Sponsored message
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

This is an archival story that predates current editorial management.

This archival content was written, edited, and published prior to LAist's acquisition by its current owner, Southern California Public Radio ("SCPR"). Content, such as language choice and subject matter, in archival articles therefore may not align with SCPR's current editorial standards. To learn more about those standards and why we make this distinction, please click here.

News

'Safe Streets Bill' Fails to Advance out of State Transpo Committee

ab766file.jpg
Photo by Dan4th via Flickr

With our free press under threat and federal funding for public media gone, your support matters more than ever. Help keep the LAist newsroom strong, become a monthly member or increase your support today.

After heavy opposition from the Teamsters and the Automobile Club (AAA), Assemblyman Paul Krekorian's AB 766, otherwise known as the "safe streets bill," failed to advance out of the transportation committee's today. That doesn't mean it failed--it just didn't get seconded--but it will either fade away until forgotten or the more likely outcome, until it's tweaked to incorporate opponent's comments and concerns.

The bill is meant to give local governments who wish to have police use radar more control over speed limit increases, which are currently forced to evaluate and raise if 85% of drivers are speeding. The current law is meant to stop governments, usually small and rural towns, from lowering limits to make speed traps. The unintended consequences happened in larger and denser cities where the raised speed limits put pedestrians and cyclists at odds. AB 766 would force cities looking to retain a speed limit to hold a public hearing and make an official finding.

The California Highway Patrol did not join the Teamsters and Automobile Club in officially opposing the bill, but they had a lot of questions about the AB 766's effectiveness. The committee's chair, Mike Eng reportedly claimed "it's worked for the last 30-50 years," and called for a no vote. Krekorian will keep working on the bill and the committee will review of the specifics of state law that deal with this bill.

In the same meeting, a bill about the costs of employer parking moved forward.

At LAist, we focus on what matters to our community: clear, fair, and transparent reporting that helps you make decisions with confidence and keeps powerful institutions accountable.

Your support for independent local news is critical. With federal funding for public media gone, LAist faces a $1.7 million yearly shortfall. Speaking frankly, how much reader support we receive now will determine the strength of this reliable source of local information now and for years to come.

This work is only possible with community support. Every investigation, service guide, and story is made possible by people like you who believe that local news is a public good and that everyone deserves access to trustworthy local information.

That’s why we’re asking you to stand up for independent reporting that will not be silenced. With more individuals like you supporting this public service, we can continue to provide essential coverage for Southern Californians that you can’t find anywhere else. Become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.

Thank you for understanding how essential it is to have an informed community and standing up for free press.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief

Chip in now to fund your local journalism

A row of graphics payment types: Visa, MasterCard, Apple Pay and PayPal, and  below a lock with Secure Payment text to the right