With our free press under threat and federal funding for public media gone, your support matters more than ever. Help keep the LAist newsroom strong, become a monthly member or increase your support today.
Metro's CEO Explains What Metro's In-House Police Force Could Look Like
The E lline now connects Santa Monica to East L.A.
(
Samanta Helou Hernandez
/
LAist
)
Topline:
Metro's CEO Stephanie Wiggins gave a vision of how an in-house police force could be deployed: on the most problematic lines and various bus routes.
Why now: Last month Metro's board of directors voted to look into creating an in-house police force to respond to transit incidents. But the agency has been exploring the move for years.
"Public safety is my number one priority and we know the status quo is not working the way we would like it," she said.
Support for LAist comes from
Why it matters: Speaking on LAist's AirTalk, Wiggins says ridership levels are still 23% below pre-pandemic levels. And recent safety concerns have some questioning safety on public transit.
What transportation advocates say: Madeline Brozen who directs UCLA's Lewis Center for Regional Police Studies told LAist last month that the perception of safety hits different when you're reading about it versus when you're really experiencing it.
"If you kind of compare overall crime statistics for the city in terms of property crime or car break-ins with the amount of crime concerns that we see on public transit, public transit is a safer environment by and large," she said.
What's next: While the plan is still in development, Wiggins says the in-house police force would focus on engaging riders and employees, "establishing relationships, having a more visible presence so that they're riding our trains and buses as opposed to being in their vehicles."
Cost savings: Wiggins says the in-house department could save Metro between 20 to 40% of what it spends on law enforcement contracts. For 2023, the agency set aside $173 million in policing contracts.
At LAist, we believe in journalism without censorship and the right of a free press to speak truth to those in power. Our hard-hitting watchdog reporting on local government, climate, and the ongoing housing and homelessness crisis is trustworthy, independent and freely accessible to everyone thanks to the support of readers like you.
But the game has changed: Congress voted to eliminate funding for public media across the country. Here at LAist that means a loss of $1.7 million in our budget every year. We want to assure you that despite growing threats to free press and free speech, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust. Speaking frankly, the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news in our community.
We’re asking you to stand up for independent reporting that will not be silenced. With more individuals like you supporting this public service, we can continue to provide essential coverage for Southern Californians that you can’t find anywhere else. Become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission.
Thank you for your generous support and belief in the value of independent news.
Chip in now to fund your local journalism
(
LAist
)
Trending on LAist
-
What do stairs have to do with California’s housing crisis? More than you might think, says this Culver City councilmember. -
Yes, it's controversial, but let me explain. -
Doctors say administrator directives allow immigration agents to interfere in medical decisions and compromise medical care. -
The Palisades Fire erupted on Jan. 7 and went on to kill 12 people and destroy more than 6,800 homes and buildings. -
People moving to Los Angeles are regularly baffled by the region’s refrigerator-less apartments. They’ll soon be a thing of the past. -
Experts say students shouldn't readily forgo federal aid. But a California-only program may be a good alternative in some cases.
Best of LAist