Congress has cut federal funding for public media — a $3.4 million loss for LAist. We count on readers like you to protect our nonprofit newsroom. Become a monthly member and sustain local journalism.
LA moves forward with plan to implement sweeping street safety enhancements

Street improvements that Los Angeles residents voted for last year are one step closer to happening after City Council committees on Wednesday approved a plan to implement Measure HLA.
“It’s still not done, but it’s a huge step forward in actually implementing Measure HLA,” Michael Schneider, founder and CEO of advocacy group Streets For All, told LAist.
The plan, which still needs to be adopted by the full City Council, outlines the agencies responsible for street improvement projects, establishes public reporting requirements and reaffirms L.A. residents’ ability to sue the city for noncompliance.
The City Council transportation and public works committees were initially scheduled to discuss the plan, which was drafted by the city attorney, two weeks ago.
Councilmembers Heather Hutt and Eunisses Hernandez were present for the discussion and voted to move the plan with their amendments forward. Councilmembers Traci Park, a critic of Measure HLA, and Imelda Padilla weren't there and therefore didn’t vote.
A quick refresher on HLA
In 2015, the City Council adopted Mobility Plan 2035, which identified networks of streets to improve with protected bike lanes, pedestrian signal enhancements, bus lanes and other enhancements.
Seven years later, frustrated with a lack of progress on the plan, Streets for All began campaigning for Healthy Streets L.A., or Measure HLA.
The initiative that voters overwhelmingly approved last year requires the city to implement Mobility Plan upgrades when it repaves at least one-eighth of a mile of a street specified in one of the networks.
What’s in the plan
Under the initiative voters approved, L.A. residents are able to file a lawsuit against the city if they believe it didn’t install a mobility upgrade when it should have. The initial version of the implementation plan drafted by the city attorney required complaints to first go through an appeals process. The amended version would make that appeals process optional.
Starting in April, the Department of Transportation will host an online dashboard detailing Mobility Plan projects. That’s when you’d start seeing how street enhancements could affect parking availability, street accessibility, as well as how the number of travelers along a corridor could change.
“It is in the final stages of development and will be online as required by the ordinance in April,” Laura Rubio-Cornejo, the general manager of the Department of Transportation, said at Wednesday's meeting.
The city’s transportation department would lead the “planning, initiation, scoping, and outreach” of street improvement projects. The scheduling and actual construction on the projects would be done in conjunction with the Bureau of Engineering and StreetsLA, which fall under the Public Works department.
L.A.'s fire and police departments would review the street improvement projects. During the campaign for Measure HLA last year, the union representing L.A.’s firefighters opposed the initiative and claimed it would worsen traffic and emergency response times.
What comes next
An outstanding and consequential question is how much money the city will allocate to StreetsLA and the Department of Transportation in the next budget cycle.
“ I don't think any of this matters if the budget doesn't get fixed,” Schneider said, adding that Streets For All and other organizations plan to send a letter to Mayor Karen Bass next week with budget and process recommendations that “would help move HLA forward.”
For now, the implementation ordinance will be sent back to the city attorney before going to the City Council for full adoption.
As Editor-in-Chief of our newsroom, I’m extremely proud of the work our top-notch journalists are doing here at LAist. We’re doing more hard-hitting watchdog journalism than ever before — powerful reporting on the economy, elections, climate and the homelessness crisis that is making a difference in your lives. At the same time, it’s never been more difficult to maintain a paywall-free, independent news source that informs, inspires, and engages everyone.
Simply put, we cannot do this essential work without your help. Federal funding for public media has been clawed back by Congress and that means LAist has lost $3.4 million in federal funding over the next two years. So we’re asking for your help. LAist has been there for you and we’re asking you to be here for us.
We rely on donations from readers like you to stay independent, which keeps our nonprofit newsroom strong and accountable to you.
No matter where you stand on the political spectrum, press freedom is at the core of keeping our nation free and fair. And as the landscape of free press changes, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust, but the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news from our community.
Please take action today to support your trusted source for local news with a donation that makes sense for your budget.
Thank you for your generous support and believing in independent news.

-
The L.A. City Council approved the venue change Wednesday, which organizers say will save $12 million in infrastructure costs.
-
Taxes on the sale of some newer apartment buildings would be lowered under a plan by Sacramento lawmakers to partially rein in city Measure ULA.
-
The union representing the restaurant's workers announced Tuesday that The Pantry will welcome back patrons Thursday after suddenly shutting down six months ago.
-
If approved, the more than 62-acre project would include 50 housing lots and a marina less than a mile from Jackie and Shadow's famous nest overlooking the lake.
-
The U.S. Supreme Court lifted limits on immigration sweeps in Southern California, overturning a lower court ruling that prohibited agents from stopping people based on their appearance.
-
Censorship has long been controversial. But lately, the issue of who does and doesn’t have the right to restrict kids’ access to books has been heating up across the country in the so-called culture wars.