Sponsored message
Logged in as
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen
  • Listen Now Playing Listen
News

When does a public apology backfire? One Olympian may have just found out

A male presenting person wearing a white winter jacket and a bronze medal
Bronze medalist Sturla Holm Laegreid of Team Norway reacts on the podium during the medal ceremony for the Men's 20km Individual on day four of the Milano Cortina 2026 Winter Olympic games at Anterselva Biathlon Arena on February 10, 2026 in Antholz-Anterselva, Italy.
(
Alexander Hassenstein/Getty Images
/
Getty Images Europe
)

One year ago, Congress defunded public media. Now that we're 100% community funded, please become a sustaining member or increase your existing membership today.

Listen 1:39:10
Today on AirTalk: Do public apologies work? Check-in on marijuana How do you get off the screens? California's trucking industry; and Why are fewer 16-year-olds driving?
Today on AirTalk: Do public apologies work? Check-in on marijuana How do you get off the screens? California's trucking industry; and Why are fewer 16-year-olds driving?

When does a public apology backfire? One Olympian may have just found out

Listen 16:26

In a live post-race interview, a Norwegian Olympian took a very public moment to disclose some private details of his personal life. The bronze medalist shared that he’d been unfaithful to his girlfriend, “the love of [his] life,” and that it was the biggest mistake of his life. He had hoped to share his Olympic victory with her. The story has gone viral, and now, the athlete whose name is Sturla Holm Laegreid, is wondering if he made the right decision. How do you interpret this mea culpa? If you were in his position, would you try to make this sort of grand gesture? If you were his ex-girlfriend, how would this public admission of guilt make you feel? Call us at 866-893-5722 or email us at atcoments@laist.com.

The evolving landscape of Marijuana in the United States

Listen 33:04

A recent editorial from the New York Times editorial board made the case that marijuana legalization, in its current state, has gone too far and that the drug needs less normalization. With Cannabis still regulated on a state-by-state level, the board also calls for more federal regulation specifically. The piece marked a stark reversal from the board’s previous position for widespread legalization, with the board citing widespread use and rising evidence of addiction-related issues as reasons for their change of mind. So does the board have a point? How has our understanding of how marijuana affects our bodies changed in recent years? And as the industry continues to face economic headwinds with grey market operators still in the background, is it in a spot to accept more stringent oversight? Joining us to help answer these questions is Robin Goldstein, director of the Cannabis Economics Group and an economist in the department of agricultural and resource economics at the University of California, Davis, and Deepak D’Souza MD, professor of psychiatry at the Yale University School of Medicine and a staff psychiatrist at VA Connecticut Healthcare System.

A check in on California’s trucking industry

Listen 29:59

In the robust infrastructure of California’s central valley trucking industry, aging drivers have contributed heavily to the growing shortages in employment. This has led to a community of Sikh immigrants, picking up most of the jobs over the last 20 years. Although estimates of the number of Sikh truckers vary, California is home to half of the Sikh population in the US, which includes tens of thousands of truckers who can link their heritage back to the region of Punjab, India. Many truck drivers of South Asian descent, particularly those who are seeking asylum, rely on California’s special licenses called 'domicile licenses' or more commonly 'non-domiciled commercial driver's licenses' that are issued to individuals, including foreign nationals, who do not have a legal residency status in the state or country at the time of issuing the license. That all changed when the Trump administration’s focus on immigrant truckers intensified after two fatal crashes involving Sikh truck drivers caught national attention. The Department of Transportation has since threatened to pull 160 million dollars in funding for the state, forcing California to cancel non-domiciled commercial driving licenses altogether. Along with the immigration crackdowns, the trucking industry also may get hit with additional regulations this year, as a loophole in California state law that allows trucking schools to operate with little oversight has raised concerns about the quality of training for the state’s truck drivers. Here with us to talk about it is Gagandeep Singh, freelance journalist following the Sikh trucking workforce in the Central Valley for CalMatters and Adam Echelman, CalMatters higher education reporter.

Sponsored message

Fewer 16-year-olds are on the road; what’s factoring into it?

Listen 19:38

A recent piece on Business Insider contextualized 2022 data from the Federal Highway Administration, which found that fewer 16-year-olds are getting their drivers licenses. This trend has gone on for some time, with the New York Times having reported on this in 2008, and there seems to be little suggestion that the numbers will ever come back up. With most teenagers at this point being Gen-Z, the story does offer insight into the psychological factors that may be at play, with the generation having been associated with relatively higher levels of anxiety. With there also being reported social differences in drinking and sex habits, it does offer some more context as to why driving may be another thing that the younger generation is doing less of. Today on AirTalk, we’ll talk about this reported decrease with Julia Pugachevsky, senior health reporter for Business Insider. Join the conversation: Are you a parent whose teenage child doesn’t seem interested in driving? Are you finding it difficult to help them get a car, or are insurance costs too high at this time? Give us a call at 866-893-5733 or email atcomments@laist.com.

One year ago, Congress voted to defund public media, eliminating a critical $1.7 million from our budget every year going forward. But they couldn’t silence us, and we’re not going anywhere. LAist is now 100% community funded and that means we’re taking our future into our own hands and turning to you to keep local reporting strong.

You come to LAist because you want independent reporting and trustworthy local information. Our nonprofit newsroom doesn’t answer to shareholders looking to turn a profit. Instead, we answer to you and our communities. We are free to follow facts wherever they lead and to hold power to account without fear or favor. Our only loyalty is to our readers and listeners and our mission: to inform, engage, and strengthen Southern California’s communities.

If this story helped you, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief

Make your tax-deductible donation today