Congress has cut federal funding for public media — a $3.4 million loss for LAist. We count on readers like you to protect our nonprofit newsroom. Become a monthly member and sustain local journalism.
Trump policies will add to LA’s billion-dollar budget shortfall, officials say; others point to city overspending

The Trump administration’s trade tariffs and crackdown on unauthorized immigrants are expected to reduce tax revenues to the city of Los Angeles, contributing to a projected budget shortfall of nearly $1 billion in the next fiscal year, according to city officials.
City Administrative Officer Matt Szabo delivered the news to the City Council this week during his mid-year financial status report. He told the panel that for the fiscal year that starts July 1, revenue alone is projected to be $315 million below the city’s four-year projected outlook.
“Federal trade policy is not only likely to spur further inflation but also to slow growth and to dampen international travel upon which our hotel tax relies,” Szabo said.
A weakening economy already has pushed revenues down $141 million below projections.
Bass echoed worries about the economy in a letter to Szabo.
“Our city is affected by downward national economic trends ranging from unpredictable federal fiscal policy and ever-changing tariff proposals, to volatile stock markets, to continued post-pandemic impacts related to tourism, lower office occupancies and more,” the mayor wrote.
But one economist said the city may be overstating the effects of Trump administration policies. He and others said the real problem is overspending by the city of L.A.
“It's a little too early in the day to see just how far he’s going to push these things,” said Christopher Thornberg of Los Angeles-based Beacon Economics, who noted that the city largely makes its money off of consumer demand, including property taxes, sales taxes, and gross receipts taxes.
“The fundamentals of the consumer economy are still pretty good,” he added. “I don’t see the Trump Administration having a sizable impact on city revenues.”
Federal fire relief money
City officials have several concerns about the potential impacts of President Donald Trump’s policies on local revenue.
One has to do with Palisades Fire federal relief money. Trump has threatened to withhold relief money if California doesn’t enact a voter ID law requiring people to show identification at the polls.
Szabo said federal immigration policy also “poses a particular threat to our local economy,” especially after the Palisades Fire. He noted that unauthorized immigrants make up about 40% of the workforce in the construction industry.
“Due to the fires, there is nowhere in the country where demand for construction and construction related services will be higher than here in Los Angeles,” he said. Restricting immigration and mass deportations could contribute to inflation in the construction industry.
He also said the Palisades Fire will cause property values on thousands of homes to go down, reducing tax revenue. Because of declining revenue and increasing costs, layoffs and reductions in city services are “almost inevitable,” Szabo said.
Not everyone agrees on those claims. The head of the city’s biggest labor union balked at the notion of layoffs, calling them “short-sighted” and “irresponsible.”
“Before laying off employees, the city needs to take a hard look at reining in spending on private outside contractors,” said David Green, president of the Service Employee International Union Local 721.
Thornberg, from Beacon Economics, said it’s unlikely Trump will accomplish the number of deportations he’s promised, and the city of L.A. has more of a spending problem than a revenue issue. The situation, he said, dates back to the pandemic stimulus spending by Congress, which resulted in an enormous surge in taxable sales, property values and gross receipts taxes.
“So we increased our permanent expenditures on the basis of a temporary surge in revenues and now deficits are showing up,” he said. “This is a spending problem.”
Thornberg continued: “A lot of cities and states started to increase their spending to match that surge and what happened was what they thought was going to be a long-run increase in revenues turned out to be a very short run. But once you start spending, it's hard to stop.”
Liability costs increase dramatically
City officials say L.A.’s financial challenges go much deeper.
The reserve fund dropped well below the 5% required by city policy, and Szabo said it will take $285 million to restore it next fiscal year.
In addition, liability costs have increased sharply. Payouts from legal settlements and judgments are expected to be $320 million in the 2024-2025 fiscal year — three times what was budgeted. Szabo said the city will need to set aside an extra $100 million beyond the city’s four-year outlook for the next fiscal year.
The city also faces a $100 million increase in pension obligations next fiscal year largely because of salary increases for city workers, Szabo said.
Last year, the mayor and City Council signed what critics said were too generous labor contracts with city workers. The police contract alone boosted the starting pay of officers by nearly 13% and provided four raises of 3% over a four-year period.
Bass sent a letter to Szabo asking him to explore ways to address the deficit. They included reducing liability costs and “proposals that realize payroll and benefit savings.”
That could mean layoffs or deferred compensation, said Councilmember Bob Blumenfield, vice-chair of the Budget and Finance Committee.
“Given 80% of the budget is labor, it's going to have to involve labor in some way,” he said.
What’s next?
The mayor is set to release her budget on April 21. The City Council will then hold a series of public hearings on the document and send it back to the mayor.
As Editor-in-Chief of our newsroom, I’m extremely proud of the work our top-notch journalists are doing here at LAist. We’re doing more hard-hitting watchdog journalism than ever before — powerful reporting on the economy, elections, climate and the homelessness crisis that is making a difference in your lives. At the same time, it’s never been more difficult to maintain a paywall-free, independent news source that informs, inspires, and engages everyone.
Simply put, we cannot do this essential work without your help. Federal funding for public media has been clawed back by Congress and that means LAist has lost $3.4 million in federal funding over the next two years. So we’re asking for your help. LAist has been there for you and we’re asking you to be here for us.
We rely on donations from readers like you to stay independent, which keeps our nonprofit newsroom strong and accountable to you.
No matter where you stand on the political spectrum, press freedom is at the core of keeping our nation free and fair. And as the landscape of free press changes, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust, but the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news from our community.
Please take action today to support your trusted source for local news with a donation that makes sense for your budget.
Thank you for your generous support and believing in independent news.

-
The L.A. City Council approved the venue change Wednesday, which organizers say will save $12 million in infrastructure costs.
-
Taxes on the sale of some newer apartment buildings would be lowered under a plan by Sacramento lawmakers to partially rein in city Measure ULA.
-
The union representing the restaurant's workers announced Tuesday that The Pantry will welcome back patrons Thursday after suddenly shutting down six months ago.
-
If approved, the more than 62-acre project would include 50 housing lots and a marina less than a mile from Jackie and Shadow's famous nest overlooking the lake.
-
The U.S. Supreme Court lifted limits on immigration sweeps in Southern California, overturning a lower court ruling that prohibited agents from stopping people based on their appearance.
-
Censorship has long been controversial. But lately, the issue of who does and doesn’t have the right to restrict kids’ access to books has been heating up across the country in the so-called culture wars.