With our free press under threat and federal funding for public media gone, your support matters more than ever. Help keep the LAist newsroom strong, become a monthly member or increase your support today during our fall member drive.
LA lags behind on installing cameras to quell speeding on dangerous roads

Camera systems shown to reduce speeding might not be operational in Los Angeles until the end of 2026, a transportation engineer told officials Wednesday, putting the city behind some of its peers throughout the state that are also piloting the technology.
Elected officials expressed frustration with the delay at an L.A. City Council transportation committee meeting.
“It has been about two years since we approved this, and we’re still talking about [requests for proposals],” L.A. City Councilmember Traci Park said. “I find that a little frustrating.”
In October 2023, Gov. Gavin Newsom signed legislation authorizing L.A. and five other California cities to pilot camera systems that cite speeding drivers on dangerous roads.
A representative for Streets Are For Everyone, a nonprofit also known as SAFE that sponsored the bill Newsom signed two years ago, said L.A. is falling behind on implementing its program.
“Our findings show that Los Angeles has currently only completed 25% of the required steps,” Brett Slaughenhaupt, SAFE’s director of L.A. County advocacy, said at the meeting.
What will the cameras do?
The cameras will capture the license plates of cars exceeding posted speed limits on certain corridors. That information will be used to mail tickets to the owner of the vehicle.
The number of cameras each city installs is based on population. L.A. is tasked with installing 125 cameras, the most of any of the participating cities.
The locations for the cameras will be selected based on where there are a lot of drivers that speed and where past attempts to make driving safer hasn’t resulted in “significant speeding reductions,” according to the report the Department of Transportation presented to city officials Wednesday.
School zones and street racing corridors will be prioritized, according to the report.
The owners of speeding vehicles will receive warnings for the first two months the cameras are active. Eventually, they'll be fined based on how much the car was observed exceeding the speed limit.
The purpose of the cameras is to help cities reduce speeding, which is the cause of nearly one-third of traffic fatalities, according to the Department of Transportation.
In L.A., 304 people in the city died in traffic fatalities last year, according to police data. An audit released in April found that lack of cohesion across departments and insufficient political support hampered the city’s goal of reducing traffic deaths to zero by this year.
What progress has L.A. made?
Chris Rider, a transportation engineer managing L.A.’s speed safety camera program, said that over the last two years, officials have been monitoring the progress of other pilot cities and honing in on the criteria that will be used to select locations for the cameras.
According to the report, the Department of Transportation hired a consultant in August to define policies around data retention, propose locations for the cameras and facilitate community engagement and public awareness about the program in the coming months.
The most updated timeline has L.A. activating its cameras, at the latest, by the end of 2026.
Achieving that timeline hinges on whether L.A. can “piggyback” or adopt the contract another pilot city has already signed with a camera system operator, Rider said.
At Wednesday’s meeting, Rider indicated that L.A. is looking to replicate Oakland’s proposed contract with Verra Mobility. A spokesperson for the city of Oakland told LAist that they're “hoping to get the contract signed ASAP, but don’t have a firm date.”
The pilot programs are authorized to run for five years or up until Jan. 1, 2032.
Where are the other cities in the process
San Francisco’s cameras have been operational since August.
Data on the number of tickets the city’s 33 cameras helped issue won’t be available until the end of September, according to a spokesperson for the city’s transportation agency.
Other cities are not far behind.
The spokesperson for Oakland said its 18 cameras are expected to be installed by the end of the year.
San Jose has identified potential camera locations, but its program has hit a snag. The city was going to use an $8.5 million grant from the Biden administration to fund its program. But the Trump administration updated the terms and conditions of that grant, as well as others focused on health and housing.
While a U.S. District Court judge in August granted a preliminary injunction blocking the administration’s actions, the money isn’t yet available.
“While our City Attorney's Office works on that issue, the speed camera program remains in a holding pattern,” said Colin Heyne, a public information officer for the city’s department of transportation. “We will work swiftly to award a contract, install the cameras, and start the program as soon as we have funding.”
-
If you have a tip, you can reach me on Signal. My username is kharjai.61.
- You can follow this link to reach me there or type my username in the search bar after starting a new chat.
- For instructions on getting started with Signal, see the app's support page.
- And if you're comfortable just reaching out by email I'm at kharjai@scpr.org
Malibu Mayor Marianne Riggins said the five cameras the city is installing along Pacific Coast Highway will make pedestrians, cyclists and commuters safer.
“The City’s new speed safety citation camera system is one of the most important tools we have to slow drivers down and save lives on Pacific Coast Highway,” Riggins said to LAist in a statement.
Malibu officials said in an August meeting that it's targeting the end of the year for the installation of five cameras along Pacific Coast Highway.
Locations for Long Beach’s cameras have been identified and will be made public in October, according to a community information officer.
LAist reached out to the city of Glendale for a status update on its program.
At LAist, we believe in journalism without censorship and the right of a free press to speak truth to those in power. Our hard-hitting watchdog reporting on local government, climate, and the ongoing housing and homelessness crisis is trustworthy, independent and freely accessible to everyone thanks to the support of readers like you.
But the game has changed: Congress voted to eliminate funding for public media across the country. Here at LAist that means a loss of $1.7 million in our budget every year. We want to assure you that despite growing threats to free press and free speech, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust. Speaking frankly, the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news in our community.
We’re asking you to stand up for independent reporting that will not be silenced. With more individuals like you supporting this public service, we can continue to provide essential coverage for Southern Californians that you can’t find anywhere else. Become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission.
Thank you for your generous support and belief in the value of independent news.

-
Most survivors of January's fires face a massive gap in the money they need to rebuild, and funding to help is moving too slowly or nonexistent.
-
Kevin Lacy has an obsession with documenting California’s forgotten and decaying places.
-
Restaurants share resources in the food hall in West Adams as Los Angeles reckons with increasing restaurant closures.
-
It will be the second national day of protest against President Donald Trump.
-
The university says the compact, as the Trump administration called it, could undermine free inquiry and academic excellence.
-
This is the one time you can do this legally!