With our free press under threat and federal funding for public media gone, your support matters more than ever. Help keep the LAist newsroom strong, become a monthly member or increase your support today.
5-Minute Term Is Mission Viejo's Bizarre Remedy To Gutted City Council

In an unusual move, Mission Viejo’s City Council swore in a new city councilmember Tuesday for just five minutes before she left office in order to approve the city’s election results.
It was the city's answer to a political riddle: Mission Viejo didn't have a council large for a quorum and therefore couldn't legally approve its newly elected councilmembers. So the city attorney recommended appointing a third councilmember for just long enough to accept the election results, and then to send her back to retirement.
The Backstory
Mission Viejo was left with just two city councilmembers after a court ordered the other three members, Ed Sachs, Greg Raths and Wendy Bucknum, to step down in mid-November. Their removal followed an Orange County Superior Court ruling in late August that found the city council had illegally extended the terms of Sachs, Raths and Bucknum while the city tried to work out a deal to implement a new election system.
State law requires three councilmembers to form a quorum to conduct city business, which includes accepting the results of local elections. So the city appointed a third councilmember, former
Mayor/Councilmember Sherri Butterfield, on Tuesday for just long enough to pass a resolution acknowledging the five councilmembers who won seats in November.
Who Cares About The City's Legal Gymnastics?
Mission Viejo residents have been split on whether the former council's legal troubles are a major violation of voter trust or just a procedural misunderstanding. Those who believe the latter blame local Democratic party activists for overblowing the term issue in hopes of gaining a foothold in the traditionally Republican, though technically nonpartisan, council.
At the meeting held to certify the election results, resident Walt Lawson spoke during public comment and noted that city staff didn't mention why it was necessary to temporarily appoint a third councilmember.
Lawson said the lack of transparency was part of a pattern "of continuing to avoid any responsibility for the illegal term extensions and refusing to offer any apology to the citizens of Mission Viejo for denying them their right to vote."
On the other side, former Mission Viejo Mayor/Councilmember Robert Breton, who also spoke at the meeting, noted that city voters had "expressed their satisfaction with the incumbents," re-electing three of them in November.
An Update On The Legal Challenge
After the special meeting, the new city council — including Bucknum, one of the former members ordered by the court to vacate her seat — was promptly sworn in. Two other incumbents, Brian Goodell and Trish Kelley, also won reelection.
This was the city's first election where candidates ran by district rather than at-large. Bob Ruesch, a former planning commissioner, won in a district that had no incumbents running. Cynthia Vasquez won her race against ousted former councilmembers Raths and Sachs, who largely split the vote in that district.
Vasquez, the sole Democrat on the council, thanked her campaign volunteers and voters during her first meeting. She also asked City Attorney Bill Curley for an update on the status of the council lawsuit that led to the councilmembers’ oustings and the city's expected payment to the winning plaintiff's attorneys.
Curley said the city is still working to appeal the court's decision in the case, and he called the plaintiff's request for attorneys fees "rather fanciful."
At LAist, we believe in journalism without censorship and the right of a free press to speak truth to those in power. Our hard-hitting watchdog reporting on local government, climate, and the ongoing housing and homelessness crisis is trustworthy, independent and freely accessible to everyone thanks to the support of readers like you.
But the game has changed: Congress voted to eliminate funding for public media across the country. Here at LAist that means a loss of $1.7 million in our budget every year. We want to assure you that despite growing threats to free press and free speech, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust. Speaking frankly, the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news in our community.
We’re asking you to stand up for independent reporting that will not be silenced. With more individuals like you supporting this public service, we can continue to provide essential coverage for Southern Californians that you can’t find anywhere else. Become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission.
Thank you for your generous support and belief in the value of independent news.

-
What do stairs have to do with California’s housing crisis? More than you might think, says this Culver City councilmember.
-
Yes, it's controversial, but let me explain.
-
Doctors say administrator directives allow immigration agents to interfere in medical decisions and compromise medical care.
-
The Palisades Fire erupted on Jan. 7 and went on to kill 12 people and destroy more than 6,800 homes and buildings.
-
People moving to Los Angeles are regularly baffled by the region’s refrigerator-less apartments. They’ll soon be a thing of the past.
-
Experts say students shouldn't readily forgo federal aid. But a California-only program may be a good alternative in some cases.