Sponsored message
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen
Civics & Democracy

The US Copyright Office used to be fairly low-drama. Not anymore

A low angle view of Shira Perlmutter, a woman with light skin tone and wearing glasses, speaking into a microphone next to a name plate on a wooden desk, both out of focus in the foreground.
Shira Perlmutter is suing President Trump over her abrupt firing as the head of the Copyright Office.
(
Mariam Zuhaib
/
AP
)

Truth matters. Community matters. Your support makes both possible. LAist is one of the few places where news remains independent and free from political and corporate influence. Stand up for truth and for LAist. Make your year-end tax-deductible gift now.

Listen 3:31
The U.S. Copyright Office used to be fairly low-drama. Not anymore

The U.S. Copyright Office is normally a quiet place. It mostly exists to register materials for copyright and advise members of Congress on copyright issues. Experts and insiders used words like "stable" and "sleepy" to describe the agency. Not anymore.

Shira Perlmutter, the abruptly fired ex-head of the Copyright Office, is suing President Trump, arguing her firing was unconstitutional and a violation of the separation of powers. This is going on just as the office has published its report on whether or not using copyrighted works to train generative AI counts as fair use, which is a legal idea allowing the use of some copyrighted materials without permission in certain circumstances. And it's a report that could influence the dozens of lawsuits going on right now over copyright and AI usage.

"This is just a foreshadowing of the front lines of the generative AI battle," said Kristelia García, a professor at Georgetown Law focusing on intellectual property.

García and others inside the copyright world agree – this amount of commotion and palace intrigue at the Copyright Office is unprecedented. Here's a quick breakdown of the latest to catch you up.

More news

A shakeup at the Library of Congress

The U.S. Copyright Office exists within the Library of Congress. And on May 8, President Trump fired Carla Hayden, the Librarian of Congress. Then on May 9, the Copyright Office published its highly anticipated report on copyright and AI usage. The odd thing about it was that it was, and still is, uploaded as a "pre-publication version."

"That part is extremely weird," said Dave Hansen, the executive director of the Authors Alliance, a group which argues for less strict copyright laws. "I don't think they've ever done that before."

Sponsored message

By May 10, Perlmutter was fired by an assistant to the president. On May 12, Trump appointed Todd Blanche, deputy U.S. attorney general, as the new Librarian of Congress. Paul Perkins, who works for the Department of Justice, was named the new copyright register, the chief of that office.

That same day, the Copyright Office paused issuing new registration certificates. According to a statement from Lisa Berardi Marflak, a Copyright Office spokesperson, this was done "out of an abundance of caution." This pause lasted 12 business days and impacted about 20,000 registrations. While the office has resumed registering copyrights, they are now going out without the register's signature. "There is no requirement that the Register's signature must appear on registration certificates," reads the statement.

Perlmutter's lawsuit argues that since the Library of Congress as well as the Copyright Office exist under the legislative branch, the president has no authority to fire people, or hire replacements. Lawyers for President Trump argue the moves were legal under the Federal Vacancies Reform Act.

NPR has reached out to legal representatives on both sides, and was given no comment.

Perlmutter's lawsuit originally requested a temporary restraining order blocking her firing, which was denied by a federal judge. The next hearings are set to take place in July.

Inside the AI report

That big bombshell report on generative AI and copyright can be summed up like this – in some instances, using copyrighted material to train AI models could count as fair use. In other cases, it wouldn't.

Sponsored message

The conclusion of the report says this: "Various uses of copyrighted works in AI training are likely to be transformative. The extent to which they are fair, however, will depend on what works were used, from what source, for what purpose, and with what controls on the outputs—all of which can affect the market."

"It's very even keeled," said Keith Kupferschmid, CEO of the Copyright Alliance, a group that represents artists and publishers pushing for stronger copyright laws.

Kupferschmid said the report avoids generalizations and takes arguments on a case-by-case basis.

"Perlmutter was beloved, no matter whether you agreed with her or not, because she did the hard work," Kupferschmid said. "She always was very thoughtful and considered all these different viewpoints."

It remains to be seen how the report will be used in the dozens of legal cases over copyright and AI usage.

Copyright 2025 NPR

You come to LAist because you want independent reporting and trustworthy local information. Our newsroom doesn’t answer to shareholders looking to turn a profit. Instead, we answer to you and our connected community. We are free to tell the full truth, to hold power to account without fear or favor, and to follow facts wherever they lead. Our only loyalty is to our audiences and our mission: to inform, engage, and strengthen our community.

Right now, LAist has lost $1.7M in annual funding due to Congress clawing back money already approved. The support we receive before year-end will determine how fully our newsroom can continue informing, serving, and strengthening Southern California.

If this story helped you today, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.

Your tax-deductible donation keeps LAist independent and accessible to everyone.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief

Make your tax-deductible year-end gift today

A row of graphics payment types: Visa, MasterCard, Apple Pay and PayPal, and  below a lock with Secure Payment text to the right