Sustain LAist today!

Your monthly gift during our June member drive powers our local newsroom.
1,485 sustainers of 2,500 goal
Logged in as
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

This is an archival story that predates current editorial management.

This archival content was written, edited, and published prior to LAist's acquisition by its current owner, Southern California Public Radio ("SCPR"). Content, such as language choice and subject matter, in archival articles therefore may not align with SCPR's current editorial standards. To learn more about those standards and why we make this distinction, please click here.

News

Oil Drilling off Santa Barbara Coast Back on the Table

This story is free to read because readers choose to support LAist. If you find value in independent local reporting, make a donation to power our newsroom today.

oildrillingsb.jpg
Off the coast of Santa Barbara | Photo by bossco via Flickr


Off the coast of Santa Barbara | Photo by bossco via Flickr
Despite the fact that the state Assembly rejected a proposal allowing new offshore drilling in the budget vote a few weeks ago, the issues is back. Or, as Dan Jacobson of Environment California puts it, "the coast won and the oil companies lost... Or so it would seem."

As the LA Times explains, "after the measure failed, Assembly leaders expunged the vote altogether, sparing lawmakers running for reelection an official record of their controversial decision. The voting logs made available to the public on the Legislature's website do not indicate who voted for and against the bill on July 24."

Jacobson calls it "an archaic rule and a sneaky move by the oil companies and their cronies." Rules in the state Senate do not allow for votes to be expunged.

Nevertheless, Jacobson's organization is calling for yet another flurry of letters from Californians to be sent to their Assemblymembers. "When going up against oil companies, I've come to expect sneaky tricks. But this goes beyond the pale. We can't let the oil companies get away with this," he wrote, noting that $17 million in oil money has been spent in PR and lobbying California since 2005. One company, Plains Exploration and Production, stands to gain a lot if drilling is allowed.

Back in 1969, an infamous spill coated miles of coastline with oil, helping prompt a federal moratorium (which ended last year), the Earth Day movement and the creation of the Environmental Protection Agency.

Legislators are pretty vague on why they are allowing for the possibility for offshore drilling. "Though it's rare, occasionally the procedural step of expunging a vote is necessary," said Shannon Murphy, a spokeswoman for Assembly Speaker Karen Bass (D-Los Angeles) to the Times. "She said the procedure can be used to allow "further discussion and negotiation that may ultimately lead to consensus on a contentious issue."

You come to LAist because you want independent reporting and trustworthy local information. Our newsroom doesn’t answer to shareholders looking to turn a profit. Instead, we answer to you and our connected community. We are free to tell the full truth, to hold power to account without fear or favor, and to follow facts wherever they lead. Our only loyalty is to our audiences and our mission: to inform, engage, and strengthen our community.

Right now, LAist has lost $1.7M in annual funding due to Congress clawing back money already approved. The support we receive from readers like you will determine how fully our newsroom can continue informing, serving, and strengthening Southern California.

If this story helped you today, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.

Your tax-deductible donation keeps LAist independent and accessible to everyone.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief

Make your tax-deductible donation today