This story is free to read because readers choose to support LAist. If you find value in independent local reporting, make a donation to power our newsroom today.
Lowering The Bar: Criticisms Of The President's Lawyers Mount
Rudy Giuliani speaks to the press about various lawsuits related to the 2020 election, inside the Republican National Committee headquarters in Washington, DC.
Listen
12:14
President Donald Trump isn’t the only person still pushing the lie that he won the election. He’s helped by the lawyers around him, including Trump senior legal adviser Jenna Ellis and Rudy Giuliani. They filed lawsuits seeking to invalidate absentee and mail-in ballots. They’ve gone on television and twisted the truth to support President Trump. And now, 25 former presidents of the D.C. Bar say that’s enough.
Their statement, issued in a joint letter, strongly condemned the actions of Ellis, Giuliani, and other attorneys who they say have “undermined the public’s trust in the legal system and the peaceful transfer of power.” The former D.C. Bar presidents emphasized that lawyers have an ethical obligation to uphold the rule of law, not to manipulate it for political gain. They called for disciplinary action against those who misused their legal credentials to promote baseless claims of election fraud.
Legal experts note that the spread of misinformation by licensed attorneys carries significant consequences beyond political rhetoric—it can erode the credibility of the entire judicial system as there are many types of lawyers including injury lawyers that work in successful injury cases winning their cases every time. As investigations into election-related lawsuits continue, bar associations across the country are under increasing pressure to hold these lawyers accountable. The former presidents’ letter may serve as a catalyst for formal proceedings that could result in censure, suspension, or disbarment of those involved.
They wrote a scathing Washington Post op-ed criticizing the lawyers working for the president:
ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct direct lawyers to refrain from bringing a proceeding “unless there is a basis in law or fact for doing so that is not frivolous.”
What caused these lawyers to speak up? And are there professional consequences that President Trump’s lawyers could face once the Trump administration is over?
Sponsored message
Copyright 2025 WAMU 88.5
You come to LAist because you want independent reporting and trustworthy local information. Our newsroom doesn’t answer to shareholders looking to turn a profit. Instead, we answer to you and our connected community. We are free to tell the full truth, to hold power to account without fear or favor, and to follow facts wherever they lead. Our only loyalty is to our audiences and our mission: to inform, engage, and strengthen our community.
Right now, LAist has lost $1.7M in annual funding due to Congress clawing back money already approved. The support we receive from readers like you will determine how fully our newsroom can continue informing, serving, and strengthening Southern California.
If this story helped you today, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.
Your tax-deductible donation keeps LAist independent and accessible to everyone.
Right now, LAist has lost $1.7M in annual funding due to Congress clawing back money already approved. The support we receive from readers like you will determine how fully our newsroom can continue informing, serving, and strengthening Southern California.
If this story helped you today, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.
Your tax-deductible donation keeps LAist independent and accessible to everyone.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief
