With our free press under threat and federal funding for public media gone, your support matters more than ever. Help keep the LAist newsroom strong, become a monthly member or increase your support today .
LA moves forward with plan to implement sweeping street safety enhancements
Street improvements that Los Angeles residents voted for last year are one step closer to happening after City Council committees on Wednesday approved a plan to implement Measure HLA.
“It’s still not done, but it’s a huge step forward in actually implementing Measure HLA,” Michael Schneider, founder and CEO of advocacy group Streets For All, told LAist.
The plan, which still needs to be adopted by the full City Council, outlines the agencies responsible for street improvement projects, establishes public reporting requirements and reaffirms L.A. residents’ ability to sue the city for noncompliance.
The City Council transportation and public works committees were initially scheduled to discuss the plan, which was drafted by the city attorney, two weeks ago.
Councilmembers Heather Hutt and Eunisses Hernandez were present for the discussion and voted to move the plan with their amendments forward. Councilmembers Traci Park, a critic of Measure HLA, and Imelda Padilla weren't there and therefore didn’t vote.
A quick refresher on HLA
In 2015, the City Council adopted Mobility Plan 2035, which identified networks of streets to improve with protected bike lanes, pedestrian signal enhancements, bus lanes and other enhancements.
Seven years later, frustrated with a lack of progress on the plan, Streets for All began campaigning for Healthy Streets L.A., or Measure HLA.
The initiative that voters overwhelmingly approved last year requires the city to implement Mobility Plan upgrades when it repaves at least one-eighth of a mile of a street specified in one of the networks.
What’s in the plan
Under the initiative voters approved, L.A. residents are able to file a lawsuit against the city if they believe it didn’t install a mobility upgrade when it should have. The initial version of the implementation plan drafted by the city attorney required complaints to first go through an appeals process. The amended version would make that appeals process optional.
Starting in April, the Department of Transportation will host an online dashboard detailing Mobility Plan projects. That’s when you’d start seeing how street enhancements could affect parking availability, street accessibility, as well as how the number of travelers along a corridor could change.
“It is in the final stages of development and will be online as required by the ordinance in April,” Laura Rubio-Cornejo, the general manager of the Department of Transportation, said at Wednesday's meeting.
The city’s transportation department would lead the “planning, initiation, scoping, and outreach” of street improvement projects. The scheduling and actual construction on the projects would be done in conjunction with the Bureau of Engineering and StreetsLA, which fall under the Public Works department.
L.A.'s fire and police departments would review the street improvement projects. During the campaign for Measure HLA last year, the union representing L.A.’s firefighters opposed the initiative and claimed it would worsen traffic and emergency response times.
What comes next
An outstanding and consequential question is how much money the city will allocate to StreetsLA and the Department of Transportation in the next budget cycle.
“ I don't think any of this matters if the budget doesn't get fixed,” Schneider said, adding that Streets For All and other organizations plan to send a letter to Mayor Karen Bass next week with budget and process recommendations that “would help move HLA forward.”
For now, the implementation ordinance will be sent back to the city attorney before going to the City Council for full adoption.
At LAist, we believe in journalism without censorship and the right of a free press to speak truth to those in power. Our hard-hitting watchdog reporting on local government, climate, and the ongoing housing and homelessness crisis is trustworthy, independent and freely accessible to everyone thanks to the support of readers like you.
But the game has changed: Congress voted to eliminate funding for public media across the country. Here at LAist that means a loss of $1.7 million in our budget every year. We want to assure you that despite growing threats to free press and free speech, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust. Speaking frankly, the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news in our community.
We’re asking you to stand up for independent reporting that will not be silenced. With more individuals like you supporting this public service, we can continue to provide essential coverage for Southern Californians that you can’t find anywhere else. Become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission.
Thank you for your generous support and belief in the value of independent news.
-
The study found recipients spent nearly all the money on basic needs like food and transportation, not drugs or alcohol.
-
Kevin Lee's Tokyo Noir has become one of the top spots for craft-inspired cocktails.
-
A tort claim obtained by LAist via a public records request alleges the Anaheim procurement department lacks basic contracting procedures and oversight.
-
Flauta, taquito, tacos dorados? Whatever they’re called, they’re golden, crispy and delicious.
-
If California redistricts, the conservative beach town that banned LGBTQ Pride flags on city property would get a gay, progressive Democrat in Congress.
-
Most survivors of January's fires face a massive gap in the money they need to rebuild, and funding to help is moving too slowly or nonexistent.