Sponsored message
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

This is an archival story that predates current editorial management.

This archival content was written, edited, and published prior to LAist's acquisition by its current owner, Southern California Public Radio ("SCPR"). Content, such as language choice and subject matter, in archival articles therefore may not align with SCPR's current editorial standards. To learn more about those standards and why we make this distinction, please click here.

News

'Safe Streets Bill' Fails to Advance out of State Transpo Committee

ab766file.jpg
Photo by Dan4th via Flickr

Truth matters. Community matters. Your support makes both possible. LAist is one of the few places where news remains independent and free from political and corporate influence. Stand up for truth and for LAist. Make your tax-deductible donation now.

After heavy opposition from the Teamsters and the Automobile Club (AAA), Assemblyman Paul Krekorian's AB 766, otherwise known as the "safe streets bill," failed to advance out of the transportation committee's today. That doesn't mean it failed--it just didn't get seconded--but it will either fade away until forgotten or the more likely outcome, until it's tweaked to incorporate opponent's comments and concerns.

The bill is meant to give local governments who wish to have police use radar more control over speed limit increases, which are currently forced to evaluate and raise if 85% of drivers are speeding. The current law is meant to stop governments, usually small and rural towns, from lowering limits to make speed traps. The unintended consequences happened in larger and denser cities where the raised speed limits put pedestrians and cyclists at odds. AB 766 would force cities looking to retain a speed limit to hold a public hearing and make an official finding.

The California Highway Patrol did not join the Teamsters and Automobile Club in officially opposing the bill, but they had a lot of questions about the AB 766's effectiveness. The committee's chair, Mike Eng reportedly claimed "it's worked for the last 30-50 years," and called for a no vote. Krekorian will keep working on the bill and the committee will review of the specifics of state law that deal with this bill.

In the same meeting, a bill about the costs of employer parking moved forward.

You come to LAist because you want independent reporting and trustworthy local information. Our newsroom doesn’t answer to shareholders looking to turn a profit. Instead, we answer to you and our connected community. We are free to tell the full truth, to hold power to account without fear or favor, and to follow facts wherever they lead. Our only loyalty is to our audiences and our mission: to inform, engage, and strengthen our community.

Right now, LAist has lost $1.7M in annual funding due to Congress clawing back money already approved. The support we receive from readers like you will determine how fully our newsroom can continue informing, serving, and strengthening Southern California.

If this story helped you today, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.

Your tax-deductible donation keeps LAist independent and accessible to everyone.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief

Make your tax-deductible donation today

A row of graphics payment types: Visa, MasterCard, Apple Pay and PayPal, and  below a lock with Secure Payment text to the right