Sponsored message
Logged in as
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen
News

LA Council Punts Decision On Controversial Bulgari Hotel Development

Screenshot of a map of the Beverly Hills area, including Benedict Canyon.
(
Screengrab Google Maps
)

One year ago, Congress defunded public media. Now that we're 100% community funded, please become a sustaining member or increase your existing membership today.

The controversial Bulgari Hotel project, a luxury hotel proposal in Benedict Canyon, was up for a second critical Los Angeles City Council vote on Wednesday — but councilmembers chose to move the item to August. This motion would stop the project if passed, according to the councilmember behind it, Katy Yaroslavsky.

The council had deadlocked Tuesday with a 7-7 tie and one abstention on the motion.

The motion

Councilwoman Yaroslavsky brought the motion asking the city planning director to consider rescinding the initiation of a General Plan amendment for the hotel, which was introduced in 2018. Yaroslavsky's Fifth District is the site of the proposed 58-room hotel, and she said her motion would essentially end it.

The backstory

In 2018, the Department of Planning approved a process that would give the commercial project a specific designation, allowing it to be developed in a residential area. However, the project drew opposition from residents, environmental groups, and even Mayor Karen Bass, who has argued that the hotel would be constructed in a fire-prone area.

Opponents also said the hotel would require chopping down protected and significant trees, and that the narrow streets and inadequate infrastructure can't support the 25 buildings the developer plans to build.

Sponsored message

The company behind the development has said it will preserve the current trees while adding 1,000 more — but some are skeptical.

What the opposition says

Mark Levin, president of the conservation group Save Our Canyon, said the project would inevitably remove trees and that replacing those trees with younger trees wouldn't provide the same benefits.

"It's very surprising to us that they would attach their name to a project that is so disruptive to the environment, and so inappropriate,” he said.

That development company has not responded to our request for comment. In total, 11,000 people signed a petition opposing the hotel project.

One year ago, Congress voted to defund public media, eliminating a critical $1.7 million from our budget every year going forward. But they couldn’t silence us, and we’re not going anywhere. LAist is now 100% community funded and that means we’re taking our future into our own hands and turning to you to keep local reporting strong.

You come to LAist because you want independent reporting and trustworthy local information. Our nonprofit newsroom doesn’t answer to shareholders looking to turn a profit. Instead, we answer to you and our communities. We are free to follow facts wherever they lead and to hold power to account without fear or favor. Our only loyalty is to our readers and listeners and our mission: to inform, engage, and strengthen Southern California’s communities.

If this story helped you, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief

Make your tax-deductible donation today