With our free press under threat and federal funding for public media gone, your support matters more than ever. Help keep the LAist newsroom strong, become a monthly member or increase your support today during our fall member drive.
This is an archival story that predates current editorial management.
This archival content was written, edited, and published prior to LAist's acquisition by its current owner, Southern California Public Radio ("SCPR"). Content, such as language choice and subject matter, in archival articles therefore may not align with SCPR's current editorial standards. To learn more about those standards and why we make this distinction, please click here.
The $1 Billion Plan To Make Over The L.A. River Is Looking Likely
An artist's rendering of what the Arroyo Seco Tributary may look like if the L.A. River Revitalization Plan is implemented. Photo courtesy of lariverrally.org
()
It's far from a done deal, but the $1 billion (okay, technically, $1.08 billion) plan to transform the L.A. River from a concrete channel to a legit destination is looking a little more likely thanks to support from the federal government.
Mayor Eric Garcetti has been pounding the pavement in DC hoping to find support for his plan to make over 11 miles of the river north of downtown. His plan would widen the river and restore the habitat so it would be a place people would actually want to visit. At the same time, he wants to make it easier to access so we can bike, fish and kayak around the river. The plan is ambitious, but it's supposed to kickstart an even bigger effort to revitalize all 51 miles of the river.
The Army Corps of Engineers liked the idea in general but initially wanted a cut-rate $453-million alternative. They changed their mind and announced yesterday that they would recommend Garcetti's version. Congress will ultimately decided whether the project will get funded, but the Army Corps' recommendation carries a lot of weight, according to the Los Angeles Times. Most of the money for the project will come from the Army Corps, as well as the Department of the Interior and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Local and state sources will chip in, too.
This plan will restore 719 acres and remove three miles of concrete. It will also connect the river to the Chinatown's currently closed-for-maintenance Los Angeles State Historic Park and the Verdugo Wash. Some of the streets that dead-end just before the river will be transformed into access points.
Support for LAist comes from
Garcetti told the Times that he has support from Obama himself: "As I argued in the White House over and over, it's the right thing for the ecology, it's the right thing for the economy and for kids growing up being separated from downtown by a concrete flood control channel."
Garcetti's hope isn't just that Angelenos will get to enjoy our river again, but that it will spur a boom in development. And that worries environmentalists and the low-income residents that already live along the river, particularly Elysian Valley. Last week the Times noted:
As inviting as the changes are to many Angelenos, they are not universally praised. Rents are rising sharply in river-adjacent communities, many of them home to low-income residents who say they have heard nothing from the city to ease their fears of being forced from neighborhoods they will no longer be able to afford. And some environmental groups that worked for years to revive the river say they are losing their voice to development interests and their allies in City Hall. Developers want to reshape the corridor for profit and not necessarily to enhance the river for everyone to enjoy, the groups say.
Two Sections Of The L.A. River To Re-Open Tomorrow For Kayaking, Fishing
At LAist, we believe in journalism without censorship and the right of a free press to speak truth to those in power. Our hard-hitting watchdog reporting on local government, climate, and the ongoing housing and homelessness crisis is trustworthy, independent and freely accessible to everyone thanks to the support of readers like you.
But the game has changed: Congress voted to eliminate funding for public media across the country. Here at LAist that means a loss of $1.7 million in our budget every year. We want to assure you that despite growing threats to free press and free speech, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust. Speaking frankly, the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news in our community.
We’re asking you to stand up for independent reporting that will not be silenced. With more individuals like you supporting this public service, we can continue to provide essential coverage for Southern Californians that you can’t find anywhere else. Become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission.
Thank you for your generous support and belief in the value of independent news.
Chip in now to fund your local journalism
(
LAist
)
Trending on LAist
-
Kevin Lacy has an obsession with documenting California’s forgotten and decaying places. -
Restaurants share resources in the food hall in West Adams as Los Angeles reckons with increasing restaurant closures. -
It will be the second national day of protest against President Donald Trump. -
The university says the compact, as the Trump administration called it, could undermine free inquiry and academic excellence. -
This is the one time you can do this legally! -
Metro officials said it will be able to announce an opening date “soon.”
Best of LAist