One year ago, Congress defunded public media. Now that we're 100% community funded, please become a sustaining member or increase your existing membership today.
This is an archival story that predates current editorial management.
This archival content was written, edited, and published prior to LAist's acquisition by its current owner, Southern California Public Radio ("SCPR"). Content, such as language choice and subject matter, in archival articles therefore may not align with SCPR's current editorial standards. To learn more about those standards and why we make this distinction, please click here.
City Illegally Cut Benefits To Low-Income Section 8 Recipients, Says Federal Court
An apartment building in Santa Monica (Photo by GarySe7en via LAist Featured Photos on Flickr)
(
GarySe7en
/
via LAist Featured Photos on Flickr
)
The Los Angeles Housing Authority illegally reduced rent subsidies to about 22,500 Section 8 recipients, including 5,000 elderly families, a federal court ruled. The city could possibly owe millions in damages.On Monday, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that in 2004 the Housing Authority failed to give proper notice about the impending cuts in subsidies, saying the flier sent out was "incomprehensible" and also failed to provide any contact information. "In no respect does [the flier] reasonably inform its intended recipients of the changes to the payment standard, the meaning of those changes, or, most important, their effect upon the recipient," Judge Stephen Reinhardt wrote in the ruling. According to City News Service, those affected by the cuts wound up paying an average of $104 more for their monthly rent.
According to Courthouse News Service the cuts came as a result of federal budget cuts in 2004. Federal laws require the agency to tell recipients that their benefits would be cut at least a year in advance, but the court found that they had only given four weeks notice.
"After eight years of litigation, this is a fabulous result for low-income tenants," Stephanie Carroll, senior staff attorney at Public Counsel, told the L.A. Times.
Attorneys for the recipients say their clients could be owed millions of dollars for the benefits cuts between 2004 and 2006, though compensation would be decided on by another court.
One year ago, Congress voted to defund public media, eliminating a critical $1.7 million from our budget every year going forward. But they couldn’t silence us, and we’re not going anywhere. LAist is now 100% community funded and that means we’re taking our future into our own hands and turning to you to keep local reporting strong.
You come to LAist because you want independent reporting and trustworthy local information. Our nonprofit newsroom doesn’t answer to shareholders looking to turn a profit. Instead, we answer to you and our communities. We are free to follow facts wherever they lead and to hold power to account without fear or favor. Our only loyalty is to our readers and listeners and our mission: to inform, engage, and strengthen Southern California’s communities.
If this story helped you, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.
You come to LAist because you want independent reporting and trustworthy local information. Our nonprofit newsroom doesn’t answer to shareholders looking to turn a profit. Instead, we answer to you and our communities. We are free to follow facts wherever they lead and to hold power to account without fear or favor. Our only loyalty is to our readers and listeners and our mission: to inform, engage, and strengthen Southern California’s communities.
If this story helped you, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief
