in the upcoming midterm elections," she adds.

    An empowered executive branch

    The checks and letters are arriving in people's mailboxes, whether they're legal or not. Clark notes the Supreme Court has enabled Trump's illegal actions many times in the past. "So, of course, he feels empowered to go ahead and do this," she says.

    The White House did not respond directly to NPR's questions about electioneering, whether the action is a violation of the Hatch Act or if it is a "political stunt," as Allen put it.

    "This is an out-of-touch criticism," Trump administration spokeswoman Allison Schuster wrote in an email. "Americans were overcharged for the operation of the Obamacare exchange, and President Trump returned their hard-earned money. This President will never stop enabling Americans to take control of their health by implementing policies that put money back in their pockets."

    'Half a tank of gas'

    Some Republicans in recent years have advocated for giving more money directly to people rather than to health insurance companies, although the party has yet to settle on a particular approach.

    In any case, sending these checks is unrelated to that effort, says Joseph Antos, senior fellow emeritus at the conservative think tank American Enterprise Institute. There's nothing that requires people to use this money for their health.

    "From the perspective of the average senior citizen, when they get a $90 check, it's money," he adds, referencing the forthcoming checks for Medicare beneficiaries. "You can go out to McDonald's and buy probably two hamburgers and a shake for $90 [and] maybe buy a half a tank of gas."

    A widening trust gap, poll says 

    A few weeks from the midterm elections, voters say they are struggling with health costs and want candidates to address them, according to a poll released Tuesday by the nonprofit health research organization KFF.

    "The cost of healthcare is what's going to be front of mind as they're casting their votes in November," says Ashley Kirzinger, director of survey methodology for KFF. "And what we are seeing is that the Democratic Party has the advantage overall among all voters on which party voters trust to handle healthcare, but they also have the advantage among independent voters, and that's a really important voting bloc for midterm elections."

    She says there is "a widening gap" between the Democratic Party and Republicans when it comes to which party voters trust to handle health costs. "It was just a 10-point margin back in April, and now we're seeing it to be a 20-point margin," she says. The poll found 22% of voters trust Republicans on the issue, compared to 42% who trust Democrats.

    Where's the credit for GOP candidates?

    Antos, of AEI, calls the Trump administration's decision to send out these checks "inexplicable." He describes the move as politically strange, since a Republican administration that disparages Obamacare is investing more money into it, and "unreasonable from a fiscal standpoint," because of the growing national debt.

    He also notes that most Americans won't be getting these checks. "How about the average, lower-income worker who has employer coverage?" he asks. "They're not getting anything. Why is that? Is that fair?"

    He is doubtful the move will have a political benefit for Republican candidates. "For one thing, Trump is not saying that your local congressman did this for you, Trump is saying he did it for you," Antos says. "I don't get it, and I don't see any advantage to anybody, including Donald Trump."

    Despite her mixed feelings, Ellen Allen of West Virginians for Affordable Health Care is planning to deposit the $500 check she just received. "I'm not going to send it back," she says. "I'm going to put it in my health savings account and keep working towards healthcare for all."

    Copyright 2026 NPR

  • Coastal trail to reopen this week after repairs
    A passing train along the coastline.
    A popular section of the San Clemente beach trail will reopen to the public this week.

    Topline:

    A popular section of San Clemente's beach trail will reopen to the public on Friday after transit crews completed a major project to protect a coastal rail line from landslides and falling debris. Portions of the trail have been closed over the last two years.

    Background: The Orange County Transportation Authority is completing a $93 million project at Mariposa Point in San Clemente that includes a nearly 1,400-foot catchment wall to protect the battered railroad tracks from falling rocks and other debris.

    Officials said: “This project is another example of OCTA delivering our commitment to protect this vital rail connection while also returning a popular recreational amenity to the community,” OCTA Chair Jamey M. Federico said in a statement.

    More on the troubled rail: The project at Mariposa Point is part of OCTA’s greater efforts to protect a portion of the rail that is part of the Los Angeles-San Diego-San Luis Obispo rail corridor. Erosion and landslides along the coastal rail have caused several disruptions since 2021.

    What about El Niño? The trail reopens as the region braces for record-high surf and heavy rains. Other coastal Orange County cities such as Laguna Beach and San Clemente have issued local emergency proclamations because of coastal erosion this year.

    Dig deeper: Train disruptions in San Clemente raise questions of the future of coastal rail