Sponsored message
Logged in as
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

This is an archival story that predates current editorial management.

This archival content was written, edited, and published prior to LAist's acquisition by its current owner, Southern California Public Radio ("SCPR"). Content, such as language choice and subject matter, in archival articles therefore may not align with SCPR's current editorial standards. To learn more about those standards and why we make this distinction, please click here.

News

Rodney King Juror Talks About His Black Father and Family For the First Time

shutterstock_gavel_640.jpg
Photo by Kuzma via Shutterstock

One year ago, Congress defunded public media. Now that we're 100% community funded, please become a sustaining member or increase your existing membership today.

One of the most often-repeated facts about the Simi Valley jury that let four police officers off the hook in the Rodney King beating was that not a single member of the panel was black. Twenty years later one of the jurors explains why that's just not true.

The Ventura County-Star decided to call up the members of the jury to talk about their notorious decision. Not all of them were alive and most of the surviving members shied away from questions—with the exception of Henry King, Jr. who has a fascinating story.

Although Henry King, Jr. (no relation to Rodney) has fair skin and blue eyes and passes for white, his father is black. After the decision, he knew that he would have to face internal criticism in his family—along with the public scrutiny. He said: "After the verdict, I had to face that part of my family. Some were supportive, and some weren't."

King said that he hates hearing the refrain repeated to this day that there was no black perspective on the jury and that the decision was rooted in the racism of a white jury. He knew well the kinds of racist things white people will say when they think black people aren't around—and he even had the N-word hurled at him during childhood—but he says that wasn't an issue with this jury: "I didn't feel anything like that during the trial."

It's interesting to read the 69-year-old man struggling with the language to describe his own racial identity and experience throughout the in-depth interview, which is worth a read. Was he black? Part black? Mixed race? Did he have black blood? Was he a mulatto?

"Forty years ago, you really didn't say that you were part black," said King. "Now, I'm proud of it."

One year ago, Congress voted to defund public media, eliminating a critical $1.7 million from our budget every year going forward. But they couldn’t silence us, and we’re not going anywhere. LAist is now 100% community funded and that means we’re taking our future into our own hands and turning to you to keep local reporting strong.

You come to LAist because you want independent reporting and trustworthy local information. Our nonprofit newsroom doesn’t answer to shareholders looking to turn a profit. Instead, we answer to you and our communities. We are free to follow facts wherever they lead and to hold power to account without fear or favor. Our only loyalty is to our readers and listeners and our mission: to inform, engage, and strengthen Southern California’s communities.

If this story helped you, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief

Make your tax-deductible donation today