With our free press under threat and federal funding for public media gone, your support matters more than ever. Help keep the LAist newsroom strong, become a monthly member or increase your support today.
This archival content was written, edited, and published prior to LAist's acquisition by its current owner, Southern California Public Radio ("SCPR"). Content, such as language choice and subject matter, in archival articles therefore may not align with SCPR's current editorial standards. To learn more about those standards and why we make this distinction, please click here.
The Real Estate of Hollywood(land)

Photo by manmadepants via the LAist Featured Photos pool on Flickr
The relationship between real estate and the Hollywood Sign is as old as, well, the sign itself. Built in 1923 as a promotional billboard to attract buyers to make their homes in the hills of the burgeoning Hollywood community, the sign that once read "HOLLYWOODLAND" has become one of the most iconic landmarks in LA. Now real estate and the sign have a new possibility: 138 acres of land once owned by Howard Hughes that sits west of the "H" in the sign is up for sale for a cool $22 million.
The area, known as Cahuenga Peak, is " zoned for five luxury homes" explains today's LA Times. The land was purchased in 1940 by Hughes "with plans to build a love nest for actress Ginger Rogers" who wasn't too keen on his notion, fearing he might tuck her too tightly into her prospective hilltop palace. The land remained a part of Hughes' estate until 2002, when "Fox River Financial Resources acquired the mountaintop [...] for $1.675 million."
But city officials, like Councilman Tom LaBonge, are not happy with the land going on the market, nor its exorbitant price tag.
LaBonge and others had hoped the City could get a hold of the land, and ideally develop it as an extension of Griffith Park. Others, including area residents, "say building homes on Cahuenga Peak would mar hillside vistas and scar a pristine hilltop." LaBonge asserts, that the hillside "should not be cluttered," and that "[the land is] good for the psyche of Los Angeles." City leaders have been working on raising funds to buy the land, and have so far gathered approximately $5 million, but, considering the asking price as announced today, that's nowhere near enough for the current property owners' liking. It's also, apparently, more than three times more than the recently estimated value of the land, since "two months ago, a city-commissioned appraisal calculated that the mountaintop was worth about $6 million."
The appeal of Cahuenga Peak and its stunning vistas goes back to Hughes himself. The tycoon won a lawsuit in 1949 against the city to get an easement on the property, and was granted a desirable "100-foot-wide access to the site from the end of Wonder View Drive."
It's a great view if you're a homeowner with a manse on the hill, but many fear what goes up there near the sign will ruin the view from below--the view that for the past several decades has been the sign's calling card.
Ernie Carswell, who is one of the listing agents with Teles Properties of Beverly Hills wants to assure everyone that the houses will predominantly be above and behind the sign, and will not obstruct it. Five homes seems like a small development, but the land is rather expansive, and each of the plots are "large enough for a single- family home and a guesthouse," according to a report on Bloomberg.com.
That's five homes, and guest houses, that could be "seen from a broad area south of the Hollywood Hills, including the nearby Hollywood Freeway," explains the Times.
Prospective landowners of the Cahuenga Peak tracts would have to get building plans approved by the city, and would need to install utility lines--a potentially daunting set of tasks.
So while realtors wait in anticipation of inking million-dollar deals, others wait with heavy hearts. Leron Gubler, who is president of the Hollywood Chamber of Commerce is one of the latter: "I think it goes without saying that it would be a mistake to build homes there [...] It would be very unfortunate."
Do you want five homes to spoil the view?
At LAist, we believe in journalism without censorship and the right of a free press to speak truth to those in power. Our hard-hitting watchdog reporting on local government, climate, and the ongoing housing and homelessness crisis is trustworthy, independent and freely accessible to everyone thanks to the support of readers like you.
But the game has changed: Congress voted to eliminate funding for public media across the country. Here at LAist that means a loss of $1.7 million in our budget every year. We want to assure you that despite growing threats to free press and free speech, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust. Speaking frankly, the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news in our community.
We’re asking you to stand up for independent reporting that will not be silenced. With more individuals like you supporting this public service, we can continue to provide essential coverage for Southern Californians that you can’t find anywhere else. Become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission.
Thank you for your generous support and belief in the value of independent news.

-
Doctors say administrator directives allow immigration agents to interfere in medical decisions and compromise medical care.
-
The Palisades Fire erupted on Jan. 7 and went on to kill 12 people and destroy more than 6,800 homes and buildings.
-
People moving to Los Angeles are regularly baffled by the region’s refrigerator-less apartments. They’ll soon be a thing of the past.
-
Experts say students shouldn't readily forgo federal aid. But a California-only program may be a good alternative in some cases.
-
Distrito Catorce’s Guillermo Piñon says the team no longer reflects his community. A new mural will honor local leaders instead.
-
The program is for customers in communities that may not be able to afford turf removal or water-saving upgrades.