Congress has cut federal funding for public media — a $3.4 million loss for LAist. We count on readers like you to protect our nonprofit newsroom. Become a monthly member and sustain local journalism.
In Lawsuits, UC and Cal State Students Demand Refunds Of Fees For On-Campus Services

Our news is free on LAist. To make sure you get our coverage: Sign up for our daily coronavirus newsletter. To support our non-profit public service journalism: Donate Now.
Students in the University of California and California State University systems have filed federal class-action lawsuits demanding refunds of millions of dollars in fees for on-campus services that are not available during the coronavirus shutdowns.
"While both CSU and UC were initially responsible in closing their campuses, it is improper for them to attempt to retain what amounts to many millions of dollars in aggregate in campus fees they collected from their students, even though they terminated the services that these fees covered," Adam Levitt said in a written statement. He's a Chicago-based lawyer who filed the suits Monday in U.S. District Courts in Los Angeles and Oakland.
The combined enrollment in the two systems is 700,000 students. According to Levitt, CSU students paid fees ranging from $847 to $4,201 in the 2019-20 academic year, while UC students paid a base student services fee of $1,128, along with campus-specific fees typically totaling an additional $2,000 to $4,000.
The University of California declined to comment on the lawsuit.
Mike Uhlenkamp, a spokesman for the Cal State Chancellor's office, said "the complaint misstates the facts."
"Campuses continue to operate, and many personal services are now provided remotely, such as counseling, advising, faculty office hours, disability student services, and even telehealth medical care," he said. "CSU will vigorously defend against this suit."
DON'T MISS ANY L.A. CORONAVIRUS NEWS
Get our daily newsletters for the latest on COVID-19 and other top local headlines.
Terms of Use and Privacy Policy
CSU's interim refund policysays students may request refunds for "materials, services, and facilities for which students have paid but that the CSU is unable to provide," but refunds are not warranted if the services continue to be provided online. The policy makes no changes to refund policies regarding tuition.
The lawsuit against CSU alleges campuses engaged in "illegal, unfair, or deceptive conduct" as administrators forced or encouraged students to move off campus while keeping unused fees for services that are no longer being provided.
"I'm glad someone is suing to get their attention," Valarie Segovia, a senior at Cal State Fullerton, said by text message. Segovia and other student leaders want the fee refunds to happen automatically instead of by request.
"Students have been demanding refunds for students, but we are only refunded our parking pass," she said.
Akayla Miller, a Sonoma State University student who is lead plaintiff in the suit against CSU, says in the lawsuit that she paid the full cost of fees for the Spring 2020 semester but she has not been on campus since mid-March.
"Despite the shutdown of campus and suspension of on-campus activities, Plaintiff has not been offered or provided any refund of any fees that she paid for the semester," the suit said.
The suit against the University of California Board of Regents makes the same demands on behalf of lead plaintiff Claire Brandmeyer, a student at UC Davis.
As Editor-in-Chief of our newsroom, I’m extremely proud of the work our top-notch journalists are doing here at LAist. We’re doing more hard-hitting watchdog journalism than ever before — powerful reporting on the economy, elections, climate and the homelessness crisis that is making a difference in your lives. At the same time, it’s never been more difficult to maintain a paywall-free, independent news source that informs, inspires, and engages everyone.
Simply put, we cannot do this essential work without your help. Federal funding for public media has been clawed back by Congress and that means LAist has lost $3.4 million in federal funding over the next two years. So we’re asking for your help. LAist has been there for you and we’re asking you to be here for us.
We rely on donations from readers like you to stay independent, which keeps our nonprofit newsroom strong and accountable to you.
No matter where you stand on the political spectrum, press freedom is at the core of keeping our nation free and fair. And as the landscape of free press changes, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust, but the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news from our community.
Please take action today to support your trusted source for local news with a donation that makes sense for your budget.
Thank you for your generous support and believing in independent news.

-
L.A. County investigators have launched a probe into allegations about Va Lecia Adams Kellum and people she hired at the L.A. Homeless Services Authority.
-
L.A. Mayor Karen Bass suspended a state law allowing duplexes, calling more housing unsafe. But in Altadena, L.A. County leaders say these projects could be key for rebuilding.
-
This measure on the Nov. 4, 2025, California ballot is part of a larger battle for control of the U.S. House of Representatives next year.
-
After rising for years, the number of residential installations in the city of Los Angeles began to drop in 2023. The city isn’t subject to recent changes in state incentives, but other factors may be contributing to the decline.
-
The L.A. City Council approved the venue change Wednesday, which organizers say will save $12 million in infrastructure costs.
-
Taxes on the sale of some newer apartment buildings would be lowered under a plan by Sacramento lawmakers to partially rein in city Measure ULA.