With our free press under threat and federal funding for public media gone, your support matters more than ever. Help keep the LAist newsroom strong, become a monthly member or increase your support today .
Los Angeles police cannot detain or fire weapons at journalists covering protests, judge rules
Topline:
The Los Angeles Police Department cannot remove, detain or fire their weapons at members of the press who are covering protests, a federal judge ruled Friday.
What does the ruling say? The LAPD is prohibited from removing or prohibiting journalists from entering closed areas and intentionally “assaulting” or interfering with a reporter, according to the temporary restraining order issued Friday. Police also cannot cite, detain, or arrest a reporter for failing to disperse or violating a curfew. The LAPD is also prohibited from using less-lethal munitions — such as rubber bullets and tear gas — against journalists who are “not posing a threat of imminent harm to an officer or another person.”
The backstory: Press groups last month filed a federal lawsuit against the LAPD, alleging the use of force violated the rights of journalists covering the L.A. immigration protests. The suit also claims reporters were barred from areas they legally have access to and that journalists “suffered excessive force and harassment by LAPD officers.”
What does the judge say? “When journalists persisted in documenting the protests, it appears from the evidence presented that they faced an onslaught of projectiles and other shows of physical force,” U.S. District Judge Hernán D. Vera wrote in the court order. “On some occasions, LAPD officers purportedly targeted individuals who were clearly identifiable as members of the press.”
What's next: The department has 72 hours to inform all LAPD officers of the order. The judge’s temporary court order is in effect for the next two weeks. A hearing is scheduled for July 24. An LAPD spokesperson said the department does not comment on pending litigation.
At LAist, we believe in journalism without censorship and the right of a free press to speak truth to those in power. Our hard-hitting watchdog reporting on local government, climate, and the ongoing housing and homelessness crisis is trustworthy, independent and freely accessible to everyone thanks to the support of readers like you.
But the game has changed: Congress voted to eliminate funding for public media across the country. Here at LAist that means a loss of $1.7 million in our budget every year. We want to assure you that despite growing threats to free press and free speech, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust. Speaking frankly, the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news in our community.
We’re asking you to stand up for independent reporting that will not be silenced. With more individuals like you supporting this public service, we can continue to provide essential coverage for Southern Californians that you can’t find anywhere else. Become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission.
Thank you for your generous support and belief in the value of independent news.
-
The study found recipients spent nearly all the money on basic needs like food and transportation, not drugs or alcohol.
-
Kevin Lee's Tokyo Noir has become one of the top spots for craft-inspired cocktails.
-
A tort claim obtained by LAist via a public records request alleges the Anaheim procurement department lacks basic contracting procedures and oversight.
-
Flauta, taquito, tacos dorados? Whatever they’re called, they’re golden, crispy and delicious.
-
If California redistricts, the conservative beach town that banned LGBTQ Pride flags on city property would get a gay, progressive Democrat in Congress.
-
Most survivors of January's fires face a massive gap in the money they need to rebuild, and funding to help is moving too slowly or nonexistent.