With our free press under threat and federal funding for public media gone, your support matters more than ever. Help keep the LAist newsroom strong, become a monthly member or increase your support today during our fall member drive.
Los Angeles City Council bans use of N-word, C-word in meetings

Topline:
The Los Angeles City Council on Wednesday voted to ban use of the N-word and the C-word during meetings in response to a recent increase in abusive or offensive language from a handful of people who regularly address the council.
The rule: Under the ordinance, people who repeatedly use the words will be subject to removal from council chambers or committee meetings and possibly banned from future meetings.
The backstory: City Council President Marqueece Harris-Dawson, who is Black, said since the first election of President Donald Trump in 2016, public comment by a few people has devolved into “rank, cantankerous, and rude and demeaning and insulting” language. He said use of vulgar language has put a chill on civic participation because people don’t want to come to meetings.
“We believe these words add no additional value to any statement that any petitioner might make to the council and that they are always and universally designed to demean individuals,” said Harris-Dawson, who authored the proposal.
First Amendment concerns: Past efforts to curb offensive behavior have failed. The city was forced to settle a lawsuit filed by a Black man who was thrown out of a meeting for wearing a Ku Klux Klan hood and a T-shirt with the N-word on it. Harris-Dawson said he believes the new rule on speech will hold up in court because it's limited in scope and the consequences are clearly articulated.
What's next: One man who is a regular speaker at City Council meetings used the N-word Wednesday as he promised to file a First Amendment lawsuit against the city challenging the new rule.
At LAist, we believe in journalism without censorship and the right of a free press to speak truth to those in power. Our hard-hitting watchdog reporting on local government, climate, and the ongoing housing and homelessness crisis is trustworthy, independent and freely accessible to everyone thanks to the support of readers like you.
But the game has changed: Congress voted to eliminate funding for public media across the country. Here at LAist that means a loss of $1.7 million in our budget every year. We want to assure you that despite growing threats to free press and free speech, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust. Speaking frankly, the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news in our community.
We’re asking you to stand up for independent reporting that will not be silenced. With more individuals like you supporting this public service, we can continue to provide essential coverage for Southern Californians that you can’t find anywhere else. Become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission.
Thank you for your generous support and belief in the value of independent news.

-
Flauta, taquito, tacos dorados? Whatever they’re called, they’re golden, crispy and delicious.
-
If California redistricts, the conservative beach town that banned LGBTQ Pride flags on city property would get a gay, progressive Democrat in Congress.
-
Most survivors of January's fires face a massive gap in the money they need to rebuild, and funding to help is moving too slowly or nonexistent.
-
Kevin Lacy has an obsession with documenting California’s forgotten and decaying places.
-
Restaurants share resources in the food hall in West Adams as Los Angeles reckons with increasing restaurant closures.
-
It will be the second national day of protest against President Donald Trump.