With our free press under threat and federal funding for public media gone, your support matters more than ever. Help keep the LAist newsroom strong, become a monthly member or increase your support today .
LA Council Punts Decision On Controversial Bulgari Hotel Development
The controversial Bulgari Hotel project, a luxury hotel proposal in Benedict Canyon, was up for a second critical Los Angeles City Council vote on Wednesday — but councilmembers chose to move the item to August. This motion would stop the project if passed, according to the councilmember behind it, Katy Yaroslavsky.
The council had deadlocked Tuesday with a 7-7 tie and one abstention on the motion.
The motion
Councilwoman Yaroslavsky brought the motion asking the city planning director to consider rescinding the initiation of a General Plan amendment for the hotel, which was introduced in 2018. Yaroslavsky's Fifth District is the site of the proposed 58-room hotel, and she said her motion would essentially end it.
The backstory
In 2018, the Department of Planning approved a process that would give the commercial project a specific designation, allowing it to be developed in a residential area. However, the project drew opposition from residents, environmental groups, and even Mayor Karen Bass, who has argued that the hotel would be constructed in a fire-prone area.
Opponents also said the hotel would require chopping down protected and significant trees, and that the narrow streets and inadequate infrastructure can't support the 25 buildings the developer plans to build.
The company behind the development has said it will preserve the current trees while adding 1,000 more — but some are skeptical.
What the opposition says
Mark Levin, president of the conservation group Save Our Canyon, said the project would inevitably remove trees and that replacing those trees with younger trees wouldn't provide the same benefits.
"It's very surprising to us that they would attach their name to a project that is so disruptive to the environment, and so inappropriate,” he said.
That development company has not responded to our request for comment. In total, 11,000 people signed a petition opposing the hotel project.
At LAist, we believe in journalism without censorship and the right of a free press to speak truth to those in power. Our hard-hitting watchdog reporting on local government, climate, and the ongoing housing and homelessness crisis is trustworthy, independent and freely accessible to everyone thanks to the support of readers like you.
But the game has changed: Congress voted to eliminate funding for public media across the country. Here at LAist that means a loss of $1.7 million in our budget every year. We want to assure you that despite growing threats to free press and free speech, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust. Speaking frankly, the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news in our community.
We’re asking you to stand up for independent reporting that will not be silenced. With more individuals like you supporting this public service, we can continue to provide essential coverage for Southern Californians that you can’t find anywhere else. Become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission.
Thank you for your generous support and belief in the value of independent news.
-
The study found recipients spent nearly all the money on basic needs like food and transportation, not drugs or alcohol.
-
Kevin Lee's Tokyo Noir has become one of the top spots for craft-inspired cocktails.
-
A tort claim obtained by LAist via a public records request alleges the Anaheim procurement department lacks basic contracting procedures and oversight.
-
Flauta, taquito, tacos dorados? Whatever they’re called, they’re golden, crispy and delicious.
-
If California redistricts, the conservative beach town that banned LGBTQ Pride flags on city property would get a gay, progressive Democrat in Congress.
-
Most survivors of January's fires face a massive gap in the money they need to rebuild, and funding to help is moving too slowly or nonexistent.