The Brief

This story was originally published by Boyle Heights Beat on July 24, 2025.

By midday on a recent Monday, only a few customers had trickled into La Chispa de Oro, a once-busy Mexican eatery on Cesar Chavez Avenue in Boyle Heights.

Behind the counter, owner Melchor Moreno monitored the money in his till, counting the few hundred dollars in sales — about half a typical weekday.

He glanced at his staff, counting with his fingers how much he’d owe in wages that day. The math didn’t add up.

“It doesn’t help that there’s no foot traffic, too…. The streets are empty. It’s kind of scary,” Moreno said.

Since immigration raids began sweeping through Los Angeles neighborhoods, Eastside restaurants have been scraping by, as even longtime customers are keeping themselves and their dollars at home out of fear of potential immigration enforcement. While the full economic toll is still uncertain, many business owners already feel the squeeze.

Moreno has cut staff hours. He’s stepped in to wash dishes. With fewer customers, his staff goes home with fewer tips.

“They’ve noticed it. The waitresses are taking less money home every day,” he said. “I don’t know how much longer we can keep doing this.”

Moreno, who is still paying off electricity bill debt accumulated during the COVID-19 pandemic, estimates his restaurant has lost more than $7,000 since the raids began on June 6. To stay afloat, he’s now closing Tuesdays through the summer until fear stemming from the ICE raids fades, he hopes.

La Chispa de Oro sits along the popular Cesar Chavez Avenue corridor.

(

Andrew Lopez

/

Boyle Heights Beat

)

Survey shows deep losses at Boyle Heights restaurants

La Chispa’s slowdown isn’t isolated. This month, Boyle Heights Beat surveyed more than a dozen local restaurants to understand how immigration enforcement is affecting them. The results paint a grim picture: several restaurants reported losing 50% or more of their customers or revenue over the last several weeks. One business owner said he lost more than $10,000 in revenue. Another estimates losses of around $15,000.

Already struggling with inflation, some business owners are working for free and others are cutting back employee hours to save on labor costs.

At Casa Fina on 1st Street, the conversation has already started about potentially laying off staff or closing down entirely. Several owners said they hadn’t fully recovered from the economic strain of the COVID-19 pandemic when the raids dealt the latest blow.

One local taqueria owner said workers who are undocumented are having to choose between earning a paycheck and risking encountering ICE agents.

Though several restaurants have no plans in place in the event agents show up, others, like Milpa Kitchen, have posted signs barring ICE from entering private property. Neighbors of Casa Fina have offered to keep a watchful eye on the block in case federal agents arrive at the popular eatery.

Leaders take notice — but support lags behind

Local elected leaders are taking note and pledging to offer support. In June, Mayor Karen Bass and Assemblymember Mark Gonzalez walked the abnormally quiet business corridor along 1st Street to speak with restaurant owners about their concerns.

Bass described the fear and economic impact as a “body blow” to the neighborhood. In another video posted on social media Wednesday, she said her office is “doubling down on support” for small businesses, although it remains unclear what that entails. Boyle Heights Beat reached out to the Mayor’s office for clarification, but did not hear back in time for publication.

Councilmember Ysabel Jurado, who represents Boyle Heights in District 14, helped facilitate the opening of the City’s Small Business Administration’s Business Recovery Center at 1780 E. 1st Street. There, small businesses and nonprofit organizations affected by the raids can access information and resources about loan programs available to those experiencing financial hardship, a CD 14 spokesperson said.

At the county level, Supervisor Hilda Solis initiated an economic impact report to assess the effects of the ICE raids on small businesses and moved to develop a fundraising plan and cash-aid fund to impacted families.

Still, Miriam Rodriguez, president of the Boyle Heights Chamber of Commerce, says small businesses need direct financial assistance like grants.

“Just like there was financial assistance during the pandemic or during the fires, there should be a similar financial assistance program for small businesses during these times that don’t have a lot of [red tape] like a long application process.”

While Rodriguez has seen fewer reports of ICE agents around the Eastside since a federal judge granted a temporary halt to roving immigration enforcement, she says fear still lingers. And so does financial strain.

“I know the city is feeling the burdens of the city budget, but I think financial support is crucial because if they don’t do it now, there’s a high probability that a lot of businesses will close,” Rodriguez said.

Calling for community support

A sign in support of immigrants is displayed at La Chispa de Oro in Boyle Heights.

(

Andrew Lopez

/

Boyle Heights Beat

)

Rodriguez believes the solution doesn’t just lie in government action. To her, leaders working in tandem with residents supporting neighborhood restaurants may be key to persevering through this economic crisis.

At a recent Boyle Heights “Know Your Rights” workshop hosted by the Boyle Heights Chamber of Commerce, Council District 14, and the Independent Hospitality Coalition, business owners, managers and employees gathered to receive guidance on how to navigate potential encounters with ICE agents at work.

After the workshop’s presentation, one business owner said he had eliminated uniform requirements at his tortilleria and was even offering Lyft and Uber rides to his employees to protect them on their commutes to and from work.

“There is a lot of uncertainty about federal immigration policies, instilling fear in immigrant communities, whether or not they have legal status, and, in some cases, it is having a chilling effect on restaurants’ team members and guest traffic,” said Jot Condie, the president and CEO of the California Restaurant Association.

Condie called immigrants the lifeblood of the industry and emphasized the powerful role they play in the economy. “We would not be the 4th largest economy in the world without them.”

Rodriguez echoes the sentiment, noting that community resilience has defined Boyle Heights.

“We are a community that will always stand up for each other… I think Boyle Heights is unique in the sense that people step where it’s mostly needed.” Rodriguez said.

“Where possible, we should be reclaiming our streets, reclaiming our space, and supporting these family-owned businesses. Many have been here for such a long time, and it would be very unfortunate to see their doors close,” Rodriguez said.

Adapting to survive, but not everyone can

While some restaurants have cut hours, others fear that doing so could be worse.

At The Big Burrito on Wabash Avenue, an employee said they can’t further reduce their slow business for fear of potentially turning away hungry customers.

Un Solo Sol is a vegan restaurant located on 1st Street in Boyle Heights.

(

Andrew Lopez

/

Boyle Heights Beat

)

Around Mariachi Plaza, where parking is notoriously limited, Carlos Ortez, owner of Un Solo Sol, called the financial situation devastating.

Ortez estimates losing half of his business since the raids began. While his restaurant has been a 15-year fixture in the neighborhood, he said it hasn’t turned a profit since before the pandemic. Now the raids have forced him to cut back operations to just a few days a week – and if things don’t improve soon, he fears he may have to close.

“The possibility of me closing is high. Of course, I’m not going to give up that easily,” Ortez said. “The community has been my secure source of revenue for my business. But the community has experienced this exact same thing; it hasn’t gotten better. It’s been decreasing and decreasing in income and sustainability. It’s become something we can’t hide.”

Boyle Heights Beat interns Angelo Lopez and Luis Cano contributed to this story. 

Pasadena residents fighting a school district plan to remove nearly 200 trees scored a win Thursday night.

Pasadena Unified School District officials had said 193 trees across 11 campuses need to be cut down to clean up soil contaminated by the Eaton Fire. But on Thursday, the district’s board voted unanimously to attempt to save up to 57 of those trees.

The adopted motion is no guarantee trees will be saved, but directs staff to evaluate other ways to remediate soil around certain mature, protected trees.

The vote came after major public outcry from local residents, including a Pasadena teen who spent more than eight hours in the branches of an oak tree slated for removal at the district’s headquarters.

Why is the district trying to remove trees?

Last May, the school district released the results of soil tests taken after the Eaton Fire, which found elevated levels of toxic metals, primarily lead and arsenic, at 13 campuses. (You can see the reports for each campus here).

Then, late last month, the district announced it planned to remove nearly 200 trees to excavate one to four feet of contaminated soil at the remaining 11 campuses it has to clean up. Officials said they need to get the work done before students return from summer break.

The plan angered many residents.

Chapman University soil scientist Christine Sierra O’Connell said removing contaminants is critical, but cutting down too many trees could swap out one problem for another.

“You could easily imagine taking down all these trees, and the next time there's a big heatwave before the end of the school year, these campuses are super hot,” she said.

She said areas like sports fields and open soil playgrounds make sense for excavation, but a variety of methods can be used to remediate soil near trees, including phytoremediation, in which plants are used to take up metals in the soils.

“In my opinion, PUSD should not be moving forward with a wholesale excavation strategy without circling back and deeply investigating whether or not alternative soil remediation strategies can be utilized around the root beds of these large, mature, important trees,” O’Connell said.

District has concerns about additional costs

The district’s facilities director, Michael Dunning, said at the Thursday board meeting that he and his staff will assess 57 mature, protected trees where it may be possible to use an “air excavation method” to clean the soil at their base.

“It does take longer periods of time,” Dunning said. “It does come with some risk. We could go through the cost of trying this method at each tree and still not come to a conclusion.”

If the district doesn’t clean up the soil to accepted levels, they’d have to enter into a “land use covenant” with the state’s Department of Toxic Substances Control. That would require certain areas to be permanently closed off, or possibly made impermeable with concrete, as well as additional training and staff for maintenance, which could cost the district $30,000 per year in perpetuity, Dunning estimated.

“I’m not certain that our budget could withstand such a thing,” said Boardmember Michelle R. Bailey.

The original full excavation plan is estimated to cost $6.6 million, though the district would be reimbursed by the state if the contamination is reduced to public health standards.

Benjamin Stanphill, Southern California division chief at the state Department of Toxic Substances Control, told board members that the agency is "somewhat agnostic” about the method of contaminant removal and that they’d consider approving a plan involving bioremediation or phytoremediation methods.

Meanwhile, the district said in a statement that staff and arborists “will continue refining site-specific approaches, site by site, tree by tree… with the goal of maintaining as many protected trees within the removal areas as possible.”

LACMA is turning a stretch of Wilshire Boulevard in front of its new David Geffen Galleries into a living gallery.

The Art Parade is the creation of gallerist Jeffrey Deitch who first put on the event in New York’s SoHo from 2005 to 2008.

A scene from one of the east coast Art Parades of years past.

(

Courtesy LACMA

)

The inaugural L.A. edition will include 1,400 participants marching down Wilshire. There will be a massive, mirrored inflatable sculpture, a custom-painted 1959 Cadillac powered by humans and an 18-piece marching band.

“It’s going to give you the feeling of Mardi Gras, but obviously not New Orleans. I think what people are going to recognize is just the enthusiasm and excitement for this moment here in L.A.,” Naima Keith, senior vice president of education, public programs and regional partnerships at LACMA, told LAist.

You can also expect a cotton candy-themed entry from Meow Wolf, the group behind a number of immersive art museums that is slated to open an installation in L.A. later this year. L.A. artist Gary Baseman, whose exhibition recently opened at Johnie’s Coffee Shop at the corner of Wilshire Boulevard and Fairfax Avenue, will present “Peace Thru Purr.”

Keith said Art Parade is in line with LACMA director Michael Govan’s mission to make the Mid-City art institution and the surrounding space a communal “living room.”

“It’s a celebration of L.A., of L.A. artists, of the vibrant art community that’s here,” Keith said.

Most California voters cast their ballots by mail, but two big federal changes are in the pipeline that could impact how those ballots are handled and counted in the November election.

One could come from a U.S. Supreme Court ruling that’s expected soon, and another through the United States Postal service, which is working to comply with President Donald Trump’s executive order that would give the agency the final say over who receives a mail-in ballot.

The efforts come as Trump and his allies have scrutinized mail-in ballots for years, claiming without evidence that states with longer count times and universal mail-in voting are allowing widespread cheating. Research shows fraud rates remain extremely small.

A major ruling could end mail-in grace periods

Fourteen states, including California, count mail-in ballots that arrive after Election Day, as long as they are postmarked by then and show up within a certain window. The U.S. Supreme Court is expected to hand down a decision that could end that kind of grace period.

The case in question is Watson v. Republican National Committee, which centers on whether Mississippi’s five-day grace period for late-arriving ballots is constitutional under federal law. In California, that period is seven days.

Geoffrey Skelley,  chief elections analyst at Decision Desk HQ, told LAist the RNC’s argument centers on a federal law enacted in 1845 that set Election Day as the Tuesday after the first Monday in November, and that’s why votes shouldn’t be accepted after it.

A decision on that is expected to come within the next month, according to Wren Orey, who directs the elections project at the Bipartisan Policy Center. The Washington D.C.-based think tank works with both sides of the political aisle to craft policy suggestions.

Orey told LAist it’s looking like the justices will side with the RNC and overturn Mississippi’s law. However, it’s not known how broad the ruling could be. The Purcell principle, a legal doctrine that discourages last-minute changes to election procedures, could also be invoked.

“ It’s possible that the Supreme Court rules that this specific statute is unconstitutional, but their judgment doesn’t go into effect until after the election,” they said.

Some critics say the Supreme Court has unevenly applied this principle, pointing to how a ruling affected Alabama’s primary when voters had already begun casting ballots.

How it could affect California

Just over 400,000 ballots arrived during California’s grace period in 2024 — that’s 2.5% of voter turnout. Orey said these usually come from areas that take more time for mail carriers to deliver, so it could disadvantage rural residents, for example. It’s unclear if there would be a carve out for service members and overseas voters under the Uniformed and Overseas Citizens Absentee Voting Act, which get rejected at higher rates.

The Bipartisan Policy Center’s research shows about the same rate of late ballot rejections between states with a grace period and those without, Orey said, suggesting that voters adapt to their state’s deadline.

“What isn’t clear, though, is how long it takes for voters to adjust,” they said, adding that they’ve seen some evidence of rejections going up immediately after a grace period goes away.

Workers count Los Angeles County ballots in the City of Industry on June 3.

(

Kayla Bartkowski

/

Los Angeles Times via Getty Images

)

Skelley said a lot of voters would likely become aware and adjust in part because of how publicized the decision would be, but it wouldn’t solve everything.

“Now, does that mean some would be affected and might miss out on a chance to vote?” he said. “Yes, that’s perfectly plausible.”

California is also notoriously criticized for how long it takes to count ballots, even though that’s a feature, not a bug, of our election process. If the justices decide to end grace periods, don’t expect big changes to that.

That’s mostly because our slowness stems from the volume of mail-in ballots received on Election Day, Orey said. Those need to be verified, opened and flattened to be processed, which takes more time than if you voted in person.

Changes to universal mail-in ballots

Another looming change comes from Trump’s March executive order which, among many things, tasks the U.S. Postal Service with being a gatekeeper for who gets a mail-in ballot.

This is happening in the name of preventing noncitizens from voting, which is already rare and gets prosecuted.

USPS released its proposed rules earlier this month. Under the proposal, states would be required to send names of eligible mail-in voters to USPS, who would add them to a centralized list. If your name isn’t on that list for some reason, the Postal Service won’t mail your ballot.

This also depends on whether states agree to share voter information with the federal government, which California has so far refused to do in other situations.

“ Let’s say California and some states like it don’t give the federal government the information that they want,” Skelley said. “Presumably, that would mean that some people who have been voting by mail would not be able to get their mail ballots, and so they would have to figure out alternate ways to vote.”

Under federal law, states and Congress can determine how elections are run, so Trump’s executive order is seen by some as unconstitutional. It’s being challenged in court in multiple cases — one of which California is part of.

Among the concerns, it’s unclear what recourse voters would have to resolve errors, how accurate the data will be and what would happen if a voter requested a mail-in ballot after USPS’s deadline to add voters to the list.

The U.S. Postal Service may soon decide who to send mail-in ballots to.

(

Nathan Howard

/

Getty Images

)

Orey said they have talked to state election officials who don’t have a lot of trust in the Postal Service to handle ingesting and updating lists from every state, based on how the agency manages current operations and deadlines.

“We have no evidence to indicate that the infrastructure exists to begin with, or is at all functional,” they said.

Under Trump’s executive order, the final rule is due by the end of July — that is, of course, if it’s not delayed by the courts.

These rules would apply to federal elections, but not to primaries or ballots under the UOCAVA (the act for service members and overseas voters), according to the proposal. If you want to have your say, USPS is accepting public comment through July 2.

Although thousands have flocked to SoFi stadium for the World Cup, soccer wasn’t always a fan-favorite sport in the United States.

The sport’s rise to popularity began when the U.S. hosted its first World Cup in 1994. At that time, the men’s soccer team was virtually unknown.

Summer of ’94, a new documentary directed by Chad N. Walker and Dave LaMattina, chronicles the U.S. team’s unlikely run during their first home World Cup.

At a screening in LAist’s Crawford Family Forum Room, viewers got an early look at the film. LAist’s Libby Rainey later moderated a talkback with Alan Rothberg, the president of U.S. Soccer in the 1990s, and Chris Leggett and Amanda Farrand, both producers of the film.

LAist's Libby Rainey moderates a talkback with Alan Rothberg, Chris Leggett, and Amanda Farrand.

(

James Van Evers

/

LAist

)

An unlikely team and a wild-card coach

Rothberg recalled several of the team’s challenges, and also pointed to soccer’s low popularity as a spectator and player sport at the time of the World Cup.

He said that factored into his decision when choosing a wild-card coach, Velibor “Bora” Milutinović, to lead the 1994 team.

The Starting IX for the United States before a 1994 FIFA World Cup Round of 16 game between the United States and Brazil at Stanford Stadium in Palo Alto on July 4, 1994.

(

J.Brett Whitesell

/

Getty Images

)

Ernie Stewart celebrates with his team after the US scores the second goal during the USA match against Colombia in the 1994 World Cup.

(

Stephen Dunn

/

Getty Images

)

Rothberg said “there was a lot of pressure to hire an American coach” for the home team. But he said he “felt there was a necessity to have a coach with international experience.”

Milutinović also emerged as a centerpiece of the documentary, which the producers said they didn’t expect.

“We just started falling in love with Bora, and after one interview with him, where he started [...] coaching the directors, we were like, this guy is magic,” Farrand said.

Leggett said that players were able to better understand Milutinović’s strategy through the documentary. He said that during the interview process, “what was very obvious was [the players] were really digesting and getting to understand Bora as well.”

What happened to U.S. soccer after 1994? 

Rothberg said that since that World Cup, funding for U.S. soccer took off. The team’s performance, “enabled us to immediately follow up and create Major League Soccer,” he said.

At that time, the organization had a $50 million surplus, which Rothberg said they used to create a nonprofit for “underserved communities.”

In 1999, the U.S. hosted the Women’s World Cup in major stadiums.

Libby Rainey (L) and Alan Rothberg (R) speak at a screening in LAist’s Crawford Family Forum.

(

James Van Evers

/

LAist

)

“[FIFA] had so little confidence in the women's game at that time that they wanted us to play in small stadiums in the Northeast, and we persuaded them,” Rothberg recalled.

Now, Major League Soccer has invested over $11 billion in facilities and stadiums, and the U.S. is hosting the World Cup this summer, including eight matches in L.A.

Rothberg said that since that World Cup, public interest in soccer has only increased. Now, we might even be underselling how popular the sport is.

“Soccer has been underestimated to this day. It's still the number one participant sport in the country,” he said.

Farrand said the film sought to inspire not just future players, but also volunteer coaches.

“If we could use this moment and this movie to inspire former players and parents to lean into coaching, we could really make a difference,” she said.

She added that volunteer coaching is “an act of civic participation,” which she encouraged attendees to consider ahead of the U.S.’s 250th anniversary of independence.

Both Rothberg and Farrand pointed to the Women’s World Cup, which will be hosted by the U.S. in 2031, as the next landmark event.

You can find where to stream on the documentary's website.