This story is free to read because readers choose to support LAist. If you find value in independent local reporting, make a donation to power our newsroom today.
New Bill Targets Legacy Admissions At Private Colleges
A new bill introduced by Assemblymember Phil Ting would ban state financial aid for private universities in California that consider legacy when admitting students.
Ting, who represents western San Francisco and northwestern San Mateo County, joined LAist’s daily news program, AirTalk to discuss the legislation along with Jerry Lucido, professor of clinical education and senior scholar at the Center for Enrollment Research, Policy and Practice at USC.
What the bill would do and who's affected
The bill aims to take away Cal Grant funding from institutions that consider family ties during the admissions process.
“The Cal Grant … is a very powerful way that colleges and universities — the private ones, as well as the public ones — advance their equity agenda by having more financial aid for students who need it. The prospect of taking that away makes this bill a very powerful disincentive for colleges to do legacy admission,” explained Lucido.
Said Ting, “What we're talking about is really only three major institutions in the state, which is Stanford, USC, and Santa Clara, who admit between 13 to 15% of their class and give preferential treatment to donors and alumni.”
He further contextualized those numbers, “That's 50% more than the number of African Americans they admit to their class, and almost the same number of Latinos they admit.”
Legacies and equity
Proponents of legacy admissions say they strengthen alumni networks, leading to increased donations that can cover more scholarships. Legacy students are also more likely to pay full tuition to attend.
“People who do college admissions care a lot about equity, but they have to balance many competing interests … And when you change one aspect of that ecology, other aspects are impacted. That said, I agree with the Assemblyman that legacy admission should end.” explained Lucido. “I would favor being very transparent about how all of these spaces are being used and who gets them.”
Ting referenced a study by Opportunity Insights, a group of Harvard economists, that found that “if you were a family from the top 1% of the country, which is a family making over $600,000, you were twice as likely to get admitted to those same institutions as anybody else, the other 99%. And that is for children or for students who have the same grades, the same test scores, roughly the same activities.”
Second time's the charm?
Ting attempted to pass a similar bill in 2019. “We couldn't get it out of the Assembly Higher Education Committee, which is why we decided to turn it into a study bill and ask the institutions to report data … Now that we actually have data, we see what institutions really heavily rely on preferential treatment for wealthy donors and wealthy alumni.”
2024’s political climate is markedly different from 2019’s, particularly since the Supreme Court struck down affirmative action last year.
“I think we have a much better chance of having it pass this year,” said Ting.
Listen here
-
L.A. Homeless Services Authority executives were far behind in turning in required documents for a crucial oversight check, per the lead auditor.
-
Dennis Block submitted a filing in eviction court that a judge called “fabricated.” He’s now facing potential discipline from the California State Bar.
-
UFW hasn’t received direct information about the allegations, but it’s serious enough to the organization to pull back from Chávez, who co-founded the union.
-
From the Central Coast to San Diego, millions of Californians are under heat advisories and warnings this week. Here's what you need to know.
-
Trump is using Cold War-era emergency powers to force a California oil pipeline back online — and Gov. Newsom vows to sue, to block the move.
-
Person with ‘history of sleeping on the job’ held critical role during Eaton Fire, complaint allegesAn L.A. County employee makes the allegation in a whistleblower complaint and in interviews about the response to the deadly fire. County officials dispute the allegations.