Congress has cut federal funding for public media — a $3.4 million loss for LAist. We count on readers like you to protect our nonprofit newsroom. Become a monthly member and sustain local journalism.
Anaheim puts its tourism board on a short leash after corruption scandal
The Anaheim Convention Center is at the heart of tourism efforts.
(
Courtesy of Visit Anaheim
)
Anaheim city leaders are now requiring its tourism bureau, Visit Anaheim, to provide more oversight into how taxpayer dollars are spent after a scathing state audit last year found they diverted funds to resort-friendly candidates.
"We want them to sell the heck out of Anaheim," Councilmember Ryan Balius said of the bureau’s work. That includes booking events at the convention center, driving hotel stays and acting as the city’s tourism customer service center.
But the council’s action this week underscore efforts to keep a tighter leash on the tourism bureau after it was rocked by a corruption scandal.
How much money are we talking about?
A 2% tax on hotel stays in the city generates revenue for the Anaheim Tourism Improvement District. And 75% of the money generated goes toward the work of Visit Anaheim. According to a city spokesperson, that works out to about $30 million annually.
Support for LAist comes from
What are the new oversight measures?
Now, Visit Anaheim leaders must provide city leaders with performance data, such as hotel occupancy rates and convention center bookings to document how taxpayers funds are being used.
Other oversight measures the council put in place at its meeting this week:
- Visit Anaheim will have to closely document how funds generated from the hotel tax are spent — and they cannot commingle those funds with other revenue.
- They will have to share how much of the tax funds go unspent and provide annual updates on reserve balances.
- If Visit Anaheim subcontracts with another organization for more than $150,000, they have to get permission from the city.
- The tourism tax dollars Visit Anaheim gets from the city cannot be transferred to another entity without written approval from the city.
Council members also voted to give the tourism bureau a one-year contract that auto-renews every two years.
How we got here
Since 2022, a series of audits, investigations and reports have revealed the grip the tourism industry has on city politics.
Support for LAist comes from
In 2020, the Anaheim City Council approved selling Angel Stadium to the owners of the baseball team for $320 million. But the sale fell apart after a federal investigation revealed then-mayor Harry Sidhu was feeding “city-specific information” to the Angels’ owners to use against the city in negotiations. The investigation also revealed an overly-friendly relationship between Sidhu and Todd Ament, the former CEO of the Anaheim Chamber of Commerce.
Federal prosecutors accused Ament of being the ringleader of a “cabal” of leaders, including elected officials who worked behind the scenes to influence city politics — using taxpayer money to do it
An independent investigation also revealed a "potential criminal conspiracy” to divert $1.5 million in federal COVID recovery funds through Visit Anaheim to a nonprofit controlled by the chamber.
And a state audit found Visit Anaheim routed taxpayer dollars to the chamber which then funneled the money to support “resort-friendly candidates through its political action committee” and lobby for laws that benefited hotels in Disney’s vicinity.
Sidhu has been sent to prison for his crimes, and Ament is awaiting sentencing.
As Editor-in-Chief of our newsroom, I’m extremely proud of the work our top-notch journalists are doing here at LAist. We’re doing more hard-hitting watchdog journalism than ever before — powerful reporting on the economy, elections, climate and the homelessness crisis that is making a difference in your lives. At the same time, it’s never been more difficult to maintain a paywall-free, independent news source that informs, inspires, and engages everyone.
Simply put, we cannot do this essential work without your help. Federal funding for public media has been clawed back by Congress and that means LAist has lost $3.4 million in federal funding over the next two years. So we’re asking for your help. LAist has been there for you and we’re asking you to be here for us.
We rely on donations from readers like you to stay independent, which keeps our nonprofit newsroom strong and accountable to you.
No matter where you stand on the political spectrum, press freedom is at the core of keeping our nation free and fair. And as the landscape of free press changes, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust, but the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news from our community.
Please take action today to support your trusted source for local news with a donation that makes sense for your budget.
Thank you for your generous support and believing in independent news.
Chip in now to fund your local journalism
(
LAist
)
Trending on LAist
-
After rising for years, the number of residential installations in the city of Los Angeles began to drop in 2023. The city isn’t subject to recent changes in state incentives, but other factors may be contributing to the decline. -
The L.A. City Council approved the venue change Wednesday, which organizers say will save $12 million in infrastructure costs.
-
Taxes on the sale of some newer apartment buildings would be lowered under a plan by Sacramento lawmakers to partially rein in city Measure ULA.
-
The union representing the restaurant's workers announced Tuesday that The Pantry will welcome back patrons after suddenly shutting down six months ago.
-
If approved, the more than 62-acre project would include 50 housing lots and a marina less than a mile from Jackie and Shadow's famous nest overlooking the lake.
-
The U.S. Supreme Court lifted limits on immigration sweeps in Southern California, overturning a lower court ruling that prohibited agents from stopping people based on their appearance.
Best of LAist