One year ago, Congress defunded public media. Now that we're 100% community funded, please become a sustaining member or increase your existing membership today.
This is an archival story that predates current editorial management.
This archival content was written, edited, and published prior to LAist's acquisition by its current owner, Southern California Public Radio ("SCPR"). Content, such as language choice and subject matter, in archival articles therefore may not align with SCPR's current editorial standards. To learn more about those standards and why we make this distinction, please click here.
What's Not Funny? A Judge "Joking" About the Ku Klux Klan.
OMGLOLWTF!
Los Angeles County Superior Court Judge Harvey Giss thinks "[p]eople don't have a sense of humor anymore," when it comes to kidding around about the Ku Klux Klan, according to the LA Times. Details of an off-the-record discussion between Giss and attorneys from July 2010 are surfacing, and yesterday the judge "was publicly admonished" by the state's Commission on Judicial Performance (CJP).Per the CJP's release, Giss joined a discussion about a possible plea deal with two African American defendants, believing "counsel wished him to intercede and explain the potential benefits of the plea," which he felt he would not be able to do successfully. Giss then "made a remark to the effect that he guessed that the only thing that would make the defendants plead was for the judge to come out in a white sheet and a pointy white hat, which the judge indicated he would not do." (As the CJP thoughtfully points out, that remark "referenced the Ku Klux Klan and the fact that both defendants were African-American.")
Hilarious and appropriate, right? Not so much. Giss was asked by the defense to be recused, then admitted he made a "bad statement," adding the aforementioned gem about people lacking a sense of humor.
The CJP says Giss' remark was "insensitive," and constituted a failure to refrain from speech that would reasonably be perceived as bias or prejudice," citing violations on the judge's part of a handful of Judicial Ethics canons.
The Commission found that Judge Giss should have kno
Giss ultimately withdrew from the case and it went before another judge. After the admonishment was released, Giss' attorney said his client "regrets that the comment was made," and that the remark was both "unfortunate" and "in jest."
One year ago, Congress voted to defund public media, eliminating a critical $1.7 million from our budget every year going forward. But they couldn’t silence us, and we’re not going anywhere. LAist is now 100% community funded and that means we’re taking our future into our own hands and turning to you to keep local reporting strong.
You come to LAist because you want independent reporting and trustworthy local information. Our nonprofit newsroom doesn’t answer to shareholders looking to turn a profit. Instead, we answer to you and our communities. We are free to follow facts wherever they lead and to hold power to account without fear or favor. Our only loyalty is to our readers and listeners and our mission: to inform, engage, and strengthen Southern California’s communities.
If this story helped you, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.
You come to LAist because you want independent reporting and trustworthy local information. Our nonprofit newsroom doesn’t answer to shareholders looking to turn a profit. Instead, we answer to you and our communities. We are free to follow facts wherever they lead and to hold power to account without fear or favor. Our only loyalty is to our readers and listeners and our mission: to inform, engage, and strengthen Southern California’s communities.
If this story helped you, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief
