The Brief

The standard, polite line for award season goes, "It's an honor just to be nominated." And yet, there's a long list of great performers who've never received this honor. What gives?

On a recent episode of Pop Culture Happy Hour, we each made the case for a performer who's never been nominated for a competitive acting Oscar, but should have at least one on their mantle by now. Our criteria were: They have to be living and currently active in the industry. Here's our list:

Pam Grier

Pam Grier

(

Christopher Smith

/

Invision/AP

)

Glen Weldon: Pam Grier is known for playing gorgeous badasses in Blaxploitation films: Foxy Brown, Coffy, Sheba and Friday Foster. There's a sameness to those roles — genre has a formula — but there is an individuality in her performances. There's nothing cookie cutter or pat about them. And you have to respect the grind, right? She puts in the work. She's been in a Steven Seagal movie. She did women in prison movies. She's the best thing in Scream Blacula Scream.

In Jackie Brown, the 1997 Quentin Tarantino film, Grier plays an LA flight attendant who smuggles money for a gunrunner. It's widely agreed that should have been her moment. Say what you will about Tarantino and how he writes women — and there's plenty to say — but he wrote that role for her. And I don't think it's a stretch to think that he wrote it with the Academy in mind. Jackie Brown is resourceful, savvy, always looking for an angle. I think Tarantino wanted Grier to come to the attention of the Academy — and she should have.

When it comes to the Oscars, are we rewarding the actor? Or are we rewarding their ability to conform to the kind of parameters that we are setting with our expectations of what an Academy Award performance looks like? Pam Grier can give you indomitable, resolute, persevering. She can also give you sexy badass. She can give you intelligence, defiance, resourcefulness. So, justice for Pam Grier! But also justice for any actor who isn't playing into the Academy's very narrow parameters of whatever they think is "Oscar worthy."

John Goodman

John Goodman is honored with a star on The Hollywood Walk of Fame in 2017.

(

Alberto E. Rodriguez

/

Getty Images

)

Stephen Thompson: John Goodman was best known, at first, for playing Dan Conner, the lovable TV dad on Roseanne. He spent a chunk of the '90s playing Fred Flintstone and King Ralph. He does marvelous voice work in the Monsters, Inc. movies, and the various Emperor's New Groove properties.

Goodman is the type of character actor who is really always terrific in everything he does, whether the thing he's in is good or terrible. He is a big part of the Coen Brothers movies, including perhaps his most iconic film performance as Walter in The Big Lebowski. Goodman came to film with such a deep reputation for playing lovable figures and then the Coen Brothers made him terrifying. They did that in The Big Lebowski. They did that in Barton Fink and O Brother, Where Art Thou? He pops up in these movies again and again, often as a figure of menace.

When you talk about John Goodman performances that should have been nominated for Oscars, you can certainly bring up The Big Lebowski, which was nominated for zero Academy Awards. But when I looked at his filmography, what I would often see is extremely memorable performances in movies that were either too idiosyncratic, like Barton Fink, or where his role was too small for a nomination. He is very often brought in to just bring a pop of something.

Oscar Isaac

Oscar Isaac

(

Emma McIntyre

/

Getty Images for WarnerMedia

)

Marc Rivers: Oscar Isaac is one of the best actors in his generation. I first saw him in Drive from 2011, playing a very small and kind of stereotypical role — he was a Latino felon, out of prison. But what I remember from that performance is not the criminality aspect — it's the intimacy, the connecting that you see him do on screen.

I think the closest he came to an Oscar nomination was Inside Llewyn Davis from 2013. This is one of the great breakthrough performances that we've had in the last decade or so. It is the only time I've genuinely cared about a Coen Brothers protagonist in a way where I felt close to this guy's pain and agony. He does his own singing in the role — and with such authenticity.

I think Isaac is someone who would have flourished in the '70s with folks like Dustin Hoffman, De Niro, Pacino, where it's less about the plot and more about reveals of character. But if he were born then, maybe his Latino ethnicity would have held him back.

Regina Hall

Regina Hall

(

David Livingston

/

Getty Images

)

Aisha Harris: The first time I noticed Regina Hall was in Scary Movie playing Brenda. It's a great role. There's a lot of references to her being a Black person in the movie and she handles the tacky, tasteless jokes so perfectly. And it plants the seed for what Regina Hall can do, which is everything. She can do the broadest comedy possible, and the dramas and the nuance and all of the layers of a character.

I would have loved for her to get nominated for the 2018 film Support the Girls. Oftentimes with women, especially Black women, there's this need for them to be suffering to the utmost degree. This is not that kind of movie, but it is the kind of role that does occasionally get nominated if you're a white actress. Hall plays Lisa, an exasperated manager of a breastaurant sports bar. She basically has to deal with all of the little annoyances and challenges at work and in her personal life. The New York Film Critics circle named Hall the best actress that year. And sadly, she was the first Black woman to win that award — that's a whole other thing to talk about. I think that it's the type of role that you don't usually see Black women getting and doing.

She also should have won for Honk for Jesus. Save Your Soul., which came out a few years later. She is playing the first lady of a Southern Baptist megachurch whose pastor husband is embroiled in a sex scandal. She has to keep it all in, but is also slowly unraveling in this very weird satire. Regina Hall should have an Oscar.
Copyright 2025 NPR

This story first appeared on The LA Local.

Since 1977, Richard Santillan has been to every Opening Day game at Dodger Stadium. 

“The tradition goes from my father, to me, to my children and grandchildren. Some of my best memories are with my father and children here at Dodger Stadium,” Santillan told The LA Local, smiling under the shade of palm trees near the entrance to the ballpark Wednesday morning. He was there to protest the team less than 24 hours before Opening Day.

Santillan, like countless other loyal Dodgers fans, is grappling with his fan identity over the team’s decision to accept an invitation to the White House and owner Mark Walter’s ties to ICE detention facilities.

More than 30 people joined Santillan on Wednesday morning for a press conference held near 1000 Vin Scully Drive to convey a message directly to the team. 

“We are demanding the Dodgers stop participating in funding of inhumane treatment of families and do not go to the White House to celebrate with the criminal in chief,” Evelyn Escatiola told the crowd. “Together, we have the power to make a change.”

Escatiola, a former dean of East Los Angeles College and longtime community organizer, urged fans to flex their economic power by “letting the Dodgers know that we do not support repression.”

Jorge “Coqui” Rodriguez, a lifelong Dodgers fan, spoke to the crowd and called on Dodgers ownership to divest from immigration detention centers owned and operated by GEO Group and CoreCivic.

Jorge Coqui H Rodriguez speaks at a press conference outside Dodger Stadium on March 25, 2026, to demand the Dodgers not to visit the White House following their 2025 World Series win.

(

J.W. Hendricks

/

The LA Local

)

In a phone interview a day before the protest, Rodriguez told The LA Local he did not want the Dodgers using his “cheve” or beer money to fund detention centers. 

“They can’t take our parking money, our cacahuate money, our cheve money, our Dodger Dog money and invest those funds into corporations that are imprisoning people. It’s wrong,” Rodriguez said. 

Rodriguez considers the Dodgers one of the most racially diverse teams and said the players need to support fans at a time when heightened immigration enforcement has become more common across L.A.

The team’s 2025’s visit to the White House drew ire from the largely Latino fan base, citing the Trump administration’s ongoing attacks on immigrants. 

In June, the team came under further scrutiny when rumors swirled online that federal immigration agents were using the stadium’s parking, which immigration authorities later denied in statements posted on social media accounts.

The team again came under fire after not releasing a statement on the impacts of ICE raids on its mostly Latino fan base at the height of immigration enforcement last summer. The team later agreed to invest $1 million to support families affected by immigration enforcement.

When he learned the Dodgers were pledging only $1 million to families in need, Rodriguez called the amount a  “slap in the face.” 

“These guys just bought the Lakers for billions of dollars and they give a million dollars to fight for legal services? That’s a joke,” Rodriguez said. “They need to have a moral backbone and not be investing in those companies.”

According to reporting from the Los Angeles Times, former Dodgers pitcher Clayton Kershawsaid last week that he is looking forward to the trip.

“I went when President [Joe] Biden was in office. I’m going to go when President [Donald] Trump is in office,” Kershaw said. “To me, it’s just about getting to go to the White House. You don’t get that opportunity every day, so I’m excited to go.”

The Dodgers have yet to announce when their planned visit will take place. 

Santillan sometimes laments his decision to give up his season tickets in protest of the team. His connection to the stadium and the memories he has made there with family and friends will last a lifetime, he said. On Thursday, he will uphold his tradition and be there for the first pitch of the season, but with a heavy heart.

“It’s a family tradition, but the Dodgers have a lot of work to do,” he said.

A local favorite mom-and-pop bookshop in Eagle Rock is facing displacement due to a steep rent hike. The owners say theirs is just one of several small businesses along Eagle Rock Boulevard struggling to keep up with lease increases.

Over the past 19 years, many in the neighborhood have come to love READ Books for its eclectic collection of used titles and shop dog Florence.

Co-owner Jeremy Kaplan said it’s been a delight to grow with the community over the years.

“Like seeing kids come back in, who were in grade school and now they’re in college,” Kaplan said.

But the building where Kaplan and wife Debbie rent was recently sold, and the rent increased by more than 130% to $2,805 a month, Kaplan said. He told LAist it was an increase his small business simply could not absorb.

Kaplan said he originally was given 30 days notice of the rent increase. After some research, assistance from Councilmember Ysabel Jurado’s office and some pro-bono legal help, Kaplan said he pushed back and got the 90-day notice he’s afforded by state law.

California Senate Bill 1103 requires landlords to give businesses with five or less employees 90 days’ notice for rent increases exceeding 10%, among other protections.

Systems Real Estate, the property management company, did not immediately respond to LAist’s request for comment.

What can small businesses do? 

Nadia Segura, directing attorney of the Small Business Program at pro bono legal aid non-profit Bet Tzedek said California law does not currently allow for rent control for commercial tenancies.

Outside of the protections under SB 1103, Segura said small businesses like READ Books don’t have much other recourse. And even then, commercial landlords are not required to inform their tenants of their protections under the law.

“There’s still a lot of people that don’t know about SB 1103. And then it’s very sad that they tell them they have these rent increases and within a month they have to leave,” Segura said.

She said her group is seeing steep rent hikes like this for commercial tenants across the city.

“We are seeing this even more with the World Cup coming up, the Olympics coming up. And I will say it was very sad to see that also after the wildfires,” Segura said.

Part of Bet Tzedek’s ongoing work is to advocate for small businesses, working with landlords who are increasing rents to see if they are willing to give business owners longer leases that lock in rents.

What’s next 

After READ Books posted about their situation on social media, commenters chimed in to express their outrage and love for the little shop.

While he looks for a new spot, Kaplan says he’s forming a coalition of local businesses and activist groups to see what can be done to help other small businesses facing similar displacement. He wants to address the displacement issue for businesses like his, which have made Eagle Rock the distinctive neighborhood that it is today.

Owl Talk, a longtime Eagle Rock staple selling clothing and accessories in a unit in the same building as READ Books, is facing a “more than double” rent increase, according to a post on their Instagram account.

Kaplan said he’s been in touch with the office of state Assemblywoman Jessica Caloza and wants to explore the possibility of introducing legislation to set up protections for small businesses like his, including rent-control measures or a vacancy tax for landlords. Kaplan said he also reached out to the office of state Sen. Maria Durazo.

By his count, Kaplan said there are about a dozen businesses within surrounding blocks that are at risk of closing their doors or have shuttered due to rent increases or other struggles.

When READ Books was founded during the Great Recession, Kaplan said he knew it was a longshot to open a bookstore at the same time so many were struggling to stay in business.

“It was kind of interesting to be doing something that neighborhoods needed. That was important to me growing up, that was important to my children, that was important to my wife growing up,” Kaplan said.

“And then somebody comes in and says, ‘We’re gonna over double your rent.”

Topline:

Frozen budget: Most of the city’s Bureau of Street Lighting budget comes from an assessment that people who own property illuminated by lights pay on their county property tax bill. The amount people pay depends on the kind of property they own and how much they benefit from lighting. A typical single-family home currently pays $53 annually, and in total, the assessments bring in about $45 million annually for the city to repair and maintain streetlights. Changing the amount the Bureau of Street Lighting gets from the assessment requires a vote among property owners who benefit from the lights.

Ballots: L.A. City Council’s vote gives city staff the green light to prepare and send out those ballots. Miguel Sangalang, who oversees the bureau, said at a committee meeting earlier this month that he expects to send out ballots by April 17. Notices about the ballots will be sent out prior to the ballots themselves.

Near unanimous vote: L.A. City Councilmember Monica Rodriguez was the only “No” vote Tuesday, saying she wanted to see a more current strategic plan for the bureau. Sangalang said the bureau developed a plan in 2022 that lays out how money will be spent. Councilmember Imelda Padilla was absent for the vote.

Vote count: Votes will be weighted according to the assessment amount. Basically, the more you’re asked to pay yearly to maintain streetlights, the more your vote will count. Ballots received before June 2 will be tabulated by the L.A. City Clerk.

How much more money: According to a report, the amount needed in assessments from property owners to meet the repair and maintenance needs of the city’s streetlighting in the next fiscal year is nearly $112 million.

Use of the money: Sangalang said at a March 11 committee meeting that the extra funds would be used to double the number of staff to handle repairs and procure solar streetlights, which don’t face the threat of copper wire theft. That would all potentially reduce the time it takes to repair simple fixes down to a week. Currently, city residents wait for months to see broken streetlights repaired. The assessment would come with a three-year auditing mechanism.