Sponsored message
Logged in as
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

This is an archival story that predates current editorial management.

This archival content was written, edited, and published prior to LAist's acquisition by its current owner, Southern California Public Radio ("SCPR"). Content, such as language choice and subject matter, in archival articles therefore may not align with SCPR's current editorial standards. To learn more about those standards and why we make this distinction, please click here.

News

Emergency Drought Regulations To Remain, Despite Impressive Rainfall

storm_clouds.jpg
(Photo by Mary via the LAist Featured Photos pool on Flickr)

One year ago, Congress defunded public media. Now that we're 100% community funded, please become a sustaining member or increase your existing membership today.

With the record rainfall that has been hitting California as of late, the big question is: are we out of the drought yet?

The signs are hopeful. The Sierra Nevada snowpack is measured to be about 170% above normal for this time of year. Practically all of Northern California is no longer facing drought conditions, according to the U.S. Drought Monitor. And local water agencies in Southern California have taken the initiative to say that, yup, we're out of the danger zone, and that emergency state-wide regulations are no longer needed.

This sentiment, however, was countered on Wednesday, when the State Water Resources Control Board announced that it has decided to extend those emergency regulations for at least another three months, reports CBS 13. Before the decision, the regulations were set to expire this May.

This means that local water agencies will still have to report their numbers to the state every month, and that residents are expected to stick with water conversation measures; this includes not watering a lawn within 48 hours of a rainstorm, or hosing off sidewalks, or overwatering a lawn to the point where there's runoff. The regulations also bar homeowners associations from taking action against homeowners who are turning to water-saving methods (meaning you can xeriscape the heck out of your lawn).

As to why the regulations are still in place, the agency said in a release that, "While many parts of the state have benefited from this year’s rain and snow, other areas continue to experience the effects of drought, including Central Valley communities that still depend on water tanks and bottled water." It also noted that groundwater "the source of at least a third of California’s water supplies, remains significantly depleted in many areas."

And indeed the Drought Monitor shows that, while Northern California is in the clear, much of the southern regions is still mired in moderate to severe drought. The most dire level—"extreme drought"—still exists in parts of L.A. County, Santa Barbara County, and Ventura County.

Officials say that, while things aren't quite as dire any more, water conservation should remain as a precaution. “We’re certainly well-situated compared to previous years, but we’ve learned things can change suddenly. Warm rain or higher temperatures can quickly degrade snowpack,” Felicia Marcus, board Chairwoman, told the L.A. Times.

Sponsored message

Some local water agencies aren't exactly happy with the decision. Critics want water conservation to happen at the local level, and they see the monthly reports as being unnecessary. Earlier this week, the Municipal Water District of Orange County said that an extension of regulations would not be needed, as the agency's reservoirs are "overflowing."

“We remain in a drought, but it is no longer an emergency. Not only is it unnecessary, continuing the ‘emergency’ will destroy local leaders’ credibility with their stakeholders," said Wayne Osborne, president of the MWDOC Board of Directors. This argument, that state regulations may contradict public perception, was echoed by others. "It’s not being truthful to tell Californians, when they see rivers rising and reservoirs spilling, that we still have a drought emergency,” state Sen. Jim Nielsen, a Republican who represents a Central Valley farm district, told the Wall Street Journal. Nielsen added that the board's action "is an abuse of an emergency power that was supposed to be used for emergency situations," according to CBS 13.

But some local water agencies agree with the board's call, saying that water conservation itself is not an emergency action, but a practice that should be commonplace. "“While the emergency has ended, the need to conserve has not,” said Jeff Kightlinger, general manager for The Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, according to the Times. “Southern Californians have learned a lot about water conservation during the latest drought. We cannot afford to forget those lessons.”

One year ago, Congress voted to defund public media, eliminating a critical $1.7 million from our budget every year going forward. But they couldn’t silence us, and we’re not going anywhere. LAist is now 100% community funded and that means we’re taking our future into our own hands and turning to you to keep local reporting strong.

You come to LAist because you want independent reporting and trustworthy local information. Our nonprofit newsroom doesn’t answer to shareholders looking to turn a profit. Instead, we answer to you and our communities. We are free to follow facts wherever they lead and to hold power to account without fear or favor. Our only loyalty is to our readers and listeners and our mission: to inform, engage, and strengthen Southern California’s communities.

If this story helped you, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief

Make your tax-deductible donation today